‘Datuk Seri' takes Thor for a ride in land deal
The 64-year-old victim, known only as Thor, met the suspect in April last year when the latter wanted to purchase his second-hand car that was advertised on an online selling platform.
Johor MCA Youth public services and complaints bureau chief Henry Mok, who highlighted the case, said the businessman and suspect met up at a restaurant to go over the details of the vehicle purchase.
'The suspect ended up driving off with the victim's car without making a payment. The Datuk Seri kept delaying the payment, citing that the car needed repairs.
'Later, the suspect apparently sent a runner to complete the vehicle ownership transfer at Thor's shop and still, no payment was made,' he said in an interview.
'The businessman was convinced that the payment would be made because the Datuk Seri claimed that he was well connected and knew members of the royal family as well as top politicians and government officials in the country,' he added.
Mok said the suspect also showed photographs of himself with various VIPs to gain the victim's trust.
'In April last year, the suspect apparently offered to help the victim acquire a plot of land for RM30,000 instead of the market value of RM100,000.
'The suspect claimed that he could use his connections to obtain the necessary approvals for the land, which would be used for a special project, and the victim believed him,' he said.
Mok said Thor handed RM26,000 in cash to the suspect on April 20 last year.
In four months, he said the businessman made more than 20 bank deposits, with the amount ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands of ringgit, into the suspect's personal and company accounts.
'The suspect claimed that the payments were for various reasons such as land application fees, tax processing fees and charges to clean up and level the plot of land allegedly purchased by the victim,' Mok said, adding that the total amount exceeded RM438,000.
'Along the way, the suspect purportedly impersonated a police officer to intimidate and force Thor to hand over his luxury multi-purpose vehicle.
'Thor only realised he had been cheated when there was no progress on the supposed land purchase and no official documents were provided,' Mok said.
He added that the last time Thor was in contact with the Datuk Seri was on May 5 this year.
Realising that he had been duped, the victim sought help from Mok and lodged a police report on Aug 8.
Mok reminded the public against trusting claims and promises made by individuals before committing to an agreement or investment.
When contacted, Johor Baru South OCPD Asst Comm Raub Selamat said the investigation is ongoing, but no arrests have been made so far.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
30 minutes ago
- The Star
Former Sabah minister Peter Anthony's appeal rejected in forgery case, remains in prison
PUTRAJAYA: Former Sabah minister Datuk Peter Anthony has failed at the Court of Appeal in his attempt to overturn his conviction and sentence in his forgery case. A three-judge panel, chaired by Justice Azman Abdullah, unanimously ruled that there was no merit in his application. Peter, 54, had filed the revision application to have another panel of the Court of Appeal revise a decision by an earlier panel from the same court that upheld his conviction and sentence. Justice Azman said the court did not find any miscarriage of justice regarding a police report lodged by the third prosecution witness, Mohd Shukor Mohd Din, now deceased, on Aug 9, 2018. "The absence of this issue in the broad grounds of judgment does not amount to failure of justice because it is clear that it had been fully commented on in the full judgment." "It is tough for us to assume that this issue was not considered just because it was not stated or commented on in the broad grounds by the earlier panel as it was the main issue that was submitted during the appeal," Justice Azman said here on Wednesday (Aug 20). He said it was not the duty of the Court of Appeal to re-hear questions that involve matters that have already been decided upon. "We find there is no breach of natural justice as the applicant was given the right to be heard." "We find no merit to this application. The application is dismissed," he said. Other judges on the panel were Justices Noorin Badaruddin and Hayatul Akmal Aziz. Peter was taken away by prison officers after the proceedings ended. He was represented by lawyers Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla and Datuk Rosal Azimin Ahmad. Deputy Public Prosecutors Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin and Haresh Prakash Somiah appeared for the prosecution. On March 14, Peter filed a notice of motion seeking a review and setting aside of his conviction and sentence handed down by the Court of Appeal on March 4. He also applied to quash the warrant of committal issued to Kajang Prison and sought any consequential orders necessary to ensure justice is served in the matter. On March 4, the Court of Appeal ordered Peter to serve a three-year prison sentence after dismissing his final appeal against the conviction and sentence imposed by the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court in May 2022. On April 18, 2023, the Kuala Lumpur High Court upheld the conviction and sentence imposed by the Sessions Court. Peter subsequently filed an appeal on April 19, 2023, seeking to set aside the said decision. He has since paid the RM50,000 fine imposed by the court. Peter was charged under Section 468 of the Penal Code, which carries a maximum penalty of seven years' imprisonment and a fine upon conviction. He was accused, in his capacity as managing director of Asli Jati Sdn Bhd, of falsifying a letter from Universiti Malaysia Sabah's office of the deputy vice-chancellor dated June 9, 2014, by inserting false statements with the intent to deceive. The offence was allegedly committed at the office of the principal private secretary to the Prime Minister, Perdana Putra Building, Putrajaya, between June 13 and Aug 21, 2014.
