Lululemon shares plunge as Trump tariffs bite
"We experienced lower store traffic in the Americas, partially reflective of economic uncertainty, inflationary pressures, lower consumer confidence, and changes in discretionary spending," Lululemon said in a statement.
The athleisure brand joins a growing list of big companies to warn about the impact of US President Donald Trump's trade policies.
The Trump administration's approach to tariffs has triggered concerns over rising prices and a weakening economy.
"We are planning to take strategic price increases... on a small portion of our assortment, and they will be modest in nature," Lululemon's finance chief Meghan Frank said.
The company also said it will cut costs and negotiate with its vendors.
Last year, 40% of its products were made in Vietnam, and 28% of its fabrics came from mainland China.
Clothing and footwear brands are among the businesses hit hardest by tariffs as they make goods in Asian countries, which have faced steep levies from the US.
In April, sportswear giant Adidas warned that import taxes imposed by Trump will lead to higher prices in the US for popular trainers including the Gazelle and Samba.
"Since we currently cannot produce almost any of our products in the US, these higher tariffs will eventually cause higher costs for all our products for the US market," chief executive Bjorn Gulden said.
Also in April, footwear maker Skechers withdrew its annual results forecast, citing economic uncertainty.
"The current environment is simply too dynamic from which to plan results with a reasonable assurance of success," Skechers' chief operating officer, David Weinberg, told investors in a post-earnings call.
Last month, Nike said it would raise prices on some trainers and clothing in the US from early June.
The sportswear giant did not name US tariffs explicitly as a reason for the increase, saying it regularly made "price adjustments".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
a minute ago
- CNBC
Senate introduces bill for tariff rebate checks after Trump suggestion
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., on Monday introduced a bill to send tariff rebate checks to American families, which would be similar to the stimulus checks sent during the Covid-19 pandemic. If enacted, the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025 would provide "at least" $600 per adult and dependent child, or $2,400 for a family of four, according to a statement from Hawley. The bill allows for a larger rebate if tariff revenue exceeds projections. Whatever the final amount, the benefit would be reduced by 5% for joint filers with an adjusted gross income above $150,000 or single filers earning more than $75,000. The Senate bill comes after President Donald Trump on Friday told reporters the administration was "thinking about a little rebate" for Americans from tariff revenue. More from Personal Finance:Trump's tariffs could soon bring higher food prices for some AmericansAhead of the Fed meeting, here's where borrowing rates standEven many high-earning Americans don't feel wealthy. Here's why "Like President Trump proposed, my legislation would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump's tariffs are returning to this country," Hawley said in a statement. However, it's unclear whether the proposal has broad Republican support, particularly among fiscally conservative lawmakers. Earlier this year, Trump and Elon Musk floated a $5,000 dividend check for Americans, funded by savings from the Department of Government of Efficiency. However, that idea has not happened. The Treasury Department reported an unexpected surplus for June, with a boost from tariff revenue. Customs duties totaled roughly $27 billion for the month, compared to $23 billion in May. The duties reflect a 301% gain from June 2024. The tariff rebate check proposal comes as a chorus of lawmakers and policy experts voice concerns about the federal budget deficit. "I don't think [a rebate] would be particularly good policy," Tax Foundation senior economist Alex Durante told CNBC on Friday. "I would prefer that the revenue was used for deficit reduction rather than just cutting checks to people." Enacted in early July, Trump's "one big beautiful" tax-and-spending package could add an estimated $3.4 trillion to the deficit through 2034, according to a conventional score released by the Congressional Budget Office this week. The motivation for sending the direct payments would be different than they were during the Covid pandemic, when many households were losing income or unable to work, said Joseph Rosenberg, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center's tax and income supports division. Now, the federal government is imposing tariffs that will cost U.S. households, and this would be a way of helping those individuals and families, Rosenberg said. Tariffs are a tax imposed by foreign nations, paid by domestic companies that import goods or services. U.S. consumers are expected to pay higher prices via companies negatively impacted by the trade policy. An analysis from The Budget Lab at Yale released Monday found Trump's tariffs could cost U.S. households an average of $2,400 in 2025. Because Congress just passed the very expensive "big beautiful" budget and tax legislation, rebates to individuals could exacerbate the effects on the federal budget deficit, he said. The rebates would reinforce the inflationary effects of the tariffs that already exist, Rosenberg said. "People will go out and spend some of that money, and that would further put upward pressure on prices and probably magnify inflationary effects," Rosenberg said. Pandemic-era fiscal stimulus contributed to an increase in inflation of about 2.6 percentage points in the U.S., according to 2023 research from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Associated Press
