Plan to make it easier for councils to seize land for housing
Councils are to be given greater powers to seize land, under government plans to boost housebuilding. The measure is part of the flagship Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which is being introduced in Parliament later and aims to speed up building. Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook said he wanted greater use of compulsory purchase orders (CPOs), which allow public authorities to acquire land without the consent of the owner. Currently, councils buying sites through CPOs must factor in the "hope value" - the potential value if planning permission for development is secured - and this is set to be axed to allow land to be bought at a lower price.
However, rural campaign groups raised concerns farmers could be forced to sell at knock-down prices and that green spaces could be lost. Paul Miner, head of planning and policy at CPRE, the countryside charity, said the group supported the use of CPOs to build genuinely affordable homes on previously developed land.But he added: "Compulsory purchase shouldn't be used to enable the development of valued countryside and local green spaces."
Responding to such fears, Pennycook told BBC Radio 4's Today programme he was "somewhat mystified" by this interpretation, saying CPOs would be used "far more often" for regenerating brownfield - or previously developed - land."We think it's right these powers are more widely used and it will be for local authorities to make the decisions about what land is appropriate for those powers to be used on," he added. A requirement for the secretary of state to sign off on CPOs will be removed "in certain instances", he said, adding that the legislation would be "transformative" in unlocking construction for new homes, roads, rail and renewable energy projects. The bill also aims streamline the planning process, with more decisions made directly by officers rather than councillors.However, councils have raised concerns this could mean they will be shut out of the democratic planning process. Richard Clewer, housing and planning spokesperson at the Country Councils Network, said he welcomed changes to CPOs as a "useful tool".However, he said changes to the planning process could "dilute and bypass the role of councillors", particularly with rural developments where a few new homes could make a significant impact. Defending the plans, Pennycook said "expert planning officers" would support elected councillors with technical detail and allow councillors to focus on larger, more controversial applications.The government has promised to build 1.5 million new homes in England over the next five years, with the pledge key to boosting economic growth. However, the number of new homes continued to fall during the first six months that Labour was in power, with the construction industry warning the country does not have enough workers to deliver on the target. Pennycook said the inheritance from the previous Conservative government was "dire" but there were "very positive signs" and "green shoots coming forward" in the number of planning applications being submitted.
Other measures in the bill include:Up to £2,500 off energy bills for people living within 500m of new pylonsStreamlining the process for approving key projects like wind farms, roads or railways and banning multiple "meritless" legal challenges.Allowing "ready-to-go" energy projects to jump to the front of the queue for grid connections, replacing the current "first come, first served process" which the government says has clogged up the systemDeputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said the plans would be "backing the builders" and "taking on the blockers" to create "the biggest building boom in a generation".
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
9 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Pro-choice group opposes Stella Creasy's abortion amendment
Rachel Clarke, head of advocacy at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said the NC20 amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill does not have the backing of abortion providers. The amendment would remove criminal penalties for abortion in England and Wales, effectively decriminalising the procedure in all circumstances. 'We are not supporting NC20, and neither are any of the abortion providers in the country,' Ms Clarke told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday. She said a separate proposal, NC1, has the support of more than 50 pro-choice organisations – unlike Creasy's. 'Abortion law is incredibly complex. It governs 250,000 women's healthcare every single year,' she said. 'Because of that, it is essential that any huge change to abortion law is properly considered. 'That means involvement with providers, medical bodies, regulators – and proper debate time in Parliament.' She warned that MPs are being asked to back a 'generational change' after just three hours of debate next week. 'For us, unfortunately, although we truly believe that we need overwhelming and generational change for abortion law, Stella Creasy's amendment is not the right way to do it,' she said. The amendment has also been heavily criticised by anti-abortion campaigners, who say it would amount to the most extreme liberalisation of the law since the 1967 Abortion Act. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said NC20 could allow abortions on the basis of a baby's sex and would remove protections that allow abusers who harm unborn children to be prosecuted. SPUC said the amendment, along with another tabled by MP Tonia Antoniazzi, represents 'the greatest threat to unborn children and their mothers since the Abortion Act'. They urged supporters to lobby their MPs to vote against both proposals, warning that abortion 'up to birth' could become possible under the changes. Votes on the amendments are due to take place on June 17 and 18 during the report stage of the Criminal Justice Bill. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence. However a petition has gathered more than 103,653 signatures urging the Government at Westminster to 'remove abortion from criminal law so that no pregnant person can be criminalised for procuring their own abortion'. It is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. During a recent Westminster debate, Labour MP Tony Vaughan said it is time to 'abandon these outdated practices' of prosecuting women. He said: 'I believe that our laws cannot be fixed relics of the past but must reflect social attitudes and societal norms.' He insisted 'decriminalisation does not mean deregulation' and that he has not seen evidence 'to suggest that removing the criminal law deterrent would then motivate swathes of women to have abortions after 24 weeks'.