Sinar Daily
an hour ago
- Sinar Daily
Hilman Idham charged with making statement threatening public order
The Bersatu Armada chief, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge. 20 Aug 2025 01:03pm Gombak Setia assemblyman Muhammad Hilman Idham was charged at the Magistrate's Court today with making a statement on the social media platform TikTok late last month that allegedly caused public fear. - Photo by Bernama KUALA LUMPUR - Gombak Setia assemblyman Muhammad Hilman Idham was charged at the Magistrate's Court here today with making a statement on the social media platform TikTok late last month that allegedly caused public fear. The Bersatu Armada chief, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge read before Magistrate Amira Abd Aziz. "I claim trial," he said. Muhammad Hilman, 36, was accused of making the statement at 2.09 pm on July 30, and was read by a police officer from the Commercial Crime Investigation Department at Menara KPJ, here. Gombak Setia assemblyman Muhammad Hilman Idham was charged at the Magistrate's Court today with making a statement on the social media platform TikTok late last month that allegedly caused public fear. - Photo by Bernama A police officer from the Commercial Crime Investigation Department had come across the TikTok post at Menara KPJ here. The charge was framed under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code, which provides for a maximum of two years' imprisonment or a fine, or both, upon conviction. Deputy public prosecutor Datuk Badius Zaman Ahmad proposed bail at RM10,000, while lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, representing Muhammad Hilman, requested RM3,000 bail with one surety. "It is impossible for my client to abscond. He is well known throughout Selangor and Malaysia and has cooperated fully with the authorities," he submitted. The court fixed bail at RM4,000 with one surety and fixed Oct 9 for mention. - BERNAMA
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Ex-Sabah minister Peter Anthony fails in review bid, remains in jail
PUTRAJAYA: Former Sabah infrastructure minister Datuk Peter Anthony's last-ditch attempt to overturn his forgery conviction failed after the Court of Appeal (CoA) today upheld his three-year jail sentence and RM50,000 fine. Peter, 54, will remain in Kajang Prison as his legal battle has come to an end after a CoA review panel, led by Datuk Azman Abdullah, ruled that there was no merit in his application. His status as the Melalap assemblyman now hangs in limbo pending the official announcement by the Sabah legislative assembly on the vacancy of the seat. Peter had filed a revision application challenging an earlier panel's decision to uphold the conviction and sentence handed down by the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court in May 2022. A three-member CoA panel led by Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim had earlier ordered Peter to serve his sentence after dismissing his appeal against the Sessions Court ruling, which was upheld by the High Court in 2023. Azman, who sat with Datuk Noorin Badaruddin and Datuk Hayatul Akmal Aziz, said the court did not find any miscarriage of justice in the subject of contention — an Aug 9, 2018 police report lodged by the third prosecution witness, the late Mohd Shukor Mohd Din. Reading out the unanimous decision, Azman said the matter had been extensively submitted before the earlier CoA panel. "The absence of this issue in the broad grounds of judgment does not amount to a failure of justice, because it is clear that it had been fully commented on in the full judgment. "It is tough for us to assume that this issue was not considered just because it was not stated or commented on in the broad grounds by the earlier panel, as it was the main issue submitted during the appeal," he said. Azman said this was supported by the earlier panel's full grounds of judgment in which the matter was discussed in detail. "It is not the duty of this court to re-hear questions that involve the statements and facts that have already been decided. "We find there is no breach of natural justice as the applicant (Peter) was given the right to be heard. "We find no merit to this application. With this, the application is dismissed," he said. After the decision, Peter, dressed in a white shirt and black trousers, was brought out of the courtroom to be sent back to prison. During a short recess, he was seen speaking with family members and supporters in the public gallery. Lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla and Datuk Rosal Azimin Ahmad represented Peter, while the prosecution was led by deputy public prosecutors Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin and Haresh Prakash Somiah. Earlier, Haniff submitted that the absence of any mention of the fresh evidence - the police report - in the broad grounds meant the earlier panel had not considered it at all. "This is where we say there is a miscarriage of justice on the grounds that the applicant (Peter) was not given a right to be heard. "If the court agrees that there is a miscarriage of justice which warrants a review on the fresh evidence, then his conviction and sentence need to be annulled and there must be an order for a retrial at the Sessions Court," he said. In rebuttal, Wan Shaharuddin argued that Peter failed to meet the stipulated threshold, where limited and special circumstances must be shown, and that the application ought to be dismissed. He said the defence's complaint of a breach of natural justice was unfounded as the police report had been raised and addressed. "We put forth several exhibits, and dozens of paragraphs are about the police report. "The applicant was not stopped or barred from submitting about the police report.
