
Tariffs: India battles Chinese 'dumping' as Trump's trade tensions escalate
The pace at 64-year-old Thirunavkarsu's spinning mill in southern India's Tamil Nadu state has noticeably slowed down. The viscose yarn – a popular material that goes into making woven garments – he produces, now sits in storage, as orders from local factories have dropped nearly 40% in the last month.That's because Chinese import of the material has become cheaper by 15 rupees ($0.18; £0.13) per kilo and has flooded Indian ports.With Donald Trump imposing tariffs of up to 145% on Chinese goods going into the US, manufacturers in China have begun looking for alternative markets.India's textiles makers say they are bearing the brunt of the trade tensions as Chinese producers are dumping yarn in key production hubs.While China is the leading producer of viscose yarn, India makes most of the viscose yarn the country needs locally with imports only bridging supply gaps.Mill owners like Thirunavkarsu fear their yarn won't survive the onslaught of such competition."We can't match these rates. Our raw material is not as cheap," he says.Jagadesh Chandran, of the South India Spinners Association, told the BBC nearly 50 small spinning mills in the textile hubs of Pallipalayam, Karur and Tirupur in southern India are "slowing production". Many say they'll be forced to scale down further if the issue isn't addressed.
China's Ambassador to India, Xu Feihong has sent assurances to India that his country will not dump products and in fact wants to buy more high-quality Indian products for Chinese consumers."We will not engage in market dumping or cut-throat competition, nor will we disrupt other countries' industries and economic development," he wrote in an opinion piece for the Indian Express newspaper.But anxieties about dumping are spread across sectors in India, as China - Asia's biggest economy - is the world's largest exporter of practically all industrial goods, from textiles and metals, to chemicals and rare minerals.While pharmaceuticals - and later phones, laptops, and semiconductor chips - were exempted from steep tariffs, large chunks of Chinese exports still run into Trump's 145% tariff wall. It is these goods that are expected to chase other markets like India.Their sudden inflow will prove "very disruptive" to emerging economies in Asia, according to Japanese broking house Nomura, whose research earlier revealed that China was flooding global markets with cheap goods even before Donald Trump took office earlier this year.In 2024, investigations against unfair Chinese imports rose to a record high. Data from the World Trade Organisation (WTO) shows, nearly 200 complaints were filed against China at the forum - a record - including 37 from India.India in particular, with heavy dependencies on Chinese raw materials and intermediate goods, could be hit hard. Its trade deficit with China - the difference between what it imports and exports - has already ballooned to $100bn (£75bn). And imports in March jumped 25%, driven by electronics, batteries and solar cells.In response, India's trade ministry has set up a committee to track the influx of cheap Chinese goods, with its quasi-judicial arm probing imports across sectors, including viscose yarn.India also recently imposed a 12% tax on some steel imports, locally known as a safeguard duty, to help halt an increase in cheap shipments primarily from China, which were pushing some Indian mills to scale down.Despite such protections - and a loud marketing campaign by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government to boost manufacturing locally - India has found it hard to reduce its reliance on China, with imports rising even when border tensions between the two neighbours peaked after 2020. That's because the government has only had "limited success" with its plans to turn India into the world's factory through things like the production linked subsidies, says Biswajit Dhar, a Delhi-based trade expert. And India continues to depend heavily on China for the intermediate goods that go into manufacturing finished products.
While western multi-national companies like Apple are increasingly looking towards India to diversify their assembly lines away from China, India is still dependent on Chinese components to make these phones. As a result, imports in sectors like electronics have risen significantly, pushing up its trade deficit.India's burgeoning deficit is a "worrying story", says Ajay Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) think tank, all the more so because its exports to China have dropped to below 2014 levels despite a weaker currency, which should ideally help exporters."This isn't just a trade imbalance. It's a structural warning. Our industrial growth, including through PLI (production linked incentive) schemes, is fuelling imports, not building domestic depth," Srivastava wrote in a social media post. In other words, the subsidies are not helping India export more. "We can't bridge this deficit without bridging our competitiveness gap."India needs to get its act together quickly to do that, given the opportunity US trade tensions with China have presented. But also because countries with a large rise in imports from China generally tend to see the sharpest slowdown in manufacturing growth, according to Nomura.Akash Prakash of Amansa Capital agrees. A key reason why Indian private companies were not investing enough, was because they feared being "swamped by China", he wrote in a column in the Business Standard newspaper. A recent study by the ratings agency Icra also corroborates this view. With fears of Chinese dumping becoming more widespread and the likes of the European Union seeking firm guarantees from Beijing that its markets will not be flooded, pressure is mounting on China - which is now urgently looking to secure newer trading partners outside the US.China wants to completely shift the narrative, says Mr Dhar, "It is trying to come clean amidst increased scrutiny".Despite the reassurances from Beijing, Delhi should use thawing relations with its larger neighbour to kickstart a proper dialogue on its firm stance about dumping, says Mr Dhar."This is an issue that India must flag, like most of the Western countries have."Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
