Norway set to reject calls for blanket ban by wealth fund on companies in Israeli-occupied areas, source says
Norway set to reject calls for blanket ban by wealth fund on companies in Israeli-occupied areas, source says
OSLO - Norway's parliament is poised to reject campaigners' calls to instruct its $1.8 trillion wealth fund to boycott any company selling products and services in the occupied Palestinian territories, according to a person familiar with the process.
A majority in the Norwegian parliament's finance committee has decided that only companies that can be linked to the violation of international law should be excluded from the fund's portfolio, not just any companies with a presence in these areas, the person said.
The International Court of Justice said last year Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories was illegal and it should pull out as soon as possible, in a ruling that Tel Aviv rejected as "fundamentally wrong" and one-sided.
Currently, the fund, which operates under ethical guidelines set by the Norwegian parliament, has blacklisted 11 companies for assisting Israel's occupation, the last of which was Israeli petrol station chain Paz earlier this month.
At the end of last year the fund had just over $2 billion invested in 65 Israeli companies, or 0.1% of its total.
Since the start of the war in Gaza, the fund has faced growing pressure to divest from Israeli companies and all companies active in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
That would effectively force it to sell billions of dollars in stakes in major Western brands, some of which have already faced consumer boycott calls especially in Muslim-majority countries because they were perceived as friendly to Israel.
Campaigners want the Norwegian government to take the same action on Israel-linked investments as it did on Russian ones in 2022, when three days after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine it instructed the fund to dispose of all of its holdings in Russia.
However, the decision by the parliamentary finance committee means no blanket ban on Israeli firms or on multinationals with global sales only because their products and services are available in occupied Palestinian territories.
"If a company sells a generic product, which Israeli settlers buy, then this should not be sufficient to sell the fund out of the company," said the person familiar with the committee's decision, adding it would constitute a wider interpretation of the guidelines.
"But if we are speaking of specific products for, say, surveillance that are made specifically for the needs of Israeli settlers, then that is something completely different."
The committee's decision is part of its assessment of the government's annual filing on the wealth fund, which is due to be debated in parliament on June 4, with a vote expected the same day.
Lawmakers are expected to vote along their parties' lines as set in the parliamentary finance committee's conclusions.
The decision will be closely watched, given Norway's fund, which owns 1.5% of the world's listed shares across 9,000 companies, is seen as a leader in the field of investing focused on environmental, social and governance issues.
The finance committee also decided the fund should maintain a ban on investments in defence contractors that make components for nuclear weapons, such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing or Airbus.
As Reuters earlier reported, political parties have debated whether to remove the ban given the changed security environment created by Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the need to develop the Western defence industry.
But ultimately a majority of the finance committee decided against, concerned that its lifting would make managing the fund's ethical risk more complex.
The fund already owns shares in defence companies that sell weapons to Israel, including Germany's Rheinmetall and Italy's Leonardo, but not in the larger ones, like Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Starbucks struggles to find a new identity in cut-throat China
[BEIJING] When a group of private equity investors and Chinese technology companies were asked for ideas on how they would revive Starbucks's fortunes in the world's second-largest economy, the most common advice was: Be a lot more like the local competition that beat you. Starbucks, they argued, should have smaller stores, employ fewer people and cut prices, according to sources familiar with the sale process that kicked off in May who asked not to be identified for discussing private matters. These proposals resemble the very model that enabled Luckin Coffee to overtake Starbucks as China's biggest coffee chain two years ago by selling coffee at one-third of its price. Most of the prospective investors want a controlling stake of the Seattle-based company's Chinese business. And while Starbucks has said that it will only partner with an investor aligned with its vision, the process has put its local Chinese management team on tenterhooks, worried that a brand they have spent decades building will become just another low-price, trend-following chain, said sources familiar with the matter. The stake sale exercise is underscoring Starbucks' identity crisis in China as it tries to salvage a flagging legacy business amid fierce domestic competition, a problem that has afflicted other foreign brands as China's economy undergoes major shifts. What Starbucks chooses to do in China will decide whether it ends up successful like McDonald's or faltering like Apple. Starbucks is 'in a tough position', said Mark Tanner, managing director of consultancy China Skinny in Shanghai. 'Many cost-conscious consumers are opting for cheaper alternatives, but trying to compete on price will be a race to the bottom, destroying any margins they currently hold.' A spokesperson for Starbucks declined to comment but referred to comments regarding its China business recovery and stake sale process in its most recent earnings. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Starbucks brought the cafe experience to China in the 1990s, and as China's economic growth soared, its footprint expanded in tandem to bring its total number of stores there to over 7,800. In recent years, however, Western brands have been losing ground to local names amid rising nationalism and reluctance to pay premiums for brands. The very few American brands that still thrive in China's great consumer pullback have made successful adaptations to their business. Yum China Holdings's KFC incorporated street food and local delicacies to its menu and offers cost-conscious consumers meal deals all year long. Walmart's Sam's Club taps into the middle class's craving for exclusivity and growing health consciousness with high-quality private label snacks and premium meat cuts. Starbucks seems stuck in between those models. While its 'third place' store format is expensive to upkeep, customers have become less willing to pay higher prices for its drinks since the Covid-19 pandemic and ongoing economic downturn. Compounding the problem was the previous China chief executive officer Belinda Wong's tendency to hew more closely to the company's strategy in developed Western markets, according to sources with knowledge of the matter. Wong rejected ideas such as a lower-price spinoff chain before Covid-19, as well as more localised campaigns during the pandemic, the sources said, citing a belief that they conflicted with Starbucks' brand. New initiatives have been launched rapidly since new CEO Molly Liu took over in late 2024. These included a cheaper line of tea-based drinks and sugar-free options, and tie-ups with the movie Zootopia and Taiwanese rock band Mayday, all under the aegis of a new chief growth officer. Liu's understanding of the Chinese market enables different ideas to be discussed and approved more easily, the sources said. 'Starbucks' new product innovation and marketing campaigns this year show it's digging deeper to explore the demand of Chinese consumers,' said Roolee Lu, Shanghai-based director of consultancy Mintel Group. 'They want new products, they want emotional connection with brands, they need some comprehensive, immersive experiences.' There are signs of a turnaround. Based on conversations with three store managers in Shanghai, drinks cobranded with Mayday drove their May sales by as much as 20 per cent in their stores. Overall, the most recent quarter showed sales returning to growth since late 2023 in China, with Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol attributing the success in an earnings call last month to 'beverage innovation' and changes to 'non-coffee pricing'. Yet the lack of a clear strategy endures, especially around its stores, which, depending on who you ask, are either a vaunted part of brand identity or an expensive cost overhang. The Chinese management team is now experimenting with different ways to bring people in. These include making more stores pet-friendly, providing free-to-use study rooms and targeting store openings in heritage or scenic sites, such as a recent one in Yunnan's Yulong Snow Mountain. From the potential investors' perspective, it is not necessary to have large stores if Starbucks aims to capture the needs of busy professionals who are unlikely to linger, though some shops should maintain in-store experiences, said sources familiar with the proposals. Cutting the number of staff in stores is also an option, the sources said, as many local chains only have one employee, as orders are mostly taken online. Jessica Gleeson, a former Starbucks China executive who now runs her own retail consultancy in Shanghai, said the risk is that the new investor does not understand Starbucks' positioning in China and turns it into just another 'transactional' coffee chain. 'The low-end of the market is already crowded,' she said. Whichever direction Starbucks China takes, one thing is clear: It will regain past glory only if consumers like Jelly Li can be persuaded to become regular customers again. The 32-year-old musician from Guangzhou was recently at a Starbucks in Shanghai with a view of the Oriental Pearl Tower. She was unimpressed by the orange-flavoured ice-shaken espresso she ordered, noting: 'Starbucks taught me how to enjoy coffee when I was in college. Now I need coffee every day, but no longer pay for Starbucks.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Starbucks struggles to find a new identity in cutthroat China
[BEIJING] When a group of private equity investors and Chinese technology companies were asked for ideas on how they would revive Starbucks's fortunes in the world's second-largest economy, the most common advice was: Be a lot more like the local competition that beat you. Starbucks, they argued, should have smaller stores, employ fewer people and cut prices, according to sources familiar with the sale process that kicked off in May who asked not to be identified for discussing private matters. These proposals resemble the very model that enabled Luckin Coffee to overtake Starbucks as China's biggest coffee chain two years ago by selling coffee at one-third of its price. Most of the prospective investors want a controlling stake of the Seattle-based company's Chinese business. And while Starbucks has said that it will only partner with an investor aligned with its vision, the process has put its local Chinese management team on tenterhooks, worried that a brand they have spent decades building will become just another low-price, trend-following chain, said sources familiar with the matter. The stake sale exercise is underscoring Starbucks' identity crisis in China as it tries to salvage a flagging legacy business amid fierce domestic competition, a problem that has afflicted other foreign brands as China's economy undergoes major shifts. What Starbucks chooses to do in China will decide whether it ends up successful like McDonald's or faltering like Apple. Starbucks is 'in a tough position', said Mark Tanner, managing director of consultancy China Skinny in Shanghai. 