Man Spends 6 Days in the Hospital After Toothbrushing Session Goes Terribly Wrong
Doctors at The University of Tokyo Hospital described the unusual incident earlier this month in BMJ Case Reports. After fainting, the man's toothbrush scraped the back of his throat severely enough to trap air inside, raising the risk of a potentially serious infection. He was hospitalized for nearly a week and avoided any disastrous complications.
According to the report, the man first visited the hospital with a mild sore throat. Sometime earlier, he experienced 'syncope' (the medical term for fainting) while brushing his teeth. Upon initial physical examination, the doctors spotted a three-millimeter-long abrasion along his soft palate without bleeding. But a CT scan soon revealed a more dangerous injury: retropharyngeal emphysema.
This condition is characterized by free air or gas entering the area behind the throat. It's most often caused by bronchial asthma, though physical exertion or even non-violent coughing can spontaneously cause it as well. The condition can be dangerous because it might allow certain bacteria to grow in areas of the chest where they typically couldn't, leading to life-threatening infections like mediastinitis. It may also trigger the formation of blood clots in the carotid artery, which could then cause a stroke.
The man was hospitalized and given a prophylactical course of antibiotics to prevent these bacteria from taking hold. He recovered and was discharged six days later with no complications or CT abnormalities.
Unsurprisingly, toothbrush-related injuries are much less common among adults than they are in children. But there are rare reports of adults injuring their throats with wayward toothbrushes under unusual circumstances. So doctors should at least be aware of these injuries, the report authors wrote, and they should order medical imaging to properly assess the extent of the damage caused by them. People who develop toothbrush-related retropharyngeal emphysema should also be given preventative antibiotics and hospitalized for observation for at least two to three days, they added.
All things considered, the man's fainting episode could have ended up way worse.
In 2023, for instance, a different team of doctors in Japan wrote about a man who fell while brushing and got his toothbrush literally lodged through the back of his throat. The object luckily avoided puncturing any vital body parts or arteries and was successfully removed surgically. And yes, just in case anyone's wondering, people have also gotten hurt from sticking a toothbrush up their butt (please be advised that the preceding link to the report contains very graphic images of said injury).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
6 hours ago
- Medscape
Doctors' End-of-Life Choices Break the Norm
A new survey revealed that most doctors would decline aggressive treatments, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), ventilation, or tube feeding for themselves if faced with advanced cancer or Alzheimer's disease, choosing instead symptom relief and, in many cases, assisted dying. 'Globally, people are living longer than they were 50 years ago. However, higher rates of chronic disease and extended illness trajectories have made end-of-life care the need for improved end-of-life care an issue of growing clinical and societal importance,' the authors, led by Sarah Mroz, PhD, a doctoral researcher with the End‑of‑Life Care Research Group at Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, based in Brussels and Ghent, Belgium, wrote. Physicians play a critical role in initiating and conducting conversations about end-of-life care with patients, whose deaths are often preceded by decisions regarding end-of-life practices. These decisions may include choosing to forgo life-prolonging therapies or opting for treatments that could hasten death. Such choices have a significant impact on individuals, families, and the healthcare system. 'Since physicians have a significant influence on patients' end-of-life care, it is important to better understand their personal perspectives on such care and its associated ethical implications. However, existing studies on physicians' preferences for end-of-life practices are outdated and/or focus on a narrow range of end-of-life practices. Additionally, knowledge on whether physicians would consider assisted dying for themselves is limited, and no international comparative studies have been conducted,' the authors wrote. To address this gap, the researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1157 physicians, including general practitioners, palliative care specialists, and other clinicians from Belgium, Italy, Canada, the US, and Australia. Physician Choices Physicians were surveyed regarding their end-of-life care preferences in cases of advanced cancer and end-stage Alzheimer's disease. Over 90% preferred symptom-relief medication, and more than 95% declined CPR, mechanical ventilation, or tube feeding. Only 0.5% would choose CPR for cancer and 0.2% for Alzheimer's disease. Around 50%-54% supported euthanasia in both cases. Support for euthanasia varied by country, from 80.8% in Belgium to 37.9% in Italy for cancer and from 67.4% in Belgium to 37.4% in Georgia, US, for Alzheimer's disease. 'Physicians practicing in jurisdictions where both euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are legal were more likely to consider euthanasia a (very) good option for both cancer (OR [odds ratio], 3.1) and Alzheimer's disease (OR, 1.9),' the researchers noted. The results show how laws and culture shape end-of-life choices. Practice Gap The article highlights a striking disconnect: While most doctors would refuse aggressive interventions for themselves at the end of life, such treatments are still commonly administered to patients. What explains this gap? 'The gap between doctors' preference for comfort-focused care for themselves and the aggressive treatments they often provide to patients highlights a deeper conflict between personal understanding and professional obligation,' said Andrea Bovero, psychologist at the University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza and faculty member in the Department of Neurosciences at the University of Turin, both in Turin, Italy, in an interview with Univadis Italy , a Medscape Network platform. Physicians, he explained, understand the limits of medical interventions and their real impact on quality of life due to their training and experience. 