logo
Labour accuses Reform of threatening almost one million jobs with net zero plans

Labour accuses Reform of threatening almost one million jobs with net zero plans

Reform UK's 'war' on net zero would cost almost one million jobs, the energy minister has claimed, as Labour steps up its attacks on Nigel Farage's party over green power.
Michael Shanks said Reform's opposition to net zero amounted to a 'war on jobs', saying working people 'would lose jobs and opportunities if Farage's party was ever allowed to impose its anti-jobs, anti-growth ideology on the country'.
His comments come after Reform deputy leader Richard Tice wrote to energy companies urging them not to invest in the latest round of green energy contracts, known as Allocation Round 7 (AR7).
Mr Tice said he had put the companies on 'formal notice' that their investments were 'politically and commercially unsafe' as a future Reform government would seek to 'strike down all contracts signed under AR7'.
But he later told the BBC that Reform would not renege on contracts, only oppose any 'variation'.
Mr Shanks called the letter an 'energy surrender plan that would leave bills high for families and businesses, keeping the UK stuck on the rollercoaster of fossil fuel markets'.
Labour also pointed to estimates from the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), which suggested the net zero sector now supported 951,000 jobs across the country.
That figure includes almost 138,000 jobs in the East Midlands and Yorkshire and the Humber, areas where Reform has enjoyed electoral success including in this year's Greater Lincolnshire mayoral contest and Mr Tice's own Boston and Skegness constituency.
Mr Tice said: 'Labour's reckless net zero fantasies are destroying hundreds of thousands of industrial jobs, costing taxpayers £12 billion a year in renewable subsidies, and leaving us with some of the highest energy bills in the world.
'The OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) confirms that £30 billion of taxpayer money is being poured into net zero projects. These policies are crippling our economy and driving people out of this country.'
In a report published last week, the OBR estimated tackling climate change would cost the Government £30 billion a year, largely in lost income from taxes such as fuel duty.
But it also warned that failing to act presented a 'more significant fiscal cost' because of damage caused by climate change.
Mr Shanks's intervention is the latest in a series of Labour attack lines against Reform, which Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer now regards as his real opponents.
Reform has made opposition to net zero a major part of its platform since the last election.
Earlier in the year Mr Tice pledged to 'wage war' on the policy while Greater Lincolnshire mayor Dame Andrea Jenkyns told Times Radio on Thursday she did not believe climate change was real.
But Labour believes this could be a weakness for Mr Farage's party, as polls indicate net zero continues to enjoy significant support.
One survey conducted on behalf of the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit ahead of the local elections in May found 54% of Reform voters backed 'policies to stop climate change'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homelessness minister ‘hiked rent at London townhouse by £700 weeks after ending tenancy'
Homelessness minister ‘hiked rent at London townhouse by £700 weeks after ending tenancy'

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Homelessness minister ‘hiked rent at London townhouse by £700 weeks after ending tenancy'

The government's homelessness minister reportedly raised the rent at her east London townhouse by £700 weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. Rushanara Ali has been accused of raising the rent on the property, which has four bedrooms, from £3,300 to £4,000 after the previous tenants vacated the property. According to the i paper, the previous occupants were handed just four months' notice last November, informing them that their lease would not be renewed. And weeks after they had left, the house was reportedly once again up for rent – but for £700 more each month. It is understood that Ms Ali – who is the Labour MP for Bethnal Green and Stepney – told the occupants their tenancy would not be renewed as the house was being put up for sale and were offered a rolling contract while the house was on the market, but chose to leave. The property was then re-listed as a rental when a buyer could not be found, it is understood. Ms Ali has previously criticised 'private renters being exploited and discriminated against' when defending the government's Renters Reform Bill, which will eliminate "no-fault" evictions, where landlords can end tenancies without a specific reason using Section 21 notice. She said the legislation would 'empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases'. The bill will also stop landlords who have terminated a tenancy to sell the property from re-listing it with higher rent until six months or more after the occupants vacated the premises. Shadow housing secretary James Cleverly suggested she should resign, saying the allegations 'would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and she should not have the job as homelessness minister'. The Renters' Rights Bill has received its third reading in the House of Lords having already been through the Commons. A spokesperson for Ms Ali told The Independent: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.'

