Further rate cuts at risk as rent pushes up inflation
The latest data from Cotality shows there are concerns for housing inflation and its knock-on effects off the back of rental re-acceleration picking up in state capitals for the first time in two years.
The capital city rental value index has increased by three per cent to July 2025, up from 2.7 per cent a month before, according to Cotality's August monthly housing chart pack.
That has marked the end of 16-straight months of moderating or stable rental growth.
It was a trend worth keeping an eye on, Cotality economist Kaytlin Ezzy said.
"The re-acceleration that we've seen in rent value growth and construction costs more recently are an indication that maybe the housing component of inflation has sort of hit its floor in terms of the pace of growth," she told AAP.
"And that we would see that component of the CPI basket shift higher moving forward.
"If it does continue to trend higher, it could put future rate cuts at jeopardy."
The consumer price index (CPI) basket is goods and services used to track changes in cost of living.
The housing component made up more than one-fifth of the basket and rents accounted for 6.6 per cent, Ms Ezzy said.
Another concern for housing inflation is an uptick in construction costs shifting to 2.9 per cent to June 2025, from 2.6 per cent in the 12 months to June 2024.
Labour was a major factor in driving increased construction costs, Ms Ezzy said.
"We recently put out our CCCI Index report, which covers off the increase in construction costs over the June quarter ... it does suggest that we are seeing a little bit more pressure in construction costs, particularly residential projects competing for that labour with infrastructure projects," she said.
Sydney and Brisbane have led the re-acceleration in capital city rental growth with their unit markets driving the uptick.
Annual changes in dwelling rents in the NSW capital have gone from a recent low of 1.8 per cent to 2.4 per cent in the 12 months to July.
Brisbane's annual rental trend has risen by 1.4 percentage points following lows in February of 3.2 per cent to 4.6 per cent.
Melbourne's healthy flow of new housing stock to the market had kept the trend in rent growth a little bit lower in recent years, Ms Ezzy said.
The Reserve Bank cut interest rates for a third time in six months on Tuesday.
Rising construction costs and rental increases may prove to be stumbling blocks for further rate cuts from the Reserve Bank.
The latest data from Cotality shows there are concerns for housing inflation and its knock-on effects off the back of rental re-acceleration picking up in state capitals for the first time in two years.
The capital city rental value index has increased by three per cent to July 2025, up from 2.7 per cent a month before, according to Cotality's August monthly housing chart pack.
That has marked the end of 16-straight months of moderating or stable rental growth.
It was a trend worth keeping an eye on, Cotality economist Kaytlin Ezzy said.
"The re-acceleration that we've seen in rent value growth and construction costs more recently are an indication that maybe the housing component of inflation has sort of hit its floor in terms of the pace of growth," she told AAP.
"And that we would see that component of the CPI basket shift higher moving forward.
"If it does continue to trend higher, it could put future rate cuts at jeopardy."
The consumer price index (CPI) basket is goods and services used to track changes in cost of living.
The housing component made up more than one-fifth of the basket and rents accounted for 6.6 per cent, Ms Ezzy said.
Another concern for housing inflation is an uptick in construction costs shifting to 2.9 per cent to June 2025, from 2.6 per cent in the 12 months to June 2024.
Labour was a major factor in driving increased construction costs, Ms Ezzy said.
"We recently put out our CCCI Index report, which covers off the increase in construction costs over the June quarter ... it does suggest that we are seeing a little bit more pressure in construction costs, particularly residential projects competing for that labour with infrastructure projects," she said.
Sydney and Brisbane have led the re-acceleration in capital city rental growth with their unit markets driving the uptick.
Annual changes in dwelling rents in the NSW capital have gone from a recent low of 1.8 per cent to 2.4 per cent in the 12 months to July.
Brisbane's annual rental trend has risen by 1.4 percentage points following lows in February of 3.2 per cent to 4.6 per cent.
Melbourne's healthy flow of new housing stock to the market had kept the trend in rent growth a little bit lower in recent years, Ms Ezzy said.
The Reserve Bank cut interest rates for a third time in six months on Tuesday.
Rising construction costs and rental increases may prove to be stumbling blocks for further rate cuts from the Reserve Bank.
The latest data from Cotality shows there are concerns for housing inflation and its knock-on effects off the back of rental re-acceleration picking up in state capitals for the first time in two years.
