The Trump administration dismisses most on a federal board overseeing Puerto Rico's finances
A White House official told The Associated Press on Tuesday that the board 'has been run inefficiently and ineffectively by its governing members for far too long and it's time to restore common sense leadership.'
Those fired are board chairman Arthur Gonzalez, along with Cameron McKenzie, Betty Rosa, Juan Sabater and Luis Ubiñas. The board's two remaining members — Andrew G. Biggs and John E. Nixon — are Republicans.
Sylvette Santiago, a spokesperson for the board, said none of those fired had received notifications ahead of their dismissal.
The board was created in 2016 under the Obama administration, a year after Puerto Rico's government declared it was unable to pay its more than $70 billion public debt load and later filed for the biggest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history.
In remarks to the AP, the White House official claimed the board had operated ineffectively and in secret and said it 'shelled out huge sums to law, consulting and lobbying firms.' The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the subject, also accused the board's staff of receiving 'exorbitant salaries.'
The board spokesperson did not return a message seeking additional comment.
Puerto Rico is struggling to restructure more than $9 billion in debt held by the state's Electric Power Authority, with officials holding bitter mediations with creditors demanding full payment.
It's the only Puerto Rico government debt pending a restructuring, with the White House official accusing the board of preferring to 'extend the bankruptcy.'
In February, the board's executive director, Robert Mujica Jr., said it was 'impossible' for Puerto Rico to pay the $8.5 billion that bondholders are demanding. He instead unveiled a new fiscal plan that proposed a $2.6 billion payment for creditors. The plan does not call for any rate increases for an island that has one of the highest power bills in any U.S. jurisdiction as chronic power outages persist, given the grid's weak infrastructure.
Alvin Velázquez, a bankruptcy law professor at Indiana University, said he worries the dismissal of the board members could spark another crisis in Puerto Rico.
'This is really about getting a deal out of (the power company) that is not sustainable for the rate payers of Puerto Rico,' he said.
Velázquez, former chair for the unsecured creditors committee during the bankruptcy proceedings, also questioned if the dismissals are legal, since board members can only be removed for just cause.
'What's the cause?' he said. 'What you're going to see is another instance in which the Trump administration is taking on and testing the courts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
Deutsche Telekom meets Q2 profit expectations, lifts guidance
Aug 7 - Deutsche Telekom ( opens new tab reported second quarter core profit in line with analyst expectations on Thursday, citing continued growth in both Germany and the U.S., and edged up its full-year profit guidance. The Germany-based telecoms giant reported second quarter adjusted earnings before interest, taxes and amortization after leases (EBITDA AL) of 11 billion euros ($13 billion), compared with the 10.95 billion euros expected by analysts in a company provided poll. "We are again seeing sustained strong growth on both sides of the Atlantic throughout the second quarter," Chief Executive Tim Hoettges said in a statement. The group slightly raised its core profit guidance for 2025, now expecting more than 45 billion euros, adjusted from around 45 billion euros expected before. It also adjusted its free cash flow AL expectations for 2025, now expecting over 20 billion euros from around 20 billion euros. The new guidance comes after its New York listed subsidiary T-Mobile US (TMUS.O), opens new tab in July raised its annual forecast for postpaid net customer additions after adding more wireless subscribers than expected in the second quarter. ($1 = 0.8566 euros)
The Guardian
9 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘It's about justice': the couple pushing for legal aid for Windrush scandal claims
The Home Office's refusal to renew the UK passports of a Black British former servicewoman and her husband had 'devastating' consequences over decades, years after Enoch Powell's NHS recruitment drive brought their mothers to Britain. Hetticia and Vanderbilt McIntosh had their UK status revoked in the 1970s and 1980s, through no fault of their own. The married parents of three were forced to start again in St Lucia, more than 4,000 miles away. The Home Office only gave the couple new British passports in 2020 – after news emerged of the Windrush scandal, which involved the wrongful deportation and denial of rights to Black, Caribbean and African-born Britons living legally in the UK over decades. Despite the significant disruption to their family life, NHS care and pensions, the McIntoshes were each refused compensation from the Windrush compensation scheme three times between 2021 and this year. In 2019, Windrush scandal survivors were told there would be 'no cap' on payments. Instead, the scheme has been plagued by knockbacks, delays and desultory offers. Hetticia was eventually offered £40,000 this year after a legal services firm, the Southwark Law Centre, took on her case. However, Vanderbilt has received a 'nil offer'. Even though the Home Office has admitted its error by giving him his British passport back, officials say he does not qualify for compensation because he entered the country as a 'visitor' in 1993 – the only way he could at the time. In April, the government launched the £1.5m Windrush compensation advocacy support scheme to 'provide claimants with dedicated advocates from community organisations' to support applications. But Hetticia's experience has convinced her that only expert lawyers can tackle the system. She has refused her compensation offer and started a petition for legal aid for Windrush scandal survivors, which has been signed by nearly 20,000 people. She has also been lobbying politicians in the Caribbean to raise awareness. Research this year revealed claimants received huge increases in compensation offers – in one case jumping from £300 to £170,000 – after legal advice. The McIntoshes, who now live in Manchester, first entered the UK as British subjects and small children before obtaining British passports. Hetticia's mother was a Barbadian nurse employed by Manchester Royal Infirmary as part of an early-1960s NHS recruitment drive by the then Conservative health secretary, Enoch Powell, which primarily targeted Caribbean nurses and Indian doctors. Vanderbilt's mother was recruited from St Lucia as a midwife for Newham, east London, in the same period, while his father worked for Ford in Dagenham. Several years later Powell was dismissed from the Tory shadow cabinet after giving his inflammatory 1968 'rivers of blood' speech, which became one of modern British history's most divisive addresses. Hetticia's UK passport expired in 1973 while she was serving as an army physical training instructor, and in 1978 the Home Office said she was not entitled to a new one because her birth country, Barbados, had become independent from Britain. When Vanderbilt's passport expired in 1984, he was told he no longer qualified because of St Lucia's independence. Hetticia was advised to get a Barbadian passport, which UK officials stamped with 'right to abode', but Vanderbilt, whose grandfather was Scottish, was not given any UK immigration status. Suddenly unable to prove he could work legally, he lost his job at Berger Paints, which cost the couple their east London home. Vanderbilt moved the family to St Lucia in 1985, feeling 'rejected and forced out', which, Hetticia said, nearly destroyed their marriage and forced them to travel back and forth for decades. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The couple's frustration at their ordeal is compounded by its inconsistencies – their parents and siblings kept their status, while their own children, as British-born citizens, were able to return to the UK to study and work in the mid-1990s. Hetticia said: 'You feel devastated because one day you don't know who you are any more. We were born British, how is it that was taken away from us? 'The Home Office's behaviour is very insidious and further traumatising us. They pretend they're helping you, but they're not. What they've offered me is an insult. There are [Windrush scandal survivors] who are homeless, suffering from dementia, or paralysed with fear. They need legal help. This is not about compensation – it's about justice.' About 18,000 people have been given new documents confirming their status or British citizenship since the scandal broke. A Home Office spokesperson said the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, was 'determined to put right the appalling injustices caused by the Windrush scandal', make sure people received the compensation they rightly deserved and ensure permanent 'cultural change' at the department.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Albanese government has no knowledge of Trump administration threat to deport Iranian man to Australia
Labor has cast doubt on the possibility of the Trump administration transferring an Iranian-born man from US immigration detention to Australia, saying it has no knowledge of the case. The US government is threatening to deport Reza Zavvar, a 52-year-old permanent resident who lives in Maryland, to either Australia or Romania – despite having no links to either country. Zavvar is being held in detention near his home, despite previously holding a US immigration green card, due to a historical conviction for marijuana possession which dates back to the 1990s. He arrived in the US at 12 years of age on a student visa, meaning he has lived in the US for four decades. Zavvar cannot be sent back to Iran due to risk of persecution, and his lawyer Ava Benach says he has been told he could be sent to a third country under so-called 'withholding of removal' status since 2007. Most people with the status are never deported. Documents provided by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement suggest Zavvar could be sent to Australia or Romania. His lawyer, Ava Benach, said Zavvar has never lived in either country. 'There is no rhyme of reason to it, that was just what was put on the form,' Benach said. 'He has not ties to Australia. He's never been to Australia. No family, no education there. How they came up with that is anyone's guess.' Guardian Australia approached the home affairs minister, Tony Burke, and the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, about the case. The government said it has not been approached by the United States in relation to it. A government spokesperson said there was no new agreement for transfer of US immigration detainees to Australia. 'We consider any application for a visa on its merits, we have not been contacted by the US government about this matter,' the spokesperson said. 'There have been no new agreements made with the Trump Administration on immigration.' Benach told ABC radio many Iranians living in the US had faced arrest and detention. 'He's perplexed. He never would have contemplated that this could have happened.' The Trump administration has taken a hard line on deporting non-citizens from the US, often to countries in South America. The deportation policy has seen people arrested without warning by federal officials around the US, and has sparked a series of legal challenges. While there is currently no arrangement for receiving deportees from US, a 2016 deal was reached by Barack Obama and then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull for the transfer of up to 1,250 people held in Australia's offshore immigration detention system. Men, women and children from Sudan, Iran, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh were among the first people resettled in the US, after being held in Nauru and Papua New Guinea. The agreement attracted Trump's rage after he became president in early 2017, prompting him to hit out at the 'the worst deal ever' in a fiery conversation with Turnbull. Leaks of a transcript of the conversation shook the American alliance. Trump reluctantly agreed to honour the deal, the terms of which have never been made public. More than 1,100 people were transferred to the US, according to statistics compiled by the Refugee Council of Australia.
