Auckland Council says 100,000 new homes built after planning rule book came into force
planning rule book came into force
.
It comes as the government plans to take back power from local councils if their decisions are going to negatively impact economic growth, development or employment.
Housing and Resource Management Act (RMA) reform minister Chris Bishop said the new regulation within the RMA would stop councils from stalling on housing developments.
Bishop said the provision would be added into the RMA amendment legislation currently before Parliament.
The Auckland Unitary Plan has governed what can be built and where since 2016, and the council has crunched numbers to show how many consented houses became reality.
The number of homes constructed rose from 10,200 in 2018 to a record 18,100 in 2023, with 17,200 built in 2024.
As of December 2024, there were 20,200 new homes in Auckland's housing pipeline - 13,800 under construction and 6,400 consented but not yet started.
Taking into account population growth, there were close to six homes per 1000 residents before the Unitary Plan came into force and now there are 9.5 homes per 1000 residents.
Auckland Council's chief economist Gary Blick.
Photo:
Supplied/Auckland Council
Auckland Council's chief economist Gary Blick said there had been a boost in new houses with 90 percent of consented houses being completed.
"What this data really shows is that the vast majority of building consents become new homes.
"It also shows that the changes that were made with the Unitary Plan in late 2016 have created a lot of development opportunities."
The housing pipeline is still sensitive to economic shifts, such as higher interest rates which contributed to fewer new projects starting construction from late 2022.
The number of new houses consented in Auckland last year dropped 10 percent to 13,939 compared with 2023.
The region's median house price of $1 million is 7.5 times the median income, compared to five times that in 2000 which in today's terms would be $680,000.
"That's how far we've slipped so what we really need to see is a sustained material improvement in housing," Blick said.
This month, the government announced it would allow Auckland Council to scrap its intensification plan change, called Plan Change 78.
It was required to develop three storey town houses throughout the city but put on hold due in part to 2023's flooding and cyclone.
Council must replace it with a change to the Unitary Plan that permits buildings of at least six stories around the City Rail Link stations in Mount Eden, Kingsland, Morningside, and others.
It has until October 10 to notify the plan change.
Blick said the focus should remain on enabling housing capacity in accessible places, such as close to town centres and transport options.
"That could mean making it easier for people to live and work near major transport infrastructure - like the City Rail Link - giving them faster commutes, better access to jobs and education, and easing pressure on our roads," he said.
More than half of the houses built in recent years have been town houses.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
38 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Your money might be invested in Gaza weapons, investment platform says
Smoke billows from Israeli strikes in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip in May, 2024. Photo: AFP The amount of KiwiSaver money invested in weapons companies has increased 40.9 percent this year, a responsible investment platform says. Mindful Money founder Barry Coates said many New Zealanders might be unpleasantly surprised that their money was being invested in companies producing weapons that could be used in conflicts such as that in Gaza or the Ukraine. Mindful Money calculated that KiwiSaver investments in weapons companies are now worth $392.4 million. It said New Zealand investment in the production of weapons used in Gaza, through KiwiSaver and retail investment funds, totalled $71.9 m. Coates said the increase reflected a broader increase in activity in the defence industry around the world. "I think most of the increase is the chase for short-term profits - wars are good for business if you're a weapons company. "There's been an increase in investment in many of these companies that stand to benefit from sales to Gaza or via the US or into the Ukraine conflict." Koura founder Rupert Carlyon said the increase was probably because of weapons' companies strong performance. "They are strong performers with global conflicts and increased defence spending in Europe." He said while the dollar value of the investments was now much larger, funds' allocations might not have moved. "The increased size is a function of larger market capitalisations and larger KiwiSaver balances." The S&P Aerospace and Defense Select Industry index had increased 16.5 percent in the past year and 307 percent in the past decade. Coates said research had shown 80 percent of New Zealanders wanted to avoid investing in weapons companies but it continued. He said there had been a fall in investments in companies linked to social harm such as gambling or alcohol and tobacco. "But not enough and not so much in weapons particularly … it does look to us as though we're seeing the same thing happening in fossil fuels - that something happens in the world and investment funds see greater opportunity and they're increasing their investments … even though many of their clients may may be deeply worried about that." He said KiwiSaver investment in companies producing and selling firearms had also more than doubled. "There's a big increase in hand guns investments … maybe something to do with the Trump administration." The most dramatic individual company increase involved Walmart, where New Zealand KiwiSaver investment reached $115.8 million - representing a 144 percent increase over the year and 40 percent growth in just six months. Although it is best known as a general retailer, Mindful Money called it out because Walmart sells shotguns, rifles, ammunition, and firearm components. Coates said there were 36 weapons-free funds at 13 different providers. He said many people would get a "huge surprise" if they found their KiwiSaver investment was exposed to the Gaza conflict. "I think it's kind of one of the things that people can abstract a bit about weapons and so on but when they've seen the effects on people in Gaza and the complete levelling of the country, then you know, suddenly I think it comes home to them, that they don't want their funds to be invested in that." Earlier in the year, activists put pressure on ASB to divest its KiwiSaver investments from Motorola, which they said was supplying the Israeli military with smart phones and radios. But Carlyon said there should be a conversation about whether it was appropriate for weapons to remain in exclusion categories, "given the volatile world we are living in and the need for most countries to be increasing defence spending". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
38 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Beef and Lamb NZ on proposed Emissions Trading Scheme changes
environment 43 minutes ago Proposed changes to the Emissions Trading Scheme were reported back to the House last night. Beef and Lamb New Zealand chairperson Kate Acland spoke to Corin Dann.
