logo
UK must spend £1.5bn a year on flood defences to protect public, experts warn

UK must spend £1.5bn a year on flood defences to protect public, experts warn

The Guardian20-03-2025

Spending on flood defences will fall off a cliff edge next year, a report warns, calling on the chancellor to commit at least £1.5bn a year in the spending review to protect the economy and the public.
Nearly 2 million people across the UK are exposed to flooding every year, which is equivalent to the combined populations of Birmingham, Sheffield and Newcastle upon Tyne.
A third of England's critical infrastructure – including roads, railways, energy networks and water systems – is also at risk, jeopardising national security.
The physical impact of flood events to property, buildings and transport infrastructure costs £2.4bn annually, economists say in the report by Public First.
But the knock-on impact continues for years to come. 'Each year of flood events causes a decade-long downward pressure on the economy worth at least £6.1bn,' the report says.
Current spending on flood defences is £1.3bn, less than the £1.5bn recommended by the National Infrastructure Commission. The Labour government has no commitment beyond next year for flood defences and the affordability of future funding for flood defences has been under review by the Treasury since last year's autumn statement.
Emma Howard Boyd, a visiting professor at the Grantham Research Institute and former chair of the Environment Agency, who spearheaded the report, said the chancellor had an opportunity in the spending review to lead where previous administrations had fallen short. 'Given the condition of existing flood risk management assets has degraded further since the recommendation, it is likely that more than £1.5bn a year is required to sufficiently increase flood resilience in England.'
She added: 'Every £1 invested in flood defences prevents around £8 of damage – £3 of that is a direct saving to the government because more than a third of the damage is to publicly owned infrastructure such as roads, railways, schools and hospitals.'
Flood risk is growing sharply across the country. Latest EA data warns 6.3m properties, residential homes and businesses are in areas at risk of flooding from rivers, seas and surface water.
By 2050, the impact of the climate crisis means one in four – about 8m – residential and business properties will be at risk of flooding.
Howard Boyd said that the government must ensure that, in fulfilling its target to build 1.5m new homes, it kept people safe. The Guardian has revealed more than 100,000 of the new properties are very likely to be built on the highest risk flood plains unless the government intervenes, putting people's livelihoods and homes under threat. Leading insurance experts are calling for no more new homes to be built on flood plains.
The Public First research shows that the majority, 74%, of the top 10% of English constituencies facing the greatest vulnerability to flooding are Labour-held seats.
Polling for the report showed 66% of people do not think the country or their local area is prepared to deal with future flooding.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letter: Newport not at forefront of industrial revolution
Letter: Newport not at forefront of industrial revolution

South Wales Argus

time13 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Letter: Newport not at forefront of industrial revolution

It was mainly private money that was the impetus, not like the nationalisation and never-ending government subsidies that have continued and are still continuing since the end of the Second World War. Although I concede that of necessity, at that time governments had to be involved with the restart of the economy. I note that the Welsh Government has an investment, or should that be another subsidy, of £7.5 million in their Flexible Skills Programme (Argus 22nd May) for training courses. Why aren't companies training more apprentices instead of relying on the taxpayers to fund those schemes? Perhaps Jessica Morden and her fellow Labour politicians should start asking, although they might not hear the answers they want, bearing in mind the present occupiers of Westminster. Newport

Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul
Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul

South Wales Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul

Councils in England will put strict requirements in place before 'socially necessary' routes can be changed or cancelled, the department said. This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools. The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday. This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on. 'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments. 'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.' Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport. 'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed. 'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.' Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'. He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating. 'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground. 'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'

Trade Secretary to push for timeline on US tariff exemption
Trade Secretary to push for timeline on US tariff exemption

South Wales Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Trade Secretary to push for timeline on US tariff exemption

Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Trump announced the broad terms of an agreement last month that would exempt the UK from some of the US president's tariffs on steel and cars while increasing market access for other goods. The Prime Minister hailed the announcement as a major achievement, saying the UK was the first nation to reach such an agreement with Mr Trump. But the details are still being worked out ahead of a formal deal, and the Government hopes for an agreement within weeks. Mr Reynolds is expected to discuss implementing the deal during talks with US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday, where he is attending a meeting of the OECD. That meeting comes amid uncertainty about the future of Mr Trump's tariffs after a US court last week ruled many of them unlawful, before an appeals court reinstated the levies pending a further hearing. Last week also saw Mr Trump announce that he would double tariffs on steel to 50%, starting on Wednesday, and it remains unclear how the UK would be affected. Mr Reynolds's visit to Paris is part of a three-day trip, during which he is expected to meet other trade ministers and attend a G7 ministerial meeting before heading to Brussels for meetings with his EU counterparts. During the trip, the Trade Secretary will argue that the UK is a dependable partner in an era of increasing global volatility. He said: 'Our deals with the US, EU and India are proof that the UK is the most connected country in the world to do business. Along with our modern industrial strategy, our Plan for Change is making the UK a safe, stable bet in uncertain times. 'We recognise our relationship with G7 allies and EU counterparts must continue to evolve and deliver a better trading environment for our businesses and exporters. 'That's why we want to wipe away costly, business-blocking barriers and open up opportunities to grow our economy, create jobs and put more money in people's pockets.' Andrew Griffith, Conservative shadow business secretary, said: 'Labour told the British public we had a deal with the US – but one month on there is no deal in sight, meaning British businesses and workers continue to suffer because of Labour's failed negotiations. 'After snatching the winter fuel payment, lying about not increasing taxes, and misleading the public by saying the US trade deal was done, the public will rightly not trust a word Labour says. 'As all the other political parties wrangle over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are committed to being responsible with the public finances.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store