logo
Amid Trump tariffs, the world responds with a free export: Humor

Amid Trump tariffs, the world responds with a free export: Humor

Yahoo20-04-2025

An evening show last week at the Hollywood Improv comedy club included poop jokes, a song about young people being too woke and a raunchy impression of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
There were no quips about President Trump's international tariffs, even from a comedian who had just posted a lengthy podcast episode about the on-again-off-again executive orders that have led to a global trade war and, many fear, could trigger a recession.
To get your fill of trade-related chuckles these days, there's a much more reliable, if unexpected, source: the official Facebook page of the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C.
The site has been rapidly manufacturing memes and sarcastic captions to capitalize — unrestrained by any tariffs — on a hot international export, namely jokes at the expense of the United States and its tariff-loving president.
One meme shows a red MAGA hat on a store shelf bearing a "Made in China" tag. The $50 price is crossed out, replaced by a tariff-inflated cost of $77.
Another cartoon — labeled "The Art of the Deal," after Trump's 1987 book — shows a pair of gambler's hands. One with the word "tariffs" on its suit sleeve draws from a deck of cards bearing percentages. The Embassy's caption: "But... the cards are made in #China. #Tariffwar."
In Canada, the premier of Manitoba, Wab Kinew, signed a decree in an oversized folder and held it up with his signature, à la Trump. "This order," he said, "it's a wonderful order. It's a beautiful order. This order is pulling American booze off the liquor mart shelves."
And on Norfolk Island — a remote rock in the Pacific Ocean with about 2,000 residents and essentially no exports to the U.S. — a children's book author memed a baffled-looking tropical wrasse fish. The caption: "When you find out Norfolk Island exports are getting hit with a 29% tariff ... guess that's one way to leave a fish floundering."
There are many ways world leaders, businesses and consumers are grappling with the growing threat of a global trade war, but perhaps the easiest — and, for some, the most therapeutic — is to rely on dark humor.
Joking about Trump's frenetic rollout of tariffs has become a common response to the altogether serious issue of an economic fight started by the president that has upended markets, led to boycotts of American-made goods and travel to the U.S., and sparked fears of a recession.
Some of the humor has a barbed, geopolitical aim in a war for the world's hearts and minds — see the Chinese government's fusillade of memes — but political scientists say that, for many people, humor is a natural response to stressful times.
Patrick Giamario, a professor at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and author of the book "Laughter as Politics: Critical Theory in an Age of Hilarity," said humor is an important part of the modern political process — and, for many, an attempt to make sense of events that feel overwhelming.
"The fact that we're laughing so much now is a sort of sign of how broken things are," Giamario said. "We laugh when things stop making sense."
Read more: Trump says Americans could feel 'some pain' from his new tariffs that triggered a trade war
In addition to global angst, the levies have spawned: References to Trump as a "domestic tariffist." Videos generated by artificial intelligence that show obese Americans toiling in garment factories. And lots of memes about over-taxed penguins angry about Trump's tariffs, which targeted a few barren, uninhabited subantarctic islands.
"Poor old penguins, I don't know what they did to Trump," Australian trade minister Don Farrell quipped to the Australian Broadcasting Corp. "But, look, I think it's an indication ... that this was a rushed process."
Trump's tariffs have kept much of the world's collective heads on a swivel. When he announced them, he said they would bring 'jobs and factories ... roaring back into our country' — despite skepticism from economists across the political spectrum.
On April 2 — which Trump dubbed "Liberation Day" — he announced a baseline tariff of 10% on imported goods from all foreign countries. He also announced higher rates, which he called "reciprocal tariffs," for countries he said were unfairly taxing American goods. Financial markets plunged.
A week later, Trump changed course, saying he would pause the so-called reciprocal tariffs for 90 days while leaving the universal 10% tariff in place. He wrote on his Truth Social account: "BE COOL! Everything is going to work out well." Markets surged.
Meanwhile, Trump escalated his standoff with China, hiking levies on Chinese imports — except, he later said, on electronics such as smartphones and laptops — to 145%.
Beijing retaliated by raising its levies on U.S. goods to 125%. The trade war was joined by a meme war.
Many of the Chinese memes portray American workers as unprepared for the kinds of jobs that bring products to their homes at cheaper prices.