'When they become patients themselves or must make decisions for loved ones, they tend to choose less invasive options — prioritizing quality of life over simply extending it,' he added. However, the situation changes when treating patients. Doctors operate within a system that rewards intervention, action, and a 'fight the disease' mindset — often under pressure from families who want every possible option pursued and from the fear of appearing negligent to the patient. 'There's also the fear of legal consequences,' Bovero said. 'This drives a defensive approach to medicine, where taking action feels safer than choosing not to intervene.' According to Bovero, who was not involved in the study, bridging the gap between what doctors would choose for themselves and what they offer their patients requires a broader rethinking of the healthcare system. 'We need new cultural models, medical education that centers on the individual and the ethics of boundaries, and a healthcare system that prioritizes listening and support,' he said. Rethinking the Role of Death Deeper cultural factors influence the choice of end-of-life care. 'In many Western societies, death is still seen as a failure — even in medicine,' Bovero said. This mindset, he explained, contributes to the avoidance of honest conversations about dying and a preference for treatments that delay or deny death. As a result, physicians are often caught between what they know is clinically appropriate and what social or institutional norms they are expected to follow. 'Regulatory frameworks play a major role in defining what is considered possible or acceptable in end-of-life care,' Bovero said. He emphasized that clear, shared laws on practices, such as deep palliative sedation or euthanasia, could give physicians greater freedom to express and follow care decisions focused on patient comfort and relief. 'In countries where the law explicitly supports patients' rights to palliative care, informed consent, and advance directives, physicians are better positioned to align care with patient values,' Bovero noted. For example, Italy's legislation ensures access to palliative care and upholds the right to refuse treatment or plan future care, which promotes dignity and autonomy at the end of life. Individualized Care Good care doesn't always mean curative treatment; it often means focusing on quality of life,' Bovero said. He noted that this mindset becomes evident when healthcare professionals, as patients, opt for palliative care. However, he cautioned that physicians' personal preferences shouldn't be applied as a universal standard, because 'every patient has unique values, priorities, experiences, and goals that must be acknowledged and respected.' Placing the individual at the center of care is fundamental. Bovero emphasized that good clinical practice involves tailoring medical knowledge, evidence, and even a clinician's personal insights into the specific needs of each patient. Good communication between doctors and patients is key to providing thoughtful care to patients. From the beginning, there should be open, honest discussions between healthcare providers, patients, and families. It is not enough to list treatment options; doctors need to understand what truly matters to the patient, including their fears, desires, and values. This kind of communication requires time, empathy, and real listening qualities that are often overlooked in health systems prioritizing efficiency and technical fixes. 'When doctors and patients connect not only on a medical level but also around personal meaning and existential priorities, care becomes truly personalized,' Bovero said. His research, published in the Journal of Health Psychology , highlights the importance of addressing patients' spiritual needs and encouraging providers to reflect on their own spirituality to improve support for people at the end of life.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mountain rescue team called after cyclist breaks ankle in picturesque area
A 50-year-old woman was rescued by the mountain rescue service after breaking her ankle whilst mountain biking in Horwich. Bolton Mountain Rescue Team were called to the scene at 11.27 on Saturday 26 July along with North West Ambulance Service. READ MORE: North West Ambulance Service receive £8m in funding Unison NWAS workers on strike in Bolton over 'lost premia' How North West Ambulance Service is preparing for winter A 50-year-old woman was reported to have broken her ankle whilst mountain biking in Wilderswood, Horwich. Eleven team members of Bolton Mountain Rescue attended and assisted the ambulance crew already on scene. The woman was given pain relief, and her leg was splinted before she was carried for 250m to the waiting ambulance.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm terrified of rabies, my Gen Z daughter fears climate change. Why anxiety is generational
Last month, I was convinced I had rabies. I didn't have any symptoms, or I'd hardly be sitting here writing this, but I was getting occasional intrusive flashes of panic that I was incubating the dread, 100-per cent-fatal virus that can first show symptoms months after exposure. My partner and I had been on holiday in Vietnam a few weeks before. As we were leaving a guesthouse in Ninh Binh, a friendly pet puppy skittered up behind me and lightly nipped my leg through my trousers. Now, there is rabies in Vietnam – 82 people died of it in 2023 – and you don't only get it from street dogs; it lurks even in puppies who seem playful. I weighed the evidence. I hadn't been vaccinated against rabies; most tourists don't bother because the jabs are expensive, and there is a 'post exposure' option if you do interact with a rabid animal. But because the skin on my leg hadn't been broken, I decided I was almost certainly going to be okay, carried on with my holiday, and basically forgot about it. Then, a few weeks after our return, the news was full of the terrible story of Yvonne Ford, a 59-year-old woman from Barnsley, who had died from rabies after being scratched by a puppy while on holiday in Morocco in February. Only scratched! Ford had started experiencing symptoms just two weeks prior to her death on June 11. Upon reading this, I started to worry – albeit in a controlled way. Should I get the 'post infection' set of jabs which would save me from certain death if I had been exposed? Was it