logo
South Korea's presidential front-runner vows to boost stock markets

South Korea's presidential front-runner vows to boost stock markets

Miami Herald21-04-2025
Lee Jae-myung, South Korea's presidential-election front-runner, said he would make changes to the nation's equity markets to eradicate stock manipulation and protect shareholders.
The former leader of the main opposition Democratic Party will seek gradual reform of the corporate governance system by amending a key bill on board duties, and by protecting minority shareholders during corporate actions such as duplicate listings, he said in a Facebook post.
He also promised to come up with a concrete road map for South Korea to get an upgrade to MSCI Inc.'s list of developed markets from its current status of emerging market.
Lee said those measures will end the era of the so-called "Korea Discount," the persistent undervaluations in the Korean equity market, and will help the equity benchmark Kospi to reach the 5,000 level. The Kospi traded almost flat at about 2,485 as of Monday.
South Korea is holding a presidential election on June 3 after former President Yoon Suk Yeol was impeached following his botched attempt at martial law in December.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion - Kamala Harris should not run for president in 2028
Opinion - Kamala Harris should not run for president in 2028

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Kamala Harris should not run for president in 2028

The news that former Vice President Kamala Harris has decided to forgo running for governor of California next year is a clear sign that she is serious about a campaign for president in 2028. Harris would certainly go into the primary season with advantages. But she has proven to be notably tone-deaf in relation to the Democratic Party base, depressing rather than inspiring the kind of turnout needed for victory. As a national candidate, Harris has failed upward. In 2019, with polls in key states showing her in low single digits, her presidential campaign collapsed before a single primary vote had been cast. She made it onto the ticket not because of any appreciable support from voters but because Joe Biden chose her with an eye toward political balance. When Biden finally bowed out of the 2024 race last July, Harris was able to quickly consolidate support for replacing him in the top spot — not due to voter enthusiasm but because of swift backing from party power brokers and Biden himself. During the summer and fall, Harris was unable to sustain momentum, despite raising and spending $1.5 billion in less than four months. Deferring to conventional wisdom when it was least needed, by the time of the party's national convention in August she abandoned any hint of independence, sounding more like a timeworn politician than a fresh voice for change. When the Democratic Party needed to appeal to voters fed up with defenders of the existing order, Harris opted to emphatically represent the status quo. She gained instant and lasting scorn in early October when, appearing on 'The View,' she was asked, 'Would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years?' Harris replied, 'There is not a thing that comes to mind.' That response was much more than just a botched answer. It expressed a basic orientation that remains part of Harris's political persona. A Harris 2028 campaign would remind Democratic voters of her undue loyalty to Biden, whose brand is now badly tarnished in his own party at the grassroots. In March of this year, when a CNN poll asked Democratic voters 'which one person best reflects the core values of the Democratic Party,' only 1 percent chose Biden. Harris came in at 9 percent — behind Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) at 10 percent and just ahead of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) at 8 percent. Most Democrats and independents are looking for authenticity and serious reforms. It is hard for them to say whether Harris lacks the courage of her convictions, since it is so unclear what her convictions actually are. A little-noticed but significant sentence in the recent book 'Original Sin,' by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, spotlights how far Harris has been from a profile in courage. 'The issue that she truly and most strongly disagreed with the president on behind closed doors was Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza,' the book said. But, in public, Harris never expressed the slightest disagreement with the president, even as the death toll mounted among Palestinian civilians. Harris's unwavering public support for Biden's weapons shipments to Israel was politically damaging to her presidential bid. As pollsters learned, her stance seemed indefensible to many. By the start of last summer, polling was clear that most Americans wanted to stop arming Israel. A CBS News-YouGov poll in June 2024 found that Americans were against sending 'weapons and supplies to Israel,' 61 percent to 39 percent. Opposition to the arms shipments was even higher among young people. Yet Harris soldiered on, deploying standard talking points of the Biden administration and ignoring voter sentiment. In August, YouGov pollsters released findings in Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania, three swing states on a razor's edge between Harris and Donald Trump. In all three states, by a ratio of at least five-to-one, a greater number of respondents said they'd be more likely to vote for Harris if she were to support an arms embargo against Israel compared to those who said it would make them less likely to support her. But Harris kept doubling down, repeatedly insisting that there was no daylight between her and Biden on arming Israel. In the process, she put her loyalty to her patron in the Oval Office above what she reportedly believed. That is bound to come back to haunt Harris if she goes onto the presidential campaign trail again. Among Democrats, the polling is now more lopsided than ever. A new Gallup poll foreshadows that if Harris runs in 2028, she will be on the defensive with Democratic primary voters about her record of steadfast support for supplying Israel with vast quantities of weaponry to use in Gaza. Gallup found that only 8 percent of Democrats said they approved of Israel's military action in Gaza. The steady support that Harris has provided means she would be vulnerable to persistent challenges on the subject during a primary race. Overall, a Harris '28 campaign would be a stark reminder of what most Democrats would very much like to put behind them — an era when Harris dedicated herself to serving a deceptive White House that hid the realities of Biden's cognitive decline while maintaining support for Israel's actions in Gaza. Far more than any other prospective 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, Harris would drag attention back to a blameworthy past. She should not run. Norman Solomon is cofounder of RootsAction and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His book 'War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine' was published in 2023. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Which political party do Americans align with more? New poll finds a shift
Which political party do Americans align with more? New poll finds a shift

