logo
Why Labour's £650m electric car grant is doomed to fail

Why Labour's £650m electric car grant is doomed to fail

Telegraph7 days ago
Three years ago, the Tory government closed its electric car subsidy and patted itself on the back for 'successfully kickstarting the UK's electric car revolution'.
That revolution, however, has failed to materialise. Flagging sales have caused the electric vehicle (EV) market to be propped up by fleet purchases rather than private demand.
With net zero targets at risk, Labour has pledged a £650m pot to bring back the subsidy for battery-powered purchases.
But with ever-lingering fears over the charging infrastructure, the impact on the second-hand market and the threat of legal action from manufacturers, the return of the EV grant scheme could fall flat on its face.
Telegraph Money explores the challenges ahead.
How does the new grant work?
The Electric Car Grant is backed by £650m of government funding, and is poised to run until 2028-2029. Customers will be able to buy a new EV at a cut price, as long as it is listed for less than £37,000 and meets environmental thresholds.
Under the scheme, vehicles put forward by manufacturers will be scored based on how green their production processes are.
The greenest vehicles will qualify for the full £3,750 discount, while others deemed less environmentally friendly will receive a smaller discount of up to £1,500. Others could be disqualified from being eligible.
The discount will automatically be deducted from the purchase price of eligible EVs, and the manufacturer can reclaim this amount from the Treasury.
Carmakers must also prove they are signed up to 'science-based targets' to cut their carbon emissions, in line with net zero targets.
The programme will effectively revive a system of cash handouts which were previously available to EV buyers before being axed by the Tories in 2022.
Public charging infrastructure is the greater issue
Earlier this year, the public accounts committee said 'patchy' numbers of charge points on motorways and in regional areas were putting the switch to EVs at risk.
It found that chargers 'have not been evenly spread across the country', with almost half sitting in London and the South East.
A review into the previous government grant scheme found that by 2021, the market had 'matured', and the upfront price was no longer the main barrier to vehicle uptake.
It stated: 'Consumer concerns have also shifted increasingly towards their ability to charge EVs and away from concerns around the upfront purchase price of vehicles.'
Issues over charging had become 'comparatively more important' to the general public.
A government survey from 2017 to 2019 found that an average of 40pc of respondents cited vehicle charging locations as the key disadvantage of EVs, while just 8pc identified general cost.
But fast forward to today, and the Government has signalled that costs are the greatest barrier stopping the majority of drivers from going electric.
Transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, said that with 82,000 public charge points in operation, the UK has 'built the infrastructure families need to make the switch with confidence'.
Yet, that confidence still isn't there. According to the AA, one in five drivers say they will 'never' buy an electric car.
Sheena McGuinness, of tax firm RSM, said 'more investment is urgently needed in building up the infrastructure' required to make EVs a viable alternative to petrol and diesel cars.
She said: 'The Government needs to invest in transforming the grid to genuinely deliver a green industrial revolution.
'Infrastructure of this scale requires a replacement revenue scheme to expand the charging network, upgrade grid capacity and ensure equitable access across urban and rural areas.'
This week, the Government said 17,000 public chargers have been added to the UK network in the past year.
Roads minister, Leslie Greenwood, said the government is 'helping put range anxiety firmly in the rear-view mirror.'
A Department for Transport spokesman said: 'We're delivering on our commitment to make it easier and cheaper than ever to own an EV. Public charge points in the UK increased 27pc in the last year, bringing numbers to over 82,000. That's one added every half an hour.
'We know upfront costs are a barrier for drivers, so our Electric Car Grant will help thousands of people save money whilst providing a substantial boost for the industry.'
But cost variations between peak and off-peak charging times, plus the continued VAT cost on top of the public charging price, remain a bugbear for many.
According to the AA, an ultra-rapid 150kW+ charge costs an average of 17.6p per mile for an EV, compared with 11.7p per mile for a typical petrol car.
With around 40pc of drivers unable to charge at home, there is a great reliance on the more expensive public chargers. In a bid to tackle this, the Government has this month pledged a £63m package to support at-home charging for households without driveways.
Uncertainty over how many drivers can benefit
