logo
Who won the 2025 ‘Dollars and sense' Chicago sports media survey?

Who won the 2025 ‘Dollars and sense' Chicago sports media survey?

New York Times16-07-2025
'Dollars and sense' is a column about Chicago sports media and business.
It had been three years since we did a Chicago sports media survey and the voters were ready. More than double the number of respondents turned up at the polls than in 2022 (5,191 in total, though most questions received around 4,500 votes).
Advertisement
I asked a lot of questions so let's go straight to the results. (You can click here for the full list.)
No surprise here. 670 The Score won again, beating ESPN 1000, 68.4 percent to 31.6 (4,371 votes). That's down a little from 2022, when 670 The Score won 71.3-28.7.
I got some complaints about too many Score questions, but the station makes a lot of changes, so I'm interested in what the audience thinks.
'Yes, regularly' is the winner here with 41.3 percent. After that comes 'Yes, sometimes' (34.7), 'No, but I used to' at 20.9 percent, and 'No, I hate everything about it' at 3.1 percent. So, 76 percent of respondents listen to sports radio, which makes all these questions newsworthy, I suppose.
The winner is ESPN 1000's mainstay 'Waddle & Silvy' at 28.1 percent. Marc Silverman is probably renting a villa in Tuscany right now, so he won't see this, but he and Tom Waddle have been doing this show together since 2007 and it remains fun and interesting.
Second place is the new pairing of longtime Score hosts Laurence Holmes and Matt Spiegel at 26.6 percent, followed by the Score's long-running morning show of Mike Mulligan and David Haugh (who replaced Brian Hanley in 2018) at 21.7 percent.
Last time I did this in 2022, the new show 'Bernstein & Holmes' beat out 'Waddle & Silvy.'
No surprise here, it's two in a row for Laurence Holmes, who also won this vote in 2022. Holmes had 20.8 percent of the vote, beating out ESPN's 1000 morning show host David Kaplan (16 percent), who also has a separate YouTube channel for his REKAP Network. Kaplan, of course, has built an audience over the decades hosting on WGN radio and NBC Sports Chicago.
Advertisement
Third place goes to Holmes' partner Matt Spiegel (13 percent), followed by Waddle (12) and Mulligan (8.4).
Did I need to do two Bernstein questions? Probably not. But I was curious what people thought now that the smoke has cleared from his firing, which stemmed from a Twitter meltdown about fishing ethics.
You might not like him, but he was on the air for 30 consecutive years for a reason. When I first did this survey in 2019, Bernstein won best host, and in 2022, he finished second by 0.7 percent to his then-partner Holmes. But this time around, 56.9 percent said they don't miss him on the air, while 31.4 percent said they did and 11.6 percent said they did 'when something big happens.'
As for a future podcast, one possible avenue for him, 64.8 percent said they wouldn't listen, 32 percent said they would and 3.1 percent said they'd 'hate-listen.'
I think Bernstein and The Score benefited each other, and I'm not sure how powerful his voice would be elsewhere. The station certainly misses his opinions and his encyclopedic knowledge of Chicago sports.
I almost added a second question asking if anyone was watching his FS1 show 'Breakfast Ball.' And boy, would that be newsy right now.
NEWS: Joy Taylor out at Fox Sports as FS1 cancels three shows, including her's, Craig Carton's & Emmanuel Acho's, The Athletic has learned.https://t.co/vhKvPJqPWj
— Andrew Marchand (@AndrewMarchand) July 14, 2025
On Monday, The Athletic's Andrew Marchand reported that 'Breakfast Ball' was one of three FS1 shows that were canceled before football season starts. Parkins left Chicago last summer to move to New York City for a starring role on the sports talk show. The show didn't last a year, but from what I'm hearing, Parkins should get on another show there as he has a multi-year deal with Fox Sports.
Advertisement
This was a close vote, as 48.5 percent voted that they didn't miss Parkins at The Score, while 45.8 percent said they did and another 5.7 said they did 'when something big happens.'
This is where I say, 'Who ya crapping?' to some voters. Because 53.8 percent say it's worse and 56.5 percent say they're less likely to listen. How many of you said you don't miss Bernstein or Parkins, but The Score is worse without them? I think famed fictional TV executive Rogers Meyers Jr. said it best:
More than a third of you think The Score is the same as it was a year ago (35.3 percent) and that your listening hasn't changed (34.3). Only 10.9 percent said it's better than it was a year ago, and 9.1 percent said you're more likely to listen.
'Spiegel & Holmes' eked out a win over 'Mully & Haugh,' 43.9 percent to 43 percent, a difference of just 38 votes. 'Rahimi & Harris' put up a respectable 13.1 percent as the new show in town.
'Waddle & Silvy' was the easy winner here at 63.8 percent, followed by 'Kap & J. Hood' at 24.3 percent and 'Carmen & Jurko' at 11.9.
A few hours before writing this section, I tuned into one show while in the car and promptly heard a caller ask two ESPN 1000 hosts to estimate how many wins Matt Eberflus cost the Bears last season. Very pressing news in mid-July.
But 42.1 percent of you say the stations don't talk too much Bears, while 37.3 percent say they do, and 20.6 percent responded: 'Bearsssss.'
The Cubs' radio broadcast, led by the Hall of Famer Pat Hughes, deservedly won the vote this year with 37.9 percent, followed by the Bears radio team (19.4) and the Bulls' TV crew (14.5).
