Aberdeen driver who dragged police officers down Highland road with car is jailed
A driver who dragged two police officers along a Highland road with her car after they had pulled her over has been jailed for 18 months.Lauren Baird, 43, of Aberdeen, was being asked why her vehicle was not insured when she had a "moment of panic" and drove away.Inverness Sheriff Court heard that the male and female officers were lucky to escape serious injury in the incident, which was captured in dashcam footage.Baird, a mother-of-two, was jailed after earlier admitting to culpable and reckless conduct to the danger of the officers' lives.
She also admitted attempting to pervert the course of justice by giving police false details, and attempting to conceal the vehicle she was driving while having no licence or insurance.
Sheriff Sara Matheson accused Baird of "appalling behaviour", and said it was down to luck the officers' injuries were not worse than they were.The officers were treated at Inverness' Raigmore Hospital for grazing, bruises, an injured knee and a staved finger. The female officer needed the use crutches for a time.Baird was stopped on 10 July 2023 on the B9152 road between Kincraig and Rotheimurchas, near Aviemore.The court heard that the officers narrowly avoided being dragged under the wheels of her car when she sped off.Natalie Paterson, representing Baird, told the court that it had been a moment of panic, and she had not foreseen the "terrible consequences" of her actions, which she fully regretted.Baird, who was visibly upset when she appeared in court, was also disqualified from driving for 43 months.
Following sentencing, Police Scotland said it welcomed Baird's conviction.Supt Andrew Barclay said: "Whilst neither officer sustained serious physical injury her behaviour was very dangerous and has had a significant affect on those officers involved."A police officer's job, by its very nature, often means they can find themselves dealing with volatile and dangerous situations to protect the communities we serve. "It is totally unacceptable for officers to be put in harms way or injured by the irresponsible actions of others."He added: "We will take necessary action with those who deliberately put an officer's life in danger, as today's verdict confirms."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
14 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Charity begins with honesty among staff
Debbie McIlwraith Cameron on strengthening public trust in charities Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is a criminal offence to act, or continue to act, as a charity trustee if you are disqualified under the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 and you may be liable on conviction to imprisonment, a fine or both. With such consequences, charities must have a working knowledge of the disqualification criteria. Existing criteria: You cannot be appointed, or continue to act, as a charity trustee if: (i) you have an unspent conviction for an offence involving dishonesty or under the 2005 Act; (ii) you are bankrupt/sequestrated; (iii) you have granted a Protected Trust Deed/entered into an Individual Voluntary Arrangement; (iv) you have been removed by a court from being a charity trustee, or (v) you have been disqualified from being a company director. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Disqualification is determined before appointment, and if a trustee's personal circumstances change, they are under a duty to disclose this, as their appointment must automatically cease. Charities must employ due diligence when it comes to employee backgrounds, says Debbie McIlwraith Cameron While you may have to rely on information provided in good faith, there are publicly available methods to carry out due diligence, e.g. OSCR's searchable Record of Removed Persons on its website. Exemptions: An individual may apply for a waiver from OSCR for a specific charity, a type of charity or charities in general. Each case is considered and decided on its own merits. OSCR lists the variables and supporting evidence it will consider in its guidance. Some disqualification criteria are time-sensitive. Automatic disqualification because of a conviction, bankruptcy and a Protected Trust Deed only exists while they remain unspent and undischarged. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The changes: The implementation of the Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Act 2023 extends disqualification criteria in two ways. The automatic disqualification list will now include being convicted of the following offences: terrorism, money laundering, bribery, perverting the course of justice, wilful neglect of duty by a public official/misconduct in public office and sexual offences. The key change is that the criteria will now extend to employees/volunteers holding a role with 'senior management functions' within the charity, as well as charity trustees. The 2023 Act defines 'senior management function': (i) if the function relates to the management of the charity and the individual is not accountable to anyone higher within the charity, except the charity trustees (e.g. the Chief Executive role), or (ii) if the function relates to the control of money, and the only person the individual is accountable to (except the charity trustees) is someone else exercising a senior management function other than to do with the control of money (e.g. Finance Director). In guidance published by OSCR, the regulator is clear that an individual's role/job title is not the deciding factor; you must consider the function the individual undertakes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Practical implications: Before the extensions are implemented later this summer, charities should undertake due diligence to ascertain whether any of the current trustees would come under the extended criteria and update any appointment/induction policies, and consider if any of their employees/volunteers carry out 'senior management functions' and if they must cease to act. Trustees may wish to add the potential consequences of automatic disqualification (e.g. loss of the Chief Executive/Finance Director, trustee numbers being below the minimum) and mitigation methods (e.g. due diligence, ability to re-deploy within the organisation) to the charity's risk register. If an automatic disqualification event were to occur, depending on the circumstances, it would be advisable to seek HR/employment advice.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
