Polis calls on Colorado lawmakers to delay implementation of first-in-the-nation artificial intelligence law
Colorado is first state to propose new law to regulate use of AI
Colorado is first state to propose new law to regulate use of AI
Colorado is first state to propose new law to regulate use of AI
Colorado is the first state in the nation to pass a law regulating the use of artificial intelligence.
But state leaders are now asking the legislature to delay the law's implementation until January 2027.
The governor, attorney general, Denver's mayor, and members of Colorado's congressional delegation signed a letter saying stakeholders need more time to develop a framework that "protects privacy and fairness without stifling innovation or driving business away from our state."
The law is set to take effect in February of 2026 and would require businesses to disclose when the technology is being used for consequential decisions, like employment, bank loans, housing, and education.
The governor and bill sponsor agreed to work with business, consumer, and civil rights groups on revisions to the law before implementation, but after hundreds of hours of negotiations, there is no compromise, and the legislative session ends Wednesday.
The new law not only applies to tech companies but almost every company in Colorado that has more than 50 employees and uses software to make decisions.
"Both the people who build the software and the people who use it are affected by this bill," says Bryan Leach, founder and CEO of the Denver tech company Ibotta.
Leach says most businesses use software like Indeed to sort job applicants and, under the law, they will need to disclose possible biases the software might have: "You have to guess what the possible unintended, disparate impacts are and list out all of your steps of mitigation, even though you're not a developer of the software."
Bryan Leach, founder and CEO of Ibotta, decries a new state law in Colorado that seeks to regulate the use of artificial intelligence by businesses.
CBS
Business owners would also have to respond to anyone who thinks the software discriminated against them, and if they don't like the answers, they can appeal to the Attorney General's Office.
"Now every person who doesn't like the pile they're in, or the stage they get to, can force an accounting individualized to them from the developer and the deployer," says Leach. "This is a job-destroying bill."
Democratic state Sen. Robert Rodriguez, who's led the charge for the AI regulations, says it's simply about bringing more transparency to the technology.
"Would you like a computer telling you if you could have your job without an interview?" Rodriguez says. "Basically the bill is 'just try. Be responsible. Test your systems. Tell people how it works.' And if you do that, you're never getting in trouble. If you mess up and you try and fix it, you're never in trouble."
Democratic state Sen. Robert Rodriguez discusses his bill that seeks to regulate businesses' use of artificial intelligence.
CBS
Consumer and civil rights groups say the law and a compromise bill Rodriguez introduced last week don't go far enough when it comes to transparency and enforcement.
Rodriguez ended up killing the bill on Monday, and with the legislature adjourning Wednesday, the only way to delay the law's implementation is for the governor to call a special session.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Greg Kidd to Acquire Controlling Interest in Know Labs and Introduce Bitcoin Treasury Strategy
SEATTLE, June 06, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Know Labs, Inc. (NYSE American: KNW ("Know Labs" or the "Company"), a technology innovator specializing in non-invasive health monitoring solutions, today announced that it has entered into an agreement with Goldeneye 1995 LLC ("Buyer"), an affiliate of fintech investor, entrepreneur, and former Ripple Chief Risk Officer, Greg Kidd, to acquire a controlling interest in the Company. Upon the closing of the transaction, Mr. Kidd will become Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Under the terms of the agreement, the Buyer will acquire that number of shares of the Company's common stock obtained by dividing (i) the sum of 1,000 Bitcoin and a cash sum to retire existing debt, redeem outstanding preferred equity and provide additional working capital, by (ii) the per share purchase price of $0.335. The Bitcoin will be employed by the Company's treasury strategy, providing investors with significant economic exposure to this highly attractive digital asset. "I'm thrilled to deploy a Bitcoin treasury strategy with the support of a forward-looking organization like Know Labs at a time when market and regulatory conditions are particularly favorable," said Mr. Kidd. "We believe this approach will generate sustainable growth and long-term shareholder value." Mr. Kidd and his team bring deep expertise in digital assets and, with this deal, will transition their existing Bitcoin yield generation strategy to the public markets. When the Bitcoin holdings become the principal component of the Company's balance sheet, management will use the multiple of net asset value ("mNAV") metric to measure the premium (or discount) investors ascribe to the Company's market valuation relative to its Bitcoin holdings. Given a market capitalization of $128 million, the implied entry mNAV multiple is equivalent to 1.22x and the Bitcoin holdings represent 82% of the market capitalization (assuming a price of $105,000 per Bitcoin) at closing. Founder Ron Erickson will serve as President of a new division that will retain a team of scientists to continue the Company's proprietary diagnostic research. Upon the closing of the transaction, Mr. Erickson will become Vice Chairman of the Board. "Partnering with Greg Kidd marks a pivotal next chapter for Know Labs," said Mr. Erickson. "We look forward to continuing our research in non-invasive medical technology. Greg's visionary leadership positions Know Labs for a bold future." The transaction, which was unanimously approved by the Know Labs Board of Directors, is expected to close in the third quarter of 2025, following the receipt of shareholder approval and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. Advisors Cohen & Company Capital Markets ("CCM"), a division of J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC is serving as exclusive financial advisor and Lowenstein Sandler LLP is acting as legal advisor to the Buyer. Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP is acting as legal advisor to the Company. About Greg Kidd Greg Kidd is co-founder and CEO of Hard Yaka, a venture capital firm, and the majority shareholder of OCC-chartered Vast Bank. As an investor, Greg provided first money at Twitter, Square (Block), Coinbase, Robinhood, and Solana. Other early investments include Ripple, Uphold, and Brave. After working at consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton, he took his first company public on the NASDAQ in the 1990s. He later served in the payments division of the Federal Reserve and as a director at Promontory Financial Group. Greg also served as Chief Risk Officer at Ripple. Greg graduated from Brown University and earned an MBA from Yale University and an MPA in public policy from Harvard's Kennedy School. Greg Kidd was a nonpartisan 2024 candidate for Congress in Nevada's 2nd District. About Know Labs, Inc. Know Labs, Inc. is a public company whose common shares trade on the NYSE American Exchange under the stock symbol "KNW." The Company's platform technology uses spectroscopy to direct electromagnetic energy through a substance or material to capture a unique molecular signature. The technology can be integrated into a variety of wearable, mobile or bench-top form factors. This patented and patent-pending technology makes it possible to effectively identify and monitor analytes that could only previously be performed by invasive and/or expensive and time-consuming lab-based tests. The first application of the technology will be in a product marketed as a non-invasive glucose monitor. The device will provide the user with accessible and affordable real-time information on blood glucose levels. This product will require U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance prior to its introduction to the market. Other products, based upon the Company's technology may not require such FDA approval. Important Information and Where to Find it This communication relates to a proposed transaction between the Company and Buyer. In connection with this proposed transaction, the Company will file a Current Report on Form 8-K with further information regarding the terms and conditions contained in the definitive transaction agreements and a proxy statement on Schedule 14A or other documents with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). This communication is not a substitute for any proxy statement or other document that the Company may file with the SEC in connection with the proposed transaction. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS OF KNOW LABS ARE URGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT, INCLUDING THE DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE PROXY STATEMENT, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT MAY BE FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY IF AND WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Investors and security holders will be able to obtain free copies of these documents, when available, and other documents filed with the SEC by the Company through the website maintained by the SEC at Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by the Company will be available free of charge on the Company's internet website at or by contacting the Company's primary investor relations contact by email at ask@ or by phone at (206) 903-1351. Participants in Solicitation Know Labs, its respective directors and certain of its respective executive officers, Buyer and Mr. Kidd may be considered participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed transaction. Information about the directors and executive officers of Know Labs, their ownership of its common stock, and transactions with related persons is set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, which was filed with the SEC on November 14, 2024 (and which is available at in its proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the sections entitled "Corporate Governance," "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions", which was filed with the SEC on August 12, 2024 (and which is available at certain of its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and certain of its Current Reports on Form 8-K. These documents can be obtained free of charge from the sources indicated above. Additional information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitations and a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be contained in the proxy statement and other relevant materials to be filed with the SEC when they become available. No Offer or Solicitation This communication is for informational purposes only and is not intended to and shall not constitute an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, or a solicitation of any vote or approval, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. Forward Looking Statements This release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as: "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "project," "estimate," "expect," strategy," "future," "likely," "may,", "should," "will" and similar references to future periods. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on the current intent, beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company, its directors or its officers regarding the future of its business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of its control. The Company's actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause the Company's actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following: (i) fluctuations in the market price of Bitcoin and any associated unrealized gains or losses on digital assets that the Company may incur as a result of a decrease in the market price of Bitcoin below the value at which the Company's Bitcoin are carried on its balance sheet; (ii) the effect of and uncertainties related to the ongoing volatility in interest rates; (iii) the Company's ability to achieve and maintain profitability in the future; (iv) the timing to consummate the proposed transaction, (v) the risk that a condition of closing of the proposed transaction may not be satisfied or that the closing of the proposed transaction might otherwise not occur; (vi) the impact of the regulatory environment on the Company's business and complexities with compliance related to such environment including changes in securities laws or other laws or regulations; (vii) changes in the accounting treatment relating to the Company's Bitcoin holdings; (viii) the Company's ability to respond to general economic conditions; (ix) the Company's ability to manage its growth effectively and its expectations regarding the development and expansion of its business; (x) the Company's ability to access sources of capital, including debt financing and other sources of capital to finance operations and growth and (xi) other risks and uncertainties more fully detailed in the section captioned "Risk Factors" in the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, Forms 10-Q and 8-K, and other reports filed with the SEC from time to time. As a result of these matters, changes in facts, assumptions not being realized or other circumstances, the Company's actual results may differ materially from the expected results discussed in the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Forward-looking statements contained in this announcement are only made as of this date, and the Company undertakes no duty to update such information after the date of this announcement except as required under applicable law. View source version on Contacts Greg Kidd Contact:Alliance Advisorsirteamgk@ Know Labs, Inc. Contact:ask@ Ph. (206) 903-1351
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. Appeals court decides
By Dietrich Knauth (Reuters) -A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Associated Press
34 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. An attorney for Brehm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Another lawsuit over the dismantling of the agency is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.
