logo
More than 25 percent of people say Chinese-Americans are a ‘threat' to the US, poll finds

More than 25 percent of people say Chinese-Americans are a ‘threat' to the US, poll finds

Yahoo02-05-2025
More than a quarter of Americans think Chinese-Americans are a threat to U.S. society, a new poll released Thursday revealed.
The Social Tracking of Asian Americans in the U.S., or STAATUS Index, found that 40 percent believe Asian Americans are more loyal to their countries of origin than the U.S.
This comes just five years after the Covid-19 pandemic, when the U.S. experienced a rise in anti-Asian hate crimes.
Twenty-seven percent said they were 'at least somewhat concerned' that 'Chinese Americans are a threat to U.S. society, especially around national security.'
Meanwhile, 63 percent of Asian Americans say they felt unsafe in at least one daily setting, according to the index, which was released on Thursday at the start of Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month. The same number of Asian Americans say that it's at least somewhat likely that they will be subjected to discrimination in the next half-decade based on their race, ethnicity, or religion. Thirty-three percent of white Americans believe they will be victims of discrimination within the next five years.
Conducted between January 22 and February 25, the survey included 4,909 respondents over the age of 16.
Forty percent of Asian Americans, compared to 71 percent of white Americans, completely agree that they belong in the U.S. They are also the least likely to believe they belong in online spaces, on social media, and where they live.
Roughly two-fifths of Americans back legislation banning foreign citizens from some countries, such as China, from buying land.
Forty-four percent of Americans strongly agree that the internment of 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War II was wrong.
The CEO of The Asian American Foundation, Norman Chen, a co-founder of the index, told Axios that 'One of the most alarming results over the past five years has been the doubling of this perception of Asian Americans as more loyal to their country of origin.'
'It questions the loyalty and patriotism of Asian Americans in this country,' he said, adding that the poll also found that most Americans still believe the myth of the 'model minority' — that Asian Americans are overachievers who are 'good at math.'
Following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the U.S. has seen rising antisemitism, anti-Arab American, and anti-Muslim incidents hit the headlines, removing focus from anti-Asian hate crimes, the outlet noted.
According to the poll, 42 percent of Americans can't name a famous Asian American, with Hong Kong actor Jackie Chan being named by 11 percent, Bruce Lee by six percent, Kamala Harris by four percent, and Lucy Liu by three percent.
However, the index also found that almost 80 percent of Americans back specific efforts to uplift Asian American communities and roughly 41 percent support legislation that Asian American history be taught in schools.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact-Checking Trump On Crime
Fact-Checking Trump On Crime

The Onion

time34 minutes ago

  • The Onion

Fact-Checking Trump On Crime

President Donald Trump has claimed that crime is 'out of control' in the nation's capital and beyond. The Onion assesses the veracity of the president's claims. Claim: D.C. has endured a record amount of robberies. Partially true: Some places in Georgetown sell a cup of coffee for $9. Claim: Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles are crime-ridden cesspools. False: These cities are safe, vibrant cesspools. Claim: The National Guard is being deployed to crack down on crime. False: The National Guard is being deployed to give Stephen Miller an erection. Claim: Just last week, a high-ranking politician was shot in the head at a D.C. theater. False: Trump is mixing up last week with April 14, 1865. Claim: Violent foreigners traveled to D.C. to savagely beat Americans. False: The UFC fight on the White House South Lawn isn't until next year. Claim: Basically anything. False: 'False' continues to be a very safe assumption to make.

Putin will be in US despite warrant for war crimes
Putin will be in US despite warrant for war crimes

American Press

time34 minutes ago

  • American Press

Putin will be in US despite warrant for war crimes

Russian President Vladimir Putin will be arriving in the United States Friday despite an international arrest warrant accusing him of personal responsibility for the abductions of children from Ukraine. The International Criminal Court issued the warrant for Putin in March of 2023. The ICC said in a statement announcing the warrant that Putin was 'responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of (children) and that of unlawful transfer of (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation.' ICC President Piotr Hofmanski said in a video statement at the time that while the ICC's judges have issued the warrants, it will be up to the international community to enforce them. The court has no police force of its own to do so. The United States is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, and therefore is under no legal obligation to enforce the warrant — a move that baffles Lake Charles disabled veteran Mike Griner. 'We are allowing a fugitive accused of war crimes in our country,' Griner said. 'How can this be? This is not what I signed up for.' Email newsletter signup Griner — who served in the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War and is a few days shy of his 82nd birthday — said he enlisted to protect Americans from people like Putin. 'He is responsible for so many deaths,' Griner said. 'He was a KGB agent before he was the leader of Russia and has killed or ordered the killing of many. He's a thug. He's a murderer.' The U.S. signed the Rome Statute in 2000 during the Clinton administration, but it was never ratified by the Senate. In 2002, the Bush administration formally withdrew that signature from the treaty, citing concerns about the potential for politically motivated prosecutions of American personnel by the ICC. Then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said the U.S. had a number of serious objections to the treaty, including what he claimed were a lack of adequate checks and balances on the powers of ICC prosecutors and judges. 'The treaty dilutes the U.N. Security Council's authority over international criminal prosecutions,' he added. That same year, the U.S. also passed the American Servicemembers' Protection Act, which restricted cooperation with the ICC and sought to protect U.S. citizens from its jurisdiction. President Donald Trump is set to discuss the war in Ukraine — now in its fourth year — with Russian leader Vladimir Putin at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. Alaska was chosen as a secure location, relatively close to Russia. Trump said Wednesday that there will be 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to stop the war against Ukraine. Ukraine's leader Volodymyr Zelensky has been excluded from the talks.

Supreme Court declines to block state law limiting kids' use of social media
Supreme Court declines to block state law limiting kids' use of social media

USA Today

time34 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Supreme Court declines to block state law limiting kids' use of social media

NetChoice, which represents Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, X, YouTube and other sites, asked the Supreme Court to intervene. WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Aug. 14 declined to block for now a Mississippi law imposing age verification and parental-consent requirements on social media sites. NetChoice − which represents Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, X, YouTube and other sites – asked the Supreme Court to intervene after an appeals court said Mississippi could enforce its law while courts are deciding whether it's constitutional. It's one of several state laws aimed at curbing the effects of social media on young people. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 17 lifted a hold put on the law by a federal district judge who had ruled that it likely violates the First Amendment. U.S. District Judge Sul Ozerden had said the law is too broad, and parents have others way of monitoring their children's use of social media. The Supreme Court didn't explain its decision in the case. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that while Mississippi's law is likely unconsitutional, NetChoice didn't show that letting it be enforced during the legal challenge is sufficiently harmful. Mississippi's attorneys say the law is a targeted effort to regulate social media platforms that let predators interact with children. "The Act requires what any responsible covered platform would already do: make 'commercially reasonable' efforts to protect minors," they told the Supreme Court. They said the law was prompted by a 16-year-old boy taking his own life after someone he met on Instagram threatened to expose their sexual encounter unless he paid $1,000. And they said Ozerden's order blocking enforcement conflicts with the Supreme Court's June decision upholding Texas' age verification law for pornographic websites. NetChoice said the law forces every Mississippian – adults and minors alike – to surrender personal information to access online speech that's protected by the First Amendment. "Social media is the modern printing press − it allows all Americans to share their thoughts and perspectives," said Paul Taske, co-director of the Net Choice Litigation Center. 'Just as the government can't force you to provide identification to read a newspaper, the same holds true when that news is available online."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store