By-election is ‘simple choice' between SNP or Reform, says Swinney
A crucial Scottish by-election is a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Nigel Farage 's Reform UK party, the First Minister has declared as voters prepare to head to the ballot box. Speaking ahead of polls opening at 7am on Thursday to elect a new MSP for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse constituency, John Swinney said voters had an opportunity to reject the 'gutter politics' of Mr Farage and elect a local champion by voting SNP. He dismissed Scottish Labour, claiming the party had 'given up on the campaign' and had 'barely even bothered' to defend the UK Government's decision to scrap the winter fuel payment and cut support for disabled people. The results of the vote, brought about by the death in March of Christina McKelvie, the former SNP minister, are expected early on Friday. The SNP and Labour were initially seen as the frontrunners in the race but Reform UK has surged in the seat and hopes to push for second place. Mr Swinney was in Hamilton on Wednesday to support Katy Loudon, the SNP candidate, where they were seen surrounded by supporters. 'People face a simple choice in this by-election,' he said. 'They can either vote for the SNP – elect an SNP MSP – or they will end up with a Reform MSP. That's the simple choice. 'People have got to vote SNP to stop (Nigel) Farage and they can vote SNP for the various other steps that we take, our policies on eradicating child poverty, about supporting families in dealing with the cost of living crisis.' Sir John Curtice, the polling expert professor, has said the contest looks to be a 'close' fight between the SNP and Reform UK and predicted the winner might come away with less than a third of the overall votes. The by-election presents the first real test of both Scottish Labour and the SNP since last year's general election, where the former returned to being the biggest Westminster party in Scotland and the latter haemorrhaged MPs, falling to just nine. Ahead of the vote, Labour party leader Anas Sarwar said the choice facing voters is 'more failure with the SNP or a local champion' with Scottish Labour's Davy Russell, accusing the nationalists of talking up Reform to 'distract from their own failures'. Mr Sarwar said his party had faced a campaign of 'misinformation and dirt' from opponents, following a row over an advert by Reform that highlighted a 2022 speech by Mr Sarwar at an event celebrating the 75th anniversary of Pakistan's independence. Mr Farage claimed Mr Sarwar had introduced sectarianism into Scottish politics while Labour and Swinney described the online video as 'blatantly racist'. The Reform leader doubled down on his attacks on Mr Sarwar during a visit to Scotland this week, with the Reform UK leader again accusing him of 'sectarian politics. Asked about Mr Farage's comments earlier in the week, Mr Sarwar said he was a 'pathetic, poisonous little man', adding: 'Frankly, it's water off a duck's back, because I'm fighting to change our country, he wants to divide it.' He added: 'Time and time again, the SNP has failed Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. 'From our overstretched NHS to our declining education system to our crisis-hit housing system, almost all of what is broken in Scotland is run by the SNP. 'They don't deserve to win, but only Scottish Labour can beat them. 'The SNP wants to talk up Reform to distract from their own failures, but Scots will see through the spin.' Meanwhile, Aisha Mir, the Scottish Liberal Democrat candidate, made a plea to voters to back her. She said: 'For too many people, it feels like nothing works anymore. The SNP have failed Scotland for 18 years. The Conservatives are lurching to extremes. Labour are already letting people down. Reform have no real solutions. 'I'm in politics to get things done. I want to be a hard-working local champion who will put your priorities first.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Will Reform win Scotland's Hamilton by-election? Our experts make their predictions
It will be close, but this smells like an SNP victory The major problem for Unionist parties in Scottish by-elections is that the SNP invariably hoovers up something like 30 per cent of the popular vote. Infuriatingly for their opponents this tends to be the case no matter how poor its record in government has been. And remember the SNP has been the Scottish Government since 2007 since when it has become better known for its foul-ups – especially on issues like the NHS and education – than for successes. With normally such a head start for the Nats, Labour, Tories, Lib Dems – and this time Reform UK – are left to share out the remainder amongst themselves, meaning that all too often the SNP gets the prize. And last time it helped them to comfortably win this seat, Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall, with nearly 50 per cent of the vote. This time the contest has been unique in that policies, per se, have played little part in it. Nigel Farage and Reform have basically confined themselves to insisting that they're not Labour, Tory, Lib Dem or SNP but that they will provide 'Change'. And that's it. For their part all the others have concentrated on attacking Nigel Farage for