Memphis schools could lose $17M in federal funds, district says
MSCS released a statement on Thursday announcing that it was monitoring potential changes in funding. The district says if funding isn't restored, nearly 100 positions in the district could be impacted.
The district's statement comes after the news that the United States House of Representatives has passed President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which includes sweeping tax cuts and cutbacks to social services such as Medicaid and food stamps.
MSCS says the funding plays a 'vital role in sustaining essential services across the district, including professional development for educators, instructional support, extended learning opportunities, and services for immigrant students.'
The district says it is developing contingency plans to 'minimize disruption' and continue providing support to students, families, and staff.
MSCS says it may be required to make 'difficult decisions' if funding is not reinstated.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting
I never thought I would see the day when U.S. Senators John Thune and Mike Rounds and Rep. Dusty Johnson would sell out their South Dakota values and upbringing to become puppets of a president. Nor did I think I would see them damage institutions that are at the core of South Dakota's society. Unfortunately, it appears that President Donald Trump is so powerful that personal values no longer matter. Last week, all three voted to rescind $1.1 billion in funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — funding that all three had previously voted to approve. It's clear that National Public Radio was Trump's target. He believes taxpayer money shouldn't be going to support news he perceives as a challenge to his line of thinking. But often when we act hastily and with little thought, the grenades we throw miss the intended target and damage innocent victims. Such is the case here. Only 1% of NPR's operating budget and 15% of the Public Broadcasting System budget comes from the corporation, and both will survive. Most of the corporation's funding goes to support local public broadcasting systems, which likely will not. 'After the cut, NPR is still going to be NPR and PBS is still going to be PBS,' said Julie Overgaard, executive director of South Dakota Public Broadcasting. 'They are all going to continue to exist.' So will public stations in the major metropolitan areas. 'It's the places like us that will suffer the most,' Overgaard said. 'The reason the CPB was set up was so that rural communities can share in a collective public media. 'We don't have enough people and wealth to exist on our own. The very thing they were trying to eliminate will survive. Instead, it's something very important to our state that will be eliminated.' Programs like 'South Dakota Focus,' 'In the Moment,' 'Dakota Life' and 'Jazz Nightly,' along with statehouse coverage and broadcasts of high school sports and activities, may all disappear. What a legacy for Thune, Rounds and Johnson — the men who destroyed SDPB. Last week while casting their votes, they hid behind the need to cut the budget deficit. Funny. They found deficit religion only a few weeks after they voted for Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act that increases the deficit. The more talented politicians become, the better they are at creating alternative realities. Here's the reality of SDPB's future. The impending loss of $2 million in funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting may force SDPB to quickly cut up to 20 people from its 60-member staff. The damage likely will be worse. Even if SDPB could raise $2 million in three months, it probably wouldn't matter. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is essentially dead as of Sept. 30, severing the technical backbone of SDPB's network. It facilitates the sharing of programming from network to network. It facilitates emergency alerts and emergency alerts. It handles SDPB's website and negotiates music broadcast rights nationally. 'The situation is grave, fluid and chaotic,' Overgaard said. Rounds acted like he was the champion leading up to the vote, holding out to the last minute as he secured an agreement to find $9.4 million in funding elsewhere for communication towers on Native American reservations. That's not likely to be sustainable in the long-term. 'It's a nice gesture, but it is hollow in its result,' Overgaard said of Rounds' action. 'It will still result in the demise of tribal stations.' Programs like Native American News and other nationally shared music and talk programs likely won't be produced, and the national network that distributes it won't exist. Money and technical support for local programming also disappear. SDPB had just survived a funding fight in the South Dakota Legislature after then-Gov. Kristi Noem suggested cutting $3.6 million in state funding, also largely aimed at silencing NPR. Legislators were inundated with calls, and the result was an overwhelming restoration of funding. 'We know we are very important in people's daily lives,' Overgaard said. 'They trust us in moments of crisis and joy. This has nothing to do with whether we are a valued service. This is politics. I don't know that we ever had a chance to win this.' The only chance is for federal funding to be restored in the upcoming federal budget, perhaps absent taxpayer support for NPR and PBS. SDPB supporters will have opportunities to speak with their congressional delegates during the upcoming August recess. Looking at constituents in the eye can be uncomfortable. Trump puppets are not what we thought we elected. Thune, Rounds and Johnson, what have you become? EDITOR'S NOTE: Brad Johnson is married to a retired former employee of the nonprofit Friends of South Dakota Public Broadcasting. This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ITT Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags
ITT (NYSE:ITT) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$972.4m (up 7.3% from 2Q 2024). Net income: US$121.0m (up 1.1% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 12% (in line with 2Q 2024). EPS: US$1.53 (up from US$1.46 in 2Q 2024). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period ITT Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Falls Short Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 2.5%. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 3.8%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 5.6% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 4.3% growth forecast for the Machinery industry in the US. Performance of the American Machinery industry. The company's shares are up 1.6% from a week ago. Balance Sheet Analysis While earnings are important, another area to consider is the balance sheet. We've done some analysis and you can see our take on ITT's balance sheet. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
One Reading International Insider Raised Stake By 44% In Previous Year
From what we can see, insiders were net buyers in Reading International, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RDI ) during the past 12 months. That is, insiders acquired the stock in greater numbers than they sold it. Although we don't think shareholders should simply follow insider transactions, we do think it is perfectly logical to keep tabs on what insiders are doing. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. The Last 12 Months Of Insider Transactions At Reading International The insider, Steven Lucas, made the biggest insider sale in the last 12 months. That single transaction was for US$54k worth of shares at a price of US$1.36 each. That means that an insider was selling shares at around the current price of US$1.33. While insider selling is a negative, to us, it is more negative if the shares are sold at a lower price. Given that the sale took place at around current prices, it makes us a little cautious but is hardly a major concern. Steven Lucas was the only individual insider to sell over the last year. Douglas McEachern bought a total of 41.50k shares over the year at an average price of US$1.75. You can see a visual depiction of insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last 12 months, below. If you want to know exactly who sold, for how much, and when, simply click on the graph below! Check out our latest analysis for Reading International Reading International is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of under-the-radar companies with insider buying. Reading International Insiders Are Selling The Stock The last quarter saw substantial insider selling of Reading International shares. In total, insider Steven Lucas dumped US$54k worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. This may suggest that some insiders think that the shares are not cheap. Does Reading International Boast High Insider Ownership? I like to look at how many shares insiders own in a company, to help inform my view of how aligned they are with insiders. A high insider ownership often makes company leadership more mindful of shareholder interests. Our data indicates that Reading International insiders own about US$6.3m worth of shares (which is 14% of the company). We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. We do generally prefer see higher levels of insider ownership. So What Does This Data Suggest About Reading International Insiders? An insider hasn't bought Reading International stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. In contrast, they appear keener if you look at the last twelve months. But insiders own relatively little of the company, from what we can see. So we can't be sure that insiders are optimistic. So these insider transactions can help us build a thesis about the stock, but it's also worthwhile knowing the risks facing this company. Be aware that Reading International is showing 5 warning signs in our investment analysis, and 1 of those can't be ignored... Of course Reading International may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of high quality companies. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data