RNZ News
38 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Wilson Parking locked in multi-million legal fight with ex-employee
Wilson Parking signage, Queen Street Photo: RNZ / Calvin Samuel Wilson Parking is locked in a $6 million legal fight with a former employee who now owns a company that is in competition with it. Wilson Parking told the Employment Relations Authority former employee Peter Turner breached his employment agreement, duty of good faith and various fiduciary duties, and ATE Property aided and abetted the breaches. It is seeking damages, an account of profits, and a declaration that receivables gained by Turner and ATE, during the operation of the ATE business, are held on trust for Wilson Parking and will be handed over. Turner and ATE denied liability. ATE was incorporated in 2024 with Turner as the sole shareholder and director. Wilson Parking also filed a claim in the High Court, with causes of action based on knowing receipt, knowing assistance and breach of the duty of confidence. ATE responded to the High Court claim by questioning the High Court's jurisdiction, raising an objection. It argued Wilson Parking's claims were within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment Relations Authority, based on an earlier Supreme Court decision. Wilson Parking said the authority could not grant equitable remedies, so the claim was appropriately filed. In a decision on 1 August, Associate Judge Paulsen found that the authority had exclusive jurisdiction over Wilson Parking's equitable claims against ATE and he dismissed the High Court claim. Wilson Parking then applied to remove the employment relationship problem to the Employment Court. It said there was uncertainty about the authority's power to award some of the remedies it was seeking. It said that removal to the employment court would also mean all the claims would be heard in one place at the same time. Complex expert evidence would need to be analysed, Wilson Parking said, and there was a significant amount at stake, of more than $6 million. Authority member Peter van Keulen was unconvinced by some of Wilson Parking's arguments to move the case to the Employment Court - he said the authority had the necessary experience and skill to deal with complex disputes involving significant sums. But he said the employment relationship problem had serious questions of law regarding the authority's jurisdiction, and a move was appropriate. Alison Maelzer, a partner at Hesketh Henry, said it was not unheard of for an employer to bring claims against an employee or former employee, and also to add in the former employee's new employer, where it was alleged that the new employer had helped to breach the former employee's obligations. "This is usually in matters involving a breach of confidentiality or breaches of restraints of trade or non-solicitation obligations - where the former employee is alleged to have taken confidential information, given it to the new employer, and the new employer has known about this or encouraged it. " She said Wilson Parking's case was unusual because of the claims filed in both the High Court and the Employment Relations Authority. "The High Court essentially struck out the general civil claims on the basis that the Employment Relations Authority had exclusive jurisdiction over those claims. "This was relying on a decision of the Supreme Court in FMV v TZB which found that if a dispute arose out of an employment relationship, it belonged in the Employment Relations Authority. "This was the case even if the dispute had been framed or could have been framed as a tort and put before the general courts. In other words, if it could be framed as an employment claim, the Employment Relations Authority would have exclusive jurisdiction. This was a matter to be determined on the facts - i.e. figuring out whether the dispute arose out of the employment relationship, or whether the employment relationship was incidental to the dispute." She said the former employer was seeking equitable remedies and was likely to add in the claims/remedies in relation to the matters that had been kicked out of the High Court. "While the Supreme Court in FMZ v TZB found that the Employment Relations Authority had jurisdiction to award the necessary remedies to address employment relationship problems, it was not clear whether this included equitable remedies. The Employment Relations Authority therefore decided to remove the matter to the Employment Court to determine the whether the Authority had this jurisdiction, and if so, what remedies could be awarded. " She said because Wilson Parking was seeking about $6m in remedies, the claims would require extensive and complex expert evidence. "This is unusual for an employment matter." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