I'm not fan of Kate Forbes but this is a far wider problem
I'm not fan of Kate Forbes but this is a far wider problem

The National

time42 minutes ago

  • The National

I'm not fan of Kate Forbes but this is a far wider problem

The party of government shouldn't be entertaining the notion that the hard-won rights of minority groups are debatable, and I won't be convinced that's a controversial stance to take. I think the presence of those views has unforgivably given rise to those narratives and allowed them to feel at home in a space they should not have been welcomed. An important preface. However, it's impossible to consider her decision in isolation. Whether her views are congruent with the foundations of the SNP or not, it raises serious questions for the party and Scottish politics more widely. Already, 23 SNP MSPs had announced their intention to stand down in 2026, with 14 of them women. A list inclusive of party giants like Nicola Sturgeon and Shona Robison as well as fresh faces like Natalie Don-Innes, representing more than 60% of those stepping down and almost a quarter of the SNP's current parliamentary group, and that's alongside resignations from other parties. It's not a case of a few gentle career transitions or a generational refresh, it's a systemic across-the-board retreat from political life. A gendered haemorrhaging of experience and talent. READ MORE: John Swinney to consider imposing state boycott on Israel Forbes is just the latest in what could be described as a mass exodus of women from Holyrood, and more specifically from the SNP benches. While I don't always agree with her politics, her decision is a really uncomfortable one. Politics has become a punishing and thankless environment for women in Scotland, especially those who dare to be ambitious. It's to the shame of everyone involved. Even more uncomfortable when you consider that it wasn't so long ago Scotland was internationally recognised for its gender balanced representation in political life, a sore contrast to the reality heading into 2026. Even just looking to the last Holyrood election in 2021, which saw a record number of women elected to our national parliament. Or even more nostalgically to the heydays of the mid-2010s, when three of Scotland's major parties were headed by women. Sturgeon for the SNP, Ruth Davidson for the Tories and Kezia Dugdale for Labour. I remember watching First Minister's Questions at the time and feeling like I was witnessing something big and out of the ordinary. Like progress was not only in front of us in the short term, but had taken root. It was what we understood to be normal in Scotland, even if it wasn't the case more broadly around the world. We're now watching that progress, which was so intentional and meaningful, be unravelled and in large part due to the neglect of those with the power to change it. Forbes has decided to step down because the job demands too much of a mother to a young child. Was it naive of me to hope that gone were the days women would have to sacrifice the careers they worked tirelessly to build because those careers aren't accommodating of family life? It would seem so. (Image: Colin Mearns) If elected politics can't be a place of work flexible enough to accommodate family priorities, it's not working for the benefit of us all. That's just one issue cited as a reason. Others speak of burnout from an unsustainable workload, relentless abuse and a lack of support to handle it, misogyny both from external sources and internal mechanisms that are setting women up to fail. Our female political leaders are communicating en masse that they are no longer willing to tolerate what politics demands of them. The cost is too high, and the return is too low and it's no longer enough for these announcements to be met with lacklustre statement after lacklustre statement loosely expressing disappointment but understanding. We are sleepwalking into a regression that will be as hard to undo as it was the last time. Michelle Thomson MSP, one of those stepping down, described politics as being 'generally very misogynist'. She went on to say: 'I don't think the SNP can be complacent about their own internal mechanisms.' She's absolutely right. Long gone are the days of the gender balance mechanisms championed by Sturgeon, which we are told did their job in 2021 and therefore cannot be repeated. It's almost as if when women aren't represented in the highest offices, gender equality begins to slip back down the priority list. Just two years after the departure of Sturgeon and four since a record number of women were elected to Holyrood, candidate selections for 2026 are already demonstrating a backwards trend, with women making up just 42% of confirmed SNP candidates. A number that isn't final by any means and still has the potential to decline before the election rolls around. The party still completely lacks any kind of system for dealing with harassment or providing meaningful support to those facing the relentless abuse that has become synonymous with politics in Scotland. I say that from experience as a woman in the party, who has faced that abuse for years now. Support is impossible to come by, even when you ask for it. I don't believe there is a single party in our political atmosphere that is tackling this effectively, but as the party of government, it's not amiss to expect the SNP to lead by example. It's this environment, and the lack of support that allows it to freely continue, that is driving women away from our public life. It's not just women who lose out and it's not just part and parcel of being in politics like we are led to believe, it's the strangling of our democracy. When Parliament becomes a place where only certain types of people can survive and be heard, decisions naturally stop being about the many and start being about the same few. That's how representation works, and it's where we're heading if the passive acceptance of this trend continues. So yes, Kate Forbes might never have been the future of feminist politics in Scotland. But her decision to go is emblematic of a much bigger problem. A system that failed her as it has her colleagues and as it will the women coming up behind them if nothing changes. Our leaders of today would do well to look to the example of leaders gone by – who were living proof that progress is possible and sustainable – before it's too late. The time for listening is now, to the women choosing to stay and to those choosing to leave, or we are going to find our politics drowned once again under the weight of a political culture built primarily for and upheld by men. If we don't, 2026 will mark a huge step back for gender equality in Scotland. A reality that was supposed to be behind us.