During a press briefing last week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked about Chinese officials sharing AI-generated videos depicting Trump, Vice President JD Vance and billionaire Elon Musk working in factories.
Read more: Canadian snowbirds love Palm Springs. But Trump is making them say: Sorry! We're leaving
"I have seen the videos," Leavitt said. "I'm not sure who made the videos or if we can verify the authenticity. But whoever made it clearly does not see the potential of the American worker, the American workforce."
Screenshots of Leavitt herself being trolled by a Chinese diplomat who accused her of wearing a Chinese-made dress in the White House briefing room also have gone viral.
"Accusing China is business. Buying China is life," Zhang Zhisheng, China's consul general in Denpasar, Indonesia, posted on X. "The beautiful lace on the dress was recognized by an employee of a Chinese company as its product."
Ramesh Srinivasan, founder of the University of California Digital Cultures Lab, said it is clearly strategic for the typically staid Chinese government to turn to memes and internet jokes to communicate its stance on the trade war, which is that it "is ridiculous and unnecessary."
"They're presenting it in a much more innocuous and funny way, and that's very, very intelligent," Srinivasan said. "It's a sign of the times."
Trump and his acolytes, of course, are veterans of the meme wars (his son and advisor, Donald Trump Jr., lists "Meme Wars General" in his Instagram bio). The president's meme-filled X, née Twitter, account helped launch his political career, as did his crude-but-catchy nicknames for his opponents: Crooked Hillary Clinton, Sleepy Joe Biden and Little Marco [now Secretary of State] Rubio, among others.
Srinivasan said Trump, the former reality television star, has long been skilled at using dark humor to his advantage, especially online, where he is "this kind of hybrid troll-meme person."
On the internet, the tariff jokes keep coming.
One widely-shared POV — internet lingo for "point of view" — video on TikTok shows a grumpy toddler striding officiously through an empty office. The caption: "POV: Me on my way to HR yet again for nicknaming my co-worker 'Tariff' for costing the company more than they're worth."
On YouTube, Penguins International, an apolitical conservation nonprofit dedicated to studying and protecting penguins, couldn't resist getting in on the fun.
Read more: What to know about the Trump tariffs upending global trade and markets
After Heard Island and the McDonald Islands — Australian territories where lots of penguins and no humans live — were listed on Trump's tariffs list, Penguins International announced an online Protest March of the Penguins.
"Waddle we want? No tariffs!" read one digital protest sign.
"Beaks up!" read another.
On Wednesday, the Colorado-based organization posted a YouTube video of the birds' annual migratory trek across the ice to their breeding grounds. As they squawked and brayed, a narrator said: "This year, they march in protest. They are peaceful. They are flightless. But they are certainly not voiceless."
"We wanted to take an unusual current event and make light of it and stir up some support for some penguins that are endangered and threatened to go extinct," David Schutt, executive director of Penguins International, said in an interview. Before the tariff announcement, he added, "most people didn't know about the islands that these penguins are on."
During an Easter-themed "Saturday Night Live" skit this month, Trump, played by James Austin Johnson, said: 'Many people are even calling me the Messiah, because of the mess I, uh, made out of the economy — all because of my beautiful tariffs. So beautiful. They were working so well that I had to stop them.'
On her "Good for You" podcast on April 13, comedian Whitney Cummings joked about Trump's stated motive of using tariffs to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S., where workers — especially young ones who prefer remote work — don't want them.
"I have nieces who are Gen Z," Cummings said. "They're not going to work in a factory. They won't even work at the Cheesecake Factory because that would mean they would have a boss."
American manufacturing largely moved overseas, she continued, because "no one in America believes they should be working for some corporation who treats workers badly. They want to be the head of the corporation who treats workers badly."
Two nights later, Cummings did a stand-up set at the Hollywood Improv, performing on a stage that has hosted comedy legends such as Robin Williams, Chris Rock and Eddie Murphy.
Cummings made some mildly political jokes — including one about growing more conservative after having a child and trading in her electric car for a gas model because gas stations are the only places where it's socially acceptable to leave a small child alone in a vehicle.
But during her short set, she stayed away from tariffs — which are, perhaps, funnier on the internet.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Economic heart attack': 3 top experts detail how they see a possible US debt crisis unfolding
'Economic heart attack': 3 top experts detail how they see a possible US debt crisis unfolding

