Rentby Officially Launches in Texas and Oklahoma - Accelerating Hassle-Free Renting Across the Heartland
NORMAN, OK, UNITED STATES, June 24, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- Rentby, the local rental marketplace offering a user-friendly and secure platform for rental transactions, is thrilled to announce its official launch in Texas and Oklahoma. This significant milestone marks a key phase in Rentby's strategic rollout across the United States, establishing its rental experience for both renters and lenders in the region.
With this launch, residents of Texas and Oklahoma now have instant access to Rentby's unique rental marketplace, which features local listings, a user-friendly experience, verified users and listings, and exceptional customer service designed to empower the community in making confident rental decisions.
'The launch into Texas and Oklahoma marks our dedication to the local markets that we live and work in. Providing a reliable platform that simplifies the rental experience without the burden of ownership is something that we've envisaged for a long time,' said a spokesperson for Rentby. 'By connecting renters and lenders seamlessly, we are building a community of shared resources built on trust, security, and innovation.'
This launch is just the beginning. Rentby is excited to continue its expansion with upcoming launches in Wyoming, Montana, Kansas, and Arkansas planned over the next few months. Additional states will be added throughout 2025 as part of Rentby's mission to be recognized nationwide as a premier rental solution.
As Rentby continues to grow, it remains committed to its core values of Accessibility, Trust, and Community. The app not only simplifies the rental process but also promotes a sense of community through reliable and supportive customer services, such as listing support and dedicated business services for rental operators.
Rentby is transforming the rental landscape by providing an Airbnb-style marketplace that emphasizes ease, security, and mutual benefit. For more information about Rentby or to begin your rental journey, visit rentby.com today.
Rentby Press Team
Rentby
[email protected]
Visit us on social media:
X
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
Food Stamp Cuts Could Deal a Blow to Small Grocers
Republican cuts to the federal food stamp program could put millions of people at risk of losing benefits, which would make it harder for them to afford groceries. But the changes could have further consequences, as the reductions squeeze small grocery stores that depend on those customers. Grocers and food policy researchers have warned that cuts to the food stamp program, officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, could result in stores laying off workers, raising prices or shuttering entirely as their revenues drop. That has spurred concerns that the cuts could hit local economies and lead to the loss of grocery stores in rural counties that already have few food retailers. The domestic policy bill that President Trump signed last month imposes stricter work requirements on food stamp recipients, applying them to able-bodied adults through age 64. The law also subjects parents with children 14 and older to the mandate. Previously, adults up to age 54 were subject and people with dependents were exempt. The law also shifts some program costs to states, making them pay more administrative costs and a portion of the benefits for the first time unless they maintain lower payment error rates. Several states have said the changes will put hundreds of thousands of households at risk of losing some or all of their SNAP benefits. Some states, including Pennsylvania, have questioned whether they can continue operating the program if they cannot shoulder the extra costs of providing benefits. Republicans say the changes will help reduce dependence on federal benefits and ensure that SNAP serves the neediest families. They have also said the changes would hold states better accountable. But the measures have alarmed some researchers who say they could make it harder for small grocers to stay in business, particularly in rural areas that are more likely to have both higher shares of SNAP participants and lower access to food retailers. Roughly 27,000 food retailers that largely operate in rural counties face the highest risks from the cuts, according to an analysis from the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank. Gina Plata-Nino, a deputy director at the Food Research and Action Center, a nonprofit that supports anti-hunger programs, said the changes could have broad consequences for local economies. If grocery stores bring in fewer dollars, employees at those stores could lose their jobs, she said. Property tax revenue could also fall because of store closures, she added. Ms. Plata-Nino said the cuts could be particularly painful for rural areas with fewer grocery stores. If grocers close or reduce their hours, people could spend more time and money traveling to buy food, she said. The changes could also result in families purchasing less fresh produce and more food with a long shelf life because it is less convenient to go to the store, she added. Robert Greenstein, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution, said that some families would squeeze other parts of their budgets to try to offset the loss of SNAP benefits, but the overall reduction in food purchases would be substantial. 'We'll likely see more independent grocery stores in low-income and rural areas going under, especially during a recession,' Mr. Greenstein said. Stephanie Johnson, the group vice president of government relations at the National Grocers Association, a trade group for independent grocers, said the domestic policy bill provided some benefits to businesses by making certain tax breaks permanent. But she said the group's members already had low net profit margins and some have said that jobs could be affected by the cuts to SNAP. 'Those changes to their SNAP sales may be difficult,' Ms. Johnson said. The association has estimated that the federal program supports about 388,000 jobs across the food industry. Brooke Rollins, the agriculture secretary, said the program was 'never intended to be a windfall for food companies, retailers, and nonprofits,' but rather a 'temporary safety net for families and communities in need.' 'Finally, President Trump's policies are improving the economy and communities across the country,' Ms. Rollins said in a statement. 'With those improvements come jobs, which will reduce dependence on government assistance, preserving it for those truly in need.' Some local officials said they worried about how the cuts could affect food access in their communities. Matt Wireman, the judge executive of Magoffin County, Ky., said there were only two full-service grocery stores in the county, along with several dollar stores that sold food items. Mr. Wireman said he was concerned that grocers could raise prices or struggle to stay in business, given that about 30 percent of the county's roughly 11,300 residents receive SNAP benefits. Store closures could lead to more people traveling as much as 30 minutes to surrounding counties to buy groceries, Mr. Wireman said. He added that he worried poverty could worsen because Republicans have also passed cuts to Medicaid. 