Advertisement
When I did this survey in 2022, the easy winner was the White Sox TV team of Jason Benetti and Steve Stone at 39.8 percent. A lot has changed since then. The current Sox TV team of John Schriffen and Stone came in next-to-last of TV and radio shows for the 'big five' teams at 1.5 percent. I had a nice conversation with Schriffen this season and he was aware of his struggles last season. In the games I've watched, he's been much better. But I'm not sure how well he and Stone are meshing.
It turns out you do, as 38.9 percent of the respondents said they listen regularly and 34.7 percent said they do sometimes. Another 6.8 percent said they only listen to national sports podcasts and 19.7 percent aren't listening at all to podcasts.
Of course, the overwhelming favorite is 'Hoge & Jahns' with 47.3 percent. The Adams Hoge and Jahns will now be doing the show under the CHGO umbrella after Jahns left Ye Olde Athletic. Second goes to Audacy's 'Take The North' podcast hosted by Dan Wiederer and Mark Grote (15.9), and third is CHGO's Bears podcast (10.7).
I'll be honest, I don't listen to a lot of sports podcasts in general, and I definitely don't listen to ones about Chicago sports. I get enough Chicago sports chit-chat in my job. So I threw in a bunch that I knew and offered a write-in category for the rest.
One plucky podcast took the initiative to get its name out there.
The Athletic is doing a Chicago sports media survey. We are not on the favorite non-Bears podcast list so you will need to check *Other* and then type in 'Locked On Cubs.'
More details on our episode tonight. Thank you for voting! Survey link: https://t.co/ucHya82e4Y pic.twitter.com/bOc1SGxUoV
— Matt Cozzi (@matt_cozzi) July 10, 2025
And it worked. With a bunch of write-in variations, 'Locked On Cubs,' hosted by Matt Cozzi and Sam Olbur (Locked On is a chain of podcasts with local hosts), won with 23.2 percent of the vote. Second was 'North Side Territory,' which is the Cubs podcast from The Athletic's duo of Patrick Mooney and Sahadev Sharma (11.5 percent). After that came the CHGO brand of podcasts (10.6).
I feel for my friends in the TV side because the business ain't what it used to be. I will say this: Every time I'm on a show, I or my family get feedback from friends. People still watch in Chicago. But 56 percent of our respondents say they don't watch a nightly sportscast, while only 25.6 percent say they sometimes do. We still have 9.4 percent who do regularly and 9.1 percent who say their parents or grandparents watch.
Advertisement
With that in mind…
I think the CHSN Factor/YouTube TV is at play here because 32.1 percent said they don't watch any of them. That option wasn't included in 2022. But for those who do watch, the White Sox postgame show of Chuck Garfien and Ozzie Guillen won with 23.2 percent, beating the Marquee Sports Network show hosted by Cole Wright (18.1 percent).
It's clear the audience hasn't fully adapted to the new RSN reality in Chicago. For the first question, 39.4 percent said they don't get the channels, while 30.4 percent said they get both. (YouTube TV customers have to buy a la carte subscriptions to Marquee and/or CHSN.)
A whopping 84.9 percent said they are Comcast customers (the honor system is at play here) who didn't upgrade their package for CHSN, with just 5.3 percent saying they'll do it for the Bulls/Blackhawks season. That's the struggle for an RSN made up of three losing teams.
I'm curious about this one because there's such a push to YouTube (or Twitch), but the numbers never seem that impressive to me. More than half of the respondents (52.7 percent) said they never watch, but I suppose the 47.3 percent who do watch regularly or occasionally give credence to the strategy.
Your answers are pretty evenly split between cable subscription + streaming apps (34.7 percent), YouTube TV + streaming apps (32.9 percent) and only streaming (28.9 percent). In the 2022 survey, 48 percent said they still had a cable subscription.
Hey, good news for us as 84.2 percent said they are subscribers. That's up from 81.8 percent in 2022.
Advertisement
Now onto the fill-in questions…
In 2022, the winner was The Athletic's James Fegan, who has since moved on to the Sox Machine collective. This time around, it's The Athletic's OG baseball writer, Sahadev Sharma, who had 10.2 percent of the vote, just beating out Chicago Tribune football writer Brad Biggs (9.2 percent) and Jahns (8.8 percent). Less than 40 votes made the difference between first and third here. After that come The Athletic Bears writer Kevin Fishbain (8.2 percent) and, because I administered the survey, me (7.8 percent).
As I counted and fact-checked the results, I assumed Dan 'Big Cat' Katz would win with his 1.7 million followers, but I doubted the passion of the Locked On Cubs superfans. Sam Olbur, the co-host of the podcast, might only have 6,932 followers, but he easily won this category with 9.2 percent of the vote, more than double Katz's 4.4 percent. I'm guessing Katz makes slightly more money podcasting than Olbur, so this is a win for the little guy.
I finished in third at 3.8 percent. Again, I did the survey, so I suppose this is a social payment.
(Photo screenshot of Tom Waddle and Marc Silverman: Courtesy of ESPN 1000)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ben Shelton 'finally runs out of gas' against Zverev in Cincinnati Open quarterfinal
Ben Shelton 'finally runs out of gas' against Zverev in Cincinnati Open quarterfinal