With £650m allocated, the grant would subsidise the purchase of 173,000 electric cars if they were granted the full £3,750 discount.
That figure is roughly half the number of all EVs purchased in the UK last year, so the cash could run dry very quickly.
The Government plans to run the subsidy until the 2028-29 cut-off date, but for this to be the case, either more money needs to be ploughed into the scheme or the size of the grants lowered in price.
Uptake, however, will be slowed by the £37,000 cut-off point. While manufacturers on the cusp of being near to the threshold are poised to lower their list prices, dozens of models will remain out of reach.
According to Autotrader, the average price of a new battery electric car is £49,790.
Steve Walker, of Auto Express said: 'Around 70pc of new EVs cost more than £40,000, yet the new grant is only available for cars priced at or under £37,000, meaning most models won't qualify.'
Ginny Buckley, chief executive of Electrifying.com, an electric car advice service, said: 'The reality is that very few models will qualify for the full £3,750 discount.
'If the Government truly wants to accelerate adoption, they could take a cue from Scotland's interest-free loan scheme to buy a used electric vehicle, a far more inclusive approach.'
Manufacturers could take legal action
Uncertainty about whether certain cars will qualify for Britain's EV grant scheme has prompted complaints from car industry executives, who say it has made it harder to plan their marketing strategies.
There is also confusion as to whether certain car brands will be exempt from the discount scheme because of their country of origin.
Ministers have already warned that Chinese-made cars are likely to be blocked, while Stellantis – which owns brands including Peugeot, Citroën and Fiat – is scrambling to demonstrate its eco-credentials.
Stellantis manufactures EVs such as the Jeep Avenger, Fiat 600e and Abarth 600e at its plant in Tychy, southern Poland. But as the majority of Poland's electricity is generated by burning fuel, its dependence on the eastern European country could be penalised.
Jonathan Smart, of law firm Shoosmiths, said the Government could face legal challenges as a result.
He explained: 'Supply chain and dealership agreements often hinge on forecasted EV demand, which in turn depends on grant-backed affordability. If the Government's shifting position undermines those forecasts, the entire supply chain can be impacted.
'The commercial fallout could be significant. If the grant confusion materially disrupts business planning, manufacturers may have grounds to challenge the Government's handling of the scheme, particularly if the applications for the grant cause delays to some and not others.'
Mr Smart warned that manufacturers could miss their mandated EV sales targets and subsequently face penalties.
BYD, the Chinese firm which has become the world's largest EV manufacturer, branded the subsidy scheme 'stupid'.
In an interview with the Financial Times, its executive vice-president called out the Government's plan to keep out Chinese brands.
Stella Li said: 'The question is, is there any European government that can afford to fight against Chinese-made cars forever? No. So what's the purpose of doing all this?'
A DfT spokesman said: 'Applications from manufacturers are being processed, and eligible models will begin to be confirmed in the coming days and weeks.'
It could add to the rampant depreciation of electric cars
The knock-on impact for the whole EV market is poised to be wide-reaching.
A typical EV now retains only 49pc of its value after 24 months, according to Cox Automotive. The depreciation figure compares with an average of 70pc for diesel and petrol cars.
Such rapid depreciation means buyers of EVs have to commit to wiping thousands off the value of their car as soon as it rolls off the forecourt.
Experts fear the Government's new grant scheme will exacerbate the issue – driving down used EV prices further.
While this could be welcomed by those looking to pick up a cheaper second-hand motor in the years to come, it will do little to whet the appetite for drivers buying brand new EVs, which is Labour's ambition.
Toby Poston, chief executive of the British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association, said: 'This generous grant will boost uptake in the retail market, but could have serious repercussions for the used market where rampant depreciation already has red warning lights flashing.
'Further stimulating new EV registrations without supporting the used market risks creating an even greater supply and demand imbalance, putting even more pressure on fast deflating second-hand values.'
He said the exacerbated depreciation 'will erode confidence and result in higher finance costs for new EVs', which will 'eliminate' much of the benefit from the original grant.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Teachers need protecting from violence with attacks on rise by children
Teachers need protecting from violence with attacks on rise by children