The capital city rental value index has increased by three per cent to July 2025, up from 2.7 per cent a month before, according to Cotality's August monthly housing chart pack.
That has marked the end of 16-straight months of moderating or stable rental growth.
It was a trend worth keeping an eye on, Cotality economist Kaytlin Ezzy said.
"The re-acceleration that we've seen in rent value growth and construction costs more recently are an indication that maybe the housing component of inflation has sort of hit its floor in terms of the pace of growth," she told AAP.
"And that we would see that component of the CPI basket shift higher moving forward.
"If it does continue to trend higher, it could put future rate cuts at jeopardy."
The consumer price index (CPI) basket is goods and services used to track changes in cost of living.
The housing component made up more than one-fifth of the basket and rents accounted for 6.6 per cent, Ms Ezzy said.
Another concern for housing inflation is an uptick in construction costs shifting to 2.9 per cent to June 2025, from 2.6 per cent in the 12 months to June 2024.
Labour was a major factor in driving increased construction costs, Ms Ezzy said.
"We recently put out our CCCI Index report, which covers off the increase in construction costs over the June quarter ... it does suggest that we are seeing a little bit more pressure in construction costs, particularly residential projects competing for that labour with infrastructure projects," she said.
Sydney and Brisbane have led the re-acceleration in capital city rental growth with their unit markets driving the uptick.
Annual changes in dwelling rents in the NSW capital have gone from a recent low of 1.8 per cent to 2.4 per cent in the 12 months to July.
Brisbane's annual rental trend has risen by 1.4 percentage points following lows in February of 3.2 per cent to 4.6 per cent.
Melbourne's healthy flow of new housing stock to the market had kept the trend in rent growth a little bit lower in recent years, Ms Ezzy said.
The Reserve Bank cut interest rates for a third time in six months on Tuesday.
Rising construction costs and rental increases may prove to be stumbling blocks for further rate cuts from the Reserve Bank.
The latest data from Cotality shows there are concerns for housing inflation and its knock-on effects off the back of rental re-acceleration picking up in state capitals for the first time in two years.
The capital city rental value index has increased by three per cent to July 2025, up from 2.7 per cent a month before, according to Cotality's August monthly housing chart pack.
That has marked the end of 16-straight months of moderating or stable rental growth.
It was a trend worth keeping an eye on, Cotality economist Kaytlin Ezzy said.
"The re-acceleration that we've seen in rent value growth and construction costs more recently are an indication that maybe the housing component of inflation has sort of hit its floor in terms of the pace of growth," she told AAP.
"And that we would see that component of the CPI basket shift higher moving forward.
"If it does continue to trend higher, it could put future rate cuts at jeopardy."
The consumer price index (CPI) basket is goods and services used to track changes in cost of living.
The housing component made up more than one-fifth of the basket and rents accounted for 6.6 per cent, Ms Ezzy said.
Another concern for housing inflation is an uptick in construction costs shifting to 2.9 per cent to June 2025, from 2.6 per cent in the 12 months to June 2024.
Labour was a major factor in driving increased construction costs, Ms Ezzy said.
"We recently put out our CCCI Index report, which covers off the increase in construction costs over the June quarter ... it does suggest that we are seeing a little bit more pressure in construction costs, particularly residential projects competing for that labour with infrastructure projects," she said.
Sydney and Brisbane have led the re-acceleration in capital city rental growth with their unit markets driving the uptick.
Annual changes in dwelling rents in the NSW capital have gone from a recent low of 1.8 per cent to 2.4 per cent in the 12 months to July.
Brisbane's annual rental trend has risen by 1.4 percentage points following lows in February of 3.2 per cent to 4.6 per cent.
Melbourne's healthy flow of new housing stock to the market had kept the trend in rent growth a little bit lower in recent years, Ms Ezzy said.
