logo
Scientists raise red flags after US lake sets shocking world record: 'We are worried'

Scientists raise red flags after US lake sets shocking world record: 'We are worried'

Yahoo08-07-2025
Late in 2024, scientists announced they had discovered world-record levels of toxic "forever chemicals" in a New Mexico lake. Their newest study confirmed the results and analyzed the factors that contributed to this contamination.
The research expanded on the first study to examine PFAS contamination in the waters of Holloman Lake along with soils, plants, algae, fish, reptiles, and various species of birds and mammals, according to a summary from the University of New Mexico published by Phys.org.
All the samples had very high PFAS concentrations, up to or exceeding 10,000 times what the Environmental Protection Agency recommends in its drinking water standards.
Lake waters showed the highest concentration of PFAS anywhere in the world to date, as did one plant composite sample. The team also discovered the highest PFAS concentration recorded in a bird to date.
The scientists found that the contamination extends beyond the lake itself, and they linked this to past flooding events. For instance, the most contaminated soil sample was located downstream from the lake.
In the past, water from the lake sometimes flowed past a dam and into a network of playas — "shallow, generally circular, depressions with clay-lined basins" that "form at the lowest point in an enclosed watershed" and often serve as temporary lakes, according to the university.
The scientists don't know how contaminated the playas in the area might be but stated that they can serve as important habitats for migratory birds.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances have been linked to a number of health concerns, including decreased fertility, increased risk of cancer, and reduced ability of the body's immune system to fight infections.
The scientists are worried that migratory birds will become heavily contaminated at Holloman Lake and then move on to other areas, putting hunters and people elsewhere at risk.
They also recorded a herd of oryx — a nonnative African big-game species that was released in the region from 1969 and 1977 — visiting the lake to drink and are worried that hunters could ingest contaminated meat.
Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home?
Majorly
Sometimes
Not really
I don't know enough about them
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
The Santa Fe New Mexican added that consuming just one bite of meat from a Holloman Lake duck would expose someone to more PFAS than is recommended for a lifetime.
"We are worried about the possibility of toxicity on reproduction and development in local birds, some of them sensitive species like the snowy plover," study lead author Jean-Luc Cartron said. "Contamination by PFAS could also be transgenerational, with contamination affecting not just animals living at or visiting Holloman Lake but also future generations."
Though Holloman is the most PFAS-laden lake discovered so far, there are a number of other large water bodies contaminated with these chemicals. For instance, one study found forever chemicals all over the Great Lakes Basin, including in air, rain, and water.
In January, the New Mexico Department of Health issued an advisory for anyone who has eaten or captured wildlife from Holloman Lake in the past decade, urging them to speak to their medical provider. Hunting has been prohibited there since 2024.
And though PFAS are known for being difficult to remove from the environment, scientists have made breakthroughs, which could help safeguard people and wildlife in the future.
For instance, researchers at the University of Illinois found a way to remove the full spectrum of PFAS from water in a single process, and a team at the University of Rochester is doing similar work.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Short, Brisk Walks Could Help You Live Longer Than Long, Slow Strolls
Short, Brisk Walks Could Help You Live Longer Than Long, Slow Strolls

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Short, Brisk Walks Could Help You Live Longer Than Long, Slow Strolls