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

'Economic heart attack': 3 top experts detail how they see a possible US debt crisis unfolding

Investor concerns over a swelling government debt load were soothed last week. But some experts say the US isn't out of the woods yet. Goldman Sachs spoke to three top economic experts — Ray Dalio, Ken Rogoff, and Niall Ferguson — about rising debt levels in the US. All three said they were worried about an impending debt crisis, particularly when considering the effects of President Donald Trump's GOP tax and spending bill, which has been estimated to add trillions to the budget deficit over the next decade. That reflects a slightly more pessimistic view than the market. After a scare last month, demand for long-dated government bonds was strong this week. It was a sign that investors are feeling more comfortable about the fiscal situation in the US, after showing nerves last month after Moody's downgraded US debt and Trump's tax bill began making its way through Congress. Here are the top points each of the experts had to make: Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates founder The billionaire hedge fund manager said he sees three factors determining the outlook for the US debt. How much the government pays on debt interest relative to its revenue. If interest payments keep rising, it can "unacceptably" prevent the government from spending money on other things. How much debt the government needs to sell relative to demand. If the government needs to sell more Treasurys than people are willing to buy, interest rates will have to rise. That provides a more attractive yield to investors to hold onto the US debt, but high rates also hurt markets and the economy. How much money the central bank needs to print in other to purchase the remaining debt. If demand for US Treasurys is especially weak, the Fed can step in to purchase bonds to keep the government funded. If it has to print more money to do so, that can raise inflation and ding the value of the US dollar. "One can easily measure these signs of deterioration and see movement toward an impending debt crisis," Dalio, who has long warned of troubling debt dynamics in the US, said. "Such a crisis occurs when the constriction of debt-financed spending happens, like a debt-induced economic heart attack." To prevent a crisis, Dalio said he believed the government should reduce the budget deficit to 3% of GDP. Reducing the debt could cause interest rates to decline around 150 basis points, he estimated, reducing interest payments on the national debt and stimulating the economy. Ken Rogoff, Harvard professor and former IMF chief economist Given Trump's current agenda, Rogoff thinks the US will likely enter a debt crisis within the next four to five years. That's faster than the five- to seven-year timeline he predicted prior to Trump's reelection. "The notion that debt is a free lunch that had been pushed by many economy-watchers is absurd," Rogoff said. "Today's larger deficit on top of already-high debt levels is setting up for a crisis that will necessitate a significant adjustment." Rogoff thinks a debt crisis could play out in two ways: Inflation spikes and results in an economic shock. "Exactly what that shock will look like is difficult to say, but it will likely be more painful than the Covid inflation shock that precipitated only relatively minor adjustments in bond markets," Rogoff said. The government could manage the debt by keeping interest rates artificially low and restricting capital flows. But those measures will hurt economic growth and essentially serve as a tax on savers in the economy, he said. Investors have long been concerned about the US debt, but the outlook is especially worrying now because long-term interest rates are going through a "normalization" from low levels that stretched over the past decade, Rogoff said. "People need to recognize that higher interest rates are here to stay and that a return to the low-rate era of the past might well prove wishful thinking," he added. Niall Ferguson, historian and Harvard researcher Ferguson thinks a crisis could be triggered by a military challenge that results in the US losing its position as a global power, as it goes deeper into debt. The British-American financial historian said his favorite gauge to determine how unsustainable national debt was is when a country spends more on interest payments for its debt than on defense. That rule, which he calls "Ferguson's Law," now applies to the US, which spent $1.1 trillion on interest payments on the national debt over the 2024 fiscal year, according to the Treasury Department. It was more than the $883.7 billion approved that year for total defense spending. Nearly every nation that has violated Ferguson's Law has lost its status as " great power" in financial markets, he said. "Any great power that pursues a reckless fiscal policy by allowing the cost of its debt to exceed the cost of its armed services is opening itself up to challenge," Ferguson said. "The US is just the latest great power to find itself in this fiscal jam." The US has been able to borrow as much as it has through now with no issues, in part because the US dollar remains the world's reserve currency and investors still see Treasurys as " risk-free," Ferguson said, meaning they have faith in the US's ability to make good on its interest payments. But that already appears to be shifting, he said, pointing to investors around the world shedding their exposure to US Treasurys and moving away from dollar assets. "I've warned the US is on an unsustainable fiscal path for 20 years now, and so at times have felt like the boy who cried 'wolf,'" Ferguson added.

Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned.
Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned.

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned.

Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump signs order to combat 'woke' university accreditation process President Donald Trump directed the Justice and Education Depts. to investigate universities for 'unlawful discrimination' and 'ideological overreach. More teens are showing interest in vocational training and other non-college options after high school. Parents tend to favor traditional four-year colleges over non-degree career paths, according to a new survey from nonprofit American Student Assistance. Financial concerns and a desire for hands-on work are driving some students toward technical education. Nush Ahmed, 22, said she was "stubborn" when she went against her parents' wishes and chose to attend a career technical program 800 miles from home instead of enrolling in a traditional four-year college nearby. Her parents, who live in Buffalo, New York, and immigrated from Bangladesh, said they believed a bachelor's degree was the only path to success. But Ahmed insisted. She's one of a growing number of high school graduates turning to technical schools over two or four-year colleges at a time of spiraling student debt and new incentives for vocational education. Ahmed's choice to forego college and pursue a career working in manufacturing made her an outlier in her South Asian immigrant community, where most parents expect young women to attend college near home, she said. "I was hoping that time she would go to either medical school or engineering college to become a doctor or engineer," said her father, Shuhel Ahmed. "But she really wanted to go into to this career, so I finally decided to let her go." By the numbers: How do kids and parents feel about career technical education programs? New survey data from the nonprofit American Student Assistance shows that teen interest in college is down while interest in nondegree paths is on the rise. Meanwhile, parents are skeptical of options outside of the traditional college pathway to work. Nearly half of all students surveyed – 45% – weren't interested in going to college. About 14% said they planned to attend trade or technical schools, apprenticeships and technical bootcamp programs and 38% were considering those options. Some 66% of teens surveyed said parents supported their plans to pursue a nondegree route compared with 82% whose parents encouraged them to attend college. More: In emergency appeal, Trump asks Supreme Court to let him gut Education Department Seventy percent said their parents were more supportive of foregoing education altogether right after high school rather than pursuing a nondegree program. Young people told USA TODAY that finances, along with the desire to enter the workforce without more classroom-type academics, were among their reasons for choosing technical education. The financial burden of college was on Andrew Townsend's mind when he opted out of college. Townsend graduated from high school in Golden, Colorado, this June and decided against college, saying he wanted to go to work right away. The choice was easy for Townsend, 19, because he was offered an apprenticeship as a manufacturing technician for printer manufacturer Lexmark during his senior year through his school's career and technical education program. That turned into an 18-month internship. "When I went into high school I anticipated going to college and going into biology or sports management," Townsend said. "But I can't sit still in a class, and I want to get my hands dirty and get into work. It's financially best for me right now." More: Is the push for career education prioritizing business over students? His dad, construction worker Corey Townsend, wasn't sure what path his son would take, but he supports Andrew's choice. "My family doesn't have the most amount of money," Andrew Townsend said. "Maybe if I want to go to college later on in life, that's a choice. But for now I want to focus on myself and make my life better for me." College costs vs. career technical education costs At the nation's public colleges and universities, the average cost for in-state tuition is $9,750 per year and and the average cost for out-of-state tuition is $28,386, according to researchers at the Education Data Initiative. The price tag is higher at private colleges. The average cost of tuition and fees at those schools is $38,421,. The Education Data Initiative estimates college tuition has doubled in the 21st century. The costs of career technical education varies widely by trade and program. The average cost of a complete trade school program's tuition and fees was $15,070 during the 2022-2023 school year, according to data from the federal Education Department's National Center for Education Statistics. The Trump administration advances non-college options As parents and teens navigate their post-college options, President Donald Trump and his administration have championed career technical programs as a viable alternative to traditional two-year and four-year colleges. "Under my leadership, America will once again champion a culture where hard work is rewarded and equip our people with real skills for real careers that our communities are in desperate need to fill," Trump said in a Feb. 3 statement. "By offering more alternatives to higher education, we will train college-aged kids in relevant skills for the 21st century economy." More: Colleges report widespread problems with financial aid since Education Department layoffs During Trump's first term, he signed a bill called the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act into law. The law allows the federal government to provide states and local communities funding to enhance career and technical education programming. This term, the Trump administration announced it is reversing two Biden-era regulations that require states and local career technical education programs at high schools and community colleges to change the way they report on student progress to receive federal funding. What to do after high school ...if you're not heading straight to college 'They should let them follow their dreams' New survey data from Gallup, Walton Family Foundation and Jobs for the Future of 1,327 teens shows that most high school students and their parents are unaware of their post-high school options outside of the traditional four-year college path. The uncertainty resonated with Ahmed's father, who saw college as the only pathway to success for his daughter. Father and daughter now agree the path she chose has afforded her immense opportunity. If she could go back in time, Ahmed said, she would be less harsh on her parents for pushing college. Ahmed is enjoying the success that has come from completing a technical education program at the Universal Technical Institute, formerly known as NASCAR Technical Institute, in North Carolina. She works at a precision manufacturing company that specializes in metal and polymer 3D printing and has a podcast that highlights young people pursuing trade options after high school. She earns about $60,000 a year at her day job. "With the way she has gone through this and how she is doing now, I would say to parents that if kids want to try a short term school they should let them do and then see how it goes," Ahmed's father said. "If it goes well then great and if not, there's time to change. But they should let them follow their dreams." Contact Kayla Jimenez at kjimenez@ Follow her on X at @kaylajjimenez.