Daily Record

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Teachers need protecting from violence with attacks on rise by children

The Scottish Government's annual crime survey showed 31 per cent of violent crimes are carried by under-16s. No one deserves to be assaulted at their place of work. But for teachers, it's becoming a daily concern in some schools. ‌ At a time when violence in society is in long-term decline, one-in-three violent offences in Scotland is now committed by children – with attacks on teachers blamed for the massive rise. ‌ A quarter of all violent offences are carried out by children against adults in their place of work – with teacher assaults understood to be the majority of these incidents. ‌ It can't be repeated too many times that the majority of pupils are hard-working, polite and want to enjoy their time at school. But there remains a minority who seem to revel in the fact that discipline in some classrooms – such as the threat of exclusion – has been removed almost entirely. Many parents will be left scratching their heads over a policy which allows regular troublemakers to avoid consequences. ‌ For many years, well-meaning government ministers and local council education chiefs were tied to the mantra of 'inclusiveness'. This misguided policy made it almost impossible to exclude the worst-behaved children. On paper this might have sounded like a good idea. But in the real world it gave a free pass for bad behaviour. ‌ It is teachers and well-behaved pupils who are left to deal with the inevitable breakdown in school discipline. If some pupils are repeatedly violent, they must be removed from the classroom for the benefit of others. Classrooms can't be run for the benefit of the worst behaved. Teachers and parents understand. So why doesn't the government? ‌ Poverty gamble Gordon Brown's record as chancellor in cutting poverty was second to none. Children and pensioner incomes were boosted and lives were transformed under the last Labour government. But much of that good work was undone by heartless Tory administrations from 2010 onwards. More than 4.5million children are living in poverty in the UK and the numbers are projected to go up. Keir Starmer wants to cut child poverty but he is hamstrung by a lack of money. ‌ Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Brown's suggestion today that the Government take kids out of poverty by tackling the obscene profits of the gambling industry is positive. Many people like a flutter but gambling firm profits are also based on misery. Oil and gas firms pay a super tax in recognition of the damage done by their industry. Taxing gambling firms more to scrap the two child tax is a cause everyone should back.

Victoria Starmer received £650 tickets for Royal Ascot - despite the Prime Minister paying back more than £6,000 worth of gifts just last year, reveals Richard Eden
Victoria Starmer received £650 tickets for Royal Ascot - despite the Prime Minister paying back more than £6,000 worth of gifts just last year, reveals Richard Eden

Daily Mail​

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Victoria Starmer received £650 tickets for Royal Ascot - despite the Prime Minister paying back more than £6,000 worth of gifts just last year, reveals Richard Eden

