Lawsuit filed against City of San Francisco to prevent Great Highway from becoming a park
Almost 55% of voters in San Francisco agreed the section of highway from Lincoln Way to Sloat Boulevard should be re-purposed into a beachfront park.
Now one group of neighbors filed a lawsuit Tuesday saying Proposition K was not legal and should be reversed.
"I get worried about safety. When the upper highway, Great Highway is closed, traffic flows into the neighborhoods," says Matt Boschetto. His family has lived on the west side for 5 generations, and he is also a small business owner.
That's why he decided to get into the fight over the planned park, literally on the Great Highway.
"San Francisco is the most democratic city in the U.S. It used to be a city about people power. It used to be a city that had very, very inclusive processes, and this is the absolute opposite," Boschetto said.
Matt is helping to lead "Livable SF," the group that held a rally Tuesday to announce a lawsuit suing the city saying passing Prop K was not legal.
The idea to close the Great Highway was met with opposition since the start. Residents in the Sunset neighborhoods said by closing the highway there would be more traffic in the neighborhoods, making the streets less safe for families. They also argued it would be harder for people to get to the commercial corridors, which would then hurt small business.
Those in favor of the park say there are work arounds to those concerns.
"We have extended multiple invites to the leaders of the no on K folks to work together on neighborhood improvements including addressing their concerns on traffic. Their answer is filing lawsuits to try to undo the democratic will of San Franciscan's," says Lucas Lux, president of the Friends of Ocean Beach Park, a group that's supported Prop K.
But as many have pointed out, the people most impacted on the west side of San Francisco voted overwhelmingly against closing the Great Highway - where as the people living on the other side of the city generally voted for it.
"We all live in a city together. We all vote together, and we honor the democratic outcome," says Lux.
Opponents, like Matt, say they fought it before voters approved it and they will continue to fight it now.
"I think there's little we can do to stop the closure at this point, but I do think it is a very strong argument and if we do win in the court of law, the ballot measure will be null and void," says Boschetto.
This has all gotten so contentious, the group against the park has even started a recall effort for the San Francisco supervisor who represents this district, Joel Enguardio.
He released a statement today saying he believes the measure was legal and the lawsuit has no merit.
CBS Bay Area also reached out to the San Francisco Mayor's office and the city attorney's office for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
10 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Endorsement: No on Engardio recall in S.F. but Yes on charter reform
Recall elections have become a regular facet of life in California — particularly in the Bay Area. The latest public official to face a constituent uprising is District 4 Supervisor Joel Engardio, whose fate will be decided by voters in San Francisco's Sunset neighborhood in a recall election on Sept. 16. If Engardio is recalled, Mayor Daniel Lurie would appoint a replacement. The District 4 supervisor seat would then be on the ballot for the city's next scheduled election in June 2026, and whoever wins that race would be eligible for reelection the following November. Throughout the recent uptick in California recall elections, the editorial board has held a clear stance: Recalls should be reserved for instances of gross incompetence and egregious or illegal misconduct by an elected official. Does Engardio meet that threshold? Recall supporters insist he does. They say Engardio deceived them in 2024 when he joined four other supervisors to place Proposition K on the November ballot. It permanently closed a portion of the Great Highway to car traffic after passing with nearly 55% of the vote citywide. However, 64% of District 4 voters rejected it. In an interview with the editorial board, John Crabtree, a District 4 resident and volunteer with the recall campaign, said Engardio lied to voters by abandoning his support for weekend closures of the Great Highway after previously backing them. 'That's betrayal. In fact, it's politically corrupt,' he said. 'Not perhaps in a sense of something you would charge someone with … But, politically, it is absolutely corrupt.' No, it isn't. Politicians are allowed to evolve their positions on key issues. Moreover, the allegation that Engardio engaged in willful deception is dubious. In an interview, Engardio told the editorial board that he was transparent about his support for a park at Ocean Beach between Lincoln Way and Sloat Boulevard during his election campaign and throughout his time in office. He noted that he supported the weekend closures as the best option over Prop I on the 2022 ballot, which called for opening the road 24/7 and was defeated by voters. 'Gordon Mar, as a candidate, refused to ever utter the words 'permanent oceanside park,'' Engardio said of his opponent in 2022. 