The Reserve Bank cut interest rates for a third time in six months on Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
Undervalued Melbourne suburbs set for major property boom
Melbourne is 'tremendously undervalued' and overdue for a boom, with new research showing which suburbs could be set for some of the biggest jumps. Experts are tipping this year's third Reserve Bank rate cut could finally be the one to turn the city's housing fortunes around, and areas like St Kilda East, Noble Park and Doreen are poised to get the best boost. The analysis from SuburbData tracked demand-to-supply ratios, price gaps with neighbouring suburbs, as well as the difference between house and unit prices to pinpoint postcodes primed for the next growth spurt. St Kilda East leads the pack, with typical house values a staggering $348,000 cheaper than nearby bayside postcodes. Noble Park and Doreen are also trading at steep discounts compared to their neighbours, despite strong transport, shopping and schooling options. SuburbData director Jeremy Sheppard said knowing where value lay in Melbourne's market was critical. 'Melbourne is tremendously undervalued … homes have become such an enormous investment … families need to be cannier about where they buy,' Mr Sheppard said. He added that undervalued suburbs were often those priced below neighbouring areas without clear geographic disadvantages, where growth had been lacklustre while nearby markets surged, and where buyer demand was now starting to outweigh supply. 'When buyers find better value for money in a market, that's when you get a feeding frenzy,' Mr Sheppard said. 'It may take a while till you get any growth on your investment in an overvalued suburb … buying at the peak of a fast moving market could even mean, in extreme cases, that prices soon fall.' Prominent Bayside real estate director Gary Peer said the median price in St Kilda East was 'heavily influenced by apartment sales'. 'St Kilda East is absolutely prolific when it comes to apartments, historically it's been a hotspot for investors,' Mr Peer said. 'But over the past few years, many investors have exited the market for a variety of reasons. 'The rapid rise in interest rates was a big one — though we're now starting to get some relief. Land tax has also bitten hard.' The Gary Peer Real Estate boss said the result of that investor exodus has been a shift in the buyer pool, and coupled with high numbers of sales it had led to softer price growth in the suburb. 'Compared to five years ago, prices in St Kilda East haven't climbed the way we might have expected,' Mr Peer said 'In some cases they've stayed flat or even gone backwards — and that's rare in Melbourne.' He noted that the suburb was still a 'premier address' and 'as affordable as St Kilda East is likely to be for years'. Whitefox chief executive and The Block judge Marty Fox said the relative affordability, especially the six-figure gap between St Kilda East and neighbouring areas, wouldn't last long. 'Historically, these kinds of disparities don't survive long once buyers start connecting the dots on lifestyle, transport, and amenity,' Mr Fox said. 'Once demand tips, you can see 10-15 per cent lifts inside a year, especially if there's a catalyst like infrastructure upgrades, a rate cut, or just the media finally catching on.' Melbourne's fundamentals are also likely to help drive prices up in undervalued areas. 'You've got population growth back at pace, rental supply at record lows, and construction costs pushing replacement values higher,' Mr Fox said. 'The gap between what buyers think property is worth and what it should be worth is the widest I've seen in years, and that's an opportunity for those who aren't scared to act before the crowd catches on.' Tuesday's interest rate cut, while important, was not the only factor in a boost to home values. 'Cheaper money acts like lighter fluid on buyer intent, but the spark will be confidence,' Mr Fox said. Areas where home values are significantly cheaper than neighbouring suburbs St Kilda East $1.2m – $348,000 cheaper Box Hill North $1.4m – $135,000 cheaper Doreen $788,000 – $49,000 cheaper Noble Park $794,000 – $42,000 cheaper Kings Park $682,000 – $39,000 cheaper St Albans $721,000 – $34,000 cheaper Deer Park $653,000 – $35,000 cheaper Officer $756,000 – $32,000 cheaper Westmeadows $765,000 – $6000 cheaper Mickleham $714,000 – $2000 cheaper
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
Melbourne auction market braces for major shift after rate cut
An interest-rate cut earlier this week has been tipped to start giving Melbourne's auction market a lift as soon as this weekend. But property experts believe it will be a looming change to Australia's First Home Guarantee that will have first-home buyers in particular looking to make a move as soon as possible. Tuesday's 0.25 percentage point rate cut by the Reserve Bank added about $20,000 to the borrowing capacity of a typical homebuyer, while also boosting confidence with the prospect of smaller mortgage costs once they settle their purchase. It's good news of the owners of the 887 Victorian homes set to go under the hammer this week, according to PropTrack, following a 68 per cent clearance rate last week. PropTrack senior economist Eleanor Creagh said the latest rate cut was likely to give some buyers a modest confidence boost. 'That being said, the impact of rate cuts on auction activity tends to build gradually rather than at once, as buyers factor the change into their finances and bidding strategies,' Ms Creagh said. However, Real Estate Institute of Victoria director and Compton Green Inner West director Adrian Butera said Melbourne homebuyers had been very active this winter, which he attributed to buyers already taking interest rate cuts into account. 'We are seeing more buyers come through real estate, maybe 15 to 20 per cent more – that's an estimate – but that is also maybe down to a lack of stock,' Mr Butera said. Melbourne-based buyer's advocate Emily Wallace said in addition to rate cuts boosting buyer confidence, many young purchasers were now hoping to secure a home before Christmas. From January 1, the federal government's Home Guarantee Scheme will become open to all Australian first-home buyers with a 5 per cent deposit, regardless of their income. Under the scheme, which is currently means-tested and accepts a limited number of buyers, the federal government guarantees up to 15 per cent of a home loan's value. From next year the program's price cap for people wanting to buy in Melbourne and some of regional Victoria is set to rise from $800,000 to $950,000 per home, as well as removing income thresholds. Ms Wallace said many buyers felt with this change on top of interest rate cuts, homes priced below $950,000 would 'be even more competitive' from next year. 'So I think there's a sentiment of, 'Let's get in now,' she said. 'I think, anything that lowers barriers for other buyers to come into the market, you'd want to get in before that.'
