Study Reveals How Many IVF Babies Have Been Born Worldwide
Since the original 'test tube' baby was born in 1978, the number of children brought into the world by IVF technologies – collectively known as assisted reproductive technology (ART) – has exploded into the millions.
Today, an ART-conceived baby is born every 35 seconds, and IVF, where an egg is fertilized by sperm in a test tube, is the most commonly used method.
To figure out how many ART babies have been born since the technology's infancy, an international team of researchers compiled health data from 101 different nations.
Related:
As of 2018, the team estimates between 10 and 13 million babies have been born via ART, while preliminary data from 2018 to 2023 adds another 3 to 4 million children.
"Every year we estimate how many babies were born in the previous 12 months – but we've never actually gone back and used a consistent methodology and extrapolation for missing data to estimate the total number of babies born in the world," says lead author Georgina Chambers, an epidemiologist from the University of New South Wales.
The estimates are not perfect, but Chambers and her colleagues argue they are "a reasonable and sound approximation" based on the "most robust data available in the literature."
The information comes from the International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART), of which Chambers is the data custodian.
Back in the early 1980s, Australia became the first country in the world to establish an IVF registry. While many high-income nations have since followed suit, some countries, like Singapore,either lack formal registries that report to ICMART or the registries have been delayed for many years, as in China.
Even when formal lists are kept, some regional clinics do not report to ICMART, as in the United States, India, and some African countries.
To make up for these gaps in knowledge, researchers tallied the number of clinics within a nation, using that coverage rate to predict ART rates. They also accounted for miscarriage rates where only ART pregnancies were reported.
Their findings reveal that in the 40 years since the dawn of ART, between 9.4 million and 12.4 million infants from 101 countries were born using reproductive technology, with an exponential increase starting around the turn of the century.
Europe tops the charts with 3.6 to 4.5 million infants born via IVF, followed by Asia with 3 to 4 million IVF infants, and North America with 1.4 to 1.6 million IVF infants.
In the last two decades, IVF technology has come a long way, providing cheaper, safer, and more successful routes to parenthood.
The chances of IVF succeeding are far from guaranteed, but health data from the UK show that the average IVF pregnancy rate using frozen embryos has gone from 7 percent in the 1990s to 36 percent in 2021.
No longer is it necessary to transfer several fertilized eggs to increase the odds of pregnancy. As a result, the number of IVF twins and triplets being born is on a steep downward trend.
"Today, more than 93 percent of IVF cycles involve a single embryo transfer, resulting in a multiple birth rate of below 3 percent," says Chambers.
"Most IVF babies in Australia now come from frozen embryos."
"As more babies are born through IVF," Chambers adds, "we hope access to safe, high quality care will become more equitable – and based on human rights – across the world."
The study was published in Fertility and Sterility.
Related News
Image on The Shroud of Turin May Not Belong to a Real Human
Venting Doesn't Reduce Anger, But Something Else Does, Says Study
Playing Video Games Has an Unexpected Effect on Kids' IQ, Study Discovers
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
My scar makes beach outings an ordeal. How can I care less about it?
Hi Ugly, I've had a keloid scar in the middle of my chest since my teen years, when I had . (I'm now in my mid-forties.) It started off small, but is now about 5cm long, 1cm high and a few millimeters raised off my skin. It sometimes itches or feels tight and painful, but otherwise is just an unattractive inconvenience. Having said that, it's had a horrible and disproportionate impact on my confidence. Is there any way to reduce the redness or the size, or stop it from growing? Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, what mindset should I take to reduce its importance, so that going to the swimming pool or beach is less of an ordeal? – Scarred for Life Have you been to the beach or the pool, Scarred for Life? I'm not asking if you've seen a beach scene in a movie or a commercial that takes place poolside. Have you been to an actual beach or pool, populated by actual people? Maybe you've been too preoccupied with your scar to notice: almost everybody has a weird body! By 'weird', of course, I mean normal; the hyper-perfection of Hollywood is the real statistical anomaly. A sampling of features I scoped on my own recent beach outing: fat rolls, congenital moles and cellulite. Acne. Assne. Double chins, triple chins, chin hairs glistening in the sunlight. Sagging, wrinkling and/or jiggling skin. Pubic hair stubble. Top surgery scars, caesarean section scars and, yes, keloid scars. And I didn't have to look very hard. Keloids – thick, raised scars that have 'grown outside of the boundaries of the original wound', according Dr Michelle Henry, a board-certified dermatologist based in New York – affect an estimated 10% of the world's population. That's 800 million people, or more than double the US population. 