Tony Bloom: I'm here to disrupt Scottish game and take on Old Firm
The Brighton & Hove Albion chairman, Tony Bloom, has spoken publicly for the first time about his £10million investment in Hearts and his intention to 'disrupt' Scottish football.
Months of negotiations were completed when Hearts' members approved Bloom's plan to buy into the Edinburgh club via a 29 per cent stake of non-voting shares. The deal means there is no dilution of voting power for the fans' group and majority shareholder The Foundation of Hearts (FoH). Bloom's long-term right-hand man, James Franks, will become a director to represent him on the board.
Bloom's £9.86million investment is a sum equal to about half of Hearts' annual turnover and amounts to a third significant source of additional income after the funds raised by the FoH's 8,000 monthly pledgers and by the annual multimillion-pound injections from the club director and benefactor James Anderson. Hearts also have about 15,500 season-ticket holders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
Can I force fellow freeholders to pay for roof repairs?
Q. I recently bought a flat in a listed building where residents have a share of the freehold. Each apartment owner pays a tiny monthly maintenance fee, which only covers insurance and basic services. But the freeholders won't fund urgent roof repairs. What recourse do I have? A. The law does not generally distinguish between resident-owned landlords and management companies and those owned by commercial operators. The fact that leaseholders happen to own the freehold usually makes no difference. • Read more expert advice on property, interiors and home improvement Landlords are generally given a discretion about how they want to manage their properties, even though the bills may eventually be paid by leaseholders through their service charges. For example, in the leading service charge case of Waaler v Hounslow (2017), the Court of Appeal confirmed leaseholders are not 'entitled to insist upon the cheapest possible means of fulfilling the landlord's objective'. It also works the other way around. Leaseholders cannot require landlords to add additional premium services, such as resident caretakers, if these are not specifically required by the terms of the flat leases. • Can I force my neighbours to remove a redundant satellite dish? But the landlord's discretion has important limits. One of these is the basic protection for leaseholders provided by their flat leases. Again, it does not matter who happens to own or manage the block. If a resident-owned company does not meet its repairing or other obligations under its leases, the company is still in breach of covenant. It is no excuse that it does not have the money, or that a majority of members have decided they don't need to pay. You should therefore carefully check your flat lease to confirm whether the freehold company is responsible for mending the roof. If it has broken any of its repairing covenants, it does not matter who owns the building. You may still apply to the county court for an order for specific performance of the repairing obligations, requiring the resident-owned landlord to do the work on the roof. Mark Loveday is a barrister with Tanfield Chambers. Email your questions to
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
Investors shore up defences against another August market rout
LONDON, June 26 (Reuters) - Big investors are preparing for the normally thinly-traded months ahead with even more caution than usual as risks of oil price volatility or fresh tariff shocks could shake up the complacent market mood and spark a repeat of last August's rout. Scarred by the sell-off a year ago, when global growth fears hit low volume markets to drive big swings in asset prices worldwide, investors see stocks, bonds and currencies vulnerable against the backdrop of a fragile Israel-Iran ceasefire, seesawing oil prices and trade-war uncertainty . Asset managers said they were raising portfolio protections given the geopolitical risks and uncertainty about China and Europe striking U.S. trade deals as a July 9 deadline looms. "Our positioning is that over the (next) three-month horizon markets will not get the positive confirmations they are pricing in," said HSBC Asset Management Global Chief Investment Officer Xavier Baraton. Baraton is buying equity put options as an insurance, which pay out if stocks fall. Goldman Sachs' asset management chiefs, recommended in a presentation last week, loading up on protection against sell-off scenarios with volatility, interest rate and market-trend strategies. As the July 9 deadline for a U.S.-EU tariff deal approaches, with scant progress so far towards mutually-agreed baseline levies, concern is growing over how long markets will stay numb to trade risks. "If we continue to get this kind of blasé approach to that risk, then it becomes more tempting to be looking for protection over that (July) event," Chris Jeffery, head of multi-asset strategy at Britain's biggest investor LGIM, told Reuters. World stocks, up 7% so far this year, this week touched fresh record highs (.MIWD00000PUS), opens new tab. And Wall Street's fear gauge of expected volatility on the S&P 500 index (.VIX), opens new tab, (.SPX), opens new tab is muted at below 18, down from 52 in April. Still, one-month VIX futures , which cover July 9, are around a 1.5 point premium over the VIX, in a pattern that can signal investors expect market sentiment to sour. HSBC's Baraton said Trump's unpredictability remains a broad market risk. "Markets seem to have forgotten everything that the Trump administration has been threatening to do," he said. Republican leaders are pushing to get what Trump calls his One Big Beautiful Bill Act through Congress and to his desk before the July 4 Independence Day holiday. The bill would add trillions to the $36.2 trillion national debt. Markets can trade calmly for longer than appears rational in part because of a circular relationship between the VIX and risky asset prices linked to how automated trading funds are programmed to behave. Automated volatility control funds, which according to UBS run about $700 billion of assets, often buy stocks when the VIX drops and dump them when it surges. This has been cited as a reason behind last August's brief but sharp selloff. Royal London Asset Management multi-asset head Trevor Greetham said computer programs the group uses to limit clients' exposure to market swings were picking up trading cues driving them to buy equities. But fund managers overseeing RLAM's volatility control robots had decided not to follow them in recent weeks and sold some stocks to manage portfolio risk instead, he said. Goldman asset management partner Simon Dangoor warned, meanwhile, that oil shocks could boost the dollar and upend a consensus it is on a weakening trend. "If we did have a very big disruption in oil markets, that's exactly the kind of shock that could see the dollar higher into a risk-off environment," Dangoor said in last week's presentation. For sure, while Middle East tensions have eased in recent days, risks from the region and especially potential disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz shipping route remain in focus. Oil has swung between $81 and $63 a barrel in June, making it one of the most volatile months for crude in 15 years. An index of expected oil price shifts (.OVX), opens new tab is around its highest since September 2022. UBS European equity strategy head Gerry Fowler said options pricing suggested derivatives traders were betting on a higher frequency of single-day stock market volatility surges, such as last August. This, he warned, may not be the ideal time for vacations. "Given that everybody knows this summer is full of catalysts, there's going to be far fewer people on holiday this year," he said.
