Telling Tales: Sue Vice
Photo:
SUPPLIED/University of Sheffield
The current controversy over the authenticity of Raynor Winn's
The Salt Path
has given rise to a broader discussion about the nature and prevalence of literary hoaxes. Should a memoir be held to the same standard of accuracy as an autobiography? How do we distinguish fact from personal truth, perception from pure fraud?
Professor Sue Vice is a lecturer at the University of Sheffield's School of English and the author of
Textual Deceptions: False Memoirs and Literary Hoaxes in the Contemporary Era
. Sue explains to Perlina she became interested in this field after herself falling victim to a literary hoax as a reader, many years ago.
Books in a bookshelf.
Photo:
Unsplash / Jessica Ruscello
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Telling Tales: Sue Vice
Professor Sue Vice Photo: SUPPLIED/University of Sheffield The current controversy over the authenticity of Raynor Winn's The Salt Path has given rise to a broader discussion about the nature and prevalence of literary hoaxes. Should a memoir be held to the same standard of accuracy as an autobiography? How do we distinguish fact from personal truth, perception from pure fraud? Professor Sue Vice is a lecturer at the University of Sheffield's School of English and the author of Textual Deceptions: False Memoirs and Literary Hoaxes in the Contemporary Era . Sue explains to Perlina she became interested in this field after herself falling victim to a literary hoax as a reader, many years ago. Books in a bookshelf. Photo: Unsplash / Jessica Ruscello

RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
The Detail: Reality TV's Achilles heel
Love Island logo Photo: Love Island Facebook Reality TV's summer of love ended with laughter, celebration and cheers, but no amount of fireworks could make up for what's arguably been Love Island UK' s most controversial season. Misogyny, sexist comments and bullying behaviour - show producers have been inundated with complaints about some of this season's contestants. One episode in particular prompted more than 1000 complaints and a call from Women's Aid UK. Today, The Detail speaks to senior entertainment writer Tara Watson about the show's problematic history and Jane Herbert, an associate professor in developmental psychology from Wollongong University, about the wider implications of reality TV. "We learn through just watching and observing the things that are in our world," Herbert said. "When we've got lots of programmes... presenting these extreme views to people, they start to see those behaviours as 'it's in my environment all the time, this must be the way that we're supposed to act'." Shows like Love Island are premised on creating as much drama as possible and one issue that arises is bigotry - when an individual has such a strong view on something that they refuse to even acknowledge another view. "We're not understanding what we might call a theory of mind, that people have other opinions that might be different from ours and that it's worthwhile listening to those opinions," Herbert said. It's important to note that Love Island UK isn't the only reality TV show with issues. Most recently, MasterChef UK fired two of its hosts , after separate allegations of racist remarks and sexual misconduct were substantiated. The host of another reality TV show - The Repair Shop - has recently been charged with two counts of rape . Ultimately, it is up to individuals to choose what they watch and how much they consume, but Herbert said the widespread popularity and tactical evening release time made shows like Love Island UK difficult to ignore. With the rise of social media and online streaming, access to these kinds of shows - whether that be through full length episodes or short social media clips - is easier than ever. "It's changed a lot from when we were younger and we only had a couple of channels, and everyone watched the same thing. "Now our viewing is very individual. We can pick and choose when we watch it, we can be watching it sometimes when we are in very vulnerable states and we can also share snip-bits with people as well, and present very distorted views," she said. Herbert didn't think we should get rid of reality TV, arguing it could actually bring up important discussions. "Number of partners or what things we enjoy in sex, there might not be a normal conversation and watching shows like [ Love Island ] might be helpful for getting some of those views out;" she explained. "When it becomes unhelpful is when you only hear one side of the story or one becomes very dominant." Despite all its flaws, the genre remains incredibly popular. After facing a slump in previous years, this season's viewership of Love Island UK rose to over 2.6 million for the first episode. "It feels like it's reality," Herbert said. "These shows, they draw us in, because we don't know exactly what's going to happen next. "The target audience for these ones [ Love Island ] are vulnerable people who are just learning about relationships... so we need to think about the way we support people, when they're watching these sorts of shows." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter .

RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Prince Harry cleared of bullying accusations
Prince Harry is the youngest son of the UK's King Charles III. Photo: AFP / Justin Tallis The UK's charity watchdog has cleared Britain's Prince Harry of accusations of bullying in a row with an African charity he founded, but deplored that the bitter internal dispute was played out in public. The charity Sentebale was at the centre of an explosive boardroom dispute in late March and April when its chairperson Sophie Chandauka publicly accused Harry, the youngest son of the UK's King Charles III, of "bullying". Days earlier, Harry and co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho had announced they were resigning from the charity they established in 2006, after the trustees quit when Chandauka refused their demand to step down. Harry, also known as the Duke of Sussex, launched the charity in honour of his mother, Princess Diana, to help young people with HIV and AIDS in Lesotho and later Botswana. After its months-long inquiry, the UK-based Charity Commission "found no evidence of widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity," it said in its conclusions published Wednesday. But it "criticised all parties to the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly" saying the "damaging internal dispute" then "severely impacted the charity's reputation". It added there was "a lack of clarity in delegations" and added this led to "mismanagement in the administration of the charity". It has issued the charity with a plan to "address governance weaknesses". Harry said in an April statement that the events had "been heartbreaking to witness, especially when such blatant lies hurt those who have invested decades in this shared goal". Chandauka had accused Harry of trying to force her out through "bullying (and) harassment" in an interview with Sky News. In one example, Chandauka, who was appointed to the voluntary post in 2023, criticised Harry for his decision to bring a Netflix camera crew to the charity's polo fundraiser last year, as well as an unplanned appearance by his wife Meghan at the event. The accusations were a fresh blow for the prince, who kept up only a handful of his private patronages including with Sentebale after a dramatic split with the British royal family in 2020, leaving the UK to live in North America with his wife and children. "Moving forward I urge all parties not to lose sight of those who rely on the charity's services," said the commission's chief executive David Holdsworth, adding improvements should now be made. Harry chose the name Sentebale as a tribute to Diana, who died in a Paris car crash in 1997 when the prince was just 12. It means "forget me not" in the Sesotho language and is also used to say goodbye. - AFP