'Many cost-conscious consumers are opting for cheaper alternatives, but trying to compete on price will be a race to the bottom, destroying any margins they currently hold.' A spokesperson for Starbucks declined to comment but referred to comments regarding its China business recovery and stake sale process in its most recent earnings. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Starbucks brought the cafe experience to China in the 1990s, and as China's economic growth soared, its footprint expanded in tandem to bring its total number of stores there to over 7,800. In recent years, however, Western brands have been losing ground to local names amid rising nationalism and reluctance to pay premiums for brands. The very few American brands that still thrive in China's great consumer pullback have made successful adaptations to their business. Yum China Holdings's KFC incorporated street food and local delicacies to its menu and offers cost-conscious consumers meal deals all year long. Walmart's Sam's Club taps into the middle class's craving for exclusivity and growing health consciousness with high-quality private label snacks and premium meat cuts. Starbucks seems stuck in between those models. While its 'third place' store format is expensive to upkeep, customers have become less willing to pay higher prices for its drinks since the Covid-19 pandemic and ongoing economic downturn. Compounding the problem was the previous China chief executive officer Belinda Wong's tendency to hew more closely to the company's strategy in developed Western markets, according to sources with knowledge of the matter. Wong rejected ideas such as a lower-price spinoff chain before Covid-19, as well as more localised campaigns during the pandemic, the sources said, citing a belief that they conflicted with Starbucks' brand. New initiatives have been launched rapidly since new CEO Molly Liu took over in late 2024. These included a cheaper line of tea-based drinks and sugar-free options, and tie-ups with the movie Zootopia and Taiwanese rock band Mayday, all under the aegis of a new chief growth officer. Liu's understanding of the Chinese market enables different ideas to be discussed and approved more easily, the sources said. 'Starbucks' new product innovation and marketing campaigns this year show it's digging deeper to explore the demand of Chinese consumers,' said Roolee Lu, Shanghai-based director of consultancy Mintel Group. 'They want new products, they want emotional connection with brands, they need some comprehensive, immersive experiences.' There are signs of a turnaround. Based on conversations with three store managers in Shanghai, drinks cobranded with Mayday drove their May sales by as much as 20 per cent in their stores. Overall, the most recent quarter showed sales returning to growth since late 2023 in China, with Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol attributing the success in an earnings call last month to 'beverage innovation' and changes to 'non-coffee pricing'. Yet the lack of a clear strategy endures, especially around its stores, which, depending on who you ask, are either a vaunted part of brand identity or an expensive cost overhang. The Chinese management team is now experimenting with different ways to bring people in. These include making more stores pet-friendly, providing free-to-use study rooms and targeting store openings in heritage or scenic sites, such as a recent one in Yunnan's Yulong Snow Mountain. From the potential investors' perspective, it is not necessary to have large stores if Starbucks aims to capture the needs of busy professionals who are unlikely to linger, though some shops should maintain in-store experiences, said sources familiar with the proposals. Cutting the number of staff in stores is also an option, the sources said, as many local chains only have one employee, as orders are mostly taken online. Jessica Gleeson, a former Starbucks China executive who now runs her own retail consultancy in Shanghai, said the risk is that the new investor does not understand Starbucks' positioning in China and turns it into just another 'transactional' coffee chain. 'The low-end of the market is already crowded,' she said. Whichever direction Starbucks China takes, one thing is clear: It will regain past glory only if consumers like Jelly Li can be persuaded to become regular customers again. The 32-year-old musician from Guangzhou was recently at a Starbucks in Shanghai with a view of the Oriental Pearl Tower. She was unimpressed by the orange-flavoured ice-shaken espresso she ordered, noting: 'Starbucks taught me how to enjoy coffee when I was in college. Now I need coffee every day, but no longer pay for Starbucks.' BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Starbucks struggles to find a new identity in cutthroat China
