Jordan outlaws Muslim Brotherhood, confiscates assets
After members of the group were found to be linked to a sabotage plot, its assets were confiscated, said Jordan's Interior Minister Mazen Fraya, as reported by Reuters. He stated, "It has been decided to ban all activities of the so-called Muslim Brotherhood and to consider any [of its] activity a violation of the provisions of the law'.advertisementHe added that any promoter of the group's ideology will be held accountable by law.Jordanian security forces arrested 16 people linked to the Muslim Brotherhood last week who were trained and financed in Lebanon. They are alleged to have plotted attacks on targets inside the kingdom involving rockets and drones.The ban extends to everything that may be published by the Muslim Brotherhood.The group has released no official comment on the actions by Jordanian authorities.JORDAN WAS ONE OF THE FEW WHERE GROUP OPERATED LEGALLYThe Muslim Brotherhood has operated legally from Jordan for decades and has a wide supporter base spread across major urban centres and scores of offices across the country. It follows the Sunni Islamist ideology and consolidates with the goal of establishing a caliphate under sharia law.advertisementLast September, the Islamic Action Front (IAF), the political arm of the Brotherhood in Jordan, made significant gains in parliamentary elections. It secured 31 out of 138 seats by tapping into anger over Israel's war against Hamas.The group has been outlawed in many Arab countries, who consider it a dangerous 'terrorist group' that must be crushed, as mentioned by Reuters.Egypt, where it originated, has listed it as a terrorist organisation.Even though the Brotherhood claims that it publicly renounced violence decades ago and pursues an Islamist vision using peaceful means, the Arabic countries opposing it want it to be disbanded.Must Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
How Bangladesh is slipping back into Pakistan's grip
Half a century after losing the 1971 war, Pakistan is quietly creeping back into Bangladesh-not with tanks or troops, but through intelligence operatives, radical clerics, diplomatic manoeuvres, and a rising tide of Islamist is not an invasion. It is infiltration. And it is happening in plain sight. A Manufactured UprisingThe protests that shook Bangladesh earlier this year were framed as a grassroots revolt over job quotas — the cry of a generation locked out of opportunity. Years of political repression, economic inequality, and public frustration gave the unrest legitimacy. Yet beneath the surface lay the fingerprints of slogans mirrored radical Islamist narratives. The timing was too precise. The organisation too perfect. Behind it was Islami Chhatra Shibir, the student wing of the banned Jamaat-e-Islami. Behind them — Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), allegedly with discreet Western Fall of Sheikh HasinaFor over a decade, Sheikh Hasina kept Bangladesh stable through terrorism threats, coup attempts, and a war on extremism. She defied Pakistan, challenged Islamists, and resisted China's unchecked influence. In doing so, she earned enemies in Islamabad, Beijing-and, increasingly, President Biden, US–Bangladesh relations soured over allegations of democratic backsliding and human rights abuses. Reports surfaced of US-backed pressure campaigns-funding opposition voices, sanctioning Hasina's allies, and mobilising diplomatic influence. The quota protests proved the tipping point. Over 1,400 deaths later, Hasina was forced Muhammad YunusInto the vacuum stepped Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus-a celebrated figure abroad but far less respected domestically. Under Yunus, Jamaat-e-Islami was quietly rehabilitated. Radical networks once suppressed began operating openly. Groups like Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh, Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, and Ansarullah Bangla Team 21 January 2025, Major General Shahid Amir Afsar of the ISI arrived in Dhaka under the guise of medical cooperation. In reality, he met Paresh Barua, leader of the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA)-a separatist insurgency targeting India's the Eastern CorridorULFA offers Pakistan a backdoor into India. Coupled with Islamist mobilisation in Bangladesh, Rohingya youth recruitment, and terror logistics via JMB, the ISI is constructing a familiar insurgency blueprint-refined in Afghanistan and Kashmir-but this time aimed squarely at India's eastern role is equally significant. Under Hasina, Beijing's influence over ports, infrastructure, and energy was balanced. Under Yunus, it is growing unchecked. Together, China and Pakistan are forging a corridor of influence from Gwadar to Cox's Bazar, leveraging insurgent groups in Myanmar's Rakhine State to secure strategic trade Shrinking Strategic DepthWith Hasina gone, India's secure eastern flank is eroding. Infiltration from Bangladesh is rising. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) reports increased chatter between ISI handlers and sleeper cells in West Bengal. Assam Police have intercepted multiple JMB-linked operatives in recent United States, now under Donald Trump, shows little inclination to intervene. Trump's transactional foreign policy prioritises deals with Islamabad over Delhi's security concerns, especially if Pakistan can offer leverage in Afghanistan or against China in and Ideological RecolonisationUnder Yunus, Bangladesh's economy is faltering. Garment exports are collapsing as Western buyers withdraw, with Chinese firms moving in to fill the gap. This economic dependency risks turning Bangladesh into a client radical sermons are returning to mosques, Islamist student groups are re-establishing themselves on campuses, and extremist recruitment among Rohingya refugees is accelerating. Analysts warn of an 'East Pakistan 2.0'-not born of military conquest, but of ideological infiltration and economic Clock is TickingPakistan has refused Yunus's demands for 1971 reparations and instead offers deepening cooperation-direct flights, military exchanges, visa-free business travel, and port partnerships. It is a textbook case of soft annexation, and the Bangladeshi leadership appears unwilling or unable to India, the threat is immediate. The longer Dhaka drifts into Islamabad's and Beijing's orbit, the harder it will be to reverse. Border security will be tested. Sleeper cells will awaken. And the possibility of another 2008-style attack-or worse-will was a rejection of Pakistan's religious nationalism in favour of linguistic and cultural identity. If Bangladesh forgets why it fought for its independence, that hard-won freedom could quietly be undone-replaced not by foreign flags, but by foreign control.- Ends
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Many countries disappointed over plastics treaty draft, which omits production curbs
On the penultimate day of countries being expected to finalise a treaty on plastic pollution, a majority of countries expressed their disappointment with a draft agreement, which does away with a key demand of countries agreeing to limit the production of plastics. This version however favours a minority block, which includes several Arab states and India, that has consistently advocated for addressing plastic pollution without such cuts on production. 'This represents my best attempts to consolidate various positions that have been expressed through various delegations and groups,' said Chair of proceedings Luis Vayas Valdivieso. 'This is however still a proposal that can be discussed.' Kuwait has made a statement that is largely approving of the text. Naresh Gangwar, who led the Indian delegation said, 'We support the statement made by Kuwait. While there are some improvements that we can suggest we are happy to discuss this.' 'The proposed draft text is entirely unacceptable and we cannot use it as a basis for negotiations,' said Sebastian Rodriguez, the delegate from Colombia who was the first to speak but whose statement received resounding applause. 'Our red lines and that of the majority of the members of this hall have been spat upon. This is not simply about closing a treaty at any cost but about closing a wound that has hurt our oceans and our livelihood. We need a new text. This is something that we cannot work with,' said Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomez, the delegate from Panama. About 80 member states expressed their disapproval on these lines. 'This text is a milestone that demands some reflection. However there are points that we need some balance between various articles in the text,' said Abdulrahman Al Gwaiz, the delegate from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. His remarks invited a measure of applause from petrochemical countries and from the members of the Indian delegation. 'Life-cycle of plastics not addressed' Independent observers expressed disappointment. 'The Chair's text that dropped today in advance of the plenary is disappointing. The text does not fulfil the mandate of resolution 5/14 as it does not address the full life-cycle of plastics. Chemicals of Concern also does not find place in the text. There is also no attempt made to reduce plastic dependency through mandating reuse and refill systems. This text is lopsided and will do nothing, even at the level of downstream waste management to address plastic pollution. There will be serious implications on global economy, environment, climate and health,' said Swathi Seshadri, petrochemicals specialist, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). 'The new Chair's text makes a mockery of a three-year-long consultative process that showed broad support for an ambitious plastics treaty that addresses the full life-cycle of plastics, including production. While there are token references to human rights, and human health, the provisions that follow undermine any and all measures that follow. This is a treaty that all but ensures that nothing will change. It gives in to petrostate and industry demands with weak, voluntary measures that guarantee we continue to produce plastic at increasing levels... It will be very difficult to come back from this, and we encourage member states to reject the text,' said David Azoulay, Centre for International Environmental Law.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Netanyahu floats 'allowing' Palestinians out of Gaza as mediators renew truce push