Labour's minister for homelessness Rushanara Ali ejects her tenants and hikes rent
Labour's minister for homelessness Rushanara Ali ejects her tenants and hikes rent

Daily Mirror

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Labour's minister for homelessness Rushanara Ali ejects her tenants and hikes rent

Rushanara Ali, who has previously criticised "unreasonable rent increases", has been criticised amid reports rent on an East London home was ramped up after four tenants moved out Labour's homelessness minister is under fire over reports she threw out four tenants before ramping up the rent on a house she owns by £700 a month. ‌ Rushanara Ali, who has previously criticised "unreasonable rent increases" reportedly gave the renters four months notice that their lease would not be renewed. The East London home was subsequently re-listed for rent within weeks of them moving out at a massively increased price, it is claimed. ‌ The four were sent an email saying they would have to leave in November last year, the i newspaper reports. But it is understood they were offered the opportunity to stay on a rolling basis while the house was on the market. When it failed to sell, it was re-listed for rent, it is believed. Ms Ali, MP for Bethnal Green and Stepney, faces calls to step down. ‌ READ MORE: Lisa Nandy gives cutting verdict on MasterChef as new series drops on BBC iPlayer One of the tenants, Laura Jackson, told the newspaper that she saw the four-bedroom townhouse had been put up for rent at nearly £4,000 a month shortly after moving out. Previously Ms Ali charged £3,300 a month for the home close to London's Olympic Park, it is claimed. Ms Jackson said: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion'. Shadow Housing Secretary James Cleverly said the allegations "would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and she should not have the job as homelessness minister'. ‌ However sources close to the minister say it was a fixed-term contract, and the house was put on the market for sale while the tenants were there. The people living there were told they could stay on a rolling basis, but opted to leave, the BBC reports. It was only re-listed for rent because it did not sell, according to the i. A spokesperson for Ms Ali said: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.' The house, one of two rental properties Ms Ali has declared in her register of interests, is currently listed for sale at £894,995. It had originally gone up for £914,995 last November - but the price was reduced in Februrary. ‌ Under the Renters Rights Bill, which is making its way through Parliament, landlords who end a tenancy to sell a home will be banned from re-listing it for six months. The Bill will also end fixed-term tenancies. Landlords will also be required to give four months' notice if they plan to move tenants out in order to sell it. In September last year Ms Ali said renters would be given more powers to challenge "unreasonable" increases. In a written answer she said: "More widely, we are taking action to tackle the root causes of homelessness. "This includes delivering the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation, building 1.5 million new homes over the next parliament, and abolishing Section 21 'no fault' evictions which will prevent private renters being exploited and discriminated against and empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store