'We see keloids more often in patients of African descent and Asian descent, but really, we see them in everyone,' Henry tells me. They are most likely to form on the chest or back, and indicate a sort of haywire healing response. When skin starts to repair a wound – a pimple, a scrape, a surgical incision – it sends collagen to the site to create scar tissue. 'There are different checks and balances to tell the body when to stop laying down collagen, but with keloids, that goes unchecked,' Henry explains. (I generally try to avoid glorifying youthfulness, but here's a fun fact to assuage some of your insecurity, Scarred: Henry says those prone to keloids may 'age better', cosmetically speaking, due to all that collagen.) These scars can feel itchy, tight and uncomfortable as they grow. Potential treatments include steroid injections, targeted radiation, cryotherapy and Botox to reduce size, as well as laser therapy to reduce redness. 'Sometimes we do excise them,' Henry adds, 'but that's a very careful process, because you can end up with a scar that's bigger than the original keloid.' You can consult a dermatologist to see if any of these options might work for you – but if you're looking for something more low-key to try at home, Henry says silicone gels or patches can help. Related: Tell us: share your experiences of traveling with friends That said, keloids don't require treatment. They're benign. They don't pose a threat to your physical health, especially on your chest; medical intervention might be recommended if the scar were, say, close to your eye and affecting your vision, or on the back of your knee and affecting your movement. It's your mental health that needs attention right now. My recommendation, besides deriving confidence from within – who you are, what you value and how you treat people? Recalibrate your concept of averageness. Averageness is 'the most important aspect' of one's understanding of beauty, said Dr Neelam Vashi, an associate professor of dermatology at Boston University's medical school, on the Apple News in Conversation podcast. It refers to how closely any given face or body matches that of the average person within their population. 'Our population could be me looking at 1,000 images,' Dr Vashi explained. 'What my brain does is looks at all of them, and then it makes a prototype [of beauty] in my head.' More from Jessica DeFino's :Thanks to the prevalence of filters, photo-editing technology and AI-generated imagery, people's prototypes now reference digitally altered inputs, said Vashi. This means scarred, middle-aged skin might not fit your brain's idea of attractiveness, or even normality. The good news: brains are malleable! Vashi cited a 2009 study in which researchers squished and stretched the faces of storybook characters and found that, after viewing altered images, children's sense of what was beautiful subtly shifted toward the distortions. So start with some amateur exposure therapy. Go to the beach! Go to the pool! Go to a communal spa or a nude spa (Korean spas, known as jjimjilbangs, are my personal happy place). Notice different bodies, faces, skin types, textures – not to compare, judge or objectify, but to observe. Take it to the virtual realm: follow influencers with keloid scars on Instagram or TikTok. Watch the latest seasons of The Ultimatum: Queer Love and Love Island UK; both feature bikini-clad contestants with visible keloids. This will all help adjust your internal prototype. You say your scar is 'unattractive'. I hope that working through this gets you closer to neutrality. You don't have to find your scar beautiful to be confident. Just realize that your body is like any other: bizarre and inconsistent and specific and alive, and worthy of a nice day at the beach. Callout
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Short, Brisk Walks Could Help You Live Longer Than Long, Slow Strolls
The speed of your steps could make a significant difference in adding years to your life, according to a new study. Researchers led by a team from Vanderbilt University in the US analyzed the physical activity of 79,856 adults in 12 US states, comparing links between time spent walking slowly, time spent walking quickly, and eventual cause of death (where applicable) across an average follow-up period of almost 17 years. The data showed that those people who spent at least a quarter of an hour each day walking briskly were significantly less likely to die during the study period, especially from cardiovascular disease. What makes the findings particularly useful is they're based on a sample that includes people typically underrepresented in walking studies like this: the cohort was predominantly made up of low-income and Black individuals, who are often more likely to live in impoverished areas and less likely to have access to safe walking spaces. Related: "Our research has shown that fast walking as little as 15 minutes a day was associated with a nearly 20 percent reduction in total mortality, while a smaller reduction in mortality was found in association with more than three hours of daily slow walking," says epidemiologist Wei Zheng, from Vanderbilt University "This benefit remained strong even after accounting for other lifestyle factors and was consistent across various sensitivity analyses." The researchers categorized slow walking as walking the dog, or walking around at work. To qualify for the faster walking linked to the reduction in the risk of death, it