
At Business Conclave, push for more Bengalis in business world
The convention's six-point agenda aimed to encourage more Bengalis to pursue business as a career. The key points of this agenda include: Promoting existing start-ups and small businesses owned by Bengalis to help them scale up; Encouraging internal business collaborations among council members; Fostering business development in a cooperative and collaborative manner for council members; Representing members in their interactions with the government regarding policy issues that affect them; Establishing an organization dedicated to achieving these goals and ensuring continuity.
During the event, economist Abhirup Sarkar focused on the industrial structure of businesses in Bengal and the national market policy.
'Bengal was once an industrial leader, even ahead of Maharashtra and Gujarat. After independence, we had an initial advantage with established industries. However, some factors led to significant problems. The industries present in Bengal were mainly British companies focused on exports, particularly in tea, jute, and coal, rather than the domestic market. In contrast, Maharashtra was producing primarily for domestic consumption,' Sarkar explained.
According to Sarkar, Bengal has consistently lagged in terms of productivity. He noted that at one time, the overall environment was not conducive to growth, and the political climate was also unwelcoming. 'The bombings during the Naxalite movement created challenges that prompted many multinational companies to relocate their headquarters,' he said.
Sarkar emphasized the importance of community-based businesses: 'Worldwide, we see that once a community-based business is established, it paves the way for others to enter the market. If there is a successful community business, it can serve as an example for startups.'
Discussing the impact of the Left government and its decline, Sarkar remarked, 'In the past, both Bengal and Kerala had Left governments. While West Bengal pursued large investments, often facing land shortages, Kerala focused on small and medium-sized enterprises, resulting in considerable advancement. Kerala's per capita income has more than doubled. I believe we need to concentrate on small and medium enterprises in Bengal. Even now, productivity remains low, and that must change. It would be beneficial to build a robust Bengali business community and foster cooperation. I am confident that with the right focus, Bengal can move forward, as there is no lack of potential.'
Speaking at the same event, Sourav Ganguly shared his journey in sports, which began with holding the hand of his elder brother, Snehasish Ganguly.
'There will be failures, but we must remain determined. You have to master the art of success.' He believes that beyond leadership, trusting your team and teamwork are essential to achieving long-term success. 'If you don't believe in hard work, there is no point in seeking success. You must take risks to achieve something, and ultimately, you need to have sportsmanship,' Ganguly said.
Ganguly further stated, 'I do what makes me happy. I am passionate about sports and will do whatever it takes to thrive in the sports sector and contribute to youth development. I don't see pressure as a burden; I see it as an opportunity. The best way to face pressure is to confront it repeatedly and maintain discipline.'
He also expressed his satisfaction with the increasing number of Bengali entrepreneurs in the country.
Speaking to mediapersons outside the event, on India-Pakistan being drawn in the same group, Ganguly said, 'The sport must go on. However, we must ensure that incidents like Pahalgam do not occur. Terrorism needs to be stopped, and India has taken a strong stance against it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump reignites feud with London Mayor Sadiq Khan, calls him ‘nasty person'
US President Donald Trump, on Monday (July 27), took a swipe at London Mayor Sadiq Khan, calling him a 'nasty person' who has done a 'terrible job' during a news conference in Scotland. On being asked by a reporter if he would come to London in September for a state visit, Trump said, 'I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job.' 'The Mayor of London… a nasty person,' he said, reigniting his feud with Khan. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, visibly caught off guard, interjected, describing Khan as his 'friend'. 'He's a friend of mine, actually,' he said. Despite Starmer's defence, Trump remained critical, stating, 'I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London.' 🚨🎥 WATCH: Donald Trump says Sadiq Khan is a 'nasty person' who has done a 'terrible job' as London Mayor Starmer: 'He's a friend of mine actually' — Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) July 28, 2025 Khan's response to Trump's jibe In a statement issued later on Monday (July 28), a spokesperson for Khan said the mayor was 'delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world'. 'He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger, not weaker; richer, not poorer. Perhaps these are the reasons why a record number of Americans have applied for British citizenship under his Presidency,' the spokesperson further added. Trump and Khan have had a turbulent past with the two indulging in war of words on several occasions. In a podcast recorded before Trump's re-election in November 2024, Khan accused the incoming president of targeting him because of his ethnicity and religion. 'It's personal, let's be frank. If I wasn't this colour skin, if I wasn't a practising Muslim, he wouldn't have come for me,' he said. The London mayor, during Trump's first term, called out the US president over his stance on immigration and travel ban targeting Muslim-majority nations. In return, the US president accused Khan of doing a 'very bad job on terrorism', calling him 'very dumb' and a 'stone cold loser'. (With inputs from agencies)


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
What NCERT history textbooks get right about Marathas
