Plan to make it easier for councils to seize land for housing
Councils are to be given greater powers to seize land, under government plans to boost housebuilding. The measure is part of the flagship Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which is being introduced in Parliament later and aims to speed up building. Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook said he wanted greater use of compulsory purchase orders (CPOs), which allow public authorities to acquire land without the consent of the owner. Currently, councils buying sites through CPOs must factor in the "hope value" - the potential value if planning permission for development is secured - and this is set to be axed to allow land to be bought at a lower price.
However, rural campaign groups raised concerns farmers could be forced to sell at knock-down prices and that green spaces could be lost. Paul Miner, head of planning and policy at CPRE, the countryside charity, said the group supported the use of CPOs to build genuinely affordable homes on previously developed land.But he added: "Compulsory purchase shouldn't be used to enable the development of valued countryside and local green spaces."
Responding to such fears, Pennycook told BBC Radio 4's Today programme he was "somewhat mystified" by this interpretation, saying CPOs would be used "far more often" for regenerating brownfield - or previously developed - land."We think it's right these powers are more widely used and it will be for local authorities to make the decisions about what land is appropriate for those powers to be used on," he added. A requirement for the secretary of state to sign off on CPOs will be removed "in certain instances", he said, adding that the legislation would be "transformative" in unlocking construction for new homes, roads, rail and renewable energy projects. The bill also aims streamline the planning process, with more decisions made directly by officers rather than councillors.However, councils have raised concerns this could mean they will be shut out of the democratic planning process. Richard Clewer, housing and planning spokesperson at the Country Councils Network, said he welcomed changes to CPOs as a "useful tool".However, he said changes to the planning process could "dilute and bypass the role of councillors", particularly with rural developments where a few new homes could make a significant impact. Defending the plans, Pennycook said "expert planning officers" would support elected councillors with technical detail and allow councillors to focus on larger, more controversial applications.The government has promised to build 1.5 million new homes in England over the next five years, with the pledge key to boosting economic growth. However, the number of new homes continued to fall during the first six months that Labour was in power, with the construction industry warning the country does not have enough workers to deliver on the target. Pennycook said the inheritance from the previous Conservative government was "dire" but there were "very positive signs" and "green shoots coming forward" in the number of planning applications being submitted.
Other measures in the bill include:Up to £2,500 off energy bills for people living within 500m of new pylonsStreamlining the process for approving key projects like wind farms, roads or railways and banning multiple "meritless" legal challenges.Allowing "ready-to-go" energy projects to jump to the front of the queue for grid connections, replacing the current "first come, first served process" which the government says has clogged up the systemDeputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said the plans would be "backing the builders" and "taking on the blockers" to create "the biggest building boom in a generation".
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
37 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Nicola Sturgeon and Irvine Welsh join Edinburgh Book Festival line-up
The former first minister is preparing to launch a mammoth promotional tour ahead of the publication of her long-awaited political memoir. Nicola Sturgeon and Irvine Welsh are among the big names appearing at this year's Edinburgh International Book Festival, organisers have announced. The ex-SNP leader will appear at the event's venue in Chartlotte Square in August - just yards from Bute House, her official residence when she spent almost a decade as first minister. Sturgeon is preparing to launch a mammoth promotional tour ahead of the publication of Frankly, her long-awaited political memoir. The former first minister has said she "poured my heart" into writing the book, which hits the shops on August 14. Sturgeon, who will stand down as an MSP next year, is being paid a six-figure sum for the book deal. The Scottish Parliament's register of interests showed that she will earn £300,000. It comes after Scotland's top civil servant was this week accused of fawning over Sturgeon after wishing her success with her £300,000 memoirs. Permanent Secretary Joe Griffin cheered on the former First Minister after clearing the 464-page book, titled 'Frankly', for publication. In a letter telling her no changes were required for national security reasons, he gushed: "I wish you well with publication of the memoirs". Meanwhile, Trainspotting author Welsh will appear at the festival to promote his new book Men in Love, which continues the stories of classic characters like Sick Boy, Renton and Spud. It will follow the Edinburgh gang as they try to leave heroin behind and pursue romance in the late 1980s and early 1990s. 'I'm really, really excited about bringing these characters back', Welsh previously said. "It was that time at the end of punk and just before acid house, it was that quite fallow time of Thatcherism,' when the 'end of history' thesis was popular, said Welsh. 'Of course, that's really been shown to be nonsense.' Book festival bosses said the theme of this year's event is "repair". Festival director Jenny Niven said: 'This year's key theme of Repair starts from the belief that the brilliant ideas of writers and thinkers can help us repair a host of seemingly 'broken' things in our society, from the cycle of fast fashion and our relationship with the environment, to cultural reparations and the state of our politics. 'It's a statement of hope and resilience, and an invitation for our audiences to think about what 'repair' might mean for them. 'At a time when important conversations can feel impossible to have without igniting conflict and anger, we want the Edinburgh International Book Festival to provide a safe place for challenging but considered discussions. 'This year our programme features over 600 writers and artists from 35 countries, who have a wide range of perspectives on topics of personal, social and global importance. 'We invite you to come and learn something new, feed your curiosity and to broaden your horizons.' John Swinney previously quipped he had no plans to write his own tell-all book as he was focused on his job running the Scottish Government. The First Minister was asked if he planned to read the memoir written by one of his closest SNP colleagues. "I've not got a copy of it as it's not been published yet - but I'm sure it will be a good read," he told reporters. Asked if he had ever heard Nicola Sturgeon talk 'Frankly' - as per the title of her memoir - Swinney said: "I'm sure I have... maybe on the odd occasion". Swinney added: "Just for absolute clarity - I have no immediate plans to write my memoirs, as I intend to be in office for a long time to come."
