The Story Of Turkey-Pakistan 'Brotherhood' And Why It Runs Deep
That the Turkey-Pakistan brotherhood runs deep is a fact amply underlined by the Turkish response to the recent military tensions between India and Pakistan. But what makes this alliance so strong is not just diplomacy, but history and tradition. Not only had the waning Ottoman Khilafat (or Caliphate) movement influenced the formation of Pakistan, but the shared tradition of the Hanafi school of Sunni Islam, culturality, and moderate Sufism is such that the two countries often fondly call each other 'Kardeslers', meaning "brothers" in Turkish.
The fact that both Turkey and Pakistan were also in the same 'blocs' during the Cold War era - the Baghdad Pact (later Regional Cooperation for Development, and then Economic Cooperation Organisation), the Central Treaty Organisation (CENTO), or even Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC) and D-8 being examples - helped them geopolitically cement their underlying religio-cultural-historical connection.
The 1965 And 1971 Wars
In 1951, Turkey and Pakistan signed the Treaty of Eternal Friendship. That led to Ankara progressively upping its support to Pakistan in all its wars with India. If the 1965 war saw Turkey supporting Pakistan diplomatically, by 1971, that had turned into material support as well in the form of aircraft assistance. Now, in the latest four-day conflict between the two countries, Turkey is believed to have supplied over 350 drones to Pakistan, along with military advisors and operatives to use the same. The mysterious landing of a Turkish C-130, followed by a visit by Lt Gen Yasar Kadioglu (Chief of Turkish Intelligence) in Pakistan days before Operation Sindoor, also raised suspicions. All this is in addition to the already signed deal to allow for upgrading of Pakistani F-16s at Turkish facilities and supply four stealth corvettes, 30 T129 ATAK helicopters, Kemankes cruise missiles, etc. The Pakistani Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, has personally thanked the Turkish President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for his "strong support and unwavering solidarity" during the Indo-Pak conflict.
A Very Close Association
For the two countries, their once-rhetorical support for each other has now decidedly turned into a more strategic one. Just as Islamabad readily concurs with Ankara on Northern Cyprus and refuses to recognise the Armenian genocide, Ankara backs Islamabad on the plebiscite line on Kashmir as well as its bid to join the Nuclear Suppliers Group. But this is not a new shift by any measure. In his memoir, In the Line of Fire, former Pakistani President and dictator Pervez Musharaff fondly recounted how he spent his childhood in Ankara and "their [the people's] very visible love and affection for Pakistan and Pakistanis". It's also worth noting how the Indian Embassy road in Ankara has been renamed Cinnah Caddesi, meaning Jinnah Avenue.
A Simultaneous Slide
It was Turkey's oscillating and contradictory relationship of the 'state' with Islam that had inspired Muhammad Ali Jinnah - and Pervez Musharaff, decades later - to view the country as a model nation that Pakistan must emulate. However, both countries' regressive slide towards puritanism has occurred almost in tandem - in Turkey with the rise of Recep Erdogan, and in Pakistan with the tightening of the vice-like grip of religious narratives. If a more secularist and progressive Kemal Mustapha Atatürk had inspired Pakistani leaders like Jinnah, Ayub, Yahya or even Musharaff, religious hardliners like Erdogan, who rail brazenly at the "West", are the latest poster boys in Pakistan today.
Surely, the bitterly contested domestic politics of Turkey, with the Progressives in the opposition and the religious conservatives under Erdogan, has a role to play too. Both benefit much more from batting on behalf of a "brother muslim nation" like Pakistan. The sheer distance and relatively lower commercial angularities with India are not enough for it to prefer Delhi over Islamabad.
A Rival To Sheikhdoms
Bonhomie with Pakistan is also rooted in Turkey's own ambition to emerge as a leader within the Ummah, or the Islamic World, which is hitherto dominated by Saudi-led Sheikhdoms. Given how India has built stable relations with such Sheikhdoms, the non-Arab majors like Turkey and Pakistan, which were historically treated as "lessers" within the Ummah, are now seeking to stitch a rival "bloc" involving other non-Arab nations, such as Malaysia, Iran and the perennially contrarian but Arab, Qatar. The deliberate exposé of the Khashoggi murder by the Turkish authorities was designed to embarrass the Saudis, underlining the internal rift within the Ummah.