Baristas work to make drinks in Starbucks Reserve Roastery, the largest Starbucks shop in the world, in Shanghai, on Feb 28. BEIJING - When a group of private equity investors and Chinese technology companies were asked for ideas on how they would revive Starbucks' fortunes in the world's second-largest economy, the most common advice was: Be a lot more like the local competition that beat you. Starbucks, they argued, should have smaller stores, employ fewer people and cut prices, according to sources familiar with the sale of a stake in Starbucks' China business that reportedly kicked off in May. These proposals resemble the very model that enabled Luckin Coffee to overtake Starbucks as China's biggest coffee chain two years ago by selling coffee at one third of its price. Most of the prospective investors want a controlling stake of Starbucks' Chinese business. And while US company has said it'll only partner with an investor aligned with its vision, the process has put its local Chinese management team on tenterhooks, worried that a brand they've spent decades building will become just another low-price, trend-following chain, said people familiar with the matter. The stake sale exercise is underscoring Starbucks' identity crisis in China as it tries to salvage a flagging legacy business amid fierce domestic competition – a problem that has afflicted other foreign brands as China's economy undergoes major shifts. What Starbucks chooses to do in China will decide whether it ends up successful like McDonalds, or faltering like Apple. Starbucks is 'in a tough position,' said Mark Tanner, managing director of consultancy China Skinny in Shanghai. 'Many cost-conscious consumers are opting for cheaper alternatives, but trying to compete on price will be a race to the bottom, destroying any margins they currently hold.' Starbucks brought the cafe experience to China in the 1990s, and as China's economic growth soared, its footprint expanded in tandem to bring its total number of stores there to over 7,800. In recent years, however, Western brands have been losing ground to local names amid rising nationalism and reluctance to pay premiums for brands. The very few American brands that still thrive in China's great consumer pullback made successful adaptations to their business. Yum China Holdings' KFC incorporated street food and local delicacies to its menu and offers cost-conscious consumers meal deals all year long. Walmart's Sam's Club taps into the middle class's craving for exclusivity and growing health consciousness with high-quality private label snacks and premium meat cuts. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia India, Singapore ministers discuss deeper tie-ups in digitalisation, skills, industrial parks Business More seniors remain employed after retirement and re-employment ages raised in 2022: MOM study Singapore askST: Public bidding possible if assets seized in $3b money laundering case are sold at auction Singapore 2 dead after fire in Jalan Bukit Merah flat, about 60 evacuated Sport PSG beat Tottenham on penalties to win Uefa Super Cup Singapore TB screenings at two pre-schools after staff member diagnosed in July Business Haidilao to close Clarke Quay outlet on Aug 31; exit follows 3 earlier outlet closures Opinion How to train a drone warrior, with lessons from Ukraine Starbucks seems stuck in between those models. While its 'third place' store format is expensive to upkeep, customers have become less willing to pay higher prices for its drinks since the Covid pandemic and ongoing economic downturn. Compounding the problem was previous China chief executive officer Belinda Wong's tendency to hew more closely to the company's strategy in developed Western markets, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Ms Wong rejected ideas like a lower-price spinoff chain before Covid, as well as more localised campaigns during the pandemic, the people said, citing a belief that they conflicted with Starbucks' brand. New initiatives have been launched rapidly since new CEO Molly Liu took over in late 2024. These included a cheaper line of tea-based drinks and sugar-free options, and tie-ups with the move Zootopia and Taiwanese rock band Mayday. 'Starbucks' new product innovation and marketing campaigns this year show it's digging deeper to explore the demand of Chinese consumers,' said Roolee Lu, Shanghai-based director of consultancy Mintel Group. 'They want new products, they want emotional connection with brands, they need some comprehensive, immersive experiences.' There are signs of a turnaround. Based on conversations with three store managers in Shanghai, drinks cobranded with Mayday drove their May sales by as much as 20 per cent in their stores. Overall, the most recent quarter showed sales returning to growth since late 2023 in China, with Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol attributing the success in an earnings call last month to 'beverage innovation' and changes to 'non-coffee pricing.' Yet the lack of a clear strategy endures, especially around its stores which, depending on who you ask, are either a vaunted part of brand identity or an expensive cost overhang. The Chinese management team is now experimenting with different ways to bring people in. These include making more stores pet-friendly, providing free-to-use study rooms and targeting store openings in heritage or scenic sites, such as a recent one in Yunnan's Yulong Snow Mountain. From the potential investors' perspective, it isn't necessary to have large stores if Starbucks aims to capture the needs of busy professionals who are unlikely to linger, though some shops should maintain in-store experiences, said people familiar with the proposals. Cutting the number of staff in stores is also an option, the people said, as many local chains only have one employee as orders are mostly taken online. Jessica Gleeson, a former Starbucks China executive who now runs her own retail consultancy in Shanghai, said the risk is that the new investor doesn't understand Starbucks' positioning in China and turns it into just another 'transactional' coffee chain. 'The low-end of the market is already crowded,' she said. Whichever direction Starbucks China takes, one thing is clear: It'll regain past glory only if consumers like Jelly Li can be persuaded to become regular customers again. The 32-year-old musician from Guangzhou was recently at a Starbucks in Shanghai with a view of the Oriental Pearl Tower. She was unimpressed by the orange-flavored ice-shaken espresso she ordered, noting: 'Starbucks taught me how to enjoy coffee when I was in college. Now I need coffee everyday but no longer pay for Starbucks.' BLOOMBERG