'With looming cuts to that and SNAP, we are heading for an economic collapse in rural east Kentucky,' Mr. Wireman said. George Hudson, who owns Hudson's Grocery in Claiborne County, Miss., said that a significant share of his revenue depended on SNAP benefits. 'If I don't get that 15 to 20 percent, or that drops, then that's detrimental to my business,' Mr. Hudson said. Mr. Hudson, who is also a county supervisor, said there were two full service-grocery stores in the county, which has a population of about 9,000 people. He said he did not intend to lay off workers or close his store, but it could be harder to keep prices lower. 'Prices could have to rise in order to make ends meet,' Mr. Hudson said. Some researchers said they were skeptical about the extent of the cuts and did not expect to see a large effect on spending at grocery stores. Kevin Corinth, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, praised the changes to SNAP. He said he hoped to see an increase in employment and thought the stricter work requirements would affect a 'relatively modest share' of people. He said he also expected many states to lower their error rates in the coming years, and that most would probably not have to pay a major portion of the benefits. 'I don't think there's going to be a large reduction in SNAP benefits going to households,' Mr. Corinth said. 'It's possible some states will have to cover a small share, but my guess is that this incentive will be pretty strong.' States will be subject to the new cost-share rules starting in fiscal year 2028, although certain states with higher error rates will have more time to adjust before the changes take effect. States with an error rate of 6 percent or greater will have to pay 5 percent to 15 percent of the benefit costs. States with a lower error rate will not have to shoulder any of those costs. Some estimates have found that millions enrolled in the program, which provides monthly benefits to roughly 42 million people, could be affected by more stringent work requirements. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that changes to the work mandate would reduce participation in SNAP by more than three million people in an average month over the next decade, although that analysis is based on an earlier House version of the bill that included stricter work requirements for parents. The left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has estimated that more than five million people live in a household that would be at risk of losing at least some food assistance because of the expanded work requirements. Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst at the center, said that the bill dramatically expands work requirements and that she did not think they would help people achieve self sufficiency, pointing to a body of research that has found that work requirements do not increase employment. She also said the vast majority of states had an error rate above 6 percent at some point over the last two decades. 'It is very likely that at least in some years, most, if not all, states will ultimately owe this cost share for food benefits,' Ms. Bergh said. The domestic policy bill also cuts off food stamps for some immigrants who are lawfully present in the country and makes it harder for areas to qualify for work requirement waivers if they have higher rates of unemployment. It also ends work requirement exemptions for veterans, homeless people and certain former foster youth. 'It is really an unprecedented structural change to the program that jeopardizes food assistance for millions of low-income families,' Ms. Bergh said.
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
Trump's Tariffs Are Making Money. That May Make Them Hard to Quit.
President Trump's extensive tariffs have already started to generate a significant amount of money for the federal government, a new source of revenue for a heavily indebted nation that American policymakers may start to rely on. As part of his quest to reorder the global trading system, Mr. Trump has imposed steep tariffs on America's trading partners, with the bulk of those set to go into effect on Aug. 7. Even before the latest tariffs kick in, revenue from taxes collected on imported goods has grown dramatically so far this year. Customs duties, along with some excise taxes, generated $152 billion through July, roughly double the $78 billion netted over the same time period last fiscal year, according to Treasury data. Tariff revenue rose in July Monthly government revenue from customs duties and certain excise taxes Note: Monthly totals are calculated by aggregating data from daily reports. Source: U.S. Treasury Department By Ben Casselman and Christine Zhang Indeed, Mr. Trump has routinely cited the tariff revenue as evidence that his trade approach, which has sowed uncertainty and begun to increase prices for consumers, is a win for the United States. Members of his administration have argued that the money from the tariffs would help plug the hole created by the broad tax cuts Congress passed last month, which are expected to cost the government at least $3.4 trillion. 'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Mr. Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labor market. Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than $2 trillion in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that doesn't happen and the United States abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
This City of Prisons Is Suing Over a Planned ICE Detention Center
Like many people in Leavenworth, Kan., Jeff Fagan spent his career working in prisons. The son of a corrections officer at Fort Leavenworth's military prison, Mr. Fagan described going to work as a young man in Leavenworth's silver-domed federal penitentiary. He later got a job at the state prison just outside city limits, where he said he spent nearly four decades as an officer. So when Mr. Fagan heard about plans for a private company to run an immigration detention center in his city, it seemed like a natural fit. Leavenworth is a prison town, after all, and the company was offering a starting wage of more than $28 an hour. 'I'd like to see all the revenue that would come into our community, all the jobs,' Mr. Fagan said, adding that Leavenworth, which has 37,000 residents, is 'not like a community that's completely, totally afraid of the fact that you have prisons.' But even in a place that has been in the corrections business for more than 150 years, plans for an immigration detention center have proved divisive, fusing national tensions into municipal debates. City leaders filed two lawsuits against the detention center's private operator, CoreCivic, after conversations about a local permit fell apart. A judge temporarily blocked the company from housing detainees. Lawyers and activists raised alarms about understaffing and violence when the facility last housed inmates. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