Also, with the US, India and Sheikdoms working conjointly on many fronts, Pakistan is left with only Turkey, along with China, to afford it some bragging rights. By standing up for Pakistan, Erdogan wants to project the imperialist grandeur of "Pasha" - the highest ranking official harking back to the Ottoman era - something the Turkish President desperately seeks to revive.
The Indian Approach
However, for India, Turkey's indulgence of Pakistan has resulted in Delhi asserting its own anti-Turkey view on Northern Cyprus, conducting naval exercises with Turkey's rival, Greece, and even becoming Armenia's largest arms supplier. The Indian reaction is a more recent phenomenon and a fallout of the Erdogan era. The Turkey-less India-Middle East-Europe-Economic Corridor, aimed at countering Ankara's rival geostrategic initiative of 'Iraq Development Road', which shortchanges India, is part of New Delhi's approach.
In a way, Erdogan's own electoral considerations, the solidification of India's relations with Arab Sheikdoms, Afghanistan (increasingly a pain point with Pakistan now), the US and the forever sectarian Iran, will ensure that Turkey and Pakistan continue to deepen their jointmanship, something that is bound to irk Delhi.
As of now, the overwhelming nationalistic fervour in India has resulted in calls to de-prioritise Turkey as a destination for tourism and other exchanges. But that's barely enough to push Turkey to revisit its stance. Supporting Pakistan makes more sense to the calculative and ambitious Erdogan. The dearth of 'Turkish Delight' for India ought not to surprise anyone.
(Lt. Gen. Bhopinder Singh (born 20 March 1946) is the former Lieutenant Governor of The Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Pondicherry and an Indian Army officer who has been awarded the PVSM.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Turkey supported Pakistan during Operation Sindoor by giving weapons… still India is not ending all trade ties with Erdogan's country due to…
Home Business Turkey supported Pakistan during Operation Sindoor by giving weapons… still India is not ending all trade ties with Erdogan's country due to… Turkey supported Pakistan during Operation Sindoor by giving weapons… still India is not ending all trade ties with Erdogan's country due to… The government approaches a balanced policy towards Turkey rather than a complete ban due to several reasons and for the benefit of India. After Turkey's support to Pakistan, boycott business with the country was trending on social media for many days. Also there were demands for banning imports from Turkey that had grown in India. Even the government has taken strict action against Turkish companies and some of the companies and institutes had cancelled the deals with the country. Apple producers from Himachal Pradesh and marble traders from Rajasthan had also taken stand against the import from the country. But India has not broken all business ties with Turkey. The answer is in the economic considerations of various businesses. While the government has acted against Turkish companies on national security grounds, it is still cautious on the trade. The primary reason behind this is that India has a trade surplus of $2.73 billion with Turkey. It means India's exports to Turkey are more than imports. A ban will not only impact Turkey but also affect Indian exporters in sectors like engineering, electronics, and chemicals. According to a report by The Indian Express, a Commerce Ministry official stated, 'We have received several requests to stop imports from Turkey. However, we must also consider the interests of our exporters. A trade ban can give a strong geopolitical message, but the question is, how far are we willing to take it?' In the fiscal year 2024-25, India exported goods of $5.72 billion to Turkey, with engineering products alone of $3 billion. 35-40% of these exports came from the MSME sector shows the involvement of small and medium enterprises. Turkey imported goods of $2.99 billion from India like $270.83 million of gold and around $107 million of fruits and nuts. The import of fruits and nuts like apples, increased by around 10% compared to the previous year. For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest Business News on More Stories
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Chenab Bridge is a ‘mile sur mera tumhara' moment. Now Bollywood should return to Kashmir
