South African rand holds gains after SARB focuses on lower inflation target
JOHANNESBURG, May 30 (Reuters) - The South African rand held most of the previous day's gains in early trade on Friday, after the central bank stressed its strong preference for a lower inflation target at a monetary policy announcement.
The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) presented detailed modelling of the impact of a 3% inflation target, compared to the 4.5% level it aims for at the midpoint of its current 3% to 6% target range.
The SARB, which resumed interest rate cuts on Thursday after a pause in March, added that its Monetary Policy Committee felt a 3% target was "more attractive" and said it would continue to consider scenarios based on that target at future rate meetings.
"Investors focused on the implications of a lower target, namely lower inflation, reduced interest rates, bond market inflows, and stronger long-term growth, which further support the rand," ETM Analytics said.
Other factors that point to more rand resilience include a solid trade surplus, tight credit cycle and signs of prudence in government finances, the research firm added in a note.
At 0650 GMT, the rand traded at 17.8425 against the dollar , about 0.1% weaker than Thursday's closing level.
Weighing against the rand was a stronger dollar on global markets .
The benchmark 2035 government bond was stronger in early deals, as the yield fell 4 basis points to 10.13%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Politicians got used to cheap money. Now they're paying the price
Almost without exception, governments in advanced economies face an uneasy combination of high public debt and growth rates that are far too slow to fund rising public spending without resorting to even more borrowing or further anti-growth tax increases. Set against these serious policy challenges, it is no wonder that the surge in government borrowing costs that followed the gas-related inflation spike in 2022 has become a major source of concern for financial markets. In the UK and the US, 10-year government borrowing costs – a key market benchmark – have fluctuated in the 4pc-5pc range since the start of the year. Whenever borrowing costs edge towards 5pc, genuine panic seems to take hold. The commonly held view is that higher benchmark interest rates are a temporary issue that will disappear once inflation is under control, or that they are mostly a symptom of fiscal sustainability worries and can be resolved with sufficient budget discipline. But this is wrong. I am not arguing that governments and central banks should not take serious measures to improve policy discipline. Quite the opposite – this matters more than ever. Instead, my point is that even if we achieved both monetary and fiscal sustainability across the advanced world, my guess is that interest rates would fall only slightly. Why? Because the global economic forces that pushed interest rates to rock-bottom levels for more than a decade after the global financial crisis have gone into reverse. First, the global balance of savings and investment has shifted to a state that more closely resembles the pre-2008 era. In the wake of the crisis, demand for borrowing in Western economies collapsed. Along with a global rush to safety and excess savings in places like China, Japan and Germany, lower interest rates were required to balance global saving and investment. But Western debt demand is less depressed today, and the global savings glut is shrinking. In turn, the interest rates that balance these markets have risen. Second, global trade is flowing less freely as trade barriers increase and the geopolitical order fragments. US isolationism, the war in Ukraine and trouble in the Middle East put upward pressure on goods prices and increase the threat of conflict-related commodity price shocks. These inflation fears are reflected in interest rates. Third, a decades-long global demographic tailwind has turned into a headwind that will only worsen over time. As societies age, labour shortages push up wage costs and structural inflationary pressures. Fourth, with the return of inflation and the rise in global interest rates, central banks have ended their massive purchases of government debt — or quantitative easing (QE). In some cases, including the UK, central banks have been actively selling off their government debt portfolios. During the financial crisis, the argument against bailing out institutions was that it would foster moral hazard. Banks, betting on future bailouts, would take on much more risk than they otherwise would if they had to bear responsibility for their decisions. This rationale was partly behind the tragic decision to allow Lehman Brothers to fail. But, in a strange twist of fate, it was governments themselves that fell prey to moral hazard. We knew back in 2008 that government debt was at risk of spiralling out of control and that excessive deficits needed to be curtailed. That is why the UK and US both embarked on belt-tightening once the recession ended, and why parts of peripheral Europe were forced to endure excruciating austerity. But after a while, those fears about fiscal sustainability faded as structural forces drove down government borrowing costs and QE tranquillised bond investors. By the time Covid hit in 2020 – when borrowing costs reached their nadir and governments had convinced themselves that inflation would never return, and that interest rates would stay low forever – they had no misgivings whatsoever about ramping up borrowing. A German economist named Rüdiger Dornbusch, who spent most of his career in the US, said: 'Crises take longer to arrive than you can possibly imagine, but when they do come, they happen faster than you can possibly imagine.' This roughly captures the story of fiscal policy in advanced economies over the past two decades. After interest rates stayed low for much longer than anyone imagined, they normalised faster than anyone thought they could. The maths behind massive debt-financed green transitions, generous welfare states and rising defence spending – all while financing rising state pension costs and increased public healthcare demands – never really added up. But the era of ultra-low interest rates allowed policymakers to kick any hard policy choices into the long grass. Not any more.
