Sub deal raises questions
Despite the situation at the border, lawmakers must remain vigilant when scrutinising the army's budget spending. Casualties of war -- or the fear of them -- are not and should not be grounds to hand a blank cheque to the armed forces.
It is worrying that this might be the case for Thailand in precarious times. As the border skirmish with Cambodia continues and ultra-nationalism takes hold, the military keeps asking for more weapons, while the government asks fewer questions and seeks to appease.
A glaring example of this is the latest development in the controversial submarine procurement project.
This week, the Royal Thai Navy officially announced that it would permit Chinese shipmakers to fit a Chinese engine in a 13.5-billion-baht S26T Yuan Class submarine for Thailand, despite the fact that the seller would be violating the original contract over engine specifications by doing so. The green light was given by Phumtham Wechayachai when he was the defence minister, before he was named acting prime minister.
Instead of fitting a German-made engine or one stipulated in the contract, the seller, China Shipbuilding & Offshore International Co (CSOC), is offering a protocol model recently used by the Pakistani navy.
Military equipment enthusiasts might not understand why the engine cannot simply be replaced. The answer is that the navy has made a contractual demand to purchase proven technology for its first submarine in eight decades.
What is more worrying is that this leeway will set the tone for future sub procurement projects. The Royal Thai Navy planned to purchase three submarines from CSOC under a government-to-government deal. The contractual violation, however, forced the navy to scrap the deal for the other two. It remains a big question why the government did not cancel the entire deal instead and find a new supplier. Even worse, the navy kept buying related equipment, such as tug boats and even uniforms, from China to use with submarines it didn't have yet.
This newspaper has been questioning this dubious procurement -- not because we prefer a particular brand or country. We believe that public procurement projects must be transparent and accountable. Any contractual changes must be verified and agreed by parliament -- not a closed-door meeting.
But this is not the case with the dubious sub deal. Bombarded by the media over this sub deal, Mr Phumtham simply becomes coy. "It is classified... we do not discuss arm procurements during wartime," he says. This laughable explanation is not acceptable. Arms procurements -- especially this one -- must be vetted by parliament, and pertinent details must be made available to taxpayers in the country.
This project will set a bad precedent for future procurement projects. It would not be a surprise if this leeway will encourage the armed forces and the government to revise other contracts after being pressured by foreign governments to do so. It is expected, too, that arms procurement contracts in the future will be liable to changes. And this will not create the strong military that Thais want to see.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
11 minutes ago
- Bangkok Post
Thai authorities gear up to help evacuees return home
Thai authorities are preparing to help thousands of evacuees return home in the coming days as tensions along the border with Cambodia ease. Surin governor Chamnan Chuentha said on Friday that the situation in most areas along the border had stabilised following the General Border Committee (GBC) meetings in Kuala Lumpur, where the two countries signed a 13-point ceasefire agreement on Thursday. Transport is being arranged in coordination with shelters and the Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, with the first phase prioritising bedridden patients and those in need of special care. The return process is expected to take two to three days, said Mr Chamnan. According to the governor, conditions in Sangkha district have fully returned to normal, while Kap Choeng, once a flashpoint, is also calm. Minor damage in parts of Prasat district of the province is being repaired. In Phanom Dong Rak, most areas are safe, except Ta Miang and Bak Dai subdistricts, where the military remains on high alert. Mr Chamnan said he hopes the state of emergency will be lifted soon so that rehabilitation can begin. He also urged the government to provide urgent income support for farmers whose livelihoods have been disrupted. In neighbouring Buri Ram, governor Chaiwat Chuntirapong has not yet authorised a full return, especially for vulnerable groups, pending confirmation from the 2nd Army Region. This comes despite the ceasefire agreement. Many residents, however, have already begun returning on their own. In Ban Kruat district, which was heavily hit, more than 240 artillery and rocket impacts were recorded. Most unexploded shells have been disabled, but some remain. Deputy Defence Minister Natthaphon Nakphanich said he had asked the acting prime minister Phumtham Wechayachai to assign police and village security teams to protect evacuees' property. He warned residents not to return prematurely due to the danger of unexploded ordnance, and has authorised local authorities to decide on returns without having to wait for central government approval. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Public Health is also providing mental health support for Border Patrol Police officers, who have reported high stress levels. It is also monitoring environmental hazards in the conflict zones. At least 3,000 sets of N95 masks and basic medicines are being distributed to frontline staff and residents, while water sources are being inspected to prevent disease outbreaks. Mr Phumtham is scheduled to visit Si Sa Ket on Saturday with Foreign Minister Maris Sangiampongsa to inspect damage at key sites and meet evacuees. Mr Phumtham stressed that his visit should not burden the military, which is currently focused on its duties. He said he would also visit the crowded evacuation centres to observe conditions. Although the government has not yet issued a blanket order for people to return, he has instructed the 2nd Army Region to coordinate with the four provincial governors to determine when the residents can safely return home. Meanwhile, a cabinet committee will visit 12 shelters in Surin, Si Sa Ket, Buri Ram and Ubon Ratchathani on Saturday and Sunday to assess damage for a second round of aid covering homes, farms and livestock, according to government spokesperson Jirayu Houngsub.
