Encouraging Signs For Mental Health Workforce
When someone is making the brave step of reaching out for help whether it's you, your child, a friend or family member, this Government is committed to ensuring we have the right support in place to answer that call, Minister for Mental Health Matt Doocey says.
'It is promising to see reports showing New Zealand's mental health and addiction workforce is growing. This will help us ensure that people are getting the support they need, when they need it and no one's call is going unanswered,' Mr Doocey says.
'Over the past two years, there has been substantial progress in building up the mental health and addiction workforce. We have more mental health nurses, psychologists, support workers and addiction counsellors working on the ground, and overall vacancy rates are starting to ease.
'Behind every one of those new psychologists, nurses, support workers or counsellors are hundreds of people at what can be the lowest time of their life, now able to be seen, heard and supported.
'I've been very clear that increasing access to support is a top priority. The Auditor General called for a specific mental health workforce plan in response to wait-times and vacancy rates increasing under the previous Government. We treated this as a priority and delivered the first dedicated mental health workforce plan in New Zealand within the first year.
'It's pleasing to see HNZ payroll data shows total full-time staff employed in mental health grew by more than 9 per cent year-on-year between Quarter 3 in 2023 and Quarter 1 2025.'
While challenges remain, particularly in psychiatry vacancies, HNZ Payroll data also shows there has been 9.5 percent growth in the number of full-time staff employed as Senior Medical Officers – Psychiatry between Quarter 1 2024 and Quarter 1 2025.
'We know we need more psychiatrists in New Zealand. That's why we've increased training places and funding to support more people into the field. We've lifted the number of funded registrar positions from 33 in 2024 to 54 a year after Budget 2025,' Mr Doocey says.
'I've also written to both Health New Zealand and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatry to encourage them to do everything they can to remove any additional barriers to grow the psychiatry workforce.
'It is heartening to see that the Government's focus on growing the workforce and our commitment to addressing long-standing workforce gaps is starting to pay off because at the end of the day, when someone is making the brave step of reaching out to get well, workforce should never be a barrier.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Alcohol guidelines 'outdated, understate health risks'
By Guyon Espiner of RNZ The country's official low-risk drinking guidelines are outdated and "understate the health risks" of alcohol, according to Health New Zealand documents. Efforts to update guidelines were halted after alcohol lobbyists complained to a Ministry of Health general manager Ross Bell. Bell, who works within its Public Health Agency, says he intervened to clear up confusion about whether HNZ or the Ministry of Health (MOH) should manage the guidelines. He said the MOH would manage them now but that work was on hold while it considered its priorities. Documents released to RNZ under the Official Information Act show why HNZ considered updating the safe drinking guidelines was crucial and that it saw "scrutiny from the alcohol industry" as a risk factor in the process. New Zealand's drinking guidelines say that to stay low-risk, men should have no more than 15 drinks per week and women 10. The maximum number of drinks recommended per week to stay low-risk (for men and women) is set at two in Canada, 10 in Australia and 14 in the United Kingdom. Canada, Australia and the UK all significantly reduced their safe drinking guidelines in recent years as evidence emerged about the health risks of alcohol, which is linked to seven types of cancer. A November 2024 memo from HNZ alcohol harm prevention manager Tom Devine said New Zealand's guidelines, written in 2011, were now out of date. "The evidence around alcohol and its risks to health has evolved since then and other countries like ours, such as the United Kingdom (in 2016), Australia (in 2020), and Canada (in 2023), have updated their Alcohol & Health Advice, resulting in much lower recommended drinking limits," Devine wrote. "The current advice is complex (and) out of step with other jurisdictions." Current guidelines also did not meet the needs of pregnant and breast-feeding women and young people, he said. "A review and update are necessary to ensure the advice is clear, inclusive and based on the most up-to-date evidence." Another HNZ document, written in January 2024, said: "The current advice does not reflect the latest scientific evidence meaning that it understates the health risks from alcohol." The documents show HNZ commissioned Massey University to work on the first phase of a review in February 2024 - at a cost of about $130,000 - but later that year MOH's Bell intervened. Emails obtained by RNZ show a lobbyist with the Brewer's Association emailed Bell in October 2024 asking why a HNZ website was reporting that the drinking guidelines were under review. He emailed again a month later complaining that references to the review were still on the website, run by HNZ, and also took issue with the fact the site linked to Canadian drinking guidelines. Bell emailed HNZ in December 2024: "All work on this project will now pause. You will update relevant Health NZ websites to remove references to the review and also to other jurisdictions' guidelines (including the Canadian one)." Bell has declined requests for an interview with RNZ, but in a previous statement said material was removed from the website to avoid confusion, as the drinking guidelines were now led by the Ministry of Health not HNZ, which runs the website. He