New Sports Bill Lowers Eligibility Rule To Single Term In EC For NSF Leadership Aspirants
The National Sports Governance Bill specifies the criteria for seeking the positions of President, Secretary, and Treasurer in NSFs.
Aspirants for the top positions in national federations will now be required to serve just one term in the Executive Committee, a change from the previous 'overly restrictive" rule of two terms. The Sports Ministry aims to encourage 'younger administrators and athlete-leaders."
The National Sports Governance Bill, passed by Parliament last week and pending presidential assent, specifies the criteria for seeking the positions of President, Secretary, and Treasurer in National Sports Federations (NSFs).
Initially, it mandated two terms in the Executive Committee for those aspiring for the top three posts. However, this provision was amended to require a minimum of one term after consultations with stakeholders.
Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya, in an interview with PTI following the bill's passage, stated that the amendment provides the needed balance to ensure a larger pool of competitive administrators.
'The decision to reduce the minimum prior term requirement for federation elections was guided by the principle of broadening the pool of eligible and capable candidates, while still ensuring they have sufficient experience to serve effectively," he explained.
The relaxation allows current Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President P T Usha and All India Football Federation chief Kalyan Chaubey to seek re-election if they choose. Both have served one term in the Executive Committees of their respective organisations.
The revised provision also allows presidents, secretaries, and treasurers in state bodies to vie for leadership roles in the NSFs, broadening the competitive field during elections.
The Minister stated that reducing the minimum term requirement in the EC would ensure a wider talent base is available without compromising principles of continuity and experience.
'In some cases, talented administrators and former athletes with strong governance potential were unable to contest because they had not served a full earlier term on the Executive Committee. The amendment strikes a balance by retaining an experience requirement to preserve continuity and institutional memory, but lowering the threshold so that federations can draw from a wider range of candidates, including younger administrators and athlete-leaders," he said.
'This change is intended to encourage new perspectives, foster healthy competition in leadership contests, and reduce the concentration of power that often comes from closed eligibility rules," he added.
The sports bill, which had been pending for over a decade, was finally passed after extensive consultations over one year.
It not only establishes governance criteria but also mandates the creation of a National Sports Tribunal for speedy dispute resolution. Additionally, it calls for the creation of a National Sports Election Panel to oversee NSF elections, which are often controversial.
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 18, 2025, 13:03 IST
News sports New Sports Bill Lowers Eligibility Rule To Single Term In EC For NSF Leadership Aspirants
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Parliament monsoon session turns into washout; Bills passed amid Opposition protests
The Monsoon Session of Parliament this year was reduced to a near-total washout, with the Opposition staging relentless protests both inside and outside the House over the issue of SIR. From the very first day, the Opposition remained steadfast in its demand for a discussion, resulting in repeated disruptions and preventing the smooth conduct of legislative only structured discussion that took place during the entire session was on Operation Sindoor, while several other important debates — including a special discussion proposed by the government on India's space programme for Viksit Bharat 2047 — were stalled due to ruckus in both sources expressed disappointment at what they termed the 'obstinate behaviour' of Opposition parties, which, they said, not only paralysed parliamentary debates but also denied their members a chance to participate in the passage of several significant pieces of legislation. Despite the chaos, the government succeeded in getting multiple Bills passed in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Many of these legislations were cleared either without discussion or after brief debates held amid din, with Opposition MPs either shouting slogans, staging walkouts, or refusing to PASSED IN LOK SABHAIn the Lok Sabha, some of the Bills that managed to secure limited discussion before passage included:The Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2025The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2025The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025The Indian Ports Bill, 2025The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025The remaining Bills were passed without any discussion, underscoring the extent of disruption in the Lower PASSED IN RAJYA SABHAThe Rajya Sabha witnessed a similar scenario. The Bills of Lading Bill, 2025, was the only legislation that sailed through smoothly on the very first day, before protests subsequent Bills were either passed amid uproar or after Opposition members staged a walkout, including:The Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, 2025The Coastal Shipping Bill, 2025The Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025The Manipur Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2025The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2025The Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2025The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025The Income-tax Bill, 2025The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025The Indian Ports Bill, 2025The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025The Indian Institutes of Management (Amendment) Bill, 2025While the government defended its decision to proceed with the legislative agenda amid din, citing constitutional obligations, Opposition parties accused the ruling dispensation of bulldozing laws without observers noted that the session highlighted the deepening standoff between the Treasury and Opposition benches. Important legislations with far-reaching consequences—from taxation and sports governance to higher education and shipping reforms—were passed with little Monsoon Session of 2025 may be remembered more for protests and paralysis than for meaningful parliamentary debate.- Ends
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
AIFF's government funding slashed by half as Sports Ministry awards massive hike to yoga
Football has been among the biggest losers in Indian sport when it comes to receiving government funding, its allocation coming down to Rs 8.78 crore from Rs 15 crore in 2022-23 and Rs 30 crore in 2019-20. Yoga, on the other hand, has received a hike of nearly 400 per cent from the sports ministry. While Indian football has been among the biggest losers in terms of government funding, yoga has received a major push. PTI Yoga emerged the biggest beneficiary of the Government of India's allocation of budget for various sports, receiving a hike of nearly 400 per cent compared to what it was receiving in 2022-23. Football, a sport that is perceived to be in a state of crisis in the cricket-mad nation, were in for another blow with their financial assistance slashed by half. Sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya revealed the figures during the ongoing monsoon session of the parliament, responding to a question from BJP MP Sadanand Tanavade in the Rajya Sabha. Besides yoga and football, table tennis received a 50 per cent hike while athletics received a minor reduction in their assistance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Yogasana India had been receiving Rs 1.3 crore in 2022-23, but are now set to receive Rs 4.89 crore – which is close to the Rs 5.2 crore that has been set aside for the All India Chess Federation. At the same time, it will be getting a higher share of the government funding pie compared to basketball (Rs 4.75 crore in 2024-25), volleyball (Rs 4.39 crore) and squash (Rs 4.45 crore). 'As a federation, we started getting funding very recently from the government. Unlike many other sports that have come to India from abroad, we are taking India's heritage to the world. For that, we need to do substantial work,' Yogasana India president Udit Sheth was quoted by The Indian Express as saying. The Kalyan Chaubey-led All India Football Federation – which currently finds itself mired in crisis over the fate of the Indian Super League – witnessed its government funding reduced by nearly half from Rs 15 crore in 2022-23 to Rs 8.78 crore in 2024-25. This is, after all, the same sport that used to receive Rs 30 crore from the Centre not too long ago (2019-20). Athletics and boxing have had minor reductions as well. The allocation for the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) currently stands at Rs 26 crore from Rs 30 crore in 2022-23 while the corresponding figure for the Boxing Federation of India stands at Rs 22 crore from Rs 24 crore in 2022-23. Yoga is a demonstration sport at next year's Asian Games in Japan and will also likely be included in the 2030 Commonwealth Games should India win the hosting rights for the event. The push in the yoga budget might have been made keeping this events in mind.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Parliamentary panel raises concern on SAI's financial health
New Delhi: Sports Authority of India (SAI) is 'critically' under-funded and under-staffed, the parliamentary standing committee on sports has said, recommending a slew of measures to the union sports ministry. The panel, headed by Congress' Rajya Sabha MP Digvijaya Singh, presented a 40-page report to the upper house on Wednesday. Union Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports Mansukh Mandaviya addresses a press conference at the Sports Authority of India (SAI). (Vipin Kumar) The report expresses concern over India's poor returns at the Olympics. 'It is extremely painful that we being a country of approximately 1.4 billion population could not win even a single gold medal in the last Olympics in 2024 and most of the Olympics before that. The Committee feels that there is some gap or deficiency at the policy level in this regard,' it said. It calls for broad-based talent spotting and holding more age-group domestic competitions. The committee also urged the sports ministry to adopt a targetted approach towards those sports in which India is likely to win more medals. 'Countries like Australia, Cuba, Kenya, China, USA are powerhouses in select sports like swimming, boxing, cross country, badminton, table tennis, and track & field events respectively. Each of these countries participates in a few targeted sporting events and win most of the medals in such events. The committee feels that it is worth emulating this model and recommends the ministry to take the concentrated approach in picking up the sports as such in which we have the potential and talent,' it said. Further, the parliamentary panel observed a 'substantial staff crunch in coaching and scientific cadres' in SAI and urged the body to fill up vacant posts. '...about 45 per cent of sanctioned posts in the Authority are presently lying vacant. The fact that these shortfalls in staff are being managed through contractual appointment may at best be only an ad hoc arrangement,' the report stated while commending to complete the recruitment in six months and furnish an Action Taken Report. The committee noted that during the last two financial years, the funds for Khelo India Scheme have been diverted to National Centres of Excellence (NCOEs) of SAI. 'This diversion has denied precious funds of ₹38.79 crores to the Khelo India Scheme. This is more alarming as ₹122.30 crore of allocated funds under this scheme has also been returned to the Consolidated Fund of India,' it observed. '...such practice of diversion of funds from one central scheme to another is not a healthy one as it reflects poor estimation, planning and implementation on the part of a Central Scheme.' The report also said that an amount of ₹19.50 crore was allocated for play-field development under the Khelo India Scheme but has not been spent 'due to lack of proposal from eligible entities'
