logo
A list of US states where seniors are most vulnerable to social security cuts

A list of US states where seniors are most vulnerable to social security cuts

Time of India29-05-2025
Which states are vulnerable to social security cuts?
Live Events
Which is the most vulnerable state?
Top 10 States Where Seniors Rely Most on Social Security
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Recent attacks on the Social Security Administration (SSA) by tech billionaire Elon Musk's DOGE team and certain members of the Trump administration are threatening the stability of this vital agency. These actions put at risk the financial security of millions of retired, disabled, and low-income Americans, while also disrupting the state and local economies that rely heavily on this income.Social Security's 'Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance' (OASDI) benefits represent about 5% of the nation's GDP, but they make up nearly 10% of the income that U.S. consumers can actually spend—unlike non-cash benefits or income allocated to businesses, governments, and nonprofits, which are also factored into GDP.Seniors in states such as Vermont, Oregon, and New Hampshire are among the most vulnerable to potential cuts in Social Security benefits, according to a new report from Retirement Living, reports Newsweek. The analysis highlights the states where retirees are most dependent on Social Security for basic living expenses in the US.The report comes at a time of major restructuring within the Social Security Administration (SSA), driven by policy shifts under the Trump administration. Earlier this year, the SSA announced plans to eliminate 7,000 positions as part of a broader effort by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to reduce federal spending.Critics argue that these cuts could delay or disrupt access to benefits for millions of vulnerable Americans. The closure of field offices and internal departments is already making it harder for seniors and people with disabilities to get the support they need. For over 40 percent of Americans aged 65 and older, Social Security is their only source of retirement income—making the stability of those benefits crucial for survival.Certain states pose especially high risks to retirees, not only due to their heavy reliance on Social Security but also because of elevated living costs and limited local support services.A spokesperson for RetirementLiving told Newsweek: "Our research shows that many retirees rely on Social Security as their financial lifeline, not just a supplement. That's why older adults in some states are more at risk than others. In places with higher economic vulnerability, a large portion of the senior population simply can't afford to lose any part of their benefit."Vermont ranks as the most vulnerable state, according to the report. It has the eighth-highest cost of living in the US, a senior poverty rate of 9.6 percent, and a high incidence of Social Security fraud.Massachusetts ranks third on the list. Retirees there struggle to stretch an average monthly benefit of $1,979.84 in a state with the second-highest cost of living and the 20th-highest senior poverty rate.The rankings are based on multiple factors, including the percentage of seniors who depend on Social Security, the cost of living, senior poverty rates , and the prevalence of fraud related to benefits.Vermont: 90.9 percent of seniors receive Social Security; the average check is $1,949.07; the cost-of-living index is 114.4.New Hampshire: 91.6 percent of seniors; $2,087.54 average check; cost-of-living 112.6.Massachusetts: 82.8 percent of seniors; $1,979.84 average check; cost-of-living 145.9.Washington: 90 percent of seniors; $2,003.81 average check; cost-of-living 114.2.New York: 83.1 percent of seniors; $1,922.40 average check; cost-of-living 123.3.Delaware: 90.1 percent of seniors; $2,085.16 average check; cost-of-living 112.6.New Jersey: 85 percent of seniors; $2,087.95 average check; cost-of-living 114.6.Rhode Island: 88.4 percent of seniors; $1,963.73 average check; cost-of-living 112.2.Oregon: 92.7 percent of seniors; $1,909.85 average check; cost-of-living 112.Hawaii: 83.9 percent of seniors; $1,895.23 average check; cost-of-living 186.9.Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, warned last month that the DOGE-led cuts to the SSA have already made it harder for seniors, people with disabilities, and their families to access the benefits they've earned.A recent survey echoes those concerns, revealing that 59 percent of working-age Americans fear Social Security may not be available by the time they retire.The prospect of further cuts at the SSA remains unclear, and several advocacy groups have launched legal actions seeking to reverse DOGE-ordered changes."When Social Security spending disappears from these communities, it's not just individual families that suffer," Ryan said. "Think of the 'trickle down.' Grocery stores, pharmacies, the small businesses that survive on that steady monthly flow of federal dollars."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breaking news live updates, August 15: Police chief orders more cooperation with immigration agents as federal activity takes root in DC
Breaking news live updates, August 15: Police chief orders more cooperation with immigration agents as federal activity takes root in DC

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Breaking news live updates, August 15: Police chief orders more cooperation with immigration agents as federal activity takes root in DC