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Ben Shelton 'finally runs out of gas' against Zverev in Cincinnati Open quarterfinal

Ben Shelton's win streak came to an end after nine games on Friday night with a 6-2, 6-2 loss to Alexander Zverev in the ATP Masters 1000 Cincinnati quarterfinal for a second straight year. Zverev punished Shelton's second serve, winning 15 of 19 points (79%). The former Gator still fired 12 aces and won 67% of his 39 first serves, but he only reached one break point to the German's 11, four of which were converted. Relying on his serve wasn't good enough, and it seems to be a pattern against the top three players in the world. Shelton is 0-for-6 against Carlos Alcaraz, Jannik Sinner and Medvedev this year. His only win in 14 total games against the trio came in 2023 against Sinner in Shanghai. Still, Shelton is knocking on the door of the top five and has a solid 190-point cushion on Novak Djokovic heading into the US Open. 'Finally ran out of gas,' said Shelton to his 1.2 million followers on Instagram. 'Great couple of weeks, but ready to get after it, New York City.' Grand Slams bring out the best in Shelton, especially this year, and he loves playing in front of a loud crowd on American soil. It will take a lot to catch up to Jack Draper in the No. 5 spot — who has 330 points more than Shelton — but a quarterfinal run or better might do the trick. Qualifiers for the US Open start on Monday, but Shelton doesn't have to play until the following week when the main draw begins. Men's and women's singles first-round games take place between Aug. 24 and 26. Matchups have not been released yet. Follow us @GatorsWire on X, formerly known as Twitter, as well as Bluesky, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Florida Gators news, notes and opinions.

The Ultimate Guide to Using a Funny Names Generator
The Ultimate Guide to Using a Funny Names Generator