She's been described as a 'reluctant' political spouse because of her rare public appearances, but Victoria Starmer is, it seems, anything but reluctant when it comes to accepting freebies. Her husband, Sir Keir Starmer, has disclosed that her attendance at a horse racing event last month was thanks to a gift from Ascot Racecourse. This week, the Prime Minister updated his entry in the parliamentary Register of Members' Financial Interests to record that he accepted £650 worth of tickets from the Berkshire racecourse. The entry states: 'Name of donor: Ascot Authority (Holdings) Limited. Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: Tickets and hospitality for three family members (value approximate), value £650.' Sir Keir did not join his wife at the King George Racing Weekend event. It is thought that he was preparing for his talks with Donald Trump, whom he was due to meet after the US President's trip to Scotland. Lady Starmer, 52, an NHS occupational health worker, was pictured enjoying the warm weather in a bright orange sundress as she attended The King George and Queen Elizabeth Stakes at the racecourse. Sir Keir's acceptance of the freebie is surprising as last October he paid back more than £6,000 worth of gifts and hospitality he had received since becoming Prime Minister, following a backlash over donations. That included nearly £2,000 for four tickets to Doncaster Racecourse, as well as six Taylor Swift tickets and a clothing rental agreement with a high-end designer favoured by Lady Starmer. It came after Sir Keir and other cabinet ministers faced weeks of criticism for accepting freebies from wealthy donors. The Prime Minister said it was 'right' for him to repay the cost of some gifts. Asked about the donations, he said his Government would bring forward new principles for donations 'as until now politicians have used their best individual judgement to decide'. He said: 'I took the decision that until those principles were in place it was right to repay these particular payments.' Sir Keir has committed to tightening the rules around ministerial hospitality and gifts to improve transparency. Earlier, a Downing Street spokesman confirmed that the ministerial code would be updated and will include 'a new set of principles on gifts and hospitality' commissioned by Sir Keir. MPs are allowed to accept gifts from donors but have to declare these on the register of MPs' interests. It's the spiritual home of cricket and now Lord's is for sale – well, at least small pieces of it. Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) is offering its members the chance to buy chunks of turf from the north London pitch for £50 each. 'At the end of the 2025 season, we will be resurfacing the famous outfield on the Main Ground at Lord's for the first time in 23 years,' explains an MCC email. 'To raise funds for the MCC Foundation, and to aid future development of the cricket field, we are offering all members the chance to own a piece of Lord's turf.' One louche member tells me: 'I normally buy my grass in Camden Town.' Anneka (and jumpsuit) is back in black Anneka Rice once revealed she had a 'shrine' to the jumpsuits she used to wear on 1980s hit TV show Treasure Hunt and even hired them out for hen parties. Clearly, the presenter has saved a few of them for her own nights out. Rice, 64, slipped into a black jumpsuit for the opening night performance of Secret Cinema's Grease: The Immersive Movie Musical at Evolution in London this week. The Welsh-born presenter returned to our screens last year for the revival of 1990s reality series Challenge Anneka, but it was cancelled after just three episodes due to low ratings. Dame Mary Archer is not just 'fragrant' – as a judge called her in her husband Jeffrey's 1987 libel trial – but extremely fit as well. I hear the 80-year-old is to join five other dames in running a charity relay race next month. 'The Great Dames are dusting off their trainers… and generally limbering up to run in Cambridge's famous Chariots Of Fire race,' she says, referring to their team name. Each woman will run a 1.7-mile loop before passing over the baton. 'The beneficiary is Roald Dahl's Marvellous Children's Charity,' she says. 'The funds raised will go directly towards establishing a new Roald Dahl Nurse.' Francesca saddles up in style ITV's perkiest presenter, horse racing pundit Francesca Cumani, is determined to prove she'd be a stylish dresser whichever century she happened to be born in. The mother of two attended the Goodwood Regency Ball – where guests were transported back to the 19th century – wearing a floor-length red dress from vintage fashion for hire store Constantine Rex. 'In full costume at the Goodwood Ball with this handsome pair,' Cumani, 42, wrote of fashion stylist Sarah Byrne, pictured left, and racehorse trainer Stephanie Easterby, pictured right, next to this photograph taken at Goodwood House, the Duke of Richmond's ancestral seat in West Sussex. Middleton's answer to ruff days at work Some might say he's barking, but James Middleton has called for companies to let employees bring their dogs to work. The Princess of Wales's brother claims it would boost productivity. 'Dogs in the workplace should be a generic 'yes' unless there is a very good reason to say 'no',' says James, 38, who runs dog food firm James & Ella, named after him and his late first dog. 'I started the business during the pandemic and the whole team works remotely. 'When we all get together, there are dogs everywhere and I really believe they increase productivity. Ideas come from those 15-minute breaks, taking them out to the garden.'