01:37 (IST) Aug 15 The Washington, D.C., police chief stepped up cooperation between her officers and federal immigration officials as President Donald Trump's law enforcement takeover of the nation's capital took root Thursday. National Guard troops watched over some of the world's most renowned landmarks and Humvees took up position in front of the busy main train station. The police chief's order establishes that Metropolitan Police Department officers may now share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody — such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. MPD officers may also provide 'transportation for federal immigration employees and detained subject,' the order states. The changes, which raise collaboration between the two forces in notable ways, erodes the district's long-standing policy against cooperating with civil immigration enforcement. They are effective immediately. Mayor Muriel Bowser, walking a tightrope between the Republican White House and the constituency of her largely Democratic city, was out of town Thursday for a family commitment in Martha's Vineyard but would be back Friday, her office said. In a city tense from days of ramp-up toward federal law enforcement intervention, volunteers helped homeless people leave long-standing encampments — to where, exactly, was often unclear. Trump told reporters that he was pleased at how the operation — and, now, its direct link with his immigration-control efforts — was unfolding. 'That's a very positive thing, I have heard that just happened,' Trump said of Police Chief Pamela Smith's order. 'That's a great step. That's a great step if they're doing that." A boost in police activity, federal and otherwise For an already wary Washington, Thursday marked a notable — and highly visible — uptick in presence from the previous two days. The visibility of federal forces around the city, including in many high-traffic areas, was striking to residents going about their lives. Trump has the power to take over federal law enforcement for 30 days before his actions must be reviewed by Congress, though he has said he'll re-evaluate as that deadline approaches. The response before Thursday had been gradual and, by all appearances, low key. But on Wednesday night, officers set up a checkpoint in one of D.C.'s popular nightlife areas, drawing protests. The White House said 45 arrests were made Wednesday night, with 29 people arrested for living in the country illegally; other arrests included for distribution or possession of drugs, carrying a concealed weapon and assaulting a federal officer. Troops were stationed outside the Union Station transportation hub as the 800 Guard members who have been activated by Trump start in on missions that include monument security, community safety patrols and beautification efforts, the Pentagon said. 'They will remain until law and order has been restored in the District as determined by the president, standing as the gatekeepers of our great nation's capital,' Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson said. 'The National Guard is uniquely qualified for this mission as a community-based force with strong local ties and disciplined training.' Wilson said the troops won't be armed and declined to give more details on what the safety patrols or beautification efforts would entail or how many Guard members have already been sent out on the streets. National Guard Major Micah Maxwell said troops will assist law enforcement in a variety of roles, including traffic control posts and crowd control. The Guard members have been trained in de-escalation tactics and crowd control equipment, Maxwell said. The White House said Thursday that Guard members aren't making arrests but are 'protecting federal assets, providing a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests, and deterring violent crime with a visible law enforcement presence.' Although the current deployment is taking place under unprecedented circumstances, National Guard troops are a semi-regular presence in D.C., typically being used during mass public events like the annual July 4 celebration. They have regularly been used in the past for crowd control in and around Metro stations. Trump on Thursday denied that the federal law enforcement officials he sent into Washington's streets to fight crime have been diverted from priority assignments like counterterrorism. Asked if he was concerned about that, Trump said he's using a 'very small force' of soldiers and that city police are now allowed to do their job properly amidst his security lockdown. For homeless residents, an uncertain time is at hand Meanwhile, about a dozen homeless residents in Washington packed up their belongings with help from volunteers from charitable groups and staffers from some city agencies. Items largely were not forcibly thrown out by law enforcement, but a garbage truck idled nearby. Several protesters held signs close by, some critical of the Trump administration. Once the residents had left, a construction vehicle from a city agency cleared through the remains of the tents. The departures were voluntary, but they came in response to a clear threat from the Trump administration. Advocates expect law enforcement officers to fan out across D.C. in the coming days to forcibly take down any remaining homeless encampments. In Washington Circle, which still contains a few tents, city workers put up signs announcing 'general cleanup of this public space' starting at 10 a.m. Monday. For two days, small groups of federal officers have been visible in scattered parts of the city. But more were present in high-profile locations Wednesday night, and troops were expected to start doing more missions Thursday. Agents from Homeland Security Investigations have patrolled the popular U Street corridor, while Drug Enforcement Administration officers were seen on the National Mall, with Guard members parked nearby. DEA agents also joined MPD officers on patrol in the Navy Yard neighborhood, while FBI agents stood along the heavily trafficked Massachusetts Avenue.