a minute ago
- Associated Press
Trump's Environmental Protection Agency moves to repeal finding that allows climate regulation
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday proposed revoking a scientific finding that has long been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. The proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule rescinds a 2009 declaration that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. The 'endangerment finding' is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin called for a rewrite of the endangerment finding in March as part of a series of environmental rollbacks announced at the same time in what Zeldin said was 'the greatest day of deregulation in American history.'' A total of 31 key environmental rules on topics from clean air to clean water and climate change would be rolled back or repealed under Zeldin's plan. He singled out the endangerment finding as 'the Holy Grail of the climate change religion' and said he was thrilled to end it 'as the EPA does its part to usher in the Golden Age of American success.'' Tailpipe emission limits also targeted The EPA also called for rescinding limits on tailpipe emissions that were designed to encourage automakers to build and sell more electric vehicles. The transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Three former EPA leaders have criticized Zeldin, saying his March proposal would endanger the lives of millions of Americans and abandon the agency's dual mission to protect the environment and human health. 'If there's an endangerment finding to be found anywhere, it should be found on this administration because what they're doing is so contrary to what the Environmental Protection Agency is about,' Christine Todd Whitman, who led EPA under Republican President George W. Bush, said after Zeldin's plan was made public. The EPA proposal follows an executive order from Trump that directed the agency to submit a report 'on the legality and continuing applicability' of the endangerment finding. Conservatives and some congressional Republicans hailed the initial plan, calling it a way to undo economically damaging rules to regulate greenhouse gases. But environmental groups, legal experts and Democrats said any attempt to repeal or roll back the endangerment finding would be an uphill task with slim chance of success. The finding came two years after a 2007 Supreme Court ruling holding that the EPA has authority to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Passing court muster could be an issue David Doniger, a climate expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, said it was virtually 'impossible to think that the EPA could develop a contradictory finding (to the 2009 standard) that would stand up in court.' Doniger and other critics accused Trump's Republican administration of using potential repeal of the endangerment finding as a 'kill shot'' that would allow him to make all climate regulations invalid. If finalized, repeal of the endangerment finding would erase current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants and other sources and could prevent future administrations from proposing rules to tackle climate change. 'The Endangerment Finding is the legal foundation that underpins vital protections for millions of people from the severe threats of climate change, and the Clean Car and Truck Standards are among the most important and effective protections to address the largest U.S. source of climate-causing pollution,'' said Peter Zalzal, associate vice president of the Environmental Defense Fund. 'Attacking these safeguards is manifestly inconsistent with EPA's responsibility to protect Americans' health and well-being,'' he said. 'It is callous, dangerous and a breach of our government's responsibility to protect the American people from this devastating pollution.' ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CIBC Raises PT on Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) from $23 to $32; National Bank and BofA Maintain ‘Outperform' Rating
Eldorado Gold Corporation (NYSE:EGO) is included in our list of the . A golden nugget illuminated under direct lighting, hinting at the value of precious metals. While there's a mixed overall analyst sentiment on Eldorado Gold Corporation (NYSE:EGO), optimistic earnings expectations are driving confidence. On July 15, 2025, CIBC increased its price target on Eldorado Gold Corporation (NYSE:EGO) from $23 to $32, maintaining an 'Outperform' rating. The next day, National Bank also maintained its 'Outperform' rating; however, the analyst lowered their price target from $29.57 to $27.75. Previously, BofA also decreased its price target to $20.81 on July 7, maintaining an 'Outperform' rating, citing revised Q2 commodity pricing models. On the positive side, Zacks expressed optimism regarding the company's future, amid a consistent upward trend in earnings estimates. Analysts have projected an earnings per share (EPS) of $1.73 per share for FY25, matching last year's EPS. Accordingly, it has given a 'Buy' rating on Eldorado Gold Corporation (NYSE:EGO). Operating in Turkey, Canada, and Greece, Eldorado Gold Corporation (NYSE:EGO) produces gold, lead, and zinc. It is included in our list of the best gold stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of EGO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Most Undervalued Cloud Stocks Under $10 According to Hedge Funds and 11 Best Mineral Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None. Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