The speed of your steps could make a significant difference in adding years to your life, according to a new study. Researchers led by a team from Vanderbilt University in the US analyzed the physical activity of 79,856 adults in 12 US states, comparing links between time spent walking slowly, time spent walking quickly, and eventual cause of death (where applicable) across an average follow-up period of almost 17 years. The data showed that those people who spent at least a quarter of an hour each day walking briskly were significantly less likely to die during the study period, especially from cardiovascular disease. What makes the findings particularly useful is they're based on a sample that includes people typically underrepresented in walking studies like this: the cohort was predominantly made up of low-income and Black individuals, who are often more likely to live in impoverished areas and less likely to have access to safe walking spaces. Related: "Our research has shown that fast walking as little as 15 minutes a day was associated with a nearly 20 percent reduction in total mortality, while a smaller reduction in mortality was found in association with more than three hours of daily slow walking," says epidemiologist Wei Zheng, from Vanderbilt University "This benefit remained strong even after accounting for other lifestyle factors and was consistent across various sensitivity analyses." The researchers categorized slow walking as walking the dog, or walking around at work. To qualify for the faster walking linked to the reduction in the risk of death, it had to be something like climbing stairs or walking briskly as part of an exercise routine. While the study isn't comprehensive enough to show direct cause and effect, the drop in mortality risk is significant enough to strongly suggest some kind of link, and the researchers think the benefits that aerobic exercise brings to heart health is key. Fast walking makes the heart work harder, improving cardiovascular health. Burning calories can also help people stick to a healthy weight. "While the health benefits of daily walking are well established, limited research has investigated the effects of factors such as walking pace on mortality, particularly in low-income and Black/African-American populations," says Zheng. One of the reasons that researchers are so keen to promote walking as a way of staying healthy is that it's just about the simplest exercise out there: most of us can do it, without any special equipment, and it's relatively easy to roll into a daily routine (try parking a little further away from work, for example). "Public health campaigns and community-based programs can emphasize the importance and availability of fast walking to improve health outcomes, providing resources and support to facilitate increased fast walking within all communities," says epidemiologist Lili Liu, from Vanderbilt University. The research has been published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine. Related News 5 Things You Ought to Know Before Buying Supplements There's One Simple Method to Reduce Alcohol Intake, Scientists Say, And It Works Untested Peptide Injections Are Being Sold as 'Next-Gen Biohacks' Solve the daily Crossword

Study Reveals How Many IVF Babies Have Been Born Worldwide
Study Reveals How Many IVF Babies Have Been Born Worldwide

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Study Reveals How Many IVF Babies Have Been Born Worldwide

More than 13 million people worldwide owe their lives to in vitro fertilization (IVF), according to the first estimates of their kind. Since the original 'test tube' baby was born in 1978, the number of children brought into the world by IVF technologies – collectively known as assisted reproductive technology (ART) – has exploded into the millions. Today, an ART-conceived baby is born every 35 seconds, and IVF, where an egg is fertilized by sperm in a test tube, is the most commonly used method. To figure out how many ART babies have been born since the technology's infancy, an international team of researchers compiled health data from 101 different nations. Related: As of 2018, the team estimates between 10 and 13 million babies have been born via ART, while preliminary data from 2018 to 2023 adds another 3 to 4 million children. "Every year we estimate how many babies were born in the previous 12 months – but we've never actually gone back and used a consistent methodology and extrapolation for missing data to estimate the total number of babies born in the world," says lead author Georgina Chambers, an epidemiologist from the University of New South Wales. The estimates are not perfect, but Chambers and her colleagues argue they are "a reasonable and sound approximation" based on the "most robust data available in the literature." The information comes from the International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART), of which Chambers is the data custodian. Back in the early 1980s, Australia became the first country in the world to establish an IVF registry. While many high-income nations have since followed suit, some countries, like Singapore,either lack formal registries that report to ICMART or the registries have been delayed for many years, as in China. Even when formal lists are kept, some regional clinics do not report to ICMART, as in the United States, India, and some African countries. To make up for these gaps in knowledge, researchers tallied the number of clinics within a nation, using that coverage rate to predict ART rates. They also accounted for miscarriage rates where only ART pregnancies were reported. Their findings reveal that in the 40 years since the dawn of ART, between 9.4 million and 12.4 million infants from 101 countries were born using reproductive technology, with an exponential increase starting around the turn of the century. Europe tops the charts with 3.6 to 4.5 million infants born via IVF, followed by Asia with 3 to 4 million IVF infants, and North America with 1.4 to 1.6 million IVF infants. In the last two decades, IVF technology has come a long way, providing cheaper, safer, and more successful routes to parenthood. The chances of IVF succeeding are far from guaranteed, but health data from the UK show that the average IVF pregnancy rate using frozen embryos has gone from 7 percent in the 1990s to 36 percent in 2021. No longer is it necessary to transfer several fertilized eggs to increase the odds of pregnancy. As a result, the number of IVF twins and triplets being born is on a steep downward trend. "Today, more than 93 percent of IVF cycles involve a single embryo transfer, resulting in a multiple birth rate of below 3 percent," says Chambers. "Most IVF babies in Australia now come from frozen embryos." "As more babies are born through IVF," Chambers adds, "we hope access to safe, high quality care will become more equitable – and based on human rights – across the world." The study was published in Fertility and Sterility. Related News Image on The Shroud of Turin May Not Belong to a Real Human Venting Doesn't Reduce Anger, But Something Else Does, Says Study Playing Video Games Has an Unexpected Effect on Kids' IQ, Study Discovers Solve the daily Crossword