'It would not be America': Martina Navratilova slams Donald Trump for taking over Washington police and deploying troops
'It would not be America': Martina Navratilova slams Donald Trump for taking over Washington police and deploying troops

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'It would not be America': Martina Navratilova slams Donald Trump for taking over Washington police and deploying troops

Martina Navratilova slams Donald Trump for taking over Washington police and deploying troops (Image via Getty) Martina Navratilova, the famous former tennis player, spoke up on August 14, 2025, on her X account. She shared how upset she was with President Donald J. Trump. Trump had taken over the Washington, D.C. , police force and brought in 800 National Guard troops, saying the move was needed to fight rising violent crime in the city. But crime was actually at a low. Navratilova shared a Rolling Stone report and wrote plainly: 'He would love nothing more than an excuse to open fire on protesters.' She once said, calling out Trump's policy, 'I were now still in that same position and I had to go live somewhere, it would not be America, because it's not a democracy at the moment' Martina Navratilova reacts to Trump's police takeover and protests One of the all-time greats, Martina Navratilova, renounced her former nation and is now a United States citizen. She achieved 18 Grand Slams overall and won her first at Wimbledon in 1978 against Chris Evert. Under Section 740 of the DC Home Rule Act, President Trump signed an executive order on August 11, 2025. He said violent crime was surging and took temporary control of the Metropolitan Police Department. He also sent in 800 National Guard soldiers to the capital. But news outlets like PolitiFact and local officials, including Mayor Muriel Bowser, said crime had actually gone down since 2023. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Get Paid Instantly for Your Car [Sell Now] Cars24 - Sell Your Car Sell Now Undo by Taboola by Taboola Studies found violent crime dropped by about 26–35 per cent in recent years. In response, many residents took to the streets. They called the military move harsh and anti-democratic. Against this backdrop, Navratilova's warning rang out: she said Trump looked for any excuse to silence or harm protesters. Her words echoed the concern many felt. Also Read: 'More than any American Culture': Martina Navratilova once shared how Chris Evert's Catholic upbringing shaped her tennis image Martina Navratilova on moving to the U.S. under Trump's rule Martina Navratilova, who moved to America in 1981, also spoke recently about immigration. In a BBC interview, she said if she had to choose a country to live in today under President Trump, she would not pick the U.S. She said it no longer felt like a democracy. Many people, she pointed out, are deported for not fully supporting Trump's agenda or simply for not 'kissing the ring.' Martina Navratilova said that when she left her home at 18, she did not know if she would ever see her parents again. Now, looking back, she questions whether she could have made that move under Trump's policies. Her words suggest deep concern about where America is heading. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

Ahead of Alaska summit, Trump says Putin, Zelensky will make peace
Ahead of Alaska summit, Trump says Putin, Zelensky will make peace

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Ahead of Alaska summit, Trump says Putin, Zelensky will make peace

Washington, DC [US], August 15 (ANI): Ahead of his Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, US President Donald Trump expressed confidence that Putin is now ready to pursue peace. The summit is scheduled for August 15 at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska. 'I think President Putin will make peace and President Zelensky will make peace," Trump told reporters. Asked if the US is prepared to offer Putin access to rare minerals as an incentivise to end the war, Trump replied, 'We're going to see what happens with our meeting. We have a big meeting. It's going to be, I think, very important for Russia, and it's going to be very important for us and important for us only that we're going to save a lot of lives." 'But what I'm really doing this for is to save thousands of soldiers a week," he beyond the Alaska talks, Trump outlined plans for a follow-up meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, possibly joined by European leaders. He called that session potentially more important than the first.'We have a meeting with President Putin tomorrow. I think it's gonna be a good meeting, but the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're gonna have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelenskyy, me, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along, maybe not," he said. 'We're going to see what happens. And I think President Putin will make peace. I think President Zelensky will make peace. We'll see if they can get along. And if they can, it'll be great," he added. Referring to the Russia-Ukraine conflict as 'Biden's war," Trump said, 'It would have never happened if I were president. This war would have never occurred under my administration. But now, millions of people have been killed." 'And I'm there for one reason: to see if I can solve. This was Biden's war. This is in my war. I want to see if I can stop the killing," he Trump said he would know 'in the first two minutes" whether a deal can be struck. He also expressed optimism about the possibility of normal trade between the two countries. When asked if he sees a time when there could be normal trade between the US and Russia, Trump said, 'I do. Russia has a very valuable piece of land. If Vladimir Putin would go toward business instead of toward war, you know, it's a warring nation. That's what they do. They fight a lot of wars. A friend of mine said Russia is tough because they just keep on fighting." 'We're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin. And at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made," he added. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store