Reuters
13 hours ago
- Reuters
Fed's Daly: April PCE inflation is a 'relief,' but incomplete, Fox Business
May 30 (Reuters) - San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly said on Friday cooling inflation offers "relief" for Americans suffering from high prices, but that there are risks of higher inflation ahead. "The inflation number that printed today, that's good relief for American consumers," Daly said on Fox Business' "Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street," referring to the 2.1% rise in the personal consumption expenditure price index increase last month, the slowest annual increase in four years.
Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump and 'first buddy' Elon Musk's bromance ends with wild 53-minute Oval Office farewell and a golden gift
Donald Trump 's 'bromance' with Elon Musk entered a new chapter with a peculiar presser where the world's richest man praised Trump's decorating while sporting a black eye – and Trump gave him a gold key without admitting he was going away. 'Elon is really not leaving. He's going to be back and forth, I think. I have a feeling. It's his baby, and I think he's going to be doing a lot of things,' Trump said. It was one of several times neither man quite wanted to pronounce that Musk was finally leaving – even though Musk had written publicly about the end of his 130-day term as a 'Special Government Employee' with the ear of the world's most powerful man. 'Can you imagine they called him an employee?' Trump mused about his 'first buddy's' vague bureaucratic status that allowed him to avoid massive disclosure filings. The president spoke wistfully at times about the South Africa-born billionaire, who accompanied him on the campaign trail and pumped money into his election only to become a fixture at Mar-a-Lago while riding herd over his controversial Department of Governmental Efficiency. 'We'll remember you as we announce billions of dollars of extra waste, fraud and abuse,' Trump said. At one point Trump presented Musk with a golden key. 'And they gave him a little special something we have here, a very special – that I give to very special people. I have given it to some, but it goes to very special people, and I thought I'd give it to Elon as a presentation from our country. Thank you, Elon. Take care of yourself,' Trump said. 'This is not the end of DOGE, it's really the beginning,' said Musk, sounding like a retiring exec – although he is returning to helm his Tesla and SpaceX companies. He reached for a religion metaphor to hail his team of young engineers, at an event where Trump repeatedly referred to the 'slings and arrows' and other abuse Musk endured. 'I liken it to a sort of Buddhism. It's like a way of life,' Musk said. It wasn't the only gold blazing inside the Oval Friday. Musk began his own remarks bizarrely praising the president's decorating skills. 'By the way, isn't this incredible – this incredible? I mean, it's stunning. I think the way that Oval Office – the President has just completely redone the Oval Office. It's beautiful. I love the gold on the ceiling,' said the spending slasher who drew pushback after taking a dig at Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' said. 'It's been there a long time,' Trump chimed in. 'There was plaster. Nobody ever really saw it. They didn't know the eagle was up there. We highlighted it's essentially, it's a landmark, a great landmark. It's 24 carat gold, and everybody loved it. Now they all see it when they come in. And it's been good,' he said of the gilded design. When it came for questions, Musk stood by his pledge to elimiate $1 trillion – although DOGE only currently lists $175 billion in cancelled contracts on its web site after scrubbing multiple claims about nixed spending. 'We do expect, over time, to achieve a trillion,' Musk said. Trump also embraced the expanded time frame – but said he'd keep Musk in his thoughts. 'Many of the things that we're working on right now, we're going to have to remember Elon as we find them, but the numbers could double and triple, because many, many things – we don't want to go out with them until we're for sure, but we've, we've found things that are unbelievably stupid and unbelievably bad,' Trump said. Standing inside the room for all of it was Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, whose angry clash with Musk precipitated his departure. Also there was Katie Miller, the wife of top Trump aide Stephen Miller who is following Musk back to the private sector. Trump said cuts would be 'surgical', although Musk himself brandished a chain saw during his memorable sunglasses-wearing CPAC appearance. Unspoken through most of the event was a bombshell New York Times report claiming Musk regularly used drugs on the 2024 campaign trail. 'The New York Times? Is that the same publication that got a Pulitzer Prize for false reporting on the Russia-gate? Is it the same organization? I think it is,' said Musk – shielding himself by bringing up one of Trump's favorite obsessions. As he did in his State of the Union, Trump ran through a list of programs Musk's DOGE team identified as wasteful, bringing back a mention of transgender mice (it was actually an NIH study of sex differences in the brain). '$Forty-five million for Diversity Equity and Inclusion scholarships in Burma. In Burma, does anyone know about Burma?' Trump asked. There was little talk about the msasive disruption DOGE brought to government agencies, essentially dismantling U.S. international aid and slashing staff at agencies from the National Institutes of Health to the National Science Foundation and even the National Nuclear Security Administration (cuts that got quickly reversed). Was it worth it? 'We became essentially the DOGE boogeyman, where any cut anywhere would be ascribed to DOGE,' Musk replied. It wasn't until 42 minutes into the event that a reporter got the chance to ask the burning question about what was wrong with Musk's face. The world's richest man had already made reference to his 'shiner,' which was visible under his black ball cap as he wore a 'Dogefather' t-shirt and jacket. 'I was just horsting around with Little X, and I said, "Go ahead, punch me in the face. And he did,' Musk explained. 'That was X that did that?' Trump wanted to know. But the black eye sported by the man expecting to remain a 'friend and advisor' hadn't caught his attention, Trump claimed.
