7 things I learned after my house fire, according to an insurance expert
The sweet scent of cinnamon rolls baking in the oven, a steaming cup of coffee in hand, and holiday carols softly playing in the background is how Christmas mornings usually look in my household.
But last year, our quiet Christmas morning quickly turned into chaos with smoke hanging in the air, sirens blaring, and dozens of firefighters racing from room to room.
As an insurance writer, I've spent the past decade covering the ins and outs of homeowners insurance, helping consumers understand their policies so they can make more informed decisions about protecting their homes. I'm well-versed in the steps to take when filing a claim, coverage details, and the questions to ask. But when disaster came knocking at my door, it hit completely differently. While I expected challenges along the way, the claim and restoration process brought more curveballs than I could have ever imagined.
To help you avoid some of the stress, delays, and unexpected costs I faced, here's what I learned from my house fire insurance claim.
This embedded content is not available in your region.
Learn more: Homeowners insurance: What it covers and how much you'll pay
No. 1: Trust your gut
I've always lived by the motto, 'It's better to be safe than sorry.' So when I caught a faint smell of smoke in my bathroom, I knew something was off. My husband wanted to let it go because there was no visible smoke or fire, but I went with my gut and called 911. Within minutes, six local fire departments arrived at my home with axes, pick poles, and hoses in hand.
It only took a few minutes to locate the source of the fire before they started ripping down my walls, ceiling, and even my beloved shower tile. Once the demolition began, I contacted my insurance agent and started the claim process.
Learn more: How much homeowners insurance do I need?
No. 2: Check your lightbulbs
To my surprise, they identified the cause as a small can light above my linen closet. Over the years, the wiring had become brittle, whether due to incorrect wattage, faulty wiring, or a defective bulb, and eventually began sparking and spreading into the insulation.
Learn more: How can a lightbulb start a fire?
After the fire was extinguished and everyone was out of harm's way, the fire captain explained that if I had waited even an hour or two to call, the fire would have engulfed my entire home.
Trusting my instincts saved our home and our pup from what could have been complete devastation. Every year, the Electrical Safety Foundation International (ESFI) estimates that 51,000 home fires result from electrical issues, causing around $1.3 billion in property damage. So if you have even the slightest gut feeling something isn't right, make the call, even if you're second-guessing yourself.
Up Next
Up Next
No. 3: Document and save everything, if you can
The fire department managed to save most of the debris, including the charred wood above the cabinet, but somehow the actual light fixture got tossed out.
Even though this doesn't sound like a big deal, it was. If we had saved the light, or even just a piece, it could have helped the engineer who inspected my home pinpoint exactly why it caught fire. That could have helped us spot any other electrical problems in the house and prevent another fire. Because the light was lost in the shuffle, I hired my electrician to inspect most of the electrical work throughout my house and replace every canned light with LEDs.
Home insurance policies usually only cover costs they consider 'necessary for the covered repairs,' and what's considered 'necessary' is typically up to your insurer's interpretation. Therefore, if they decide something isn't essential, they may not cover it. This means you'll be left picking up the tab for extra inspections or repair work.
That's why, if the cause of your fire is unknown, do your best to save (and document) everything that may be relevant to solving the mystery. This could include lightbulbs, wiring, or other items that could serve as evidence and even help provide more support for your claim.
Learn more: How much is homeowners insurance? A guide to lowering costs.
No. 4: Have a reputable repair crew on speed dial
When the unexpected happens, the last thing you want is to scramble for help while you're still in shock. Fortunately, my insurance agent referred me to a reputable restoration company, and I already had a list of trusted professionals to contact for repairs. After working with him for two decades, I trusted his recommendations.
That said, even if your insurer gives you referrals, you're not required to use them, and in some cases, their recommendations may not be the best fit for your situation.
If you don't have these contacts handy, you may find yourself wondering who to trust. In moments of crisis, it's easy for pushy companies, or even outright scammers, to take advantage of panicked and uninformed policyholders.
Learn more: What does homeowners insurance not cover?
So, before you need them, make a list of trusted professionals. Ask friends and family for recommendations, and check reviews to find reputable options such as contractors, painters, and plumbers.
For me, having this list ready was worth its weight in gold, especially when the pressure was on.
In addition to cleanup services, restoration companies may offer contracting services, which can act as a one-stop shop for repairs. While this sounds appealing and convenient, their contractors may not have the expertise to help with your project. That's why it's important to vet any contractor thoroughly, whether you find them yourself or through your insurance or restoration company.
No. 5: 'Preferred' doesn't always mean the best
Some vendors, especially those recommended by your insurer, may assure you they'll handle everything directly with your insurance company, including settling the final payment. While these 'preferred' vendors usually have a direct line of communication with your insurer, that doesn't mean you should step back completely. In fact, some preferred contractors rely on insurance companies for work, so they may prioritize keeping that relationship intact over giving you the best advice.
In my case, the restoration company did communicate with my adjuster, but when it came time for payment, the logistics still ended up on my plate. In other cases, homeowners have faced blank contracts that lock them into unfavorable terms, hidden waivers that remove the contractor's liability for damage, or payment arrangements where the contractor gets paid directly, leaving the homeowner without visibility into costs.
