CIA director confirms Iran nuclear sites 'severely damaged'
In an unusual move on Wednesday, CIA director John Ratcliffe released a statement confirming that the US strikes on Iran's three nuclear sites last week "severely damaged" the facilities.
This follows US media reports that US intelligence assessments found the strikes only set Iran back a few months. That reporting had visibly angered US President Donald Trump, who maintains the sites were "totally obliterated".
"CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes," Ratcliffe said.
"This includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years," he added.
"CIA continues to collect additional reliably sourced information to keep appropriate decision-makers and oversight bodies fully informed. When possible, we will also provide updates and information to the American public, given the national importance of this matter and in every
attempt to provide transparency."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
38 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel-Iran ceasefire: Tehran's resistance sends a message to the world
On Monday night, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that took effect within hours. Of course, as with any of Trump's schemes, this has to be taken with a sizeable grain of caution. But for now at least, this development appears to have ended two hectic weeks that started with Israel attacking Iran. We then saw Tehran retaliating, the US jumping into the fray by striking Iranian nuclear facilities, and Iran's largely symbolic response against US military bases in the region. Israel had already signalled its wish for de-escalation last weekend. Perhaps Israeli planners had not anticipated the harsh Iranian response, or had put excessive confidence in the damage inflicted upon the Islamic Republic's s military capabilities. It also emerged that US envoy Steve Witkoff had been maintaining direct contact with the Iranian side the entire time. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters What has occurred in the last few days between the US and Iran looks more like theatrics than war, similar to the choreographed clash that played out five years ago after General Qassem Soleimani's assassination. US political leaders made bombastic claims about delivering a devastating blow to Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Military assessments, however, appeared more cautious about the damage inflicted, especially in the case of the Fordow enrichment site, which is buried under a mountain. Time will tell, but the general sentiment does not seem optimistic. Beyond western media spin Fordow is the core of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme, with advanced centrifuges that could enrich uranium up to the military threshold of 90 percent. Iran is already estimated to own 400 kilogrammes of uranium enriched to 60 percent. To increase it to 90 percent seems eminently feasible, but this does not imply that Iran will soon own a nuclear bomb; rather, it has enough material to potentially assemble a few, but according to some estimates, that process could take a couple of years. This past March, the vast US intelligence community, through director Tulsi Gabbard, assured Congress that Iran was not in the process of building nuclear weapons - a conclusion also reached, amid other clumsy moves, by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel's failure to subdue Iran shows it can no longer dictate the regional order Read More » Last weekend, by ordering strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump ignored this assessment. When challenged by journalists, his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, remarked that the intelligence assessment was irrelevant. Tens of billions of dollars spent annually by US taxpayers for the biggest intelligence apparatus on earth, just to see top officials dismiss their findings as irrelevant. Hours after Iran carried out its largely symbolic retaliation on Monday, a deal was announced. If the ceasefire stands, and if from here it paves the way for a new nuclear deal, Trump will bombastically portray himself as the winner, the dealmaker, the man of peace - while also recovering some credibility among his disappointed Maga base. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may emerge as the biggest loser. He apparently did not achieve the destruction of Iran's nuclear programme, nor was he able to drag the US into a prolonged military confrontation with Iran - and it is highly likely that his decades-long dream of regime change in Tehran will remain just that: a dream. Beyond all the western media spinning, however, the real winner - unrecognised of course - could be Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iran ultimately resisted the joint military pressure of Israel and the US, displaying a remarkable capacity to retaliate by severely depleting Israel's missile-defence system. This will be the key takeaway for the region, and for those around the world - especially in the Global South - who grasp its significance. As for Europe, the dystopian statements of its top leaders issued after the Israeli-US strikes on Iran will go into history's dustbin for their sheer hypocrisy. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
Trump wants more high-tech missiles and drones in $893 billion budget request
26 June 2025 10:08 WASHINGTON (Reuters) US President Donald Trump wants a pay raise for troops, more high-tech missiles and drones in next year's defence budget, while cutting Navy jobs, and buying fewer ships and fighter jets to save money, according to budget materials posted $892.6 billion, the defence and national security budget request is flat compared with this Reuters Tariff Watch newsletter is your daily guide to the latest global trade and tariff news. Sign up budget, which also includes nuclear weapons-related activities carried out by the Department of Energy and increases funding for homeland security, puts Trump's mark on the military by pulling funds away from weaponry and services to fund his White House said the funding will be used to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific and revitalize the defence industrial of the funding for Trump's marquee Golden Dome missile defence shield was included in a separate budget request and is not part of the latest proposal sent to the 2026 budget, Trump requested fewer F-35 jets made by Lockheed Martin (LMT.N) and only three warships. Procurement of a Virginia-class made by General Dynamics (GD.N) and Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII.N) and 15 other ships are expected to be included in a separate appropriation bill, the Navy budget asks for a 3.8% pay raise for troops, but also trims costs by retiring older weaponry including ships and planes that are more expensive to operate. Under the plan, the Navy will reduce its civilian employee workforce by 7,286 to Biden's budget from his last year in office, which had asked for 68 F-35 jets in fiscal 2025, Trump's fiscal 2026 request seeks only 47 of the fighter Pentagon continues prioritizing purchasing munitions and key weapons Air Force is continuing its investment in the Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile – Extended Range and Long Range Anti-Ship missiles which have longer ranges and can be more effective in the the other hand, the budget seeks far fewer Precision Strike Missile, which will replace the Army Tactical Missile (ATACM) used in Ukraine. Lockheed Martin makes all three budget also boosts spending on small drones - in part because of lessons learned in Ukraine where unmanned aircraft have proven to be an integral part of low-cost, yet highly effective detailed request comes as Republicans debate defence spending priorities in their sweeping $150 billion defence package contained in the pending "One Big Beautiful Bill Act". The act has already been passed by the House of Representatives and will give an initial $25 billion boost to Trump's controversial Golden Dome missile defence shield. Defence spending usually accounts for about half of the US discretionary budget; the rest goes to transportation, education, diplomacy and other departments.
Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
U.S. to Resume Iran Nuclear Talks
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that American and Iranian officials will meet next week to discuss Tehran's nuclear ambitions, following a concerted military campaign that he claims has effectively neutralised key Iranian enrichment facilities. The announcement came at the NATO summit in The Hague. Trump defended the use of bunker-busting bombs against the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites, asserting they had been 'obliterated' and describing the bombing campaign as a decisive blow to Iran's nuclear programme. He struck a triumphant tone, crediting the strikes with hastening the end of the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, though he expressed reservations about formalising a diplomatic agreement: 'We may sign an agreement. I don't know, to me, I don't think it's that necessary,' he told reporters. ADVERTISEMENT U.S. intelligence assessments, however, diverge on the scale of success. A preliminary report from the Defence Intelligence Agency concluded the setbacks to Iran's nuclear efforts might be limited to a matter of months, not years. CIA Director John Ratcliffe affirmed that the programme had been 'severely damaged' but stopped short of declaring it destroyed. Israeli officials estimated the setbacks to be multi‑year, while the International Atomic Energy Agency emphasised uncertainties over Iran's stockpile and called for robust inspections. Diplomatic activity has meanwhile resumed. This U.S.–Iran meeting will follow six rounds of indirect talks mediated by Oman and Italy, which collapsed in mid‑June as the military confrontation intensified. Earlier this week, European envoys from the E‑3—France, Germany and the UK—engaged in direct negotiations in Geneva with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Those discussions aimed to bridge differences after stalled U.S. efforts. White House special envoy Steve Witkoff reiterated red‑line U.S. stipulations ahead of next week's meeting: Tehran must renounce nuclear weaponisation and accept restrictions on uranium enrichment. He noted the U.S. is open to crafting a comprehensive peace framework, building on what Trump described as a de‑escalation following 'a victory for everybody'. From Tehran, Iranian officials have not confirmed next week's meeting but emphasised national security. The Iranian parliament accelerated a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, pending guarantees for the safety of nuclear infrastructure targeted in the strikes. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf accused the IAEA of failing to condemn the U.S. attack. Meanwhile, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi urged renewed inspections to clarify the status of enriched uranium moved before the bombings. Regional and global actors are also weighing in. France has called for robust diplomacy to carve a sustained peace path. China has echoed the call for diplomatic restraint. Israel hailed the strikes as a critical setback to Iran's programme; Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu endorsed Trump's strong posture and emphasised the need to keep pressure on Tehran. ADVERTISEMENT Analysts note the gravity of waging diplomacy in the shadow of military action. One specialist observed that while bombings may degrade enrichment infrastructure, they can complicate trust and cooperation needed for inspections and verification. Moreover, uncertainty lingers over the status of highly enriched uranium caches. Rebuilding diplomatic channels will require assurances, reciprocal transparency, and a mutual understanding of consequences. Trump has warned that if Iran attempts to rebuild its nuclear programme, the U.S. is prepared to act again: 'Sure,' he said when asked about further strikes. Yet the pendulum has swung toward a blend of military deterrence and diplomatic engagement. As next week's talks approach, key questions remain: who will represent each side, where the dialogue will occur, and whether the focus will be solely nuclear constraints or broader regional stability. White House administration officials have yet to disclose details, but the U.S. envoy confirmed Washington's intent is to establish a framework that could replace the 2015 agreement. Trump also signalled openness to exploring a bilateral relationship beyond nuclear confines: 'We'll end up having something of a relationship with Iran,' he said, as long as Tehran adheres to non‑weaponisation terms. As the diplomatic window opens under the spectre of military force, the world watches to see whether this fragile blend of coercion and conciliation can unfold into a sustainable agreement—one that might ensure Iran never pursues nuclear weapons and stabilises a volatile region.
