Planning to Retire in the 2030s? Read This Before You Collect Your First Social Security Check.
Social Security is projected to run out of money by 2035, according to the latest report.
It's important for those within a decade or so of retirement to know where things stand, beyond the headlines.
The worst-case scenario might not be as bad as you think, and there's plenty of time to fix the problem.
The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook ›
You may have heard that Social Security isn't exactly on the best financial footing, and that's true. Although the Social Security trust funds have trillions in reserves right now, the reality is that Social Security is paying significantly more money to beneficiaries than it is taking in, and the deficits are expected to get far worse in the coming years.
In fact, the latest estimates from the Social Security Board of Trustees project that the combined trust funds for the Old Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance trust funds will be depleted by 2035 unless something is done.
While this might sound like an emergency, especially if you're planning to retire in the next decade, it's important to take a step back and put things into perspective. So, here's what Social Security running out of money could mean for you, and what is the most likely scenario.
For sake of argument, let's say that the latest trustees' report projection happens, and Social Security's trust funds completely run out of money in 2035.
At the end of 2023, the latest year for which we have final data, the Social Security trust funds had a total of about $2.8 trillion in reserves. The program took in a total of $1.35 trillion in income between payroll taxes, taxes on certain Social Security benefits, and interest earned on the reserves, and paid out about $1.39 trillion -- a roughly $40 billion deficit that is withdrawn from the trust funds.
But the key thing to emphasize from that last paragraph is that most of Social Security's benefits are paid from income coming into the program, not from the reserves. So even if the deficits get much larger and the trust funds are depleted in 2035, there will still be payroll and other tax revenue coming in.
In fact, the latest projections found that even if the trust funds are allowed to run out of money entirely, incoming revenue will be able to cover 83% of scheduled benefits.
In other words, in a worst case scenario, if you were expecting a $2,500 monthly Social Security retirement benefit based on your work record (you can view an estimate for yours by logging in at ssa.gov), you would still receive monthly checks of $2,075 even if Social Security was completely out of money.
One big reason Americans are nervous about the Social Security shortfall is that it's been a known problem for a long time. I've been writing for The Motley Fool since 2011, and the Social Security Trustees Report from that year found that the trust funds would be depleted by 2036, just one year later than the current estimate. So why hasn't anything been done?
The short answer is that the ways to fix Social Security are politically divisive, and quite frankly, with a decade or more of financial runway, those in power simply haven't made Social Security reform a priority. To be fair, there have been some significant tweaks, such as eliminating the "file and suspend" loophole a few years ago, but nothing major has been done to extend the program's solvency.
Having said that, it's worth noting that we've seen a similar situation play out before. In the early 1980s, Social Security was just a few months away from running out of money, and the Social Security Amendments of 1983 helped stabilize the program for the next few decades. Just to name one provision, this round of reforms is why the full retirement age has gradually risen from 65 to 67 over the past couple of decades.
The bottom line is that history shows us that something will be done to bolster Social Security's financial situation, even if it happens at the last minute. And while the exact reform package remains to be seen, it's also worth noting that virtually nobody is talking about benefit cuts for those currently receiving payments, or those who are close to retirement age now.
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.
One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Planning to Retire in the 2030s? Read This Before You Collect Your First Social Security Check. was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
Entry level jobs are disappearing — Gen Z should learn these skills if they want to get hired
AI in, Gen Z out. Experts are warning that entry-level jobs may be disappearing — leaving Gen Z unemployed. 3 Entry-level jobs may be shifting or all together disappearing leaving Gen Z on the job hunt. LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – Advertisement This generation of young workers, expected to make up about 30% of the global workforce by 2030, is entering the job market as the roles they were set to apply for might not exist. As AI continues to evolve, it's clear that many of the traditional entry-level roles, often seen as stepping stones into the workforce, are rapidly being automated. A YouGov survey found that 54% of Americans say they feel cautious about advances in AI and 47% feel concerned. Advertisement The shift towards AI is impacting the types of jobs available, especially those for new employees. 'Entry-level jobs tend to involve routine, well-defined tasks — exactly the kind of work current AI systems are best suited to automate,' Professor Daniela Rus, the Director of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at MIT, told Newsweek. Experts argue that while some of these roles might not disappear entirely, they are evolving into something unrecognizable. 3 A YouGov survey found that 54% of Americans say they feel cautious about advances in AI and 47% feel concerned. – Advertisement For Gen Z, this transition could wipe out or change the roles they expected to apply for. 'AI is rapidly reshaping entry-level jobs, automating repetitive tasks, streamlining workflows, and, in some cases, eliminating roles entirely,' Keri Mesropov, founder of Spring Talent Development, said. However, Gen Z's chances of being employed aren't completely deleted. Those looking to enter the workforce may just need to adapt to utilize this new technology. But this is nothing entirely new. The workforce as gone through changes due to technological leaps throughout history — the industrial revolution and the dot-com era. Advertisement 3 The shift towards AI is impacting the types of jobs available, especially those for new employees. Seventyfour – Industry analyst Josh Bersin argues that entry-level hiring has currently slowed due to economic factors, but that the introduction of AI could also create entirely new job categories. These roles would involve building, managing, and optimizing AI systems, presenting an opportunity for digital natives to step into new roles. This shift isn't just about surviving in the job market — it's about adapting to a new professional environment where AI becomes a powerful tool in everyday work. 