That's why it's worth vetting every contractor, whether they come from your insurer's list or your own research, and keeping the lines of communication open from the start.
No. 6: Don't let repairs run on autopilot
Just because you've picked a reputable contractor doesn't mean it's time to kick back and watch the magic happen. While you'd hope every professional treats your home with the same care you do, the reality is, to them, it might just be another job. Staying hands-on, especially with the construction details, can help you avoid costly mistakes and unnecessary headaches.
Unfortunately, I had to learn this the hard way: Paint spilled all over my hardwood floors, my marble countertop chipped, the shower door shattered from a bad installation, and I had to scramble at the last minute to find floor tile I was told didn't need replacing.
Acting as your own project manager is crucial to make sure the work is done right the first time and up to your standards. So, don't be afraid to check progress regularly, ask questions, and confirm details — even if you've been assured they know what to do. This is your home, and the work should meet your expectations from the start.
Learn more: The important difference between actual cash value and replacement cost
No. 7: Set realistic expectations on timing
Even a minor fire claim can take far more time and energy than you expect. When my contractor first walked through the damage, he estimated we'd have everything wrapped up in a month or two. Eight months later, we were still putting the finishing touches on repairs and trying to get life back to normal.
The delays weren't always dramatic, but they added up over time, from discontinued tile to backordered floor stain to installation mistakes and crew vacations. And between those setbacks were the constant interruptions: contractors coming and going, noise, dust, and the mental load of making decisions about colors, materials, and layouts while juggling work and life. On top of that, the time away from work to meet contractors, oversee repairs, or handle claim details can cut into your paycheck, especially if you're self-employed or don't have paid leave.
But here's something to keep in mind: Restoration takes patience and organization. So, prepare for delays and do your best to stay on top of all the moving parts. That way, the process hopefully feels more manageable and less overwhelming.
What my home insurance policy didn't teach me
Having a solid homeowners insurance policy in place is only half the battle when it comes to filing a fire claim. The rest comes down to trusting your gut, documenting everything, choosing suitable professionals for the job, and staying hands-on every step of the way. It's a roller coaster of an experience, so staying patient through delays, mistakes, and endless decisions can help you keep your peace of mind intact.
While you won't find this advice hidden in your homeowners insurance policy's fine print, it can make a world of difference when living through a house fire insurance claim.
Tim Manni edited this article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
Putin made a 'business pitch' to Trump in his statement: Edward Lawrence
FOX Business White House correspondent Edward Lawrence analyzes Russian President Vladimir Putin's 'business pitch' to President Donald Trump in Alaska.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income
Key Points Statistical evidence supports the idea that these two ETFs can simultaneously grow capital and generate income. Maximum monthly drawdowns are less than the benchmark's performance, and so is the risk as defined by standard deviation. These ETFs do relatively best when benchmark indexes are highly volatile but still make money in bull markets. 10 stocks we like better than JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF › The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEMKT: JEPI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ: JEPQ) have garnered significant investor attention, in part due to their trailing-12-month dividend yields of 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Moreover, they offer monthly income, making them a favorite among passive income investors. As such, it would be interesting to share some modeling of their performance to see if they do offer investors a way to a relatively low-volatility strategy that practically guarantees a monthly income. (Keep in mind dividends can always be cut.) Introducing two JPMorgan ETFs The first thing to understand about these two exchange-traded funds is that they are not tailored to invest in dividend stocks. Instead, they both follow the same strategy of investing up to 80% of net assets in equities (stocks), with the only difference being that the Equity Premium ETF focuses on S&P 500 stocks while the Nasdaq Equity Premium ETF focuses on stocks in the Nasdaq-100. As noted above, the stocks are not explicitly selected for their dividend yield, an essential point because high-yield equity-focused ETFs often involve concentrating holdings in sectors with high yields. The remaining net assets, up to 20%, are invested in equity-linked notes (ELNs) that follow a strategy of selling call options on the indexes that the two ETFs benchmark -- S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, respectively. A call option is the right to buy shares of the index at a specified price (the strike price) and is bought by bullish investors. The seller of the call options (in this case the ETF) receives a premium from the buyer. However, if the index increases significantly, the option is exercised, and the ELN typically incurs a loss. Conversely, when the index experiences a small gain, stays flat, or loses value, the option isn't exercised. The idea is that an anticipated net profit in premiums collected from the ELNs, combined with some dividend income from stock holdings, will generate sufficient income for distributions to be paid to shareholders under any condition, particularly in the event of a substantial increase in the index. And note that the upside is limited (gains less than the market), but the downside is also restricted. This table lays out how the portions of the ETFs will perform based on how the underlying index performs in a month. Monthly Index Performance Strong Gain Moderate Gain Moderate Loss Strong Loss Equities (At least 80% of the ETF assets) Strong Gain Gain Loss Strong Loss ELNs (Up to 20% of the ETF's assets) Loss Profit Profit Profit Overall Gain, but less than the market Gain, but less than the market Slight profit/slight loss Loss, but less than the market Author's analysis. What