Bank of Korea governor says US trade deal removes 'huge burden'
"I thought we would be in a difficult situation if things went wrong with tariffs before the policy meeting, and while there might be different opinions, I think you did a difficult job at a difficult time," Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong said at his first meeting with Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol, according to a media pool report of his opening remarks.
Koo visited the U.S. last week, just a week after he took office, as head of South Korea's negotiation team and clinched a trade deal with U.S. President Donald Trump that set import tariffs on South Korean goods at 15%, on par with Japan and the European Union. Trump had earlier threatened a tariff of 25%.
Rhee did not elaborate when asked by local reporters what he meant by saying the agreement had removed a "huge burden".
At the meeting at the Bank of Korea, Rhee and Koo agreed to communicate closely on policy coordination as well as to cooperate on long-term structural reforms, Koo's ministry said in a statement.
The Bank of Korea kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 2.50% last month, but a majority of board members signalled another rate cut in the next three months and warned of "significant" economic uncertainty from the U.S. tariffs.
Later in July, the Bank of Korea said a trade deal similar to that of Japan's would be marginally worse than the central bank's base-case growth projection, after data showed Asia's fourth-largest economy grew in the second quarter at the fastest pace in more than a year.
The central bank next meets on August 28.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
13 minutes ago
- Metro
Interest rates fall even further - what does that mean for you?
Interest rates have fallen for a fifth consecutive time, after the Bank of England decided the economy is healthy enough to cut them to their lowest level in two-and-a-half years. The Bank's governor Andrew Bailey announced this afternoon its Monetary Policy Committee has decided on a reduction of a further 0.25 percent, bringing the figure to 4 percent. It marks another fall for the base rate after it peaked at 5.25 percent in autumn 2023 and stayed there until the following summer. In the dramatic few years that followed the Covid lockdowns, the Bank increased interest rates 14 times in an effort to control inflation, causing alarm for homeowners. Today's decision means repayments on many mortgages will fall – but it could also result in less welcome news for savers. If you've got a tracker mortgage, meaning one that's tied to the base rate decided by the Bank of England, your repayments will go down each month. You may see a reduction if you have a standard variable rate (SVR) mortgage, too. Even though these deals are decided by your lender, they often also move according to the base rate. However, you'll have no such luck if you opted for a fixed-rate mortgage, since you've agreed to pay the same amount for a certain amount of time. If you're looking to remortgage, there's a strong chance the new fixed rate will be higher than the one you were on originally, since the base rate is still close to its highest level for the past 15 years. Savers have had a decent time in the past few months, when inflation was low but interest rates remained high. That's because banks tend to look at the base rate when deciding their own savings rates, and lower inflation meant people could stash more money away with a higher return. But it's likely that those rates will as a result of today's reduction. So, now may be a good time to go hunting for some decent deals if you're looking for somewhere to place your savings. For much of summer 2024, the Bank of England interest rate was at 5.25 percent – its highest point since the beginning of the financial crisis in 2007. That only started to change last August, when a 0.25 percent reduction – the first cut in more than four years – was agreed. The rate fell another 0.25 percent in November, as the Bank became increasingly confident that inflation was under control, then again in February. At the next Monetary Policy Committee meeting in March, it was kept at 4.5 percent before a further 0.25 percent decrease was agreed in May. More Trending The rate was held steady again at the last meeting in June. Bailey said the Bank would be taking a 'gradual and careful approach to reducing rates further' for the rest of 2025. After today, the next meeting of the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee when the interest rate will be reviewed is September 18. However, no change is guaranteed as the members may decide the keep the rate at the same level. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Benefit's new foundation promises flawless skin — but does it live up to the hype? MORE: Maximalism is having a moment – and these are the statement home accessories we're loving MORE: Jonathan Edwards' triple jump world record still stands the test of time 30 years on
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Takeaways from AP's report on Alaska Natives' response to oil and mining proposals
President Donald Trump 's administration and its allies have pushed aggressively for drilling, mining and logging in Alaska. This has intensified long-standing debate over extraction projects in the nation's largest state, particularly within Alaska Native communities. Some view such projects as key to jobs and economic development. Others see them posing environmental risks as they've already faced severe fishing restrictions on the state's longest rivers due to a collapse in the salmon population. Scientists are unsure of the causes of the salmon collapse — which possibly include warming waters and commercial fishing — but opponents of extraction say its possible impacts could be similar in terms of endangering subsistence traditions and food sources. They say this risks, in turn, damaging their sacred connections to the land and to cultural traditions tied to fishing and hunting. How has the administration pushed for extraction projects? Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office in January seeking to 'maximize the development and production of the natural resources' in the state. Congress, in its recent budget bill, authorized an unprecedented four new sales of oil and gas leases in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in northeast Alaska. It also authorized more sales in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska in the northern part of the state. Extraction proposals take years to become reality, if ever. Previous lease sales have generated limited interest, and the extent of oil reserves in the Arctic refuge remains uncertain. Members of Trump's Cabinet visited Alaska in June. They called for doubling the amount of oil coursing through its vast pipeline system and building a massive natural gas pipeline as its 'big, beautiful twin.' The administration is also boosting the proposed Ambler Mining District Industrial Access Project, which would include construction of a 200-mile road in wilderness areas and open the way for more mines. Private corporations are pursuing projects, some in collaboration with Alaska Native corporations — which sometimes are in conflict with their Indigenous shareholders — and landowners. One is an oil exploration project in the Yukon Flats. Another is a proposed major gold mine in southwestern Alaska, which would require a massive dam to contain millions of tons of chemical and mineral waste. Project proponents say the dam will be safely built, incorporating the surrounding geology and state-of-the-art design. Trump's policy shifts came even as he removed one of the most prominent Alaska Native names from the official map. He returned the federal name of 'Mount McKinley' to the largest mountain in Alaska and North America. For all their disputes over extraction, Native and Alaska political leaders were largely united in wanting to keep its traditional Athabascan name of Denali, which translates to 'the high one.' What are the views of Alaska Natives favoring such projects? They say the projects can be done safely and bring much-needed jobs and economic development. They say this enables Native communities to fund services while retaining their subsistence hunting, fishing and other cultural traditions. 'We find that balance,' said PJ Simon, first chief of the Allakaket Tribal Council. 'We don't want handouts by the federal government. We want to stand on our own two feet.' Regional and local Native-run corporations, with the mandate of pursuing economic development for the benefit of Native shareholders, are actively involved in extraction proposals. In some cases, they own land and mineral rights in areas eyed for drilling or mining. What about Alaska Natives opposing such projects? They fear large-scale drilling and mining will overwhelm their ancient subsistence traditions. They say any short-term profits will precede a long-term legacy of environmental impacts to rivers, tundra and hunting grounds. 'Our people have been stewards of this land for millennia, and we've taken that relationship seriously because we have to sustain our resources,' said Gloria Simeon of Bethel, a small regional hub in southwestern Alaska, and a member of the environmental advocacy group Mother Kuskokwim Tribal Coalition. Already, tribes are struggling with severe fishing restrictions on their longest rivers, the Yukon and Kuskokwim, because of a collapse in salmon populations, which they have relied on for generations. The salmon collapse has been blamed on such factors as commercial overfishing and climate change. But many fear that extractive industries will create similar and permanent damage to caribou, salmon and other traditional food sources. 'We're already dealing with salmon problems,' said Chief Brian Ridley of the Tanana Chiefs Conference, a Fairbanks-based coalition of Athabascan tribes across Interior Alaska that oppose proposed drilling projects and the Ambler road project. 'The concern is if we start going down this path anywhere along the Yukon or any of the rivers and there's a spill, would that completely eliminate all the salmon stocks?' He said it's not just theoretical. A mine disaster in Canada last year caused a massive release of cyanide-laced debris, which caused fears that contamination might spread. Such a mining accident in the Yukon watershed could 'really take all the gains that we've gotten of trying to get the fish stocks back and really put us back to zero,' Ridley said. Why are subsistence hunting and fishing so important? Alaska Native people have relied for generations on hunting and fishing to survive the brutal winters — and in modern times, as a healthier alternative to expensive groceries. Fish camps and caribou hunts are closely interwoven with cultural traditions, where elders transmit skills and stories to younger generations. 'Protecting the river and the land and the Earth is part of the partnership and the relationship that we have as caregivers,' said Simeon. Who are Alaska Natives? Alaska Natives consist of diverse cultural and language groups in the state, among them the Aleut, Athabascan, Iñupiat, Tlingit and Yup'ik. They widely share a history in the region dating back thousands of years. They also share cultural and spiritual traditions, including those closely associated with subsistence hunting, and a belief in a sacred connection to the land, water and wildlife. Specific practices vary, and many follow both traditional and Christian practices. More than 1 in 5 Alaskans identify as Alaska Native or American Indian alone or in combination with another racial group, the highest ratio of any state, according to 2020 U.S. Census figures. The 1971 Alaska Claims Settlement Act, which resolved long-standing land claims with the federal government, resulted in establishment of regional and local for-profit corporations run by Native leaders for the benefit of Native shareholders. In some cases, such corporations are involved in extraction projects that tribal coalitions from the same area oppose. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
South Park targets Donald Trump once again
The latest South Park episode continues its satire of Donald Trump, his colleagues, and supporters. Titled Got a Nut, the episode features parodies of figures, including a miniature JD Vance, Kristi Noem, and Cartman imitating Charlie Kirk. The plot sees Mr Mackey join ICE due to financial struggles, leading to a scene where an animated Kristi Noem parodies her controversial dog-killing confession during an ICE orientation. The episode depicts Trump inviting Mackey to his Mar-a-Lago complex, where he is shown in bed with Satan, with the mini JD Vance offering assistance. This instalment follows a social media exchange where the Department of Homeland Security used a South Park image to promote ICE, prompting a sarcastic retort from the show's official account.