'AI is changing everything, faster than most institutions, companies or curriculums can keep pace with. But no, that doesn't mean your education or potential is obsolete. It means we have to think differently about what growth and opportunity look like,' wrote LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman in a recent post on the platform. 'You were born into this shift. You're native to these tools in a way that older generations aren't. Lean into it. Teach others.' Despite fears that AI will replace human workers, experts agree that AI cannot fully replace human judgment. Mesropov argues that while AI can automate tasks, it still requires human input for context-heavy decisions, judgment calls, and troubleshooting. Advertisement And Gen Z's familiarity with technology, particularly AI, could make them valuable assets in this new era. According to the YouGov survey, adults under 30 are more likely than older Americans to ever use AI tools (76% vs. 51%) and are also more likely to use AI at least weekly (50% vs. 23%). 'The advantage Gen Z has is that they are digital natives. They are well-positioned to work alongside AI, not in opposition to it,' Rus told Newsweek. 'Young people today are using AI to solve problems and even have fun by creating stories and images.' As AI reshapes the job market, the skills companies will need most in their entry-level hires won't just be technical— they will need strong problem-solving abilities, creativity, and emotional intelligence. Advertisement Experts suggest that while the structure of entry-level jobs is changing, the challenge will be to rethink what these roles look like. AI-assisted apprenticeships, project-based learning environments, and hybrid human-AI teams are among the potential models for the future. However, experts also caution that while young workers have an advantage in terms of digital fluency, they must still build the soft skills necessary to succeed in the workforce, such as communication, adaptability, and critical thinking. Though it's easy to get lost in the rhetoric surrounding AI's potential to disrupt jobs, the reality is that the technology is not just a threat — it's an opportunity. For Gen Z, the key to thriving in this new era will be their ability to adapt, learn, and leverage AI tools to solve real-world problems.
Hamilton Spectator
39 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canada will impose new counter-tariffs against U.S. if it can't make a trade deal in 30 days, Mark Carney says
OTTAWA — Canada will impose a new wave of counter-tariffs if it cannot reach a deal within 30 days to resolve the trade dispute with the Trump administration, says Prime Minister Mark Carney. Speaking in Ottawa on the eve of a key meeting tomorrow between the negotiating teams, Carney announced a suite of new countermeasures, including adjusting existing counter tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum products on July 21, at the end of that 30-day period. 'In other words, we're going to adjust them to levels consistent with the progress that's made at that point on the broader trading arrangements with the United States,' he said. Carney also announced a Buy Canadian policy for steel and aluminum used in federal procurement. 'Only Canadian producers and producers from trading partners that provide Canada with tariff free reciprocal access through trade agreements, can compete for federal government procurement of steel and aluminum,' he said. Carney wants an immediate end to the so-called 'border emergency' tariffs and the sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and aluminum that U.S. President Donald Trump has hit Canada with. But he said, 'it's a negotiation,' acknowledging there may not be an immediate lift to all of them. 'There is still some room to travel, so to speak, before we get to that point. But we have a deadline in order to achieve that, and if it's in Canada's interest, we'll sign it,' Carney said. With the move, the Carney government is putting more pressure on Canadian and U.S. negotiators to outline the path to a more predictable trade relationship. Carney also announced new tariffs of 100 per cent on foreign imports of steel from 'non-free trade agreement partners to stabilize the domestic market and prevent harmful trade diversion as the result of the U.S. actions that are destabilizing markets.' He said Trump did not ask him to institute the anti-dumping measure, but it has been a call made by steel producers in Canada. Ottawa also signalled that its digital services tax, which Trump calls an unfair trade practice and wants to eliminate, will apply even as Carney's team is in pitched negotiations to reach a deal. Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne told reporters, 'This was voted by Parliament so we're going ahead with the DST. 'But obviously, you know, all of that is something that we're considering as part of broader discussions that you may have, but the DST is in force and it's going to be applied.' Champagne said he and other G7 finance ministers have discussed different regimes of taxation that affect Big Tech at length with the Americans. 'This is not the big thing. The big thing is all the (value-added taxes) and other type of taxes you have around the world,' he said. 'And we had a discussion at the G7 about a few weeks ago, and even in Washington last time, to explain to our American colleagues that, a lot like the VAT they have in Europe and the GST we have in Canada, is neutral, so that it applies to goods … there's no distinction in terms of imports and exports. So we're going to continue to have these discussion and make our case.' Asked if retaining the digital services tax is a red line for Canada in the current trade dispute with the U.S., Champagne said, 'Listen, the tax is in Canada, the tax applies and will apply.' Carney's surprise scheduling of a news conference Thursday afternoon set back a planned news conference by the Canadian Steel Producers Association and the United Steel Workers, who were set to outline their urgent call for immediate action as the 50 per cent steel tariffs Trump imposed are squeezing domestic producers. They have previously called for the full imposition of tit-for-tat counter-tariffs against U.S. steel without any exemptions. During the election campaign, the Carney government authorized exemptions for Canadian imports of U.S. steel and aluminum products — called remissions — that amount to about $8 billion. But most of those exemptions favour importers of American steel, which Canadian steel producers say has given their competitors an advantage.
Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
The golden Trump Phone is almost certainly not made in the US
Not content with a real estate empire and the presidency of the United States, the Trump family is wading into the phone wars like it's 2011 with a shiny gold monstrosity called the T1, the marketing of which leans extensively on the narrowest idea of patriotism. Beyond the immediate question — why do this, like, at all? — the T1 invites a question that's perhaps easier to interrogate: How can any modern smartphone claim to be made in the US? Over the last 40 years America has led a massive globalization effort that allows companies to pick and choose where they develop and build hardware that finds its way back to the US. The best chips to run your phone are built in Taiwan — regardless of the phone maker. The best phones are built in China, India or Vietnam. The displays are often produced in Korea. The glass is actually made in America. The sand that will eventually become the silicon wafers chips are made of is sourced here too. But most phones, and virtually all smartphones found in America, are globally produced devices. An all-American golden Trump phone is about as fantastical as the big, beautiful bill's promise to make all Americans rich. The phone has reasonable specs for the $499 price tag. There's a 6.8-inch AMOLED display with a punch hole for the 16MP front camera, 12GB of RAM, 256GB of storage. Its rear array of cameras includes a 50MP main camera, a 2MP depth sensor and a 2MP macro lens. Notably lacking in the spec list is the processor. Perhaps that's a typo, or perhaps that's because nearly all smartphone processors are made overseas. Multiple analysts have suggested the Trump T1 is actually a reskinned Revvl 7. That's a $200 Android phone currently offered by T-Mobile in the US and manufactured by Wingtech, a (partially) state-owned Chinese phone maker and semiconductor manufacturer. However the specs and outer appearance better align with the €180 (also about $200) Coolpad X100, which is mentioned as a 'related phone' to the T1 on the smartphone database GSMArena . Similarly, that phone has a 6.8-inch AMOLED display, 256GB of internal storage and up to 12GB of RAM, but its cameras are significantly higher resolution and it has a flash built into its camera module. It, like the Revvl 7, is manufactured in China by a Chinese company. Don Jr and Eric Trump haven't said if the T1 is a reskin of the Revvl 7 — or any other existing phone for that matter — instead insisting their device will eventually be made in the US. (Note that word 'eventually.' It is doing a lot of work.) The Trump brothers have chosen their words like lawyers are watching, likely because the Made in America claim they're making isn't just marketing, it's enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission. You can't just slap it on a crummy Chinese phone and call it a day. 'The FTC actually has very strict regulations on how you label products and country of origin,' Todd Weaver, CEO and Founder of Purism, told me. Purism is an American company that produces its own operating system to compete with iOS and Android and is the only company in the US which can actually use any part of the 'Made in America' claim for its phones. In our call he sounded a little irritated about the T1's claims, but was eager to explain how the labeling works. The Purism Liberty Phone. (Purism) 'I don't make that claim and I manufacture all the electronics in the US,' Weaver said. Purism had to go with a non-phone processor for the Liberty phone because no company based in America makes phone processors (yet). Even with a non-standard chip, Purism's processor comes from its supplier's fabrication in South Korea. He found it financially challenging to source a chassis in the US as well. An unqualified Made in America claim would mean that a phone was not just assembled here, but every single part of the device was manufactured here as well. That's an essentially impossible task for phone makers. It's why Purism's phone has the label Made in America Electronics instead. Weaver could get a lot, but not all of the parts manufactured in the US. While it's certainly theoretically possible the Trump brothers could take all the wealth they've been amassing since their father reentered the Oval Office to brute force a more American phone, it isn't happening any time soon. The Trump T1, which they claim will be sold in September, cannot carry that label, at least not legally. (Whether the current FTC would prosecute the president's sons for misrepresenting the T1 is another story entirely.) We've reached out to the FTC for comment and as of publishing have not heard back. So what about other pro-American manufacturing labels? The Trump Brothers have hinted that the phones will be assembled here — even if the Revvl 7 (or Coolpad X100) is currently not. Those labels are also governed by the FTC and they're not easy to get around. A simple "screwdriver" operation (importing almost entirely foreign parts and fitting them together in the States) is even provided by the FTC as a straightforward example of consumer deception. That's a lesson we all learned when Apple promised to start building computers domestically again. In 2019 it announced a big factory in Texas under pressure from the Trump administration to bring more manufacturing jobs to America. But even though people are putting screws into Mac Pros stateside, those can't carry the label 'Assembled in America.' Instead they're 'Designed in America' and a 'Product of Thailand' with 'Final Assembly in America.' It's a global device. Electronics are global devices and no amount of gold gilding or misleading claims from the sons of American presidents can change that. The best estimates from manufacturing experts claim it will be half a decade, minimum, before Apple or Samsung could be building phones in the US. Weaver has already mused about reporting the Trump brothers for claiming their gold-gilded T1 is Made in America, and noted that anyone (even you, dear reader) could do the same. If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.
