Hold onto your hats! Is the 'blaze star' T Corona Borealis about to go boom?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
A new set of predictions for the so-called "blaze star," T Corona Borealis suggests the star might go nova on either March 27, November 10, or June 25, 2026. However, other astronomers are skeptical about these predictions, which are based on an implied pattern in the explosive system's orbital configuration,
"T Corona Borealis [T CrB] is a unique object that has fascinated amateur and professional astronomers for more than a century," Léa Planquart of the Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique at the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium, told Space.com.
T CrB is a symbiotic binary, a vampire system in which a white dwarf is siphoning material from a red giant star. A white dwarf is the dense, compact core remnant of a once sun-like star, packing a mass equivalent to that of a star into a volume about the size of Earth. A red giant represents an earlier stage in a star's evolution, when a sun-like star starts to run out of its hydrogen fuel supply and begins to swell. Its distended atmosphere then becomes easy prey to the gravity of the far smaller, but denser, white dwarf.
Material captured from the red giant forms a spiraling disk around the white dwarf, ultimately depositing that material onto the white dwarf's surface. Once enough material has built up, a thermonuclear explosion ignites. It does not destroy the white dwarf, but we can see the light of the explosion across thousands of light-years.
We call this a nova, after the Latin for "new star."
Typically, T CrB languishes at about magnitude +10, which means it is so faint that it can only be seen through moderate-aperture telescopes or large binoculars. However, when it goes nova, it brightens to naked-eye visibility, and hence briefly becomes seen as a "new star" in the night sky.
T CrB is actually even more special than that, because it is one of only 11 known "recurrent" novas, which are seen to go nova repeatedly, with gaps of less than 100 years between explosions. Previously, on February 9, 1946 and May 12, 1866, the white dwarf in the T CrB system went nova. It also went nova around Christmastime in 1787, although the exact date isn't known, and there is also a suggestion that a nova connected to this star was seen sometime in the autumn night sky of 1217.
Prior to the 1946 nova, T CrB brightened slightly in 1938, before dimming again just before going nova. The same pattern has also been seen in T CrB this time around, with it brightening by 0.7 magnitudes in 2015 before dimming again in 2023. This is why astronomers are anticipating a new nova.
Jean Schneider of Paris Observatory, has also noticed what he believes to be a pattern between the timing of the T CrB nova events. The red giant and white dwarf take 227.5687 days to orbit one another, and Schneider believes that each nova takes place after a time equal to an exact whole number of orbits. In other words, something about the position of the white dwarf and the red giant is triggering the nova outbursts, he says.
Yet, because their orbits are circular, no single position should have an effect. So, Schneider proposes the presence of a third object in the T CrB system on a wider, elliptical orbit. Every 79–80 years, he says the third object is close to the white dwarf, meaning that the white dwarf can feed off both the red giant and this hypothetical third object at the same time. This would enhance the rate of matter falling onto the white dwarf, creating the conditions for a nova.
So far, this third object, if it exists, has remained undetected, but Schneider tells Space.com that "it could be detected by astrometry, radial velocity, direct imaging, a transit or microlensing."
Indeed, Schneider wonders whether it hasn't already been detected but just not recognized. On April 21, 2016, the T CrB system suddenly increased in visual brightness by 0.5 magnitudes.
"I have the following, qualitative interpretation, which is that before then, the third body was outside the pixel corresponding to the visual measurements," he said. In other words, the third object moved close enough to the other two components of the T CrB system that from our point of view it was sharing a pixel with them in images, adding its brightness to the combined light of the red giant and white dwarf.
However, other astronomers are not yet convinced. Léa Planquart has studied T CrB and other recurrent novas, and in January published a paper describing the mass transfer between the red giant and the white dwarf based on radial velocity observations with the HERMES spectrograph on the 1.2-meter Mercator telescope at La Palma in Chile. Radial velocity here, for context, refers to the Doppler shifted motions of the individual stars and the matter being transferred between the red giant, what's known as the "accretion disk" and the white dwarf.
"Jean Schneider has suggested the presence of a third companion in an eccentric orbit with a period of 80 years," Planquart told Space.com. "Such additional orbital motion is, however, not detected in our decade-long radial-velocity monitoring."
In other words, radial velocity measurements show no evidence for a third star, although Planquart cannot rule out a low-mass body such as a large exoplanet.