He has promised our Kashmiri brothers and sisters a vision of a Kashmir free of terrorism, a 'location for shooting films and a hub of sports'. Due to the neglect by political parties pushing their own agenda, the people of Jammu and Kashmir had stopped dreaming and had accepted terrorism as their fate. With certain vested interests in cahoots with Pakistan, terrorism had been perpetrated in the snow-covered slopes of Kashmir. PM Modi and home minister Amit Shah have stood firm and tall in the face of opposition and taunts. Today, their commitment to the region stands vindicated in the form of the structural marvel of the Chenab Bridge, soaring 359 metres above the riverbed. This week brought a new bridge to the divine valley of Shiva and Parvati, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the world's highest rail bridge, a wonder of sorts. Jammu and Kashmir's development and the aspirations of its youth will not be shaken by the Pahalgam terror attack, he said. All eyes are truly on Reasi now, which, exactly a year ago on 9 June, was the scene of a dastardly terror attack on Hindu pilgrims by the TRF—the very perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack. PM Modi has given a befitting reply to Pakistan-sponsored terrorism by inaugurating the highest rail bridge in the world. Bridge to peace The Kashmir Valley has remained mostly cut off from the rest of the country due to the obsolete Article 370, as well as physical barriers. The Chenab Bridge has forged a connection, the missing link on the Jammu–Baramullah train route, which in turn connects the Valley with the rest of India. After 1947, the Valley saw periods of alternating peace and turmoil until 1989, when it spiralled into a vortex of Pakistan–sponsored terrorism, after targeted killings of Hindus by militant groups such as the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front. This led to a mass exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the region. Prior to this period, the Kashmir Valley saw a period of peace, when it was the favoured location for Yash Chopra—my favourite director—who filmed iconic scenes from classics like Daag and Silsila. Who can forget Shammi Kapoor's song, Yahoo Chahe Mujhe Koi Junglee Kahen? Today, the breathtaking Baisaran Valley has gained infamy due to the tragic terror attack, but it once formed the backdrop against which Shammi Kapoor and Sharmila Tagore romanced in the 1964 hit Kashmir ki Kali. It was also the setting for Arzoo and Jab Jab Phool Khile. In the 1970s, iconic hits such as Kabhi Kabhie and Roti had scenes that were shot in the valley. And who can forget the musical Neela Aasman So Gaya? After 1990, a period of insurgency restricted access to the Valley, and only a handful of films were shot well up to the early 2000s, including Roja and Mission Kashmir. These blockbusters had the Kashmir unrest and insurgency as the primary theme. Even in relatively recent films such as Haider and The Kashmir Files, the focus has been on the post-1990 suffering of the Kashmir Valley. The hope is that the Chenab Bridge and the Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla rail link will bring Bollywood and other film industries back to the Valley. The film–tourism synergy is substantial, and Kashmir's annual tourism industry is worth Rs 12,000 crore. Also read: Srinagar train reminds us Kashmir was secured by iron and rock, that's how soldiers moved in Bridge to national integration The Chenab Bridge is a prime example of India's unity. There was no North-South, Hindu-Muslim divide at play during the execution of the iconic structure. The entire country worked as one for its construction and execution. Rock engineering specialist G Madhavi Latha, a professor at IISc, Bengaluru, spent 17 years working on the stability of the foundation. Her team used a 'design as you go' approach—the terrain was so complex and challenging that the team had to keep modifying calculations and the design was continuously evolving. IIT Delhi professor KJ Rao was a project consultant, and IISc professor TG Sitharam was the geotechnical consultant during 2005-2020. 'The Chenab Bridge is more than a technical achievement — it is a story of human endeavour, of teamwork, of innovation under pressure, and above all, of patriotic purpose,' Sitharam wrote. His words echo the pride of all Indians. Researchers and engineers like Sitharam across the country take pride in this monument to India's technical talent. The steel used in the columns was manufactured by engineers from Steel Authority of India Limited in their plant in Bhilai, including 5,922 tonnes of TMT Steel, 6,454 tonnes of plates and 56 tonnes of structural steel. The remaining steel was brought in from SAIL's Bokaro, Rourkala, and Durgapur plants. Afcons Infrastructure Limited, headquartered in Mumbai, was the contractor for the construction. The project provided employment to over 1,000 Reasi locals. And while the area comes under Northern Railways, the branch was only pleased to partner with Konkan Railways, given the latter's expertise in railroad construction in difficult terrain. Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) provided inputs to make the bridge blast-proof. We can safely state that the Chenab Bridge is a mile sur mera tumhara moment in Indian history. Bridge to self-governance I have been told by friends and acquaintances in the Valley that the Governor's rule ensured a period of peace and stability in Kashmir. However, conducting free and fair elections is one of the main pillars of democracy. And the BJP government fulfilled its commitment to democracy by ensuring that elections were peacefully held for 90 Legislative Assembly seats in 2024. The INDIA bloc won 49 seats, leading to Kashmir's first elected government after the abrogation of Article 370, which paved the way for self–governance for the Kashmiri people. Critics of the BJP's handling of Kashmir may read my piece, which appeared in ThePrint on 14 October 2024. Omar Abdullah was elected CM in a peaceful election process that saw a whopping 63.8 per cent turnout. 