The Advertiser
12 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Responsibility, not legacy driving Chalmers to reform
If those who can't remember history are condemned to repeat it, Jim Chalmers has as good a chance as any at avoiding the pitfalls of reformist treasurers past. Dr Chalmers is attempting the most ambitious process of economic reform by a Labor treasurer since Paul Keating's 1985 tax summit or Wayne Swan's tax forum of 2011. While Mr Keating's summit led to significant reform around income taxes, it buried his centrepiece policy - a broad-based consumption tax like the GST - for another 15 years. Mr Swan's attempt amounted to even less. History will drive Dr Chalmers as he prepares for his own economic reform roundtable - running from Tuesday to Thursday in Canberra - speculates veteran economist Saul Eslake. "As a biographer of Keating and a former staffer for Swan, he knows the difference between treasurers who are remembered as great treasurers and treasurers who aren't, and he'd like to be in the former group, I suspect," Mr Eslake says. Dr Chalmers says he doesn't see it in personal terms. Australia's economy has made a lot of positive strides in recent years, he says. Economic developments last week backed that up, with unemployment falling, real wages growing at a five-year high and a third interest rate cut in six months. But global volatility required more economic resilience, the nation's dismal productivity performance was holding back living standards and a growing budget deficit threatened Australia's future prosperity. He sees the roundtable as an opportunity to reform the country in ways that make Australians better off. "I do feel that all of us have a responsibility to use these positions of influence to strengthen the economy and, really, we can't afford as a country to waste the next decade like our predecessors wasted the last one," Dr Chalmers tells AAP. "So I feel that responsibility but don't see it in personal terms necessarily." Already, the consultation has been worth it. "We've shaken the tree for a whole bunch of ideas," he says. "We've focused the country's attention on our big economic challenges, primarily productivity, and we've helped people understand the kinds of trade-offs and challenges the government is grappling with." Dr Chalmers says he's optimistic he'll find common ground in moves to remove unnecessary regulation holding back productivity, housing supply and the clean energy transition. One example is the financial regulator ASIC's announcement on Wednesday that it will review a regulation called RG 97, which forces super funds to disclose stamp duty when reporting fees involved in housing investments. After feedback from investors at a roundtable in the lead-up to Dr Chalmers' summit, ASIC heard removing the requirement could boost housing investment by $8.7 billion and get an additional 35,000 homes built by institutional investors over the next five years. That's the low-hanging fruit. But there are signs the treasurer has been forced to lower his sights for more electorally difficult, large-scale tax reform. Dr Chalmers insists he and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese are singing from the same hymn sheet. But Mr Eslake believes the treasurer's ambition has been reeled in by his boss, "the staunchest defender of the status quo of any prime minister I can remember". "Those aspirations appear to have been shot down, as it were, by his much more cautious prime minister, who has made it clear, particularly in the tax space, they're not going to do anything they hadn't said they would do during the election campaign," he says. History shows governments can't push through major, contentious tax reform without receiving a mandate from the electorate. But Mr Albanese found himself with a slim majority in his first term, so felt he could only seek a light mandate at his second election, limiting his government to a minor agenda on tax. One of those policies, reducing the tax concession for holders of large superannuation accounts, has copped flak because it would tax capital gains on assets before they are sold and the increased value is realised. Mr Eslake would love to see the government use the roundtable as an opportunity to revisit the tax. "While I support the objective, that people with big super balances should pay more tax, I absolutely support that, I don't like the idea of taxing unrealised gains," he says. "Sometimes voters will give a government credit for saying, 'yes, I know we had this idea but we've listened to the people and we've realised it's not a good idea'." Dr Chalmers says he will listen to concerns about the policy but his intention is to proceed with the legislation regardless. "I try and have a genuinely consultative approach," he says. "But we announced that policy more than two and a half years ago, we're yet to hear an idea about a better way to go about it. I expect people will raise it at the roundtable and that's fine." While he stresses he doesn't want to pre-empt things by ruling any ideas in or out in advance, he acknowledges some policies, like raising or broadening the GST, will less likely receive his support. "The policy changes we are most likely to pick up and