Jeremy Shears, who is the Director of the British Astronomical Association's Variable Star Section, also has doubts. "Most astronomers are skeptical about this prediction, as am I," he told Space.com. "The best thing to do is to keep watching every clear night."
Should there be no third object, and if the pattern seen by Schneider in the dates of previous novas is just a coincidence, then what is happening to T CrB?
Planquart's observations shed some light on the matter, particularly the brightening seen in 1938 and 2015, followed by a dimming, most recently seen in 2023.
"We realized that from 2015 to 2023, the accretion disk around the white dwarf had reached its maximum extension and became hotter and more luminous, leading to increased brightness," Planquart said. This enhanced what Planquart calls "the vampirization effect," increasing the transfer of matter to the white dwarf in a "super-active phase." Then, in 2023, the accretion disk cooled back down again, resulting in the dimming, although matter continues to flow from the disk to the white dwarf at a slower rate.
"It is likely that this enhanced activity is necessary to trigger the nova explosion, as it allows the material to accumulate more rapidly," said Planquart.
Then, in 2023, the accretion disk cooled back down again, resulting in the dimming, although matter continues to flow from the disk to the white dwarf at a slower rate. However, the details are still somewhat unclear — what causes the state change in the accretion disk that leads to the super-active phase, and exactly what is happening on the surface of the white dwarf between the disk cooling again and the nova explosion?
Although Schneider's exact date predictions may or may not come to pass, the pattern of the super-active phase followed by quiescence and dimming suggests that the nova is just around the corner. "We may expect to see the explosion in the coming months — or possibly next year," said Planquart.
When that happens, what can we expect to see in the night sky? In 1946, T CrB reached magnitude +2, meaning it was easily visible to the naked eye, similar in brightness to the stars of the Big Dipper. Shears expects it to be just as bright this time around.
T CrB is located in the constellation of Corona Borealis, the Northern Crown, which is currently visible in the night sky across the whole of the Northern Hemisphere and from as far south as South Africa and Australia (albeit low down in the sky from southerly locations).
"At present T CrB is tenth magnitude, so it is only visible in giant binoculars," said Shears. "But when it rises [in brightness] it will become visible in standard binoculars and then the naked eye."
And the rise in brightness will be rapid. "It's only a matter of a few hours for the rise to occur — precisely how many is not known as the rise has never been caught before," said Shears. "That's why it is so exciting. We hope that with so many observers this time around, we may indeed catch it as it awakes from its slumber."
Indeed there will be many observers, as astronomers wait and watch to catch a glimpse of this rare nova and learn more about what is happening on the surface of this white dwarf when it hosts a giant thermonuclear explosion. "When it explodes, it will be one of the most extensively observed objects, targeted by telescopes worldwide," said Planquart.
As for what the future holds for T CrB, an even larger explosion is on the horizon. The mass of the white dwarf in the T CrB system is 1.37 times the mass of our sun. This is very close to the Chandrasekhar limit, which is 1.44 solar masses, and is the point at which the thermonuclear detonation overcomes the white dwarf and blows it to smithereens as a Type Ia supernova. As it steadily steals mass from its companion red giant and grows in the process, it accelerates its own demise.
Related Stories:
— Is the 'Blaze Star' about to explode? If it does, here's where to look in March
— 'Shocking' nova explosion of dead star was 100 times brighter than the sun
— This astronomer found a sneaky extra star in James Webb Space Telescope data
"As white dwarfs approach the Chandrasekhar limit their radius shrinks and their surface gravity is increased," Ken Hinkle, an astronomer at NOIRLab in Tucson, Arizona, told Space.com. "This results in the short time between eruptions."
As the white dwarf inches closer to the Chandrasekhar limit, the nova events will become more frequent, until one day … boom! But it will take hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of years for the white dwarf to get to that stage, so there's no rush to add it to your calendar. In the meantime, we shall keep watching the sky for its latest nova.
Jean Schneider's paper was published in Research Notes of the AAS.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How do clouds get their shapes?