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Which political party do Americans align with more? New poll finds a shift

More Americans now identify with the Democratic Party than with the Republican Party, reversing the trend of the past two years, according to a new Gallup poll. The shift — a common phenomenon following a presidential election — is largely due to political independents reassessing their loyalties. The Democrats' renewed advantage also comes despite the fact the party suffers from an all-time low favorability rating among the public. The results are based on quarterly telephone interviews of at least 3,000 U.S. adults. They have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Here is a breakdown of the results. An average of 46% of Americans said they identified as Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents in the second quarter of 2025, while an average of 43% said they identified as or leaned Republican. This 3-point lead follows a tie in the first quarter of 2025, in which 45% of respondents identified with both parties. It also marks a reversal of the trend of 2023 and 2024, during which Republicans led or tied in every quarter but two. This quarter's boost in Democratic alignment is 'entirely due to more Americans saying they are independents who lean toward the Democratic Party,' according to Gallup. Meanwhile, the Republican decline was caused by equal shares of those who identify as and lean Republican. As a result, the bulk of the shift in partisan affiliation can be attributed to people with weak party attachments reorienting themselves during the first months of President Donald Trump's second term. Gallup noted that their 'temporary loyalties could easily change.' This trend away from alignment with the ruling party is also not unique. In fact, it has transpired during the first year of the majority of modern presidential administrations. For example, the president's party experienced declines in the share of Americans identifying with it in 1993, the year after former President Bill Clinton took office, in 2009, after former President Barack Obama took the White House, and in 2017, after Trump first gained power. As such, these shifts 'appear to reflect less of a change in how the parties are viewed overall or perceived in terms of competence, and more of a typical reaction to one party controlling the presidency and both houses of Congress,' according to Gallup. The Democratic Party's newfound advantage also comes at a time when the party has never been more unpopular. In the poll, 34% of respondents said they have a favorable view of the party, marking the lowest such figure since 1992, the year Gallup began asking this question. The previous record-low of 36% was registered in November 2014, near the end of Obama's second term. Republicans, meanwhile, received a slightly higher favorability rating of 38%. This is down from the 44% measured in November, following the 2024 presidential election that sent Trump back to the White House. At the same time, both parties received similar marks for their perceived ability to govern. Thirty-five percent of respondents said the Democratic Party can effectively manage the federal government, while 36% said the same for the Republican Party. Republicans, though, held an advantage when it came to their ability to effect necessary changes. Forty-two percent of respondents said the GOP 'can bring about changes the country needs,' while 37% said the same for Democrats.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store