Bangkok Post
3 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Thai gallery removes China-focused artworks after 'pressure' from Beijing
One of Thailand's top art galleries removed, at China's request, materials about Beijing's treatment of ethnic minorities and Hong Kong from an exhibit on authoritarian governments, according to a curator and communications seen by Reuters. In what the artists called the latest attempt by Beijing to silence critics overseas, the Bangkok Arts and Cultural Centre changed multiple works by artists in exile in the exhibit on authoritarian governments collaborating across borders. When Reuters visited on Thursday, some works previously advertised and photographed had been removed, including a multimedia installation by a Tibetan artist, while other pieces had been altered, with the words 'Hong Kong', 'Tibet' and 'Uyghur' redacted, along with the names of the artists. Three days after the show, "Constellation of Complicity: Visualising the Global Machinery of Authoritarian Solidarity', opened on July 24, Chinese embassy staff, accompanied by Bangkok city officials, "entered the exhibition and demanded its shutdown', said the exhibit's co-curator, Sai, a Myanmar artist who goes by one name. In a July 30 email seen by Reuters, the gallery said: "Due to pressure from the Chinese Embassy - transmitted through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and particularly the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, our main supporter - we have been warned that the exhibition may risk creating diplomatic tensions between Thailand and China." The email said the gallery had "no choice but to make certain adjustments", including obscuring the names of the Hong Kong, Tibetan and Uyghur artists. Several days later, Sai told Reuters, the embassy demanded further removals. The Chinese embassy in Bangkok and Foreign Ministry in Beijing, and Thailand's Foreign Ministry did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The Bangkok Metropolitan Administration referred Reuters to the gallery, which did not respond to an email seeking comment. A gallery representative at the exhibit said the team had agreed not to comment on the issue. 'Authoritarian pressure' Rights groups say China carries out a sophisticated campaign of harassment against critics overseas that has often extended into the art world, allegations Beijing has denied. Sai, co-founder of Myanmar Peace Museum, the organisation that put together the exhibition, said the removed pieces included Tibetan and Uyghur flags and postcards featuring Chinese President Xi Jinping, as well as a postcard depicting links between China and Israel. "It is tragically ironic that an exhibition on authoritarian cooperation has been censored under authoritarian pressure,' he said. 'Thailand has long been a refuge for dissidents. This is a chilling signal to all exiled artists and activists in the region." Sai said he was speaking from overseas, where he had fled after Thai police sought to find him. The superintendent of Pathumwan Police Station, who oversees the gallery's Bangkok neighbourhood, told Reuters he had received no reports of such an incident. Thailand this year returned to China 40 Uyghurs, members of a mainly Muslim ethnic minority numbering about 10 million in China's far western region of Xinjiang, in a secretive deportation. UN experts had warned they would be at risk of torture, ill-treatment and "irreparable harm". China denies abusing Uyghurs. The Bangkok exhibition also features works by artists in exile from Xinjiang as well as Russia, Iran and Syria. China has been steadily increasing its influence in Southeast Asia, where governments are balancing cooperation with the regional giant against concerns over sovereignty. Beijing recently sought unsuccessfully to block screenings in New Zealand of a Philippine documentary on that country's struggles in contested parts of the South China Sea amid alleged harassment from the Chinese coast guard and maritime militia, local media reported. It was pulled from a film festival in the Philippines in March due to "external factors", the filmmakers said. Black screen Chinese officials returned to the Bangkok gallery on Wednesday, asked to remove another flyer and reiterated 'enforcement of the One China policy', Sai said, citing updates from contacts. That policy, observed by governments that have relations with Beijing, acknowledges Beijing's position that the People's Republic of China is the sole legitimate government representing all of China, including Taiwan. China has never renounced the use of force over the self-governed island. Taiwan's government says only Taiwan's people can decide their future. Foreign governments refer to Tibet and Xinjiang as part of China. Works withdrawn from the Bangkok exhibit by Tibetan artist Tenzin Mingyur Paldron included video of Tibetans carrying Palestinian flags while calling for accountability for genocide and a film titled "Listen to Indigenous People". The works were previously advertised, and Sai shared images of them previously on display with Reuters. 'By forcing (the gallery) to remove significant parts of my work, the Chinese government has once again demonstrated that it desperately wishes to cut Tibetans off from the rest of the world,' said Paldron, adding that China did not 'want its complicity in other colonialisms and genocides to be recognised'. 'Who are museums for?" he said. "They should be for the people, not dictators of any ideology."