U.S. Steel shares slip as Nippon Steel faces Trump's hurdle over control
June 13 (Reuters) - Shares of U.S. Steel dipped in premarket trading after a Nippon Steel executive told the Japanese Nikkei newspaper that its planned acquisition of the company required "a degree of management freedom" to go ahead, after President Donald Trump said he would exercise "total control" over the U.S. steelmaker. The comments signal that last-minute discussions continue regarding the structure of the deal, which was opposed by then-U.S. President Joe Biden and Trump when it was first proposed. Trump said on Thursday that the U.S. will have "a golden share", opens new tab in U.S. Steel. "It's 51% ownership by Americans," Trump said while speaking to reporters at the White House. He did not provide details on how the arrangement would be structured. The $14.9 billion deal was first announced in December 2023 to opposition across the U.S. political spectrum, and has run a long, uncertain route in the year-and-a-half since. U.S. Steel shares fell 4% in premarket trading on Friday. Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple "investment" in U.S. Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, have created confusion. Last month, Trump told reporters the deal still lacked his final approval, leaving unresolved whether he would allow Nippon Steel to take ownership.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Oil prices surge, stocks tumble in the wake of Israel's strikes on Iran
Oil prices surged and stocks tumbled Friday in the wake of Israel's strikes on Iran's top military officials and nuclear sites. The price of Brent crude oil, the global benchmark, climbed more than 8% to almost $74 a barrel, its highest level since early April. Major stock indexes fell more than 1% in premarket trading, though they pared heavier losses as investors assessed that wider fallout from the conflict was initially limited. Gold prices also reached a new monthly high, rising more than 1% to as much as $3,440 an ounce. The price of bitcoin fell almost 1% to less than $105,000. U.S. bond prices were little changed. Israel launched strikes on Iran early Friday local time, a dramatic escalation of long-running tensions between the two countries. Israel officials have warned of a "lengthy operation," while President Donald Trump said there was "much more to come" from Israel and that Iran should make a deal. Iran has so far retaliated by launching drones toward Israel while also threatening U.S. assets in the region. While spiking oil prices usually signal higher gasoline prices for consumers in the coming days and weeks, experts said there was no need to rush out to the pump. "Higher gas prices are coming. But it will not be insane, and ultimately gas prices remain affordable vs income," Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at price tracker GasBuddy, said in a post on X. Higher oil prices could stoke inflation, complicating the Federal Reserve's calculations as it continues to weigh a weakening job market against fears of the price impact from Trump's tariffs. Before the strikes, stocks appeared heading for a wining week after the Trump administration signaled renewed interest in a rapprochement with China over trade concerns. The president said he planned on stabilizing import duties on Chinese goods at 55%, while those on U.S. goods into China would be set at 10%.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Iran attack shunts Gulf into more volatile realm
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters Breakingviews) - The Middle East has taken one of its periodic lurches into turmoil. Earlier this week, impending talks between the United States and Iran raised the prospect of a nuclear deal that would have eased tensions in the region. A series of strikes by Israel on the Islamic Republic on Friday morning mean that's off the table. Any talk of stability in the Middle East rings hollow given Israel's near two-year campaign in Gaza, that region's unfolding humanitarian crisis, direct military strikes between Israel and Iran, and attacks by Iran-aligned Houthis on ships in the Red Sea. But U.S. President Donald Trump's recent tour of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, plus his decision to lift sanctions on Syria, had pointed to a less fraught future. A U.S. deal to curtail the capability of Tehran to build nuclear weapons would have cemented relative regional peace, which in turn would help to enable inward investment in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries as they seek to wean their economies off oil. That's a bigger prize for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman than settling old scores with Tehran. Much depends on how and where Iran responds. One option is that Tehran restricts its retaliation to Israel, as it did in April and October last year when responding to Israeli strikes which targeted the leadership of Iranian proxies like Hezbollah. Right now that's the outcome oil traders seem to be betting on. The price of a barrel of Brent crude was up just 6% at $74 on Friday morning - roughly the same level as in March and the autumn of last year, and far off the spike above $120 a barrel that followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Saudi and the United Arab Emirates collectively have 4 million barrels a day of spare capacity to deploy, while the International Energy Agency expects, opens new tab global supply to grow by 1.6 million barrels daily this year, more than twice the increase in demand. In other words, there's plenty of scope for the global economy to avoid an oil shock. Still, it's equally possible that Iran sees Israel's strikes as a calculated extension of its negotiations with Trump – who used a social media post, opens new tab on Friday to urge a deal - and decides to respond by targeting U.S. military bases in Qatar and Bahrain. That could spark a regional struggle that might threaten the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world's daily supply passes, choke off Iranian crude exports of 1.5 million barrels per day, and chill foreign investment in the Gulf. The risk that the latest flare-up in the Middle East turns into something more prolonged and economically problematic is clear – and arguably underpriced. Follow George Hay on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.