
Bengaluru floods: Karnataka may ban basement parking in flood-prone areas; Experts flag higher costs, design challenges
Karnataka is considering a ban on basement parking in flood-prone zones of Bengaluru to improve resilience against urban flooding. While real estate experts agree the move could help mitigate waterlogging risks, they caution it may lead to higher construction costs and design limitations for developers.
'While the idea of banning basements is sound from a flood-resilience standpoint, it's unclear whether it will be viable in the long run,' said an urban expert.
Basements typically cost twice as much to construct as ground floors. However, replacing basement parking with additional floors above ground may drive up costs even further, due to the need for extended plumbing, elevator systems, and electrical infrastructure. Additionally, such changes could reduce the efficient use of Floor Space Index (FSI), affecting project feasibility, they say.
After the recent flooding in Bengaluru, which claimed the lives of two men while they were pumping water out of a basement in BTM Layout, Karnataka deputy chief minister D.K. Shivakumar announced that the state government is considering a ban on basement parking in low-lying and flood-prone areas.
"I am taking a policy decision that wherever there is a low-lying area, we will not allow underground parking facilities in future. We will allow them to build parking spaces at a higher level," he told reporters while on his visit to assess the flood situation across the city.
"There is an idea to plan a way to park vehicles on the ground floor, instead of underground. Let people build houses on top of that," he said.
This comes amid relentless rainfall that has crippled Bengaluru in recent days, with heavy downpours triggering widespread waterlogging and flooding across the city. From upscale residential areas to major tech corridors, the rains have laid bare the city's fragile infrastructure and poor drainage systems, sparking serious concerns over urban planning and real estate development in flood-prone zones.
Also Read: Bengaluru floods: Was the city's Maharaja-era drainage system more effective and in sync with nature?
Experts say that eliminating basements may not significantly reduce construction depth. In many cases, foundations still need to be dug to around 6 metres, depending on soil conditions and structural requirements, potentially increasing overall construction costs.
'When a basement is part of the plan, excavation is already accounted for, and since the space is used for parking, there's no need for soil refilling—this offsets some of the construction cost,' said Abhay Gupta, structural consultant. 'Without a basement, however, the excavated area must be refilled entirely, which adds to expenses,' he explained.
Experts also noted that basements often cover more area than the actual building footprint, as Bengaluru permits construction up to 2 metres from the boundary wall.
"In contrast, ground-level or stilt parking is limited to the building footprint, which restricts capacity. In many cases, a single basement with that extra width can offer the equivalent parking capacity of 2.5 to 3 floor levels," Sarang Kulkarni, managing director, Descon Ventures, said.
While basements are typically more expensive to construct, often costing twice as much as a ground floor, adding extra floors to compensate for lost parking can further drive up construction costs due to additional plumbing, elevator, and electrical requirements.
'From a cost standpoint, avoiding basement excavation may seem beneficial,' said Sarang Kulkarni. 'However, this is offset by the reduced ability to fully utilize the Floor Space Index (FSI), which directly affects land value.'
FSI, or Floor Space Index, is a key urban planning metric that defines the maximum permissible built-up area on a given plot, effectively determining how many floors can be constructed.
Banning basement parking in commercial or retail developments could create significant challenges, experts say.
'Ground-floor space is prime real estate for retail. Without basement parking, that space must be repurposed for vehicles, leaving developers with two choices: build a multi-level car park with retail on the ground floor or position retail between parking levels and office floors above,' said Sarang Kulkarni, Managing Director of Descon Ventures. 'Both options increase the building's overall height.'
However, height restrictions—especially in areas near airspace and defence zones like Koramangala, Indiranagar, and North Bengaluru—limit vertical expansion. 'If developers can't utilise the full permissible Floor Space Index (FSI) due to these restrictions, it leads to suboptimal land use. While the basement ban may boost flood resilience, its long-term viability remains uncertain,' Kulkarni said.
In contrast, cities like Hyderabad, where FSI limits are more relaxed, allow greater design flexibility. Developers there often allocate the ground and first floors for retail, the second for parking, and the upper floors for office use, creating more efficient mixed-use developments.
Also Read: 'Does the area flood?' Bengaluru homebuyers and investors now have fresh real estate worry
Experts believe aesthetic concerns about visible parking on lower levels can be addressed, especially in residential projects, by drawing inspiration from global cities. In places like New York, buildings often feature grand ground-floor lobbies and use façade elements such as vertical gardens to screen parking areas.
However, construction methods significantly impact feasibility.