Bangkok Post
5 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Chinese carmakers reduce discounts after Beijing's warning, but no end in sight to price war
Chinese carmakers have refrained from offering steep discounts to align with Beijing's efforts to protect a vital industry, but an end to the prolonged price war remains elusive, as the sector grapples with overcapacity and weak consumer demand for high-ticket items. The average discount offered by mainland Chinese electric vehicle (EV) and petrol car manufacturers fell to 16.7% last month from an unprecedented 17.4% in June, according to a recent JPMorgan report. "This is encouraging, as intense competition - especially after the Shanghai Auto Show in April - sent industry-wide discounts to a record high of over 17% in May, June and early July, the highest since we started tracking pricing trends in China in 2017," said Nick Lai, head of auto research in Asia-Pacific at JPMorgan. "However, the root cause of the challenging price environment is overcapacity. We may need to be patient to see a sustainable [and] better price environment in the long term." JPMorgan's data covered 40 foreign and Chinese car brands across 1,000 variants, including imports. In late May, the Chinese government intervened in the automotive market over concerns that fierce price competition could jeopardise the EV sector, where mainland companies lead globally, according to analysts. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology warned that carmakers initiating price cuts would face penalties, although it did not mention specific measures. Since July, many carmakers have begun to reduce their discounts in response to Beijing's directives, but they remain watchful and may cut prices again to maintain market share, according to car dealers. "Every carmaker wants to stay ahead because the overall market demand is stagnant," said Zhao Zhen, a sales director at Shanghai dealer Wan Zhuo Auto. "Unless the government takes strong actions to prevent price reductions, a new round of discount wars cannot be ruled out." Among the mainland's 50 or so EV manufacturers, only BYD, the world's largest player; Li Auto, Tesla's closest competitor in China; and Aito, backed by telecommunications equipment giant Huawei Technologies, are profitable. Lai said the net profit margin for Chinese carmakers averaged around 4%, compared with 7% to 8% for leading international brands. Fewer than 10% of EV brands in China were expected to turn a profit in the next five years, as their margins faced further pressure from discount wars and chronic overcapacity, global consultancy AlixPartners said last month. Stephen Dyer, Greater China co-leader and head of Asia automotive practice at AlixPartners, said mainland EV manufacturers selling fewer than 1,000 units per month were likely to be pushed out of the market soon. Only half of the nation's EV production capacity - about 20 million units - was used last year, according to Goldman Sachs. "A grim reality is that Chinese consumers are cautious about making large purchases," said Ding Haifeng, a consultant at Shanghai-based financial advisory firm Integrity. "They are inclined to buy cheaper cars, and big discounts appeal to them." He added that EVs priced below 100,000 yuan (450,000 baht) and featuring basic self-driving systems and digital cockpits typically sold well because consumers believed they offered value for money. Still, the market was expected to benefit from buyers seeking to take advantage of tax breaks on new-energy vehicle purchases, which would be phased out by year's end, according to a Fitch Ratings report last week. Currently, mainland buyers are exempt from sales tax on EV purchases. However, starting in January, consumers will be subject to a 5% tax until the end of 2027, after which the tax will increase to 10%.
