Devolution: Hampshire and Isle of Wight mayor election date set
The Hampshire and Solent region, along with Sussex and Brighton, Cumbria, Cheshire, Warrington, Norfolk and Suffolk and Greater Essex, joined the Devolution Priority Programme (DPP) in February.Mr McMahon said: "We are taking the next step in our devolution revolution, shifting power out of Whitehall and into our communities..."The six devolution priority areas are leading the way towards a new era of devolved power in England and a stronger relationship between central and local government."The news was announced at meeting of Hampshire County Council by the leader, Nick Adams-King, who said: "We've got devolution."
Alex Winning, leader of Southampton City Council, said it marked a "pivotal moment"."It reflects our shared ambition and readiness to take on greater powers and deliver real benefits for our communities," he added.Leader of Portsmouth City Council, Steve Pitt, said: "Devolution has the potential to benefit Portsmouth residents and businesses and the wider area and deliver extra regional powers and investment in jobs, infrastructure and services."A separate restructuring of local government is running alongside the devolution plans which would see district and borough councils scrapped.A consultation is under way, with three options, all involving the creation of five councils across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight.
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ofwat to be abolished as ministers explore creating new water regulator
England and Wales' embattled water regulator will be abolished under recommendations from a government-commissioned review due on Monday, the Guardian understands. Ministers will next week announce a consultation into creating a new regulator, to coincide with the results of a review into the water industry directed by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe. This consultation is likely to conclude in the abolishment of Ofwat, the embattled watchdog that polices how much water companies can charge for their services in England and Wales, sources said. Ofwat has faced intense criticism over its failure to prevent sewage spills, hefty payment of dividends and ballooning debts across England and Wales's water companies. The review will recommend creation of new regulatory system. Cunliffe's review was set up by the government amid growing public anger about record sewage spills and rising bills, as well as the fraying finances of some of the biggest companies. It was announced as the largest review of the sector since its privatisation under Margaret Thatcher. At the launch of the review last year, environment secretary Steve Reed said it would 'shape new legislation to reform the water sector so it properly serves the interests of customers and the environment.' Critics of Ofwat have said the regulator presided over a culture of underinvestment in water infrastructure and financial mismanagement by water companies since its creation in 1989. The most troubling case for the government is the UK's largest water company, Thames Water, which is loaded with £20bn in debt and struggling to stave off financial collapse. Thames Water is in talks with Ofwat over a takeover by creditors who hold much of its debt, and is trying to secure leniency from fines and penalties. Should those negotiations fail, it is likely to fall into temporary state ownership via the special administration regime. Cunliffe warned in his interim review that the current regulatory system, including Ofwat, had 'largely lost public trust'. Industry leaders have also long bemoaned a lack of coherence in water regulation, with different regulators and agencies doubling up on areas of investigation. This has made it hard to have timely decisions, allowing probes to drag on rather than prevent or address environmental harm and pollution. Cunliffe had also suggested 'fundamental, structural options for integrating regulatory remits and functions'. Currently, there are three regulators for water – Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Water campaigner and former Undertones frontman Feargal Sharkey said: 'The bonfire of the quangos in the industry needs to go further, we need remedial and radical action and we demand it now. 'A regulator that has never been prepared to acknowledge its role at the epicentre of greed corruption and incompetence is just as guilty as any water company of polluting rivers and exploiting customers.' A government spokesperson said: 'We do not comment on speculation'. Insiders at Ofwat have expressed concern that scrapping the regulator without a clear plan for the future could add to uncertainty at a sensitive time for investment. However, sources said they supported combining some different investigatory and punishment powers within one regulator – even if it cost them their jobs. One insider said 'simply scrapping Ofwat would not be a quick fix'. 'If this were an easy way to avoid putting Thames Water into special administration, I think the government would have done it already,' they added. A senior Whitehall source said they feared the politicisation of regulatory changes could make it harder to attract investment for the water industry in the short and medium term. 'Investors need to know what they are buying,' they said. 'That includes regulation.' On Friday it was revealed serious pollution incidents by water companies were up 60% last year compared with the year before. The total number of serious pollution incidents in 2024 was 75, up from 47 in 2023, Environment Agency figures showed. Of these, 81% (61) were caused by three companies: Thames Water (33), Southern Water (15) and Yorkshire Water (13). Thames Water's serious incidents more than doubled from 14 to 33. Ofwat declined to comment.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Reform seeks to spend up to £570k on three assistants at council