being, well, Nigel Farage, even if he's not his party's candidate here. They've sought to conjure up an image of Reform's leader as an extreme Right-wing, racist bogey man – a character assassination that he constantly denies but which he shrugs off while accepting that it gets him talked about. But as Labour showed in last year's general election 'Change' works and now seems to be helping Reform. However, there are two wars being fought in this by-election – a ground war, on the doorsteps with continuous canvassing as well as an air war in the mass media. In spite of numerous defections from other parties, as the new boys on the block, Reform doesn't have anything like the foot soldiers required to fight an effective ground war. But Mr Farage's stardom – or notoriety if you prefer – means Reform is getting masses of broadcast, online and newspaper coverage in the air war. But while the SNP, Labour and Tories know who their traditional supporters are it is pretty much a shot in the dark for Reform. They think they're doing well but can't be sure. The SNP is a formidable election-fighting machine and is defending a huge majority won last time by a popular minister whose death caused this by-election, even if its present candidate lost in her last two contests. Meanwhile Labour reckon their strength on the doorsteps has been helped by having a popular local candidate, even if he's been shielded from too much media attention. The result may well be very close but it looks and smells like an SNP victory. Labour is desperate to be second and is praying that it gets its vote out. But failing to be runners-up, almost certainly behind Reform, will count as a major humiliation for Sir Keir Starmer and Scottish leader Anas Sarwar. Scots won't publicly admit supporting Farage – but they may vote Reform anyway A Labour Party friend forwarded me an email from his party today, which appealed for help in the last 24 hours of campaigning in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Scottish parliamentary by-election. The only problem with the message is that it features a photo of a large billboard being used by Labour in the final days of the campaign. The first word on that billboard? Reform. 'REFORM CAN'T WIN', it reads. 'THE SNP DON'T DESERVE TO'. For an invitation to voters to cast a positive vote for Labour, you need to wait for the third sentence in the lower half of the advert. In advance of the actual result, we can be sure of only two things: that Labour has thrown every resource it possibly can at this campaign. And also that it isn't going to win. In fact it is more likely to come third, behind the SNP and Reform. This should not be the case: Labour's publicity is right. Having governed Scotland for 18 years, and having governed badly, the SNP certainly doesn't deserve a victory. Nevertheless, having skilfully led his party out of the choppy waters made more hazardous by his two predecessors, first minister John Swinney could reap the benefits of being a distinct improvement on both Humza Yousaf and Nicola Sturgeon. The bar is set dreadfully low in Scottish politics. But will his party win in a seat that has been SNP since 2011? Bookies and commentators reckon this is the most likely outcome, narrowly ahead of Reform, which has become an unlikely challenger. In the 1990s, polling organisations blamed 'shy Tory voters' for the inaccuracy of polls that skewed in Labour's favour. Given the public hostility to all things Tory, at least some voters chose to deny the party in public while quietly voting for them in the privacy of the polling booth. It would not be unreasonable to suggest that the same phenomenon might work in Reform's favour. In Left-wing, right-on, progressive Scotland, no one would dare admit publicly to supporting Nigel Farage's party. But they might vote for them anyway, once they've been issued with their ballot paper and the thin curtain has safely closed behind them. That's what Farage is counting on, in the hope that Reform's disadvantage over the other two parties in terms of organisational experience will be outweighed by disgruntled Scots wishing a plague on both Labour's and the SNP's houses. In private, of course. And it could conceivably happen. If Reform pulls it off, this will be the most momentous Scottish by-election since 1967 In British politics Hamilton will always be remembered for the 1967 by-election when Winnie Ewing won the Westminster seat. Scotland's Labour-Tory duopoly was torn asunder giving the SNP elected representatives at Westminster and Holyrood ever since. Although Labour won the Commons constituency in July 2024 the Scottish Parliament seat was held by the SNP's Christina McKelvie until her untimely death in March this year. A year ago Labour could have been expected to win a by-election, but their candidate, Davy Russell, has been heavily chaperoned by his minders, nervous about him defending Keir Starmer's highly unpopular policies. Declining to take part in Monday's televised debate, only the SNP and Reform candidates appeared live. The SNP's Katy Loudon has already been branded a serial loser of two previous elections, while Reform UK's Ross Lambie was a Tory councillor until March. Voters are said to be 'scunnered' with the mainstream parties, causing expectations of Lambie coming second. That would send a shockwave through the Holyrood establishment. Yet such has been the welcoming response for Reform on the door steps a victory cannot be ruled out. Nigel Farage said he was hopeful of coming second but winning was 'improbable' – a perfect example of expectation management. The Tories will be pleased to save their deposit. In 1967 Scots singer Lulu was top of the charts with To Sir with love. If the punters of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse send Farage's man to Holyrood it could be the beginning of a Scottish love affair causing Farage to dance a Highland jig.