worth the not insignificant £500 this would cost? Or should I just live with the very tiny risk? To add to my squirming brain, around this time there was a hostile incident between India and Pakistan, which the media always helpfully refer to as 'nuclear powers.' This brought back my teenage fear of nuclear war, of dying slowly of radiation sickness, as fed by such terrifying 1980s fare as the films Threads and The Day After. It really was Apocalypse Bingo for a while there, earlier this summer. I talked to my daughter, Annabel, 22, about what she made of my paranoias, and we started to explore the subject more deeply. I shared my Generation X fears: nuclear war, Aids – back in the day, at least – and rabies. (Who could forget those scary public information campaigns and screaming, red La Rage posters on cross-channel ferries?) Annabel, who is firmly Generation Z, told me she was worried about her economic future, 'brain aneurysms and freak deaths – I think this definitely comes from reading too much health journalism,' but most of all, climate change. 'Fears about climate change do occasionally keep me up at night,' she said. 'The heatwaves have been making me worried about the coming decades. It is clearly already happening. I think due to modern life we all forget how reliant we are upon the environment. Although the anxiety maybe isn't productive, I do think we should all be more concerned about climate change.' Why anxiety sticks with us I asked Owen O'Kane, a psychotherapist and the author of the bestselling book Addicted to Anxiety, what he made of all this. To a certain extent, the 'flavour' of our fears is due to what was making headlines at a formative period in our lives, he believes. 'Fashions change and we go through phases, your experience as an early adult stays with you,' he says. 'News headlines certainly don't help. The people who write them go for the worst-case scenario, the most catastrophic outcome. If you are anxious by nature, your 'anxious self' will gravitate towards these headlines.' If you tend towards anxiety, these more dramatic incidents are likely to affect you compared with an individual who is more sanguine. 'Anxious people are responsible people and they care deeply about things,' says O'Kane. 'They have a healthy altruistic core.' The problem, however, is that there's a risk anxiety can affect your life in a negative way. 'Your anxiety is like a watch guard, looking for a potential threat, and you might suddenly fixate on this threat,' says O'Kane. 'For example, a teenager might see a photo of a field of fire, and start worrying about climate change after a period of not thinking about it.' At heart, says O'Kane, anxiety is all about how much a person can tolerate the uncertainty of everyday life. 'To be worried is useful and has a function, to some degree,' he says. 'But it becomes a problem if we become obsessive, or avoid going out, for example. Every person has to do a cost-benefit analysis – where the price is not leading your life, and you become 'addicted' to your anxiety.' These days, says O'Kane, many people are 'frightened of our own shadow. 'The presentation and triggers are different, but these existential fears are actually our psyche asking fundamental questions: 'Will I get ill?', 'Will I die?', 'Will anyone help me?' 'Will I cope?'' And for our children's generation, the triggers are everywhere. 'People who are now in midlife didn't have social media,' says O'Kane. 'There was less exposure to world events. Yes, we knew there were wars and starvation and plane crashes; we were not unaware of these. But young people have a more elevated awareness of what's going on globally. It's not surprising that there are heightened levels of anxiety in Generation Z.' How social media fuels modern fears Annabel agrees with this analysis. 'Most of my fears are because of the news and social media, which allow little nuggets of anxiety to interrupt your day,' she says. 'Your phone pops up and it's another thing to be worried about, because that's what we engage with.' O'Kane suggests that anxieties can fluctuate, both in a negative way – in that they become harmful phobias – but also in a positive way, in that you can learn to manage and overcome them. I certainly concur with this: my teens and 20s were a mass of health anxieties, usually involving dread neurological diseases, all without a logical explanation. As I grew up, I learnt to keep a lid on these worries and defuse them. So, how did I resolve my rabies scare? First of all, I looked up the statistics of how many people had died of rabies in the UK after a foreign trip: six people between 2000 and 2024. I spoke to my sister-in-law, a GP, who reiterated my chance of contracting the virus was infinitesimal. I then texted the guesthouse in Vietnam, who told me the puppy had been vaccinated against rabies and was healthy. (I have to assume they were telling the truth.) As I received this reply, I was looking at my phone while crossing a road and almost got hit by a car. When I related the above to O'Kane, I was thrilled to have passed his 'healthy response' test. 'The situation was that you were bitten by a dog and there was rabies in the area,' he says. 'It's not dissimilar to how people felt during Covid. I wouldn't describe this as an irrational fear, but a 'situational one'. 'The context of your worry was normal and your parameters went up, you identified the trigger,' he says. 'Someone less prone to worry than you would have made the decision this was low risk and not worried at all afterwards. But you did the healthy thing for you – looked at the broader evidence, weighed it up, and let it go. You were able to acknowledge you could tolerate the worry. Someone more prone to worry would have been googling furiously, or have gone for the vaccinations.' O'Kane is at pains to point out that not all anxieties should be dismissed. 'I'm not saying you should tolerate all uncertainty, and there are useful, functional worries,' he says. 'For example, if you've had unsafe sex with someone you know is HIV positive, you should take the sensible medical approach and seek treatment.' And in less critical situations, we can lower our exposure to worrying material. 'I've gone off social media, and I'm feeling a bit better about everything,' says Annabel. 'It was overwhelming though, because there's so much online encouragement to optimise and do better – very Gen Z.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