Take a look at the sky on any given day and you'll likely see clouds of different shapes — some look like cotton balls, others are fine and feathery or tall and imposing. But what gives a cloud its distinct appearance? The answer lies in a mix of factors. To understand how clouds get their shape, it helps to understand the basics of how they form. When air rises and cools, the water vapor it holds condenses into tiny water droplets or ice crystals. If enough of these particles cluster together, a visible cloud forms. Scientists typically classify clouds into ten main types, based on their shape and how high they appear in the sky. For instance, cumulus clouds (from the Latin for 'heap') resemble a pile of cotton balls, while stratus clouds (meaning 'layer') stretch out like blankets and cirrus clouds (Latin for 'hair') look feather-like. These root names can be combined to describe more complex cloud types—like cirrocumulus. The prefix 'alto' (meaning 'high') helps distinguish mid-level clouds from their lower-level counterparts (such as altostratus vs stratus). The distance of a cloud from the Earth has a big influence on its appearance. Air temperatures decrease with altitude, so clouds that form closer to earth are made mostly of water droplets, while higher clouds tend to be composed of ice crystals. Mid-level clouds often contain a mix of both. This difference in composition influences how clouds look: water-based clouds, like cumulus, have crisp edges and a solid appearance, while icy clouds, such as cirrus, are usually more transparent and diffuse. Air movement also affects cloud shapes. As warm, moist air rises—a process known as convection—it cools and condenses, forming clouds. But something interesting happens in the process: as water vapor condenses, it releases heat, which warms the surrounding air. The warmer air becomes less dense than the surrounding cooler air, making it more buoyant. This increased buoyancy causes the air parcel to rise even faster. 'These upward currents are associated with billows, giving the cumuliform clouds that many of us picture when we think of clouds,' Bjorn Stevens, a climate scientist and managing director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany, told Popular Science. If the air is warm and humid near the Earth's surface but much colder higher up, a fair-weather cumulus cloud can quickly grow into a towering cumulonimbus—the kind that brings thunderstorms. Cirrus clouds, known for their wispy, feathery appearance, are shaped by strong winds high in the atmosphere. These winds act on the ice crystals that make up cirrus clouds, twisting and spreading them into delicate strands. 'The shape also depends very much on the light,' adds Stevens. He explains that clouds are a 'dispersion,' meaning that they're made up of countless particles suspended in air—more like fog than a solid object. 'They don't have a clear end or beginning,' he says. What we perceive as a cloud's edge is actually where sunlight scatters off the droplets or ice crystals within. Sometimes this scattering happens near the cloud's surface, while other times it comes from deeper within the mist, which is why cloud boundaries often seem vague or ever-shifting. The physical features of an area, or the 'topography,' can also influence the shape of clouds. In an article published on The Conversation, Ross Lazear, an instructor in Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences at the University at Albany, State University of New York, explained how air flowing over mountain ranges sets off atmospheric ripples, much like a rock disrupting water in a stream, and leads to the formation of lenticular clouds, which resemble flying saucers. Each cloud is shaped a certain way for a reason. For meteorologists, those shapes aren't just fascinating—they're valuable clues for forecasting what weather is coming next. his story is part of Popular Science's Ask Us Anything series, where we answer your most outlandish, mind-burning questions, from the ordinary to the off-the-wall. Have something you've always wanted to know? Ask us.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
We've Been Misreading a Major Law of Physics For Nearly 300 Years
When Isaac Newton wrote down his now-famed laws of motion in 1687, he could have only hoped we'd be discussing them all these centuries later. Writing in Latin, Newton outlined three universal principles describing how the motion of objects is governed in our Universe, which have since been translated, transcribed, discussed and debated at length. But according to a philosopher of language and mathematics, we might have been interpreting Newton's precise wording of his first law of motion slightly wrong all along. Watch the video below to see a summary of Hoek's perspective; Virginia Tech philosopher Daniel Hoek wanted to "set the record straight" after discovering what he describes as a "clumsy mistranslation" in the original 1729 English translation of Newton's Latin Principia. Based on this translation, countless academics and teachers have since interpreted Newton's first law of inertia to mean an object will continue moving in a straight line or remain at rest unless an outside force intervenes. It's a description that works well until you appreciate external forces are constantly at work, something Newton would have surely considered in his wording. Revisiting the archives, Hoek realized this common paraphrasing featured a misinterpretation that flew under the radar until 1999, when two scholars picked up on the translation of one Latin word that had been overlooked: quatenus, which means "insofar", not unless. To Hoek, this makes all the difference. Rather than describing how an object