the ETFs need to do to demonstrate they work Before I throw charts at you, it's worth noting that the proof of the strategy working includes: The ETF should have a lower volatility than the index (measured here by the standard deviation of monthly returns). The ETFs should have relatively low maximum monthly drawdowns because passive investors usually do not want to lose a significant amount in any one month. The strategy should demonstrate a high coefficient of determination, or R^2, indicating that the independent variable (in this case, the benchmark index) is primarily responsible for determining the outcome. Performance consistent with the outcomes outlined in the table above. That said, here are the charts comparing the monthly index performance to the ETF's performance. Both sets of data include reinvestment of dividends. First, here's the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. And now the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. A few conclusions can be drawn from the data, along with some additional calculations. The monthly standard deviation of the S&P 500 over the period is 4.7%, compared to 3.1% for JEPI, indicating lower volatility returns. The monthly standard deviation of the Nasdaq-100 over the period is 5.7%, compared to 4.2% for JEPQ, indicating lower volatility returns. Both ETFs exhibit high R^2 values, indicating a consistency of outcome from the strategy. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPI are -6.4%, -4.2%, and -4.1%. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPQ are -8.7%, -6.8%, and -6.6%. In general, the strategy is effective, generating a collection of positive returns when the indices report moderate gains and losses. The downside is limited compared to the index when the market declines significantly, and the upside is limited when the indexes perform well. What it means to passive investors Both indices have performed very well over the periods, with an average monthly gain of 1.5% on the S&P 500 and 1.8% on the Nasdaq; therefore, the ETFs have understandably underperformed. However, there's no guarantee that these conditions will continue, and these ETFs have demonstrated lower volatility returns while maintaining substantial dividends for those seeking monthly income. As such, they are excellent options for those seeking to generate passive income across a range of market conditions. Should you invest $1,000 in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF right now? Before you buy stock in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors react to US-Russia summit reaching no deal
NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin did not reach an agreement to resolve Moscow's war in Ukraine after a nearly three-hour summit in Alaska, though he characterized the meeting as "very productive." "There were many, many points that we agreed on," Trump said at a joint press conference with Putin. "I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway. So there's no deal until there's a deal." COMMENTS: CAROL SCHLEIF, CHIEF MARKET STRATEGIST, BMO PRIVATE WEALTH, MINNEAPOLIS: "The only news was absolutely no news out of it. Not sure there will be any market impactful portions - geopolitical issues in general do not tend to preoccupy market attention for very long if at all." "Markets are at new highs despite this conflict going on for three years. Markets care more about consumers, inflation and commentary from Wyoming next week." MICHAEL ASHLEY SCHULMAN, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, RUNNING POINT, EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA "At this point, it has been three years into the war, so it really shouldn't have much effect. I think markets will take it as status quo, but I think there's only upside from here." ERIC TEAL, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, COMERICA, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA: "The fact that there were no economic sanctions is a positive and markets should breathe a sigh of relief, but it doesn't appear as though a deal is in hand." "If anything, we see opportunity in the energy sector, as oil prices are at pretty low levels here and the prospect of sanctions on oil did not bear out. There could be a relief rally and that would be an opportunity to invest in energy as we head into higher seasonal demands and economic growth beginning to re-accelerate." "Gold and precious metals are likely to sell off because of being an asset class good for safety. Given concerns about inflation, they are a good buying point as well if any weakness." EUGENE EPSTEIN, HEAD OF TRADING AND STRUCTURED PRODUCTS, NORTH AMERICA, MONEYCORP, NEW JERSEY: "I don't think anybody expected it to be particularly specific or substantive. It's essentially a first step towards potentially something more. They both kind of said everything diplomatically. But it's more about the significance of the meeting as a whole, as opposed to the content of what they're saying." "Again, I don't think anybody really expected them to suddenly within a couple of hours come up with a very specific set of plans or any kind of blueprint to something. It basically was just showing their willingness to have continued talks to arrive at a conclusion that is beneficial for all parties. And I think this is just the first steps, and many more to come." TOM DI GALOMA, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF RATES AND TRADING AT MISCHLER FINANCIAL IN PARK CITY, UTAH "Basically, President Trump needs to go back to the European Union and relay what Putin has said. And then he's got to negotiate with Zelenskiy. For the most part, I think they've laid the groundwork for a deal. And my feeling is that it will probably get done, but there's probably a couple more steps. I'm thinking one of those steps will be Trump, Putin and Zelinski all meeting in the next month." "They will probably reach a deal in 30 days. I was kind of surprised that they didn't take any questions. So there's a little bit of disappointment in that, but until a deal is done, you can't really take any questions." "Overall, the markets will like it marginally because I think they've made some progress. But I don't think we will be up 400 points in Dow futures on Sunday night." JAMIE COX, MANAGING PARTNER, HARRIS FINANCIAL GROUP, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA: "Without Ukraine at the table, there was little chance for a peace accord. That Putin attended at all was significant, but he can't be seen ending the conflict while on American soil meeting with Trump." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data