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) revived calls to "allow" Palestinians to leave the Gaza Strip, as the military prepares a broader offensive in the territory. Past calls to resettle Gazans outside of the war-battered territory, including from U.S. President Donald Trump, have sparked concern among Palestinians and condemnation from the international community. Also read | Benjamin Netanyahu's push for a no-state solution Mr. Netanyahu defended his war policies in a rare interview with Israeli media, broadcast shortly after Egypt said Gaza mediators were leading a renewed push to secure a 60-day truce. The premier told Israeli broadcaster i24NEWS that "we are not pushing them out, but we are allowing them to leave". "Give them the opportunity to leave, first of all, combat zones, and generally to leave the territory, if they want," he said, citing refugee outflows during wars in Syria, Ukraine and Afghanistan. In the Gaza Strip, Israel for years has tightly controlled the borders and barred many from leaving. "We will allow this, first of all within Gaza during the fighting, and we will certainly allow them to leave Gaza as well," Netanyahu said. For Palestinians, any effort to force them off their land would recall the "Nakba", or catastrophe — the mass displacement of Palestinians during Israel's creation in 1948. Netanyahu has endorsed Trump's suggestion this year to expel Gaza's more than two million people to Egypt and Jordan, while far-right Israeli ministers have called for their "voluntary" departure. Cairo talks Israel's plans to expand its offensive into Gaza City come as diplomacy aimed at securing an elusive ceasefire and hostage release deal in the 22-month-old war has stalled for weeks, after the latest round of negotiations broke down in July. Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty announced that Cairo was "working very hard now in full cooperation with the Qataris and Americans", aiming for "a ceasefire for 60 days, with the release of some hostages and some Palestinian detainees, and the flow of humanitarian and medical assistance to Gaza without restrictions, without conditions". Hamas said in a statement early Wednesday that a delegation of its leadership had arrived in Cairo for "preliminary talks" with Egyptian officials. A Palestinian source earlier told AFP that the mediators were working "to formulate a new comprehensive ceasefire agreement proposal" that would include the release of all remaining hostages in Gaza "in one batch". Netanyahu said in his interview he would oppose the staggered release of hostages, and instead would "want to return all of them as part of an end to the war — but under our conditions". Mediation efforts led by Qatar, Egypt and the United States have failed to secure a breakthrough since a short-lived truce earlier this year. News of the potential truce talks came as Gaza's civil defence agency said Israel has intensified its air strikes on Gaza City in recent days, following the security cabinet's decision to expand the war there. Intensified strikes Netanyahu's government has not provided an exact timetable on when forces may enter the area, but civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said on Tuesday that air raids had already begun increasing over the past three days. Israel is "intensifying its bombardment" using "bombs, drones, and also highly explosive munitions that cause massive destruction", he said. Bassal said that Israeli strikes across the territory, including on Gaza City, killed at least 33 people on Tuesday. "The bombardment has been extremely intense for the past two days. With every strike, the ground shakes," said Majed al-Hosary, a resident of Gaza City's Zeitun neighbourhood. An Israeli air strike on Sunday killed four Al Jazeera employees and two freelance reporters outside a Gaza City hospital, with Israel accusing one of the slain correspondents of being a Hamas militant. Israel has faced mounting criticism over the war, which was triggered by Palestinian militant group Hamas's October 2023 attack. UN-backed experts have warned of widespread famine unfolding in the territory, where Israel has drastically curtailed the amount of humanitarian aid it allows in. Netanyahu is under mounting domestic pressure to secure the release of the remaining hostages — 49 people including 27 the Israeli military says are dead — as well as over his plans to expand the war. Hamas's 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,599 Palestinians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza, whose toll the United Nations considers reliable.