maintains its momentum if no forces are impressed on it, Hoek says the new reading shows Newton meant that every change in a body's momentum – every jolt, dip, swerve, and spurt – is due to external forces. "By putting that one forgotten word [insofar] back in place, [those scholars] restored one of the fundamental principles of physics to its original splendor," Hoek explained in a blog post describing his findings, published academically in a 2022 research paper. However, that all-important correction never caught on. Even now it might struggle to gain traction against the weight of centuries of repetition. "Some find my reading too wild and unconventional to take seriously," Hoek remarks. "Others think that it is so obviously correct that it is barely worth arguing for." Ordinary folks might agree it sounds like semantics. And Hoek admits the reinterpretation hasn't and won't change physics. But carefully inspecting Newton's own writings clarifies what the pioneering mathematician was thinking at the time. "A great deal of ink has been spilt on the question what the law of inertia is really for," explains Hoek, who was puzzled as a student by what Newton meant. If we take the prevailing translation, of objects traveling in straight lines until a force compels them otherwise, then it raises the question: why would Newton write a law about bodies free of external forces when there is no such thing in our Universe; when gravity and friction are ever-present? "The whole point of the first law is to infer the existence of the force," George Smith, a philosopher at Tufts University and an expert in Newton's writings, told journalist Stephanie Pappas for Scientific American. In fact, Newton gave three concrete examples to illustrate his first law of motion: the most insightful, according to Hoek, being a spinning top – that as we know, slows in a tightening spiral due to the friction of air. "By giving this example," Hoek writes, "Newton explicitly shows us how the First Law, as he understands it, applies to accelerating bodies which are subject to forces – that is, it applies to bodies in the real world." Hoek says this revised interpretation brings home one of Newton's most fundamental ideas that was utterly revolutionary at the time. That is, the planets, stars, and other heavenly bodies are all governed by the same physical laws as objects on Earth. "Every change in speed and every tilt in direction," Hoek mused – from swarms of atoms to swirling galaxies – "is governed by Newton's First Law." Making us all feel once again connected to the farthest reaches of space. The paper has been published in the Philosophy of Science. An earlier version of this article was published in September 2023. Big Bang May Not Be The Beginning of Everything, New Theory Suggests 20-Year Mystery of The Muon's Wiggle May Finally Be Solved Sound of Earth's Flipping Magnetic Field Is an Unforgettable Horror
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Elon Musk's satellites are 'dropping like flies'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Elon Musk has no shortage of targets for his animosity: the media, "woke" progressives, the trans "agenda" and, most recently, his former best buddy Donald Trump. But one less expected Musk adversary is more powerful than them all: the Sun. SpaceX's vast network of Starlink internet service satellites are "dropping like flies", due to an extraterrestrial weather phenomenon caused by the Sun, said Futurism. And it's only set to get worse. The thousands of Starlink satellites orbiting our planet have given space scientists a "golden opportunity to study the effects" of the Sun's activity on the lifespan of these "minimalist, constellation-based spacecraft", said Futurism. And it appears that Musk's "space internet constellation" is "particularly prone to the effect of geomagnetic storms", triggered by eruptions from the Sun, said The Independent. These "ferocious solar storms", Nasa scientists have found, are causing many of Musk's low-orbit satellites to fall to Earth "faster than expected". The impact is particularly significant at the moment because the Sun is approaching the peak of an 11-year activity cycle, "known as the solar maximum", which provokes "large amounts of extreme space weather". The earlier than predicted satellite "re-entries" could "increase the chances of them not burning up properly in the Earth's atmosphere". and debris reaching the Earth. However, so far, the "only known instance" of this happening was in August 2024, when a piece of a Starlink satellite was discovered on a farm in Canada. The solar storm problem threatens one of Musk's biggest power grabs to date. When his engineers "bundled a batch of prototype satellites into a rocket's nose cone six years ago, there were fewer than 2,000 functional satellites in Earth's orbit". Now more than 7,000 of his satellites now surround Earth, "like a cloud of gnats", said The Atlantic. This is the most dominant any individual has been in the "orbital realm" since the late 1950s, when Sergei Pavlovich Korolev, the Soviet engineer who developed Sputnik and its launch vehicle, was "the only guy in town" as far as satellites were concerned, space historian Jonathan McDowell told the magazine. But the Sun is an adversary not even Musk can overcome. Solar storm forecasting "has significantly improved over the past few years", Piyush Mehta, a US professor of aerospace engineering, wrote on The Conversation in 2022 but "there is only so much shielding that can be done in the face of a powerful geomagnetic storm". The Sun is "essential for life to go on," he said, but, like a child who often throws tantrums, "its ever-changing disposition make things challenging".