Time Business News

time2 hours ago

  • Time Business News

The Ultimate Guide to Using a Funny Names Generator

Discover how a funny names generator can spark creativity, create hilarious nicknames, and make online conversations more fun. Learn why people love funny names and how you can create your own today. Humor is universal. Everyone loves a good laugh, and sometimes the simplest way to make people smile is with a name that catches them off guard. Whether it's a gaming username, a social media handle, or even a group chat nickname, funny names are a timeless way to stand out. Think about it: would you remember someone called John123 or someone called Sir Laughs-a-Lot ? Exactly. That's where a funny names generator comes in. Instead of racking your brain to think of something witty, you can use an online tool like Funny Names Generator to instantly create clever, ridiculous, or even absurd names. A funny names generator is a tool that combines words, phrases, and quirky logic to create unique, laugh-out-loud names. These aren't just random names—they're designed to catch attention and make people chuckle. Here's what it can do: Generate random funny names that you'd never think of yourself. that you'd never think of yourself. Mix and match silly words to create new nicknames. to create new nicknames. Customize names based on categories like fantasy, gaming, or even food themes. So if you want to call yourself Captain WafflePants or Princess GiggleNugget , you don't have to think too hard—a generator does the heavy lifting. In the gaming world, standing out matters. Having a funny name like NoobSlayer3000 or BananaShooter instantly makes your profile more memorable. Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter thrive on personality. A funny handle is an easy way to show off your humor before people even see your posts. Sometimes group chats get chaotic. Giving your friends funny nicknames like Meme Lord Supreme or Snack Attack Jack keeps the energy light and fun. Writers and comedians often use a funny names generator to come up with character names or stage names. There's no one-size-fits-all when it comes to funny names. Depending on what you're looking for, you can find names that fit your mood or purpose. Think TacoFace , BurgerNugget , or SushiSlapper . Perfect for people who love mixing humor with food obsessions. Want something playful yet epic? Try names like Sir ChickenNoodle or The Mighty Toaster King. Mixing celebrity names, memes, or movies can lead to hilarious results. For example, Shrekson Bieber or Harry Popcorn. Sometimes the funniest names make no sense at all— Bubblepants Explosion or Chair Wizard. That's the charm. Still wondering why you should bother with one? Let's break it down. Saves Time – No more wasting hours trying to come up with clever names. – No more wasting hours trying to come up with clever names. Unlimited Creativity – Generators never run out of ideas. – Generators never run out of ideas. Perfect for Any Platform – Gaming, social media, or comedy projects. – Gaming, social media, or comedy projects. Memorable & Shareable – People are more likely to remember and talk about you. Using Funny Names Generator guarantees you'll always have a stash of hilarious names ready. Pick a Theme – Do you want a name related to food, animals, or complete nonsense? Click Generate – Tools like funny names generator do the hard part. Test It Out – Try it as your username, nickname, or even in a group chat. Mix & Match – Combine different generated names until you find the perfect one. Pro tip: Keep a list of your favorite generated names so you can switch them up whenever you want. Here are a few ideas to inspire you: For Gaming: KeyboardWarriorLOL , CheeseSniper , LagMaster , , For Social Media: CoffeeZombie , NetflixSpoon , EmojiStorm , , For Friends: Captain Giggles , Drama Llama , Snackzilla Each one is silly enough to make people smile while still being unique. Search data shows that terms like 'funny usernames,' 'nickname maker,' and 'random name generator' get thousands of searches every month. That's because people are constantly looking for new ways to be creative online. The popularity of tools like funny names generator is growing fast because they combine entertainment with practicality. They're useful, but they're also just plain fun. At the end of the day, a funny names generator is more than just a tool—it's a creativity booster. Whether you need a hilarious gaming username, a catchy social media handle, or just a laugh with friends, it's the fastest way to come up with something original. Instead of stressing about what to call yourself, let Funny Names Generator do the work. You'll be surprised at how quickly it makes you stand out. Q1: Are funny names suitable for all platforms? Yes, but make sure the name follows platform rules. Some words might not be allowed. Q2: Can I customize the results? Most generators allow tweaks—change words, add themes, or generate multiple times until you find the perfect fit. Q3: Why not just make up my own names? You can, but a generator speeds up the process and often gives you creative results you wouldn't think of yourself. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Inside the Business Model of Smudge the Cat
Inside the Business Model of Smudge the Cat

Business Upturn

time8 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

Inside the Business Model of Smudge the Cat

The internet has always had a soft spot for cats, but few have reached the level of viral fame that Smudge the Cat enjoys. Known for his now-iconic appearance in the viral 'Woman Yelling at a Cat' meme, Smudge went from being an ordinary housecat to a global digital sensation. While the meme started as a piece of internet comedy, it quickly evolved into a lucrative business model in the USA, turning Smudge into one of the most recognized pet influencers in the world. But how exactly does a meme-famous cat like Smudge transform internet clout into a thriving income stream? Let's dive deep into the Smudge the Cat business model and explore the economic engines behind this fluffy internet star. Smudge the Cat's Rise to Meme-Fueled Fame in the USA Smudge wasn't always a celebrity. In fact, like many viral stars, fame found him unexpectedly. The photo of Smudge sitting at a dinner table with a grumpy expression, paired with the yelling woman meme template, exploded across Twitter, Reddit, and Instagram in 2019. Almost overnight, Smudge became a face recognized worldwide. What makes Smudge's story unique is that his fame was not initially manufactured by branding agencies or marketing professionals. Instead, it was entirely grassroots — powered by shares, reposts, and remixes from millions of online users. This organic virality laid the foundation for what would later become a carefully managed and profitable influencer business in the USA. Smudge's human family quickly realized the potential of this fame and began shaping it into a sustainable income model. How the Smudge the Cat Business Model Works in the USA When it comes to understanding how pet influencers make money, Smudge provides one of the clearest examples. His business model combines meme culture, influencer economics, and traditional branding strategies. Here are the core pillars: Smudge Pet Influencer Income USA: Brand Sponsorships and Partnerships One of the primary revenue streams for Smudge comes from brand sponsorships. With millions of meme fans across social media platforms, Smudge has a built-in audience that brands want to tap into. Pet food companies, lifestyle brands, and even tech firms see value in associating with an instantly recognizable internet celebrity. In these deals, Smudge's image is used to promote products in fun, meme-inspired ways. Unlike traditional influencer ads that sometimes feel forced, Smudge's campaigns often use humor, making them more authentic and shareable. This keeps engagement rates high, which in turn drives up his value to advertisers. Smudge Meme Brand Deals: Merchandise and E-Commerce If there's one place Smudge has truly thrived, it's merchandise. The Smudge meme brand deals often come to life in the form of T-shirts, mugs, stickers, and even plush toys. Fans of the meme love owning physical reminders of their favorite internet joke, and Smudge's signature table-sitