logo
Antonio Brown takes shot at media from afar as attempted murder warrant waits

Antonio Brown takes shot at media from afar as attempted murder warrant waits

New York Post16-06-2025
Antonio Brown seemed to be blaming the media for his current predicament as the former NFL star faces attempted murder charges in Miami-Dade County.
A warrant for the ex-wide receiver's arrest was issued last week by a judge related to a May incident that occurred outside a celebrity boxing event.
But Brown pushed the blame on the media in a post on social media, in which he screenshotted an alleged ChatGPT conversation in which he asked the service, 'Is Antonio Brown being racial profiled?'
Advertisement
Along with the screenshot, Brown posted a lengthy caption where he suggested 'they' control the media, though he never specifies who exactly he is referring to.
3
AP
'How TF you go from being victimized [into an] attempt to murder,' Brown posted on X. 'You see they control the media. Took a month to change the narrative. A year or 2 them dragging the narrative. Attempt to murder. You see they only want 3 types of n—-s. In America, in jail dead or dead broke.'
Advertisement
Brown had ended the post with the hashtags 'Black man' and 'takedown.'
The incident occurred on May 16 and Brown had claimed that he was jumped in an attempted robbery outside the Brand Risk boxing promotion being put on by streamer Adin Ross.
Video from outside the event was posted online and showed Brown in a brawl with several men before falling to the ground.
The video later cuts to Brown kicking a man on the ground before jumping to the sounds of gun shots and a second video showed Brown being led away by police, though he was later released.
Advertisement
3 Antonio Brown's post-NFL spiral continued Friday night as the former All-Pro wide receiver was involved in a chaotic brawl at a boxing event in Florida. The incident, which escalated from an attempted chain-snatching to alleged gunfire, is the latest in a growing list of public controversies involving the ex-NFL star.
MEGA
While Brown was trying to push the narrative that he was being treated unfairly, the warrant includes that police were able to obtain video that showed the former NFLer punching another man, identified as Zul-Qarnain Kwame Nantambu, and later taking a gun from a security officer before moving toward Nantambu, according to the warrant.
'Mr. Nantambu stated Mr. Brown proceeded to shoot at him (possibly grazing him in the neck), placing him in fear for his life,' the arrest warrant stated.
3 Antonio Brown's post-NFL spiral continued as the former All-Pro wide receiver was involved in a chaotic brawl at a boxing event in Florida.
MEGA
Advertisement
Nantambu told police that he had known Brown since 2022 and that there was a 'verbal altercation' before things came to blows.
A spokesperson for the Miami-Dade state attorney's office said 'the warrant speaks for itself' when reached by The Post for comment last week.
Brown has been traveling in the Middle East since the warrant was issued, though police do not consider him to be on the run.
Brown has posted a number of social media posts from foreign countries in recent days and Miami Police Chief Manny Morales told the Miami Herald that its believed that the former Steeler is still in Dubai.
Morales told the outlet that they have been in contact with Brown's attorney and he is expected to be taken into custody when he returns to Florida.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Humza Yousaf : Tories 'deliberately trying to fuel hatred against asylum seekers'
Humza Yousaf : Tories 'deliberately trying to fuel hatred against asylum seekers'

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Humza Yousaf : Tories 'deliberately trying to fuel hatred against asylum seekers'

Humza Yousaf has accused the Tories of 'deliberately trying to fuel hatred' against asylum seekers by presenting them as a threat to women and children. The former First Minister said politicians like Robert Jenrick were 'reviving the old colonial lie that people from the east are somehow dangerous savages'. Mr Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, has said he supports 'every peaceful protest outside an asylum hotel' and later attended one in Epping, where an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Demonstrations against asylum seekers staying in hotels have sprung up across the UK, including in Scotland, with those attending claiming they are making their communities less safe. Mr Jenrick, who previously ran for the Tory leadership, said small boat crossings in the English Channel amounted to a 'national security emergency', adding: 'The truth is that mass, uncontrolled immigration has been fuelling crime and made women and girls less safe. ' In a video posted to social media, Mr Yousaf hit back at the Tory claims, saying it was 'predatory men' who posed a danger to women, rather than people from any one group, such as asylum seekers. READ MORE: 'I want grown up politics': ex-Labour Fife councillor defects to Reform Sturgeon: Gender reform opposition 'hijacked' by supporters of Trump and Erdoğan Mark Smith: The Scots who love Badenoch and Jenrick He said: 'As a father of three girls, let me tell you that it's not asylum seekers I'm worried about when it comes to my daughter's safety – it's men, predatory men, who come in every colour, every religion, are from every background. 'Of course, those who do commit heinous crimes against women, be they asylum seekers or those who have lived in the UK for 10 generations, they should and must feel the full force of the law. 'But when you purposely single out asylum seekers, as the Tories are doing, you're not interested in protecting women, you're deliberately trying to fuel hatred. 'You're reviving the old colonial lie that people from the east are somehow dangerous savages.' The former SNP leader said such rhetoric has turned 'fear into mobs who are ready to set fire to hotels housing asylum seekers', in reference to a riot in Rotherham last year in which a man who attempted to set fire to an asylum hotel. 'It leads to bricks through windows,' he added. 'It leads to fire bombs aimed at vulnerable families who've already fled war and persecution. 'And here's the truth, violence against women is committed by men from every walk of life. 'Blaming asylum seekers doesn't make women safer, it just makes society more divided, more suspicious, more willing to turn on the most vulnerable. 'What the Tories are doing isn't about women's safety, it's about stoking fear. It's the oldest populist trick in the book, let's make sure we don't fall.' A spokesperson for the Scottish Tories said: 'We don't watch Humza Yousaf's videos.'

DC residents feel less safe after Trump takeover: poll
DC residents feel less safe after Trump takeover: poll

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

DC residents feel less safe after Trump takeover: poll

Roughly 8 in 10​​ Washington, DC, residents oppose President Donald Trump ordering the federal government to take control of the city's police department as well as his deployment of the National Guard and FBI to patrol the city, a new Washington Post-Schar School poll finds. Notably, more than half of those living in the capital city have noticed the increased federal presence and 61% of those people feel less safe as a result of Trump's action. The figures go against the narrative Trump and other top administration officials have touted about the impact of the federal takeover. 'We went from the most unsafe place anywhere to a place that now people, friends are calling me up, Democrats are calling me up, and they're saying, 'Sir, I want to thank you. My wife and I went out to dinner last night for the first time in four years, and Washington, DC, is safe. And you did that in four days,'' Trump said at the White House on Monday. Overall, a 79% majority of DC residents oppose Trump's order, according to the survey, with just 17% supportive of the decision. Most, 69%, say they're strongly opposed. DC residents say, 65% to 20%, that they don't think Trump's actions will reduce the amount of violent crime in the city. By contrast, majorities say they think increased economic opportunities in poor neighborhoods (77%), stricter national gun laws (70%), an increased number of Metropolitan Police officers patrolling communities (63%) and using outreach workers to resolve disputes (57%) would help to reduce violent crime. Trump, who was supported by just over 6% of DC voters in last year's presidential election, remains broadly unpopular in the District, the poll finds, with his overall job approval rating now standing at just 15% among all residents. The poll also finds a significant shift in DC residents' attitudes toward crime since this spring, perhaps reflecting the changing political context of the question — just 31% now describe crime as an extremely or very serious problem in the District (down from 50%) and a 54% majority say they believe the problem of crime in the city is improving (up from 29%). Among the 35% of residents who say they, a family member, or a close friend has been a victim of crime in the past five years, support for Trump's actions stands at 34%, compared with 8% support among those who do not know a recent crime victim. About half of residents say Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser should be doing more to oppose Trump, with 30% saying she is handling things about right and 12% that she should be more supportive. A 71% majority also say DC police should not help the federal government much or at all to deport undocumented immigrants living in the city. Local police officers have been seen participating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement checkpoints over the past week. Bowser's rating stands at 53%, unchanged from a May survey, with 54% saying that DC police are doing a good or excellent job. The Washington Post-Schar School poll was conducted August 14-17 and surveyed 604 DC residents through a combination of live phone interviews and online surveys. Results for the full sample have a margin of error of +/- 4.1 percentage points.

Trump administration sanctions ICC officials for efforts to arrest Americans, Israelis
Trump administration sanctions ICC officials for efforts to arrest Americans, Israelis

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump administration sanctions ICC officials for efforts to arrest Americans, Israelis

President Trump's administration announced on Wednesday that it is imposing sanctions on four members of the International Criminal Court (ICC), saying they are engaged in efforts to 'investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute' Americans and Israelis without the consent of either country. The sanctions were slapped on two judges and two prosecutors at the ICC: France's Nicolas Yann Guillou, Fiji's Nazhat Shameem Khan, Senegal's Mame Mandiaye Niang and Canada's Kimberly Prost. 'The United States has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicization, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty, and illegitimate judicial overreach. The Court is a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare against the United States and our close ally Israel,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement on Wednesday. Last November, ICC judges released arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, ex-Israeli defense head Yoav Gallant and former Hamas commander Ibrahim al-Masri, alleging war crimes and crimes against humanity in light of Israel's war with the Palestinian militant group. The State Department hit Prost for a ruling greenlighting the ICC's probe into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan. Guillou, the French judge, was sanctioned for a ruling to issue arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. Niang and Khan are the ICC's deputy prosecutors. Both were sanctioned for 'continuing to support illegitimate ICC actions against' Israel, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant. Israel asked judges in May to strike the ICC's arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister and former defense minister. The Trump administration imposed sanctions on four ICC judges over what the U.S. government has deemed as 'illegitimate and baseless actions' against Washington and Jerusalem. In early July, the administration levied sanctions against United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese, over her political 'warfare' against Israel. 'It remains the policy of the United States Government to take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our troops, our sovereignty, and our allies from the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions,' Rubio said on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store