South Wales Guardian
40 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Pro-choice group opposes Stella Creasy's abortion amendment
Rachel Clarke, head of advocacy at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said the NC20 amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill does not have the backing of abortion providers. The amendment would remove criminal penalties for abortion in England and Wales, effectively decriminalising the procedure in all circumstances. 'We are not supporting NC20, and neither are any of the abortion providers in the country,' Ms Clarke told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday. She said a separate proposal, NC1, has the support of more than 50 pro-choice organisations – unlike Creasy's. 'Abortion law is incredibly complex. It governs 250,000 women's healthcare every single year,' she said. 'Because of that, it is essential that any huge change to abortion law is properly considered. 'That means involvement with providers, medical bodies, regulators – and proper debate time in Parliament.' She warned that MPs are being asked to back a 'generational change' after just three hours of debate next week. 'For us, unfortunately, although we truly believe that we need overwhelming and generational change for abortion law, Stella Creasy's amendment is not the right way to do it,' she said. The amendment has also been heavily criticised by anti-abortion campaigners, who say it would amount to the most extreme liberalisation of the law since the 1967 Abortion Act. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said NC20 could allow abortions on the basis of a baby's sex and would remove protections that allow abusers who harm unborn children to be prosecuted. SPUC said the amendment, along with another tabled by MP Tonia Antoniazzi, represents 'the greatest threat to unborn children and their mothers since the Abortion Act'. They urged supporters to lobby their MPs to vote against both proposals, warning that abortion 'up to birth' could become possible under the changes. Votes on the amendments are due to take place on June 17 and 18 during the report stage of the Criminal Justice Bill. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence. However a petition has gathered more than 103,653 signatures urging the Government at Westminster to 'remove abortion from criminal law so that no pregnant person can be criminalised for procuring their own abortion'. It is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. During a recent Westminster debate, Labour MP Tony Vaughan said it is time to 'abandon these outdated practices' of prosecuting women. He said: 'I believe that our laws cannot be fixed relics of the past but must reflect social attitudes and societal norms.' He insisted 'decriminalisation does not mean deregulation' and that he has not seen evidence 'to suggest that removing the criminal law deterrent would then motivate swathes of women to have abortions after 24 weeks'.
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Pro-choice group opposes Stella Creasy's abortion amendment
A leading pro-choice group has come out against Labour MP Stella Creasy's plan to overhaul abortion laws, warning the move is being rushed through without enough scrutiny. Rachel Clarke, head of advocacy at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said the NC20 amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill does not have the backing of abortion providers. The amendment would remove criminal penalties for abortion in England and Wales, effectively decriminalising the procedure in all circumstances. 'We are not supporting NC20, and neither are any of the abortion providers in the country,' Ms Clarke told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday. She said a separate proposal, NC1, has the support of more than 50 pro-choice organisations – unlike Creasy's. 'Abortion law is incredibly complex. It governs 250,000 women's healthcare every single year,' she said. 'Because of that, it is essential that any huge change to abortion law is properly considered. 'That means involvement with providers, medical bodies, regulators – and proper debate time in Parliament.' She warned that MPs are being asked to back a 'generational change' after just three hours of debate next week. 'For us, unfortunately, although we truly believe that we need overwhelming and generational change for abortion law, Stella Creasy's amendment is not the right way to do it,' she said. The amendment has also been heavily criticised by anti-abortion campaigners, who say it would amount to the most extreme liberalisation of the law since the 1967 Abortion Act. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said NC20 could allow abortions on the basis of a baby's sex and would remove protections that allow abusers who harm unborn children to be prosecuted. SPUC said the amendment, along with another tabled by MP Tonia Antoniazzi, represents 'the greatest threat to unborn children and their mothers since the Abortion Act'. They urged supporters to lobby their MPs to vote against both proposals, warning that abortion 'up to birth' could become possible under the changes. Votes on the amendments are due to take place on June 17 and 18 during the report stage of the Criminal Justice Bill. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence. However a petition has gathered more than 103,653 signatures urging the Government at Westminster to 'remove abortion from criminal law so that no pregnant person can be criminalised for procuring their own abortion'. It is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. During a recent Westminster debate, Labour MP Tony Vaughan said it is time to 'abandon these outdated practices' of prosecuting women. He said: 'I believe that our laws cannot be fixed relics of the past but must reflect social attitudes and societal norms.' He insisted 'decriminalisation does not mean deregulation' and that he has not seen evidence 'to suggest that removing the criminal law deterrent would then motivate swathes of women to have abortions after 24 weeks'.