run with are the ones consistent with the government's values and directions," Dr Chalmers says. The government has consulted far and wide for reform ideas in the lead-up to the roundtable. Nearly 900 submissions have been received, ministers have held more than 40 roundtables of their own and regulators have pitched 280 new ways to reduce the burden of red tape. Dr Chalmers hopes he can find consensus to avoid the failures of past talkfests and has extended an invitation to shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien "in good faith". But he fears the coalition will be intentionally obstructionist, to make the roundtable appear a failure and inflict political damage on the government. "My preference would be that they're constructive about that opportunity," he says. "Unfortunately, they're showing no signs of that yet. I think it will go down badly in the room if they just try and turn it into some kind of political stunt." Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has accused Labor of choreographing the entire exercise to push through pre-determined policies, following a leaked Treasury document briefing Dr Chalmers on potential outcomes of the summit. "It just tells me this whole thing is a stitch-up," she told reporters on Thursday. "They're lining up an exercise at this productivity roundtable that is all about raising taxes. "We'll call it out when we see it." If those who can't remember history are condemned to repeat it, Jim Chalmers has as good a chance as any at avoiding the pitfalls of reformist treasurers past. Dr Chalmers is attempting the most ambitious process of economic reform by a Labor treasurer since Paul Keating's 1985 tax summit or Wayne Swan's tax forum of 2011. While Mr Keating's summit led to significant reform around income taxes, it buried his centrepiece policy - a broad-based consumption tax like the GST - for another 15 years. Mr Swan's attempt amounted to even less. History will drive Dr Chalmers as he prepares for his own economic reform roundtable - running from Tuesday to Thursday in Canberra - speculates veteran economist Saul Eslake. "As a biographer of Keating and a former staffer for Swan, he knows the difference between treasurers who are remembered as great treasurers and treasurers who aren't, and he'd like to be in the former group, I suspect," Mr Eslake says. Dr Chalmers says he doesn't see it in personal terms. Australia's economy has made a lot of positive strides in recent years, he says. Economic developments last week backed that up, with unemployment falling, real wages growing at a five-year high and a third interest rate cut in six months. But global volatility required more economic resilience, the nation's dismal productivity performance was holding back living standards and a growing budget deficit threatened Australia's future prosperity. He sees the roundtable as an opportunity to reform the country in ways that make Australians better off. "I do feel that all of us have a responsibility to use these positions of influence to strengthen the economy and, really, we can't afford as a country to waste the next decade like our predecessors wasted the last one," Dr Chalmers tells AAP. "So I feel that responsibility but don't see it in personal terms necessarily." Already, the consultation has been worth it. "We've shaken the tree for a whole bunch of ideas," he says. "We've focused the country's attention on our big economic challenges, primarily productivity, and we've helped people understand the kinds of trade-offs and challenges the government is grappling with." Dr Chalmers says he's optimistic he'll find common ground in moves to remove unnecessary regulation holding back productivity, housing supply and the clean energy transition. One example is the financial regulator ASIC's announcement on Wednesday that it will review a regulation called RG 97, which forces super funds to disclose stamp duty when reporting fees involved in housing investments. After feedback from investors at a roundtable in the lead-up to Dr Chalmers' summit, ASIC heard removing the requirement could boost housing investment by $8.7 billion and get an additional 35,000 homes built by institutional investors over the next five years. That's the low-hanging fruit. But there are signs the treasurer has been forced to lower his sights for more electorally difficult, large-scale tax reform. Dr Chalmers insists he and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese are singing from the same hymn sheet. But Mr Eslake believes the treasurer's ambition has been reeled in by his boss, "the staunchest defender of the status quo of any prime minister I can remember". "Those aspirations appear to have been shot down, as it were, by his much more cautious prime minister, who has made it clear, particularly in the tax space, they're not going to do anything they hadn't said they would do during the election campaign," he says. History shows governments can't push through major, contentious tax reform without receiving a mandate from the electorate. But Mr Albanese found himself with a slim majority in his first term, so felt he could only seek a light mandate at his second election, limiting his government to a minor agenda on tax. One