'I was bold enough to say it in a debate and write it on my campaign platform.' Beyond that, Engardio campaigned in 2021 on a platform of urbanist change for the Sunset — and has championed the idea of ' turning the Sunset into Paris ' with denser mixed-use housing developments for nearly a decade. He openly and publicly shared on social media his desire to turn the Great Highway into a permanent park long before he brought the issue to the ballot. No one in his district should have been surprised that Engardio would step forward to champion a ballot measure that would turn the Great Highway into a full-time park. Where recall proponents are right in their criticism of Engardio, however, is that he placed Prop K on the ballot at the last-minute and without input from Sunset residents, who would be most affected by issues stemming from the road closure. Engardio has apologized for doing that. The editorial board understands why many Sunset residents would be upset — even outraged — that Engardio didn't conduct sufficient community outreach on a divisive issue before taking action. But insufficient outreach for an idea plainly aligned with a politician's broader policy platform is a political misstep, not an unethical bait and switch. Meanwhile, few if any in his district have been critical of Engardio's performance on other key issues, from his popular night market initiative to his lobbying for increased public safety. While many disagree with his support of Mayor Lurie's plans to upzone broad swaths of the west side, more and taller housing development for the neighborhood is something Engardio openly campaigned on. The editorial board believes that District 4 voters should reject the recall. There is no justification for expending diminishing city resources on a recall when angry Sunset voters could simply oust Engardio when he's up for reelection next year during the regular election cycle. If residents consider Engardio's position on the Great Highway a dealbreaker, they can identify and support a candidate who better suits their sensibilities in 2026. Regardless of what happens with this year's recall, however, this entire saga speaks to San Francisco's need for broader governmental reform. It's already apparent that the long-term benefits of Sunset Dunes, the park created on the 2-mile stretch of closed road, will outweigh any short-term disruptions. So far, the closure hasn't created the kind of congestion apocalypse opponents warned of, according to a Chronicle analysis of traffic data. Meanwhile, the park is immensely popular – and will only become more so as the next generation of city residents grows up enjoying its amenities. This burgeoning popularity is already creating economic benefits for many small businesses in the district — which are receiving increased foot traffic — and for the city's moribund general fund. San Francisco needs politicians who are empowered to take big swings on broadly popular and beneficial citywide initiatives like Sunset Dunes. The Engardio recall, regardless of its outcome, is destined to have a chilling effect on bold moves unless broader structural changes are implemented. That inevitably means charter reform to allow for some citywide supervisors to complement district-based representatives. Voters outside the Sunset will have no say in the Sept. 16 recall. Nor should they. But that doesn't mean the result won't impact them. They should be paying attention and thinking about action accordingly.
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
What to know about Supervisor Joel Engardio's recall election
Over 50,000 voters in District 4 are set to receive ballots for the Sept. 16 special election to recall Supervisor Joel Engardio. Why it matters: The moderate Democrat's support for closing the Great Highway ignited a wave of backlash from his constituents, a majority of whom opposed the initiative over concerns about traffic and longer commutes. How it works: The ballot will ask voters to vote "yes" or "no" on whether to remove Engardio from office. Once filled out, voters can return them via mail or drop them off at City Hall's elections department office. Three official ballot drop boxes will also be stationed at the Ortega Branch Library, Parkside Branch Library and City Hall. If voters oppose the measure, Engardio will remain in office and fight to retain his seat when he's up for reelection in November 2026. If they approve it, Mayor Daniel Lurie will appoint a replacement to serve until the June 2026 primary, which will ask voters to decide who should fill the remainder of the term. The big picture: Engardio was put on blast after he championed Proposition K, which would convert a 2-mile stretch of the Great Highway into a park, in the lead-up to the November 2024 election. Though the measure passed with 55% of voters' approval citywide, only 36% of voters in District 4 agreed with Engardio. A recall campaign was launched shortly after amid rebuke from voters in the Sunset and Richmond districts. The Department Elections called for a special election in May after certifying the 9,911 signatures — 20% of the district's registered voters — needed to put it on the ballot. What they're saying:"District 4 voted against Prop K — overwhelmingly. If Joel Engardio didn't know that was going to happen — he was out of touch, not listening, not talking to us or he deliberately defied our will," the recall campaign's website states. The other side: "Prop. K was decided by voters in the most open, transparent, and democratic process possible," Engardio said at a Wednesday San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee endorsement hearing for Prop. A.
Bloomberg
5 days ago
- Bloomberg
Taiwan's Energy Security Needs Nuclear, Ex-US Officials Say
Restarting Taiwan's mothballed nuclear power plants is one of the key things the self-governed island should do to bolster its energy security against threats from China, according to a former deputy US national security adviser and a retired American admiral. That was the conclusion Matt Pottinger, who served on the National Security Council in President Donald Trump's first administration, and Mark Montgomery, who was previously director of operations for US Pacific Command, took away from war games held by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Taipei at the end of last month. Other steps they see Taiwan needing include adding liquefied natural gas storage and growing its fleet of LNG transport ships.