'Many people dreamt of this train service. What the British could not do, you [PM Modi] got it completed, and Kashmir Valley has now been connected with the rest of the country,' CM Abdullah said during the inauguration ceremony. The bridge will now serve as a gateway for the process of self-governance for the Kashmiri people, with Panchayat elections on the anvil as the electoral rolls have been updated in January. Also read: 'Modi made our dream honeymoon possible'—couple on board the Srinagar Vande Bharat Bridge to prosperity On the day of the Pahalgam terror attack, there was an unprecedented footfall of tourists in Kashmir. Tourism had surged in recent years, peaking at 3.5 million in 2024, and in 2025, was expected to breach that number by the end of the summer holidays. The Chenab Bridge is predicted to boost tourism in the region, as the rail link from Srinagar to Jammu will connect onward to New Delhi and provide a more economical travel option for tourists. Apple growers are also likely to benefit. Over 75 per cent of the country's apple production comes from the Valley, which also accounts for 8 per cent of Kashmir's GDP. 'Poor connectivity has negatively impacted the economic development of 70 percent of the Valley's population, which is dependent on farming and perishable fruit cultivation,' read the article by Ayjaz Wani in ORF's 'Expert Speak'. Beyond apples and plums, all–weather rail connectivity and access to rail cargo services will provide access to newer markets for Kashmiri almonds, walnuts, saffron, cherries, and other fruit. The Chenab Bridge will serve as much more than a connection between two banks of the Chenab River. It will become the lifeline to the Kashmiri economy, linking the once–isolated Valley to the rest of the country. The bridge and the rail link provides a physical manifestation of what every Indian lived by—Kashmir is an integral part of India, and it won't be left behind on the highway to Viksit Bharat 2047. Our Kashmiri brethren will walk into a new dawn of development and prosperity, unlike their neighbours in the Pakistan-occupied part of Kashmir. Bridge of technology India supplies the world with STEM talent. Why should this technical talent not be used for the advancement of our national interest? The Chenab Bridge is 35 times the height of the Eiffel Tower and 1,315 m long, with an imposing steel arch span of 467 m. Designed to withstand zone V earthquakes and wind speeds of 256 km/hr, it straddles a seismologically rugged Himalayan terrain in the comparatively young mountains of the Pir Panjal Range and is connected with two steel pylons. The bridge has a lifespan of 120 years and can support a train speed of up to 100 km/hr. This technological marvel is capable of withstanding high-intensity explosions equivalent to 40 tonnes of TNT and extreme temperatures down to -20 degrees Celsius. Also read: Anubrata Mondal threatened a police officer & may go scot-free. It's a blot on TMC Bridge of gender equality Symbolically, the Chenab Bridge is also a bridge to gender equality in India. The presence of women in leadership roles, such as G Madhavi Latha, challenged stereotypes and inspired a generation of young women to pursue careers in STEM. Latha has been a trailblazer her entire life. 'At a particular slope cutting, I remember spending sleepless nights as my inputs were required at every stage,' she said while sharing the challenges her team faced in executing the project. The Jammu–Srinagar travel time has been reduced to around three hours, and the Vande Bharat trains are a safe and convenient way to travel. Thus, the bridge is critical for the autonomy and mobility of women in the region. Even critics like Iltija Mufti have admitted that the bridge is a 'welcome step'. The photo of PM Modi holding the Tricolour and marching confidently on the bridge showcases India's resolve and resilience: Nothing can deter us from achieving our goals of prosperity and peaceful coexistence. Like the steel used in the construction of the Chenab Bridge, Indians have forged a new future that is different from the traps set for us. Our stellar resolve will take us forward. This grateful citizen thanks all the researchers, engineers, workers, and agencies involved in the execution of this project, but most of all, our honourable prime minister, who helped bring it to fruition despite the many challenges. Meenakashi Lekhi is a BJP leader, lawyer and social activist. Her X handle is @M_Lekhi. Views are personal. (Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
How China Has Been Blocking India's UNSC Actions Since The 2000s