had to be something like climbing stairs or walking briskly as part of an exercise routine. While the study isn't comprehensive enough to show direct cause and effect, the drop in mortality risk is significant enough to strongly suggest some kind of link, and the researchers think the benefits that aerobic exercise brings to heart health is key. Fast walking makes the heart work harder, improving cardiovascular health. Burning calories can also help people stick to a healthy weight. "While the health benefits of daily walking are well established, limited research has investigated the effects of factors such as walking pace on mortality, particularly in low-income and Black/African-American populations," says Zheng. One of the reasons that researchers are so keen to promote walking as a way of staying healthy is that it's just about the simplest exercise out there: most of us can do it, without any special equipment, and it's relatively easy to roll into a daily routine (try parking a little further away from work, for example). "Public health campaigns and community-based programs can emphasize the importance and availability of fast walking to improve health outcomes, providing resources and support to facilitate increased fast walking within all communities," says epidemiologist Lili Liu, from Vanderbilt University. The research has been published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine. Related News 5 Things You Ought to Know Before Buying Supplements There's One Simple Method to Reduce Alcohol Intake, Scientists Say, And It Works Untested Peptide Injections Are Being Sold as 'Next-Gen Biohacks' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Study Reveals How Many IVF Babies Have Been Born Worldwide
More than 13 million people worldwide owe their lives to in vitro fertilization (IVF), according to the first estimates of their kind. Since the original 'test tube' baby was born in 1978, the number of children brought into the world by IVF technologies – collectively known as assisted reproductive technology (ART) – has exploded into the millions. Today, an ART-conceived baby is born every 35 seconds, and IVF, where an egg is fertilized by sperm in a test tube, is the most commonly used method. To figure out how many ART babies have been born since the technology's infancy, an international team of researchers compiled health data from 101 different nations. Related: As of 2018, the team estimates between 10 and 13 million babies have been born via ART, while preliminary data from 2018 to 2023 adds another 3 to 4 million children. "Every year we estimate how many babies were born in the previous 12 months – but we've never actually gone back and used a consistent methodology and extrapolation for missing data to estimate the total number of babies born in the world," says lead author Georgina Chambers, an epidemiologist from the University of New South Wales. The estimates are not perfect, but Chambers and her colleagues argue they are "a reasonable and sound approximation" based on the "most robust data available in the literature." The information comes from the International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART), of which Chambers is the data custodian. Back in the early 1980s, Australia became the first country in the world to establish an IVF registry. While many high-income nations have since followed suit, some countries, like Singapore,either lack formal registries that report to ICMART or the registries have been delayed for many years, as in China. Even when formal lists are kept, some regional clinics do not report to ICMART, as in the United States, India, and some African countries. To make up for these gaps in knowledge, researchers tallied the number of clinics within a nation, using that coverage rate to predict ART rates. They also accounted for miscarriage rates where only ART pregnancies were reported. Their findings reveal that in the 40 years since the dawn of ART, between 9.4 million and 12.4 million infants from 101 countries were born using reproductive technology, with an exponential increase starting around the turn of the century. Europe tops the charts with 3.6 to 4.5 million infants born via IVF, followed by Asia with 3 to 4 million IVF infants, and North America with 1.4 to 1.6 million IVF infants. In the last two decades, IVF technology has come a long way, providing cheaper, safer, and more successful routes to parenthood. The chances of IVF succeeding are far from guaranteed, but health data from the UK show that the average IVF pregnancy rate using frozen embryos has gone from 7 percent in the 1990s to 36 percent in 2021. No longer is it necessary to transfer several fertilized eggs to increase the odds of pregnancy. As a result, the number of IVF twins and triplets being born is on a steep downward trend. "Today, more than 93 percent of IVF cycles involve a single embryo transfer, resulting in a multiple birth rate of below 3 percent," says Chambers. "Most IVF babies in Australia now come from frozen embryos." "As more babies are born through IVF," Chambers adds, "we hope access to safe, high quality care will become more equitable – and based on human rights – across the world." The study was published in Fertility and Sterility. Related News Image on The Shroud of Turin May Not Belong to a Real Human Venting Doesn't Reduce Anger, But Something Else Does, Says Study Playing Video Games Has an Unexpected Effect on Kids' IQ, Study Discovers Solve the daily Crossword