said that was an internal decision by the MOH and that a review of the drinking guidelines was now on hold while the ministry considered its priorities. But the documents released to RNZ show HNZ believe it is crucial to update the guidance. A memo from HNZ alcohol harm prevention manager Tom Devine said health professionals relied on accurate guidelines, which were "foundational" for screening, interventions and referral for treatment. "This is where health professionals ask patients about their alcohol consumption using the advice as a baseline to assess risk, which informs the need for brief interventions or referral for counselling or treatment." Devine's memo said one of the risks in reviewing the guidelines was "scrutiny from the alcohol industry" and his mitigation strategy included "a strategic communications plan to articulate the evidence base and reasoning". Associate Professor Andy Towers, the co-director of the Mental Health & Addiction Programme at Massey University, worked on the initial stages of the review for HNZ and said current guidelines understated the risk. "There's more and more evidence now, especially with longitudinal health data, to show that even low levels of alcohol use over a long time can result in some significant alcohol related harms." He said sticking with the 2011 guidelines could lull drinkers into a false sense of security. "For us to set low risk advice thresholds that are quite high, much higher than other countries, means that we will continue to have serious alcohol related harms occurring across the country, in communities, and that will flow through into hospitals." Cancer Society evidence and insights lead Emma Shields said a review of the drinking guidelines was needed to bring them into line with the latest evidence and international guidance. She said alcohol caused seven different types of cancer including breast, bowel and oesophageal. "When it comes to cancer risk, there is no 'safe' level of alcohol use, and even small amounts of alcohol increase the risk of cancer."
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Outdated alcohol guidelines understate health risks, ministry documents reveal
HNZ considered updating the safe drinking guidelines was crucial. Photo: RNZ New Zealand's official low-risk drinking guidelines are outdated and "understate the health risks" of alcohol, according to Health New Zealand (HNZ) documents. Efforts to update the guidelines were halted after alcohol lobbyists complained to a Ministry of Health general manager Ross Bell. Bell, who works within the ministry's Public Health Agency, says he intervened to clear up confusion about whether HNZ or the Ministry of Health (MOH) should manage the guidelines. He said the MOH would manage them now but that work was on hold while it considered its priorities. Documents released to RNZ under the Official Information Act show why HNZ considered updating the safe drinking guidelines was crucial and that it saw "scrutiny from the alcohol industry" as a risk factor in the process. New Zealand's drinking guidelines say that to stay low-risk, men should have no more than 15 drinks per week and women ten. The maximum number of drinks recommended per week to stay low-risk (for men and women) is set at two in Canada, ten in Australia and 14 in the UK. Canada, Australia and the UK all significantly reduced their safe drinking guidelines in recent years as evidence emerged about the health risks of alcohol, which is linked to seven types of cancer. Photo: RNZ A November 2024 memo from HNZ alcohol harm prevention manager Tom Devine said New Zealand's guidelines, written in 2011, were now out of date. "The evidence around alcohol and its risks to health has evolved since then and other countries like ours, such as the United Kingdom (in 2016), Australia (in 2020), and Canada (in 2023), have updated their Alcohol & Health Advice, resulting in much lower recommended drinking limits," Devine wrote. "The current advice is complex (and) out of step with other jurisdictions." He said the current guidelines also did not meet the needs of pregnant and breast-feeding women and young people. "A review and update are necessary to ensure the advice is clear, inclusive and based on the most up-to-date evidence." Another HNZ document, written in January 2024, said "The current advice does not reflect the latest scientific evidence meaning that it understates the health risks from alcohol." The documents show HNZ commissioned Massey University to work on the first phase of a review in February 2024 - at a cost of about $130,000 - but later that year Ross Bell from the Ministry of Health intervened. Emails obtained by RNZ show a lobbyist with the Brewer's Association emailed Bell in October 2024 asking why a HNZ website was reporting that the drinking guidelines were under review. He emailed again a month later complaining that references to the review were still on the website, run by HNZ, and also took issue with the fact the site linked to Canadian drinking guidelines. Bell emailed HNZ in December 2024: "All work on this project will now pause. You will update relevant Health NZ websites to remove references to the review and also to other jurisdictions' guidelines (including the Canadian one)." Bell has declined requests for an interview with RNZ, but in a previous statement said material was removed from the website to avoid confusion, as the drinking guidelines were now led by the Ministry of Health not Health New Zealand, which runs the website. He said that was an internal decision by MOH and that a review of the drinking guidelines was now on hold while the ministry considered its priorities. But the documents released to RNZ show HNZ believe it is crucial to update the guidance. A memo from HNZ alcohol harm prevention manager Tom Devine said health professionals relied on accurate guidelines, which were "foundational" for screening, interventions