Millions of Children Across 13 States Told To Limit Outdoor Activity
Millions of Children Across 13 States Told To Limit Outdoor Activity

Newsweek

timea day ago

  • Newsweek

Millions of Children Across 13 States Told To Limit Outdoor Activity

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Air quality alerts spanned at least 13 U.S. states on Tuesday, with sensitive groups urged to limit outdoor activity to avoid health risks. Why It Matters According to the Environmental Protection Agency, studies have linked particle pollution exposure to various health effects, including respiratory symptoms—such as coughing and wheezing, the development of asthma and increased susceptibility to respiratory infections. Authorities advise that during periods of poor air quality, sensitive groups—including children, older adults and those with certain preexisting conditions—should limit prolonged or heavy outdoor exertion. What To Know In collaboration with local agencies, the National Weather Service (NWS) published air quality alerts for the following states as of Tuesday morning: California Colorado Texas Minnesota Wisconsin Michigan Indiana Ohio Pennsylvania New York Connecticut Vermont New Hampshire Alerts spanned the entirety of Michigan and Wisconsin because of smoke from Canadian wildfires. "The main culprit remains Canadian wildfire smoke, originating from the Manitoba and Ontario Provinces. The second culprit is a stubborn high-pressure cell planted over the Midwest which is holding the smoke in place and compressing it close to the ground," said a notice from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, which the NWS published. "The weak clockwise winds will recirculate the worst of the smoke westward then northward, back into the western U.P., but the entire state will remain under hazy conditions during Tuesday," it continued. Northeast Minnesota and eastern Pennsylvania were also affected by wildfire smoke, according to alerts for the regions. Particle pollution—a product of wildfires—was also the cause of air quality alerts in Indiana, Vermont, New Hampshire and Colorado. Wildfire smoke from Canada will be on the increase over the next 24 hours. This is a model depiction of smoke in the atmosphere. Orange colors indicate thicker smoke, representing more hazy skies. #mewx #nhwx — NWS Gray (@NWSGray) August 2, 2025 In California, the South Coast Air Quality Management District issued a wildfire smoke advisory as multiple blazes burn in both central and Southern California. This included the 72,460-acre Gifford fire affecting parts of San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties, as well as the Rosa fire near the Santa Rosa Mountains and the Gold fire in the San Bernadino National Forest, north of Big Bear Lake. Here's a projection for the smoke from the #GiffordFire 🔥in San Luis Obispo/Santa Barbara Counties through tomorrow night. Smoke will generally move towards the south and east. — NWS Los Angeles (@NWSLosAngeles) August 4, 2025 Meanwhile, air quality alerts were in place in Texas and Ohio because of ozone pollution. In Ohio, this affected Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Portage and Summit Counties. In Texas, alerts applied to both the Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston-Galveston areas. What People Are Saying AccuWeather meteorologist Dan Pydynowski told Newsweek on Friday: "Smoke and haze creating poor air quality at times will likely continue to be an issue in [the Great Lakes, Upper Midwest and central U.S.] through the weekend and into early next week. "The smoke/haze will gradually spread south and east later this weekend into early next week as well, perhaps getting into parts of the Northeast U.S. and the central-southern Plains too." The National Weather Service account for Burlington, Vermont, wrote on X on Thursday: "Air Quality Alerts continue for New York and Vermont. Some cleaner air is mixing in from the north compared to recent days, but some smoke will remain with higher concentrations expected in southern portions of the region." What Happens Next The NWS regularly issued forecast updates on its website.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store