The interim leader of Warwickshire County Council has put forward plans to hire political assistants at a cost of up to £570,000 a assistant would serve each of the three largest parties on the council - Reform UK, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives. Their salary would be up to £190,000 Finch, leader of Reform, which is running the authority as a minority administration, said it was necessary because council staff have been "unable to help come up with the imaginative ideas" to resolve key Lib Dems, Labour and Green Party oppose the idea. Lib Dem leader Jerry Roodhouse said money should be "spent on frontline services and not on political assistants". National legislation allows councils to employ up to three people for this role, one for each of the authority's three largest groups, providing they have at least 10% of the seats assistant's role is to "undertake research and provide administrative support to members of political groups in the discharge of any of their [council] functions".While they would be restricted in what they could say, they are allowed to "speak to the public with the intention of affecting support for a political party" and publish material intended to gain support for a political salary range for these jobs is between £151,000 and £190, 19, will present his proposals at a full council meeting on Tuesday, when a vote will also be held to decide if he should become leader of the Finch was confirmed in the role, he would be among the youngest in that position in the country and, in Warwickshire, oversee a budget of half a billion pounds along with council assets worth £ weeks ago, the Reform UK cabinet unanimously accepted principles set out in the council's medium-term financial plan, which included the assertion that it would "be necessary to set a very high bar for new permanent budget allocations". Disagreement over plans In a statement, Finch said: "For years, the council administration has relied on the corporate policy team to come up with the innovative ideas required to shepherd Warwickshire through the crises we face. "We've found this team to be unable to bring about the change we were elected for."He said the council needed a "fresh, bold approach to policy creation".But Roodhouse said: "I would rather spend £150,000 on family support workers or something that is useful in the community."Green Party group leader Jonathan Chilvers said he was "very surprised" by the proposal and added: "Their claim to voters was that they would cut 'wasteful' council spending, and yet their very first proposal does the exact opposite."Labour group leader Sarah Feeney said: "Given that we are at a time when there are massive cuts to services to balance the books, this seems like an unnecessary expense."The Conservative group said it had not yet made up its mind on the proposals. This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Trial date set for alleged Palestine Action members accused of damaging planes at RAF base
Four people accused of damaging two Voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton in a demonstration allegedly carried out by members of Palestine Action will face trial in January 2027. Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22, appeared at the Old Bailey on Friday, and spoke only to confirm their names. Police previously said the incident in Oxfordshire on 20 June had caused about £7 million worth of damage to the aircraft. It has previously been alleged the defendants had been heavily involved in Palestine Action at the time. On the same day they were charged, MPs backed the Government's move to ban the direct action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. Legislation passed in the Commons as MPs voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. Counter Terrorism Policing South East (CTPSE) charged the defendants with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. On Friday, the defendants appeared at the Old Bailey amid heightened security, with a timetable set for the course of the case. Watched by members of the public in a packed public gallery, the defendants spoke only to confirm their identities, with one mouthing 'I love you' to his supporters. As the prosecution have claimed the case has a 'terrorist connection', it was heard in the terrorism list before Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, with the court told a provision trial date had been identified for 18 January 2027. Prosecutor Jonathan Polnay KC accepted that was 'obviously a considerable distance away' and there was uncertainty at this stage how long any trial would take. Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said the 2027 trial date meant an 'inordinately long time' for the four young people to wait in custody. She said: 'The sooner the real issues in this case are identified the better for everyone, particularly in fixing the trial date.' The senior judge confirmed the 2027 trial date at the Old Bailey but said she would review it at a plea hearing on January 16 next year.