'In high-rise residential projects, the Mivan formwork system—known for its speed, monolithic concrete walls, and reduced labour—is commonly used above ground,' said Sarang Kulkarni. 'Basements, however, typically require traditional beam-and-column structures to facilitate vehicle movement, which Mivan isn't suited for due to its continuous wall design.'
If parking shifts above ground, developers must blend traditional construction with Mivan formwork, potentially increasing timelines and costs.
Another key concern is building height. 'If a project has a 60-metre height cap and 15 metres are used for above-ground parking, only 45 metres remain for residential units. This could reduce the number of floors, affect developer revenues and pushing up apartment prices,' Kulkarni noted.
While multi-level parking structures are a possible workaround, they often sacrifice green or open spaces.
Experts also warn that property values in low-lying or flood-prone areas could decline, as developers may avoid these zones due to the added challenges of parking and drainage constraints.
Experts suggest podium-level construction as a potential solution. Developers can build a raised concrete podium with a sealed, box-like structure beneath it for parking. Ramps can connect this podium to the basement, preventing groundwater seepage while preserving the advantages of underground parking.
'In cities like Mumbai, developers are sometimes granted additional height allowances when basements are used for parking,' said Gupta. 'On larger plots, basement areas can extend beyond the building's footprint, offering more flexibility and capacity—something that's difficult to achieve with stilt or above-ground parking due to zoning restrictions.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Special court closes Powai land case against Niranjan Hiranandani, others
MUMBAI : A special court Monday closed criminal proceedings against developer Niranjan Hiranandani and others in the alleged Rs 30,000 crore Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS) land scam case. The judge observed that prosecuting the accused would not be in keeping with justice and that there was no prima facie case after the state Anti-Corruption Bureau submitted a closure report saying there was no evidence of corruption, monetary gratification, dishonest intention, or criminal conspiracy. The case relates to allegations that prime public land leased at concessional rates for affordable housing was diverted to construct luxury real estate and commercial premises by private developers, notably Niranjan Hiranandani, managing director of the Hiranandani group . "Having perused the closure report, I find that no material or anything incriminating, which could connect the accused…with the alleged crime has been found…in my opinion it would thus, be futile to unnecessarily prosecute the accused.., sans any material against them," special judge Shashikant Eknathrao Bangar said in a 119-page order made available on Tuesday. The judge said the closure reports are based on cogent investigation, verified compliance, and supported by judicial orders of the Bombay high court. Pointing to the HC's orders in three related PILs alleging breach of agreement with govt and misuse of FSI and development rights, the judge said allegations concerning breach of affordable housing obligations, amalgamation of flats, and sale of flats were conclusively examined and remedied. The judge noted that the high court had constituted a three-member joint committee to verify compliance and accepted reports in 2016 and 2017, which confirmed that out of 2,200 flats of 80 sqm, 1,337 were constructed, 12 locked, and 887 remained to be completed as per the plan and timeline. "The directions for completion of the remaining flats were passed with monitoring provisions. Any further breach or non-compliance was made subject to the court's ongoing supervision, obviating the need for separate criminal proceedings…the ACB rightly concluded that no prosecutable offence remained. There was no material to show abuse of public office or conspiracy," the judge said, adding that the probe was a 'fair' one. The ACB, through public prosecutor Ramesh Siroya, submitted before the court that sale of larger flats and amalgamation, though deviating from the spirit of the Agreement, was retrospectively regularised through the high court hearing the PILs. The agreement dated 19 Nov 1986, was executed between the state, MMRDA, and the developer for an area of 232 acres. Based on activist Santosh Daundkar's plea alleging that Hiranandani and others were involved in irregularities in the housing project, a court in 2012 ordered a probe. The ACB filed an FIR against Hiranandani and senior urban development department officer Thomas Benjamin and others under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC. In 2013, the ACB sought to close the case on the grounds that there wasn't sufficient evidence. Daundkar opposed the move. The ACB's closure report, which was rejected by the court on Jan 4 2018, led to a directive for further investigations. Following this, a second closure report was submitted on Aug 30, 2019. Daundkar challenged this report too and sought a reinvestigation. He alleged malafide transfer of the investigating officer, who was purportedly preparing to file a chargesheet against top officials and the builder. Daundkar argued that the final report was a result of administrative interference and suppression of crucial material. He contended that the final report is based heavily on the HC's civil PIL orders and ignores criminal aspects. He sought a fresh probe by an independent agency. The ACB said the allegations were not supported by documentary evidence or witness statements. "There are around 8,000 residents (approx) residing in PADS. None of the residents have filed any criminal complaints over the years pertaining to the development carried out in PADS," it submitted. It also pointed out that Daundkar had neither purchased any commercial premises nor was a resident or investor in the development. The judge rejected Daundkar's plea against the closure report, saying it reiterated allegations already considered in PILs and brought no new substantive material.


Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Spl court closes Powai land case against Hiranandani
Mumbai: A special court Monday closed criminal proceedings against developer Niranjan Hiranandani and others in the alleged Rs 30,000 crore Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS) land scam case. The judge observed that prosecuting the accused would not be in keeping with justice and that there was no prima facie case after the state Anti-Corruption Bureau submitted a closure report saying there was no evidence of corruption, monetary gratification, dishonest intention, or criminal conspiracy. The case relates to allegations that prime public land leased at concessional rates for affordable housing was diverted to construct luxury real estate and commercial premises by private developers, notably Niranjan Hiranandani, managing director of the Hiranandani group. "Having perused the closure report, I find that no material or anything incriminating, which could connect the accused…with the alleged crime has been found…in my opinion it would thus, be futile to unnecessarily prosecute the accused.., sans any material against them," special judge Shashikant Eknathrao Bangar said in a 119-page order made available on Tuesday. The judge said the closure reports are based on cogent investigation, verified compliance, and supported by judicial orders of the Bombay high court. Pointing to the HC's orders in three related PILs alleging breach of agreement with govt and misuse of FSI and development rights, the judge said allegations concerning breach of affordable housing obligations, amalgamation of flats, and sale of flats were conclusively examined and remedied. The judge noted that the high court had constituted a three-member joint committee to verify compliance and accepted reports in 2016 and 2017, which confirmed that out of 2,200 flats of 80 sqm, 1,337 were constructed, 12 locked, and 887 remained to be completed as per the plan and timeline. "The directions for completion of the remaining flats were passed with monitoring provisions. Any further breach or non-compliance was made subject to the court's ongoing supervision, obviating the need for separate criminal proceedings…the ACB rightly concluded that no prosecutable offence remained. There was no material to show abuse of public office or conspiracy," the judge said, adding that the probe was a 'fair' one. The ACB, through public prosecutor Ramesh Siroya, submitted before the court that sale of larger flats and amalgamation, though deviating from the spirit of the Agreement, was retrospectively regularised through the high court hearing the PILs. The agreement dated 19 Nov 1986, was executed between the state, MMRDA, and the developer for an area of 232 acres. Based on activist Santosh Daundkar's plea alleging that Hiranandani and others were involved in irregularities in the housing project, a court in 2012 ordered a probe. The ACB filed an FIR against Hiranandani and senior urban development department officer Thomas Benjamin and others under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC. In 2013, the ACB sought to close the case on the grounds that there wasn't sufficient evidence. Daundkar opposed the move. The ACB's closure report, which was rejected by the court on Jan 4 2018, led to a directive for further investigations. Following this, a second closure report was submitted on Aug 30, 2019. Daundkar challenged this report too and sought a reinvestigation. He alleged malafide transfer of the investigating officer, who was purportedly preparing to file a chargesheet against top officials and the builder. Daundkar argued that the final report was a result of administrative interference and suppression of crucial material. He contended that the final report is based heavily on the HC's civil PIL orders and ignores criminal aspects. He sought a fresh probe by an independent agency. The ACB said the allegations were not supported by documentary evidence or witness statements. "There are around 8,000 residents (approx) residing in PADS. None of the residents have filed any criminal complaints over the years pertaining to the development carried out in PADS," it submitted. It also pointed out that Daundkar had neither purchased any commercial premises nor was a resident or investor in the development. The judge rejected Daundkar's plea against the closure report, saying it reiterated allegations already considered in PILs and brought no new substantive material.


New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
68 acres costing Rs 500 crore identified for tallest skydeck in South Asia
BENGALURU: Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, who also holds the Bengaluru Development portfolio, on Tuesday inspected the site in Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout for the proposed 250-metre skydeck. According to informed sources, the ambitious project of the Karnataka government will come up on 68 acres in 7th block of the layout situated between Mysuru Road and Magadi Road in Kommaghatta. Considered to be the tallest skydeck in South Asia, the project is estimated to cost Rs 500 crore. 'Today, I visited the BDA site in Kemepgowda Layout where the skydeck will come up. The tallest skydeck in South Asia, an ambitious project of Brand Bengaluru, will be our city's pride,' Shivakumar said. An official said that the DyCM will decide on which civic agency will execute the project. Shivakumar was accompanied by former minister and MLA ST Somashekhar, BDA Commissioner Manivannan, and senior officials.