This Vermont Town Loves Its Canadian Neighbors. Trump Made Things Complicated.
This Vermont Town Loves Its Canadian Neighbors. Trump Made Things Complicated.

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

This Vermont Town Loves Its Canadian Neighbors. Trump Made Things Complicated.

On the front porch of her tidy yellow house on Canusa Street — so named because it runs along the border with Canada in tiny Beebe Plain, Vt. — Jan Beadle recently removed the American flag and hung a Canadian one in its place. Ms. Beadle, who has lived along the border for 71 years, hoped that the red maple leaf rippling in the breeze would send a message to her neighbors in the country across the way: I stand with you. And I'm sorry. 'I do feel like it reflects on me, somehow,' she said of President Trump's frequent jabs at Canada, including his imposition of steep new tariffs and his talk of making it the 51st state. 'As a kid, my family went to church in Canada. I went to the movie theater there, and to a youth club. We were just a group of kids together. We weren't labeled as Canadian or American.' The economic impact of Mr. Trump's trade war with Canada is already palpable on both sides of the border. Economic data shows a steep drop-off in spending by Canadians at Vermont hotels and restaurants; normally, 750,000 Canadian visitors spend $150 million in the state each year. Governors of New England states plan to meet on Monday in Boston with leaders from five Canadian provinces to strategize about the strain in their trade relations. But in the Northeast Kingdom of Vermont, where many towns and villages sit close by the border, residents also fear the loss of a kinship that has run deep for as long as they can remember. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store