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Pro-choice group opposes Stella Creasy's abortion amendment
Rachel Clarke, head of advocacy at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said the NC20 amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill does not have the backing of abortion providers. The amendment would remove criminal penalties for abortion in England and Wales, effectively decriminalising the procedure in all circumstances. 'We are not supporting NC20, and neither are any of the abortion providers in the country,' Ms Clarke told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday. She said a separate proposal, NC1, has the support of more than 50 pro-choice organisations – unlike Creasy's. 'Abortion law is incredibly complex. It governs 250,000 women's healthcare every single year,' she said. 'Because of that, it is essential that any huge change to abortion law is properly considered. 'That means involvement with providers, medical bodies, regulators – and proper debate time in Parliament.' She warned that MPs are being asked to back a 'generational change' after just three hours of debate next week. 'For us, unfortunately, although we truly believe that we need overwhelming and generational change for abortion law, Stella Creasy's amendment is not the right way to do it,' she said. The amendment has also been heavily criticised by anti-abortion campaigners, who say it would amount to the most extreme liberalisation of the law since the 1967 Abortion Act. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said NC20 could allow abortions on the basis of a baby's sex and would remove protections that allow abusers who harm unborn children to be prosecuted. SPUC said the amendment, along with another tabled by MP Tonia Antoniazzi, represents 'the greatest threat to unborn children and their mothers since the Abortion Act'. They urged supporters to lobby their MPs to vote against both proposals, warning that abortion 'up to birth' could become possible under the changes. Votes on the amendments are due to take place on June 17 and 18 during the report stage of the Criminal Justice Bill. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence. However a petition has gathered more than 103,653 signatures urging the Government at Westminster to 'remove abortion from criminal law so that no pregnant person can be criminalised for procuring their own abortion'. It is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. During a recent Westminster debate, Labour MP Tony Vaughan said it is time to 'abandon these outdated practices' of prosecuting women. He said: 'I believe that our laws cannot be fixed relics of the past but must reflect social attitudes and societal norms.' He insisted 'decriminalisation does not mean deregulation' and that he has not seen evidence 'to suggest that removing the criminal law deterrent would then motivate swathes of women to have abortions after 24 weeks'.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Pro-choice group opposes Stella Creasy's abortion amendment
Rachel Clarke, head of advocacy at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said the NC20 amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill does not have the backing of abortion providers. The amendment would remove criminal penalties for abortion in England and Wales, effectively decriminalising the procedure in all circumstances. 'We are not supporting NC20, and neither are any of the abortion providers in the country,' Ms Clarke told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday. She said a separate proposal, NC1, has the support of more than 50 pro-choice organisations – unlike Creasy's. 'Abortion law is incredibly complex. It governs 250,000 women's healthcare every single year,' she said. 'Because of that, it is essential that any huge change to abortion law is properly considered. 'That means involvement with providers, medical bodies, regulators – and proper debate time in Parliament.' She warned that MPs are being asked to back a 'generational change' after just three hours of debate next week. 'For us, unfortunately, although we truly believe that we need overwhelming and generational change for abortion law, Stella Creasy's amendment is not the right way to do it,' she said. The amendment has also been heavily criticised by anti-abortion campaigners, who say it would amount to the most extreme liberalisation of the law since the 1967 Abortion Act. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said NC20 could allow abortions on the basis of a baby's sex and would remove protections that allow abusers who harm unborn children to be prosecuted. SPUC said the amendment, along with another tabled by MP Tonia Antoniazzi, represents 'the greatest threat to unborn children and their mothers since the Abortion Act'. They urged supporters to lobby their MPs to vote against both proposals, warning that abortion 'up to birth' could become possible under the changes. Votes on the amendments are due to take place on June 17 and 18 during the report stage of the Criminal Justice Bill. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence. However a petition has gathered more than 103,653 signatures urging the Government at Westminster to 'remove abortion from criminal law so that no pregnant person can be criminalised for procuring their own abortion'. It is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. During a recent Westminster debate, Labour MP Tony Vaughan said it is time to 'abandon these outdated practices' of prosecuting women. He said: 'I believe that our laws cannot be fixed relics of the past but must reflect social attitudes and societal norms.' He insisted 'decriminalisation does not mean deregulation' and that he has not seen evidence 'to suggest that removing the criminal law deterrent would then motivate swathes of women to have abortions after 24 weeks'.