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Real estate is on the road to recovery. Here's how to profit
Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest. As with so many other asset classes, the real estate market took fright in 2022. In just two months, the index tracking real estate equity trends fell sharply, down 33pc between August and October of that year. While it has since staged a recovery, up 45pc from its lows, the sector has been on a volatile journey. However, in spite of the macro-economic headwinds of recent years, we see an important positive inflexion point for pan-European listed real estate – and know how investors can profit from it. TR Property Investment Trust offers access to a portfolio of UK and European real estate securities, as well as investments in the bricks-and-mortar properties themselves. The trust has focused solely on property investing for more than 40 years and aims to pay investors an income while compounding their capital growth. It is managed by a highly experienced team led by Marcus Phayre-Mudge and, under his stewardship, the trust has consistently outperformed its market benchmark with about 2pc annualised outperformance over the past five years. Marcus Phayre-Mudge brings a wealth of experience and a disciplined investment approach. His focus on bottom-up analysis and stock selection, combined with a deep understanding of macroeconomic trends, has enabled the trust to navigate volatile markets effectively. The manager's emphasis on balance sheet strength, dividend sustainability, and management quality helps to ensure that the portfolio remains resilient even during periods of economic uncertainty and, importantly, captures the market rebound. The portfolio is diversified across geographies and sectors, with significant allocations to logistics, residential, shopping centres and office properties. As of the end of May 2025, the trust's largest exposures were to the UK, France, Germany and Sweden. Top holdings include Vonovia, a specialist in German residential and one of the largest real estate companies in continental Europe by market capitalisation; TAG Immobilien, a residential company, with a portfolio of about €6.5bn (£5.5bn) split between Germany and Poland; and Picton Property Income, a diversified UK Reit with a weighting towards UK industrial. This reflects a strategic tilt towards high-quality, income-generating assets with strong fundamentals. The trust's physical property portfolio, though a smaller component at about 5pc of net asset value (Nav), provides additional diversification and income stability. In our view, what sets this company apart is its active management style and the ability to adapt to changing market conditions. The trust has demonstrated a strong track record of identifying undervalued opportunities and capitalising on structural trends such as urbanisation, e-commerce and demographic shifts. Its flexible mandate and the closed-end structure allow it to adjust sector and geographic exposures dynamically, enhancing its ability to generate outperformance. In addition, 'animal spirits' have returned to the market over the past few years, and the trust is well-placed to be a beneficiary of this phase in the property cycle. Recent portfolio activity includes selective additions to logistics and residential names, reflecting the manager's confidence in these sectors' long-term prospects. The trust also reduced exposure to office assets in weaker locations, aligning the portfolio with evolving tenant preferences and hybrid working trends. Looking ahead, potential catalysts include a stabilisation in interest rates, improving rental growth and continued consolidation within the pan-European property sector. The trust has a long-standing commitment to delivering income to shareholders. For the year to the end of March 2025, it declared a total dividend of 15.9p per share, representing a 1.3pc increase from the previous year. It currently yields 4.7pc and this dividend has grown every year since 1996 (excluding 2010 where it was held unchanged) and boasts an annual dividend growth rate of 8pc over the last decade. In terms of valuations, the trust is trading at a discount to net asset value, currently about 9pc, which we think presents an attractive entry point for investors. As market sentiment improves, there is scope for this discount to narrow, providing additional upside. The valuation of the pan-European property equity market has bounced off its post-global financial crisis discount levels but, even though Navs are rising, the ratings are still dislocated. Listed real estate share prices continue to be driven by interest rates and movements in the yield curve, and in Britain, a pick-up in transaction activity points to some green shoots of recovery, as well as much-needed price discovery. In this column's view, there is an attractive valuation opportunity in listed real estate. Merger and acquisition activity will probably remain elevated and the market is likely to continue rewarding the winning sub-sectors and quality growth companies, but dispersion is also likely to remain high. At the risk of stating the obvious, the outlook should only improve further if the future path of interest rates is downward.