In the India-Pakistan strategic dynamic, China has emerged as an inextricable third actor, turning a bilateral rivalry into a triangular matter. While military escalation in the subcontinent does not align with Beijing's strategic interests, its pro-Pakistan leanings often manifest on international platforms. Most recently, China blocked the designation of The Resistance Front (TRF), an alleged offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), following the 2025 Pahalgam attack. This move reflects a longstanding pattern: China has consistently complicated New Delhi's diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan-based groups in global forums. As India seeks broader consensus on counterterrorism designations, particularly at the UN Security Council (UNSC), China has frequently intervened by blocking or delaying the listing of individuals affiliated with anti-India groups such as LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). A 'technical hold' in the UNSC sanctions process allows a member state to indefinitely delay designation without a formal veto. For decades, China has exploited this to delay, if not deny, sanctions on Pakistan-linked terror architecture without triggering a diplomatic confrontation. The symbolic framing of China-Pakistan relations, famously described by former Pakistani Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani as 'higher than mountains, deeper than oceans, stronger than steel, and sweeter than honey", for now has translated into sustained strategic cover for Pakistan on the international stage. Chinese media's description of terrorism in India, such as the Pahalgam attack, as a case of 'shooting' by local gunmen against civilians, further supports the Pakistani narrative of the conflict. 'Technical Holds' China's pattern of using 'technical holds' in the UNSC 1267 Sanctions Committee can be traced to the early 2000s. After the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, India began pushing for international sanctions against Pakistan-based outfits. While China supported the designation of groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, it remained reluctant to target individuals associated with these anti-India groups, most notably JeM chief Masood Azhar, who was finally listed in 2019. India's first formal request to enlist Azhar came in 2009, following the Mumbai attacks and was followed up in 2016, 2017, and 2019. While international pressure eventually influenced this reversal after two decades, the exclusion of any reference to the Pulwama attack in the final listing allowed China to maintain that Azhar's designation was based on his long-standing links to terrorism rather than a specific attack on India. Over time, the Pathankot attack of 2016 and the Pulwama suicide bombing in 2019 resulted in intensified Indian diplomatic efforts targeting Pakistan-based terrorist leaders and groups. All efforts were impeded by China's technical holds, despite co-sponsorship by France, the UK, and the US. At large, this trend continues. In 2023, Beijing blocked a joint India-US proposal to list Abdul Rauf Asghar and other anti-India terrorists. Double Standards This stands in contradiction to China's own counterterrorism posture against separatist and Islamist groups that threaten Chinese nationals and investments in Pakistan, including in major cities like Karachi. In 2021, a suicide bomber affiliated with the Baloch Liberation Army's (BLA) Majeed Brigade attacked a convoy carrying Chinese engineers and workers, killing three Chinese nationals near the Jinnah International Airport and the Chinese consulate area in Karachi. China has also raised similar concerns with the Taliban administration in Afghanistan regarding the alleged presence of Uyghur militant groups, such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM). This antithetical approach serves dual purposes - mitigating pressure on Pakistan's influential military establishment while keeping India preoccupied with cross-border security challenges. The SCO Factor China's selective counter-terror posture also plays out in other multilateral groupings like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which remains a key arena for its regional influence. With India and Pakistan inducted as full members in 2017, China portrayed the bloc as a pan-Asia alternative to Western-led groupings. But India's strong stance against cross-border terrorism and leanings towards the QUAD bloc have complicated that narrative. India's limited participation in the SCO, especially since 2019, is increasingly shaped by the grouping's silence on cross-border terrorism allegations against Pakistan. India's decision to downgrade its summit participation to a virtual format in 2023 further challenges China's efforts to position the SCO as a counterweight to US influence in the region. For China, India's continued engagement in the SCO remains crucial for maintaining the bloc's diplomatic credibility. India could continue framing Chinese obstructionism as a significant concern for global counterterrorism efforts with the aim of raising the reputational and diplomatic costs of China's inaction, without relying solely on the UNSC system. India's widening engagement with QUAD, involving Australia, Japan, India, and the US, through military exercises and joint dialogues, will also keep China on edge by signalling a strengthened Indo-Pacific alliance countering the Chinese regional influence.