and referral for treatment. "This is where health professionals ask patients about their alcohol consumption using the advice as a baseline to assess risk, which informs the need for brief interventions or referral for counselling or treatment." Devine's memo said one of the risks in reviewing the guidelines was "scrutiny from the alcohol industry" and his mitigation strategy included "a strategic communications plan to articulate the evidence base and reasoning". Associate Professor Andy Towers, the co-director of the Mental Health & Addiction Programme at Massey University, worked on the initial stages of the review for HNZ. He said the current guidelines understated the risk. "There's more and more evidence now, especially with longitudinal health data, to show that even low levels of alcohol use over a long time can result in some significant alcohol related harms." He said sticking with the 2011 guidelines could lull drinkers into a false sense of security. "For us to set low risk advice thresholds that are quite high, much higher than other countries, means that we will continue to have serious alcohol related harms occurring across the country, in communities, and that will flow through into hospitals." Cancer Society evidence and insights lead Emma Shields said a review of the drinking guidelines was needed to bring them into line with the latest evidence and international guidance. She said alcohol caused seven different types of cancer including breast, bowel and oesophageal. "When it comes to cancer risk, there is no 'safe' level of alcohol use, and even small amounts of alcohol increase the risk of cancer."
Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Signs of life on rebuild
The Health Minister roaming about the new Dunedin hospital site last week may have been little more than a public relations exercise, but it was welcome all the same. Diggers are back on the site, working on the foundations, and billboards have gone up proclaiming the involvement of Australian construction giant CPB which is expected to get the contract for the new inpatient building. All of these things suggest action at last on the beleaguered project. Questions remain about whether the hospital, in its scaled-back state, can possibly come in within its $1.88 billion budget and be sufficient to serve the population when it is hopefully completed in 2031. Former head of the new hospital's governance group Pete Hodgson estimates inflation alone would have added an extra $40 million in costs since the government stalled the project last September citing cost concerns. There has been much airy talk of changed models of care affecting the demand for various services at the new hospital when it opens in 2031, without any detail of what this involves and how it will be achieved. The whole of the health system still faces workforce shortages. If changes mean moving to more care in the community, it is hard to understand how when basic issues such as boosting the pay of nurses working there to match their Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand counterparts remains unresolved. (The government seems to have conveniently forgotten Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, in the televised pre-election leaders' debate, promised he would ensure they would be paid the same if he won the election.) Mixed messaging from the government about the project continues. In the New Zealand Gazette notice of the appointment which will bring back Evan Davies to the project, but this time in the supremo role of Crown manager, Health Minister Simeon Brown blamed delays and extra costs on HNZ, ignoring the role the government has played in that. He said HNZ had struggled to maintain momentum on the project and identify a path forward following consistent cost pressure and extensions to the estimated delivery time for the project. That seemed at odds with his on-site comment last week that HNZ staff had been "playing a critically important role in getting us to where we are here today". During his visit Mr Brown announced the establishment of the Southern Engagement Group, to help ensure the local community was kept well informed as the project progresses. The group will involve HNZ leaders and a variety of other representatives including local government, infrastructure partners and tertiary institutions to provide regular updates and support ongoing engagement throughout the project. It will meet quarterly to consider "a broad range of matters relevant to the successful delivery of the hospital" but will not provide advice on the building's design scope, clinical models of care or procurement decisions. Although Mr Brown said he was making this announcement alongside Dunedin Mayor Jules Radich, basic questions posed to Mr Radich's office about whether the meetings would be held in public, whether members would be free to speak about hospital matters outside the group and if the group's terms of reference were finalised, were directed to HNZ. At the time of writing no answers had been received. Not a great start to make such an announcement on a group supposedly designed to improve communication and then not have relevant details promptly available. Making hay while the drizzle dries There's nothing quite like a closer-than-expected All Blacks game to take much of the nation's minds momentarily off more important matters such as the fallout from the foul weather which has ravaged much of the country in recent days. The sold-out All Blacks/France match would also have been a welcome midwinter fillip to Dunedin's hospitality sector at a time when the cost of living continues to affect domestic spending. It is an uneasy time for the local sector, as it awaits the impact of the competition from the new, bigger, covered Christchurch stadium expected to be completed next year and while Forsyth Barr Stadium continues to struggle financially and to attract major events.