Written by Deepak Solanki The recent debate surrounding the NCERT revision of the Class VIII textbook Exploring Society: India and Beyond is suggestive of what can be called 'decentralisation of history'. It is the consequence of the rise of regional histories and scholars in academia. In the recent past, most of the textbooks jumped from the Mughal Empire to the British Raj. The long transition in the 18th century that led to the capture of political power by the British was mostly omitted. This subsequently led to the erasure of the story of resistance put up by various native/regional powers against the British. There were three Anglo-Maratha wars, four Anglo-Mysore wars, and two Anglo-Sikh wars, indicating that these powers vehemently resisted British power. The revised NCERT intends to give a more holistic picture of medieval and early modern history, giving space to marginalised regional kingdoms such as the Ahoms and Gonds. Until recently, Medieval India was Mughal India. These new changes and debates open new dimensions of looking at historical events. Here, I focus on the changes in the NCERT syllabus vis-à-vis the Marathas. Why do they matter? Were they the sturdiest contenders who fought the British? Did the British in effect take India from the Marathas more than from the Mughals or any other power? Going through the new NCERT chapter on the Marathas, we see a resemblance with the Tamil Nadu History textbook of Class XI. There is a separate chapter on Marathas, and importance has been given to a ruler not heard enough of: Serfoji II. Marathas established their rule in Thanjavur after defeating the Nayak rulers of Madurai. This branch of the Marathas is popularly known as Tanjore Marathas. Serfoji II became the ruler of this kingdom in 1787. He was taught by a German missionary and mastered several European languages. He established a printing press. Serfoji's most striking initiative was the founding and management of free elementary and secondary schools for orphans and the poor in Thanjavur city. He also established Dhanvantari Mahal, a research institution that produced herbal medicine for both humans and animals. Valiant women leaders like Tarabai and Ahilyabai Holkar have also been mentioned in the new NCERT book. This is no coincidence but corroboration of the importance of Maratha history in Indian historical discourse. The second Anglo-Maratha War (1803-1805) is specifically important as it finally paved the way for the British to enter the coastal region. It was even more important because the British were successful in taking over Delhi, the symbolic seat of imperial power. Randolf Cooper, in his book The Anglo-Maratha Campaigns and the Contest for India, explicitly mentions that 'the Marathas were the last indigenous South Asian power that was militarily capable of not only halting but also rolling back the consolidation process that ultimately produced the British Raj.' These wars further suggested that the organisational capabilities of the Maratha armies were not inferior to the British. Shivaji's army had a cosmopolitan character. He hired the Portuguese into his navy. Muslims were part of his naval armada. The Maratha armies in the 18th century were quite secular and included Hindus from every caste. The emergence of Maratha sardars such as Scindias and Holkars in north Indian politics in the 18th century alludes to their growing power. The history of the Marathas matters not just because of their victories, but also the socio-cultural setup they put in place. The Marathas were the most socially inclusive power, where a slipper bearer (Shinde) could go on to become a ruler. Amar Farooqui, in his work Sindias and the Raj, explains that Mahadji Shinde initiated a major overhaul of his military in the last quarter of the 18th century because of the possibility of an all-out war with the British. The Mughals had put up a cloak of royalty and made desperate efforts to keep up appearances. The Mughal emperor faced defeat in the battle of Buxar. He lived in Allahabad for 12 years and only returned to Delhi on the promise of Maratha assistance (Mahadji Scindia and Tukoji Holkar). However, soon Ghulam Kadir, the Rohilla chief, wreaked vengeance on the Mughal emperor. Timely Maratha intervention saved the emperor and Delhi from more atrocities. The Mughal emperor could rule under the protection of the Marathas. William Dalrymple, in his book The Anarchy: The relentless rise of the East India Company, rightly asserts that the Battle of Delhi (also known as the Battle of Patparganj) in 1803, a part of the Anglo-Maratha campaign, decided the future fate of India. The last power that could have ousted the Company had been humbled. One of the company officials, Thomas Munro, realised it with clarity and exclaimed, 'We are now complete masters of India'. The writer teaches History at Shaheed Bhagat Singh College, University of Delhi


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Fabricated": Delhi Cops Reject Mamata Banerjee's Assault Claim On Bengalis
New Delhi: The Delhi Police on Monday called a video shared by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on social media, alleging that a Bengali-speaking woman and her child were assaulted in the national capital for speaking their language, "fabricated" and "politically motivated." Deputy Commissioner of Police (East) Abhishek Dhania on Monday said that the police took immediate cognizance of the video shared on platform 'X' by the West Bengal Chief Minister, where she claimed that the woman and her child were brutally assaulted by Delhi Police personnel. Atrocious!! Terrible!! See how Delhi police brutally beat up a kid and his mother, members of a migrant family from Malda's Chanchal. See how even a child is not spared from the cruelty of violence in the regime of linguistic terror unleashed by BJP in the country against the… — Mamata Banerjee (@MamataOfficial) July 27, 2025 "Upon inquiry, we identified the woman as Sanjanu Parveen. During questioning, she alleged that on the night of July 26, four men in plain clothes posing as police personnel took her and her child to a secluded spot and demanded Rs 25,000, which she claimed to have paid," DCP Dhania said. However, the DCP said that a detailed investigation, including analysis of CCTV footage and local intelligence, revealed inconsistencies in her story. "During sustained questioning, the woman admitted that her relative, a political worker from Malda district in West Bengal, had asked her to make the video. The video was then circulated locally in Bengal and later surfaced on social media," the officer said. Terming the video "baseless and fabricated", SCP Dhania added that the footage was deliberately created to defame the Delhi Police. "This appears to be a deliberate attempt to malign the image of Delhi Police through a politically motivated narrative. The matter is still under investigation," he said.