of those policies, reducing the tax concession for holders of large superannuation accounts, has copped flak because it would tax capital gains on assets before they are sold and the increased value is realised. Mr Eslake would love to see the government use the roundtable as an opportunity to revisit the tax. "While I support the objective, that people with big super balances should pay more tax, I absolutely support that, I don't like the idea of taxing unrealised gains," he says. "Sometimes voters will give a government credit for saying, 'yes, I know we had this idea but we've listened to the people and we've realised it's not a good idea'." Dr Chalmers says he will listen to concerns about the policy but his intention is to proceed with the legislation regardless. "I try and have a genuinely consultative approach," he says. "But we announced that policy more than two and a half years ago, we're yet to hear an idea about a better way to go about it. I expect people will raise it at the roundtable and that's fine." While he stresses he doesn't want to pre-empt things by ruling any ideas in or out in advance, he acknowledges some policies, like raising or broadening the GST, will less likely receive his support. "The policy changes we are most likely to pick up and run with are the ones consistent with the government's values and directions," Dr Chalmers says. The government has consulted far and wide for reform ideas in the lead-up to the roundtable. Nearly 900 submissions have been received, ministers have held more than 40 roundtables of their own and regulators have pitched 280 new ways to reduce the burden of red tape. Dr Chalmers hopes he can find consensus to avoid the failures of past talkfests and has extended an invitation to shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien "in good faith". But he fears the coalition will be intentionally obstructionist, to make the roundtable appear a failure and inflict political damage on the government. "My preference would be that they're constructive about that opportunity," he says. "Unfortunately, they're showing no signs of that yet. I think it will go down badly in the room if they just try and turn it into some kind of political stunt." Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has accused Labor of choreographing the entire exercise to push through pre-determined policies, following a leaked Treasury document briefing Dr Chalmers on potential outcomes of the summit. "It just tells me this whole thing is a stitch-up," she told reporters on Thursday. "They're lining up an exercise at this productivity roundtable that is all about raising taxes. "We'll call it out when we see it." If those who can't remember history are condemned to repeat it, Jim Chalmers has as good a chance as any at avoiding the pitfalls of reformist treasurers past. Dr Chalmers is attempting the most ambitious process of economic reform by a Labor treasurer since Paul Keating's 1985 tax summit or Wayne Swan's tax forum of 2011. While Mr Keating's summit led to significant reform around income taxes, it buried his centrepiece policy - a broad-based consumption tax like the GST - for another 15 years. Mr Swan's attempt amounted to even less. History will drive Dr Chalmers as he prepares for his own economic reform roundtable - running from Tuesday to Thursday in Canberra - speculates veteran economist Saul Eslake. "As a biographer of Keating and a former staffer for Swan, he knows the difference between treasurers who are remembered as great treasurers and treasurers who aren't, and he'd like to be in the former group, I suspect," Mr Eslake says. Dr Chalmers says he doesn't see it in personal terms. Australia's economy has made a lot of positive strides in recent years, he says. Economic developments last week backed that up, with unemployment falling, real wages growing at a five-year high and a third interest rate cut in six months. But global volatility required more economic resilience, the nation's dismal productivity performance was holding back living standards and a growing budget deficit threatened Australia's future prosperity. He sees the roundtable as an opportunity to reform the country in ways that make Australians better off. "I do feel that all of us have a responsibility to use these positions of influence to strengthen the economy and, really, we can't afford as a country to waste the next decade like our predecessors wasted the last one," Dr Chalmers tells AAP. "So I feel that responsibility but don't see it in personal terms necessarily." Already, the consultation has been worth it. "We've shaken the tree for a whole bunch of ideas," he says. "We've focused the country's attention on our big economic challenges, primarily productivity, and we've helped people understand the kinds of trade-offs and challenges the government is grappling with." Dr Chalmers says he's optimistic he'll find common ground in moves to remove unnecessary regulation holding back productivity, housing supply and the clean energy transition. One example is the financial regulator ASIC's announcement on Wednesday that it will review a regulation called RG 97, which forces super funds to disclose stamp duty when reporting fees involved in housing investments. After feedback from investors at a roundtable in the lead-up to Dr Chalmers' summit, ASIC heard removing the requirement could boost housing investment by $8.7 billion and get an additional 35,000 homes built by institutional investors over the next five years. That's the low-hanging fruit. But there are signs the treasurer has been forced to lower his sights for more electorally difficult, large-scale tax reform. Dr Chalmers insists he and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese are singing from the same hymn sheet. But Mr Eslake believes the treasurer's ambition has been reeled in by his boss, "the staunchest defender of the status quo of any prime minister I can remember". "Those aspirations appear to have been shot down, as it were, by his much more cautious prime minister, who has made it clear, particularly in the tax space, they're not going to do anything they hadn't said they would do during the election campaign," he says. History shows governments can't push through major, contentious tax reform without receiving a mandate from the electorate. But Mr Albanese found himself with a slim majority in his first term, so felt he could only seek a light mandate at his second election, limiting his government to a minor agenda on tax. One of those policies, reducing the tax concession for holders of large superannuation accounts, has copped flak because it would tax capital gains on assets before they are sold and the increased value is realised. Mr Eslake would love to see the government use the roundtable as an opportunity to revisit the tax. "While I support the objective, that people with big super balances should pay more tax, I absolutely support that, I don't like the idea of taxing unrealised gains," he says. "Sometimes voters will give a government credit for saying, 'yes, I know we had this idea but we've listened to the people and we've realised it's not a good idea'." Dr Chalmers says he will listen to concerns about the policy but his intention is to proceed with the legislation regardless. "I try and have a genuinely consultative approach," he says. "But we announced that policy more than two and a half years ago, we're yet to hear an idea about a better way to go about it. I expect people will raise it at the roundtable and that's fine." While he stresses he doesn't want to pre-empt things by ruling any ideas in or out in advance, he acknowledges some policies, like raising or broadening the GST, will less likely receive his support. "The policy changes we are most likely to pick up and run with are the ones consistent with the government's values and directions," Dr Chalmers says. The government has consulted far and wide for reform ideas in the lead-up to the roundtable. Nearly 900 submissions have been received, ministers have held more than 40 roundtables of their own and regulators have pitched 280 new ways to reduce the burden of red tape. Dr Chalmers hopes he can find consensus to avoid the failures of past talkfests and has extended an invitation to shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien "in good faith". But he fears the coalition will be intentionally obstructionist, to make the roundtable appear a failure and inflict political damage on the government. "My preference would be that they're constructive about that opportunity," he says. "Unfortunately, they're showing no signs of that yet. I think it will go down badly in the room if they just try and turn it into some kind of political stunt." Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has accused Labor of choreographing the entire exercise to push through pre-determined policies, following a leaked Treasury document briefing Dr Chalmers on potential outcomes of the summit. "It just tells me this whole thing is a stitch-up," she told reporters on Thursday. "They're lining up an exercise at this productivity roundtable that is all about raising taxes. "We'll call it out when we see it." If those who can't remember history are condemned to repeat it, Jim Chalmers has as good a chance as any at avoiding the pitfalls of reformist treasurers past. Dr Chalmers is attempting the most ambitious process of economic reform by a Labor treasurer since Paul Keating's 1985 tax summit or Wayne Swan's tax forum of 2011. While Mr Keating's summit led to significant reform around income taxes, it buried his centrepiece policy - a broad-based consumption tax like the GST - for another 15 years. Mr Swan's attempt amounted to even less. History will drive Dr Chalmers as he prepares for his own economic reform roundtable - running from Tuesday to Thursday in Canberra - speculates veteran economist Saul Eslake. "As a biographer of Keating and a former staffer for Swan, he knows the difference between treasurers who are remembered as great treasurers and treasurers who aren't, and he'd like to be in the former group, I suspect," Mr Eslake says. Dr Chalmers says he doesn't see it in personal terms. Australia's economy has made a lot of positive strides in recent years, he says. Economic developments last week backed that up, with unemployment falling, real wages growing at a five-year high and a third interest rate cut in six months. But global volatility required more economic resilience, the nation's dismal productivity performance was holding back living standards and a growing budget deficit threatened Australia's future prosperity. He sees the roundtable as an opportunity to reform the country in ways that make Australians better off. "I do feel that all of us have a responsibility to use these positions of influence to strengthen the economy and, really, we can't afford as a country to waste the next decade like our predecessors wasted the last one," Dr Chalmers tells AAP. "So I feel that responsibility but don't see it in personal terms necessarily." Already, the consultation has been worth it. "We've shaken the tree for a whole bunch of ideas," he says. "We've focused the country's attention on our big economic challenges, primarily productivity, and we've helped people understand the kinds of trade-offs and challenges the government is grappling with." Dr Chalmers says he's optimistic he'll find common ground in moves to remove unnecessary regulation holding back productivity, housing supply and the clean energy transition. One example is the financial regulator ASIC's announcement on Wednesday that it will review a regulation called RG 97, which forces super funds to disclose stamp duty when reporting fees involved in housing investments. After feedback from investors at a roundtable in the lead-up to Dr Chalmers' summit, ASIC heard removing the requirement could boost housing investment by $8.7 billion and get an additional 35,000 homes built by institutional investors over the next five years. That's the low-hanging fruit. But there are signs the treasurer has been forced to lower his sights for more electorally difficult, large-scale tax reform. Dr Chalmers insists he and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese are singing from the same hymn sheet. But Mr Eslake believes the treasurer's ambition has been reeled in by his boss, "the staunchest defender of the status quo of any prime minister I can remember". "Those aspirations appear to have been shot down, as it were, by his much more cautious prime minister, who has made it clear, particularly in the tax space, they're not going to do anything they hadn't said they would do during the election campaign," he says. History shows governments can't push through major, contentious tax reform without receiving a mandate from the electorate. But Mr Albanese found himself with a slim majority in his first term, so felt he could only seek a light mandate at his second election, limiting his government to a minor agenda on tax. One of those policies, reducing the tax concession for holders of large superannuation accounts, has copped flak because it would tax capital gains on assets before they are sold and the increased value is realised. Mr Eslake would love to see the government use the roundtable as an opportunity to revisit the tax. "While I support the objective, that people with big super balances should pay more tax, I absolutely support that, I don't like the idea of taxing unrealised gains," he says. "Sometimes voters will give a government credit for saying, 'yes, I know we had this idea but we've listened to the people and we've realised it's not a good idea'." Dr Chalmers says he will listen to concerns about the policy but his intention is to proceed with the legislation regardless. "I try and have a genuinely consultative approach," he says. "But we announced that policy more than two and a half years ago, we're yet to hear an idea about a better way to go about it. I expect people will raise it at the roundtable and that's fine." While he stresses he doesn't want to pre-empt things by ruling any ideas in or out in advance, he acknowledges some policies, like raising or broadening the GST, will less likely receive his support. "The policy changes we are most likely to pick up and run with are the ones consistent with the government's values and directions," Dr Chalmers says. The government has consulted far and wide for reform ideas in the lead-up to the roundtable. Nearly 900 submissions have been received, ministers have held more than 40 roundtables of their own and regulators have pitched 280 new ways to reduce the burden of red tape. Dr Chalmers hopes he can find consensus to avoid the failures of past talkfests and has extended an invitation to shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien "in good faith". But he fears the coalition will be intentionally obstructionist, to make the roundtable appear a failure and inflict political damage on the government. "My preference would be that they're constructive about that opportunity," he says. "Unfortunately, they're showing no signs of that yet. I think it will go down badly in the room if they just try and turn it into some kind of political stunt." Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has accused Labor of choreographing the entire exercise to push through pre-determined policies, following a leaked Treasury document briefing Dr Chalmers on potential outcomes of the summit. "It just tells me this whole thing is a stitch-up," she told reporters on Thursday. "They're lining up an exercise at this productivity roundtable that is all about raising taxes. "We'll call it out when we see it."