How will my pension be impacted by inheritance tax?
How will my pension be impacted by inheritance tax?

Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Times

How will my pension be impacted by inheritance tax?

Q. I understand pensions will be brought into the realm of inheritance tax (IHT) in the next couple of years but I wondered if there was any information concerning how the value of the pension will be assessed? Other assets have a financial value which is easily understood. They may also be given away and, provided that the rules are adhered to, may avoid IHT. I do not believe the same can be said for pensions. My understanding is that they cannot be given away during your lifetime, which is why the government is looking to include them within the IHT assessment. The real value of a pension may depend on the tax treatment it will be subjected to. When a pension is assessed for IHT purposes, is it the full value of the remaining pension that becomes part of the estate for IHT? Please note I live in Scotland — will this affect the income tax charged to my beneficiaries?Neil As you note, from April 2027 the government has confirmed unspent pensions will count towards your estate for IHT purposes, meaning more people will be affected by the tax. That said, despite IHT being one of the most unpopular taxes in the UK, it is levied on a minority of households — so it might not affect you at all. About 5 per cent of deaths result in any IHT being paid, though the inclusion of pensions may double this proportion. You will need to exhaust your nil-rate band of £325,000 and main-residence nil-rate band of £175,000 (an extra allowance for those leaving their home to a direct descendant on estates worth up to £2 million) before any of your estate is exposed to an IHT charge of 40 per cent. Furthermore, if your estate, including any pensions after April 2027, is being inherited by your spouse or civil partner, there will be no IHT to pay at all. And in general terms, it is best not to let the tax tail wag the pensions or investment dog. To confirm, it will be the full value of your pension, before income tax, that is assessed for inheritance tax. Tax, including IHT, is clearly a consideration when making retirement decisions, but it should not be the only consideration. If you die before age 75 your pension, up to a limit of £1,073,100, can usually be passed without your beneficiaries having to pay income tax when they withdraw it. Above the limit they will pay tax at their normal rate. If you die after age 75, your beneficiaries will pay income tax on all of the funds at their normal rate. These rules will still apply when defined contribution (DC) pensions become subject to IHT from April 2027. For those unfamiliar with the jargon, a DC pension is a retirement pot where how much you build up is based on what you pay in and investment growth. Your contributions benefit from upfront tax relief, the growth is tax-free and your money available to access as you wish — with up to a quarter available to take tax-free — usually from age 55 (rising to age 57 from April 2028). The alternative is a defined benefit (DB) pension, where you are paid an income for life, though these are increasingly rare as they are so expensive to fund. Where it can be passed on (usually to a dependant) this income will remain free of IHT when the rules change. Annuities, an insurance product that pays an income for life, which can sometimes be passed to a named beneficiary, will also remain IHT-free. However, certain lump sum death benefits from defined benefit (DB) schemes will be subject to IHT from April 2027. Broadly, any money left in a DC pension pot on death — whether it's untouched or has been put into 'drawdown' — will count towards your estate for IHT purposes. IHT will only become a factor if passing it on to someone other than a spouse or civil partner and the total value of your estate exceeds your IHT nil-rate bands. In terms of valuing DC pensions, that shouldn't be a problem as they are all cash amounts. On gifting, there is nothing stopping you accessing your DC pension and handing the money to loved ones. Provided that you live for seven years after making the gift, this money should be IHT-free. On income tax, these proposals are UK-wide but it will be the income tax rate that applies to your beneficiaries in the country they live that will apply. Income tax rates in Scotland are different from those in England and Wales, with a lower starter rate of 19 per cent on income between £12,571 to £15,397 a year, but a number of extra income bands and a top rate of 48 per cent on income above £125,140, instead of 45 per cent. Any beneficiaries living there could pay a higher tax bill if they withdrew a large sum in one year than if they lived elsewhere. Tom Selby is the director of public policy at AJ Bell and has successfully campaigned for retirement reforms such as banning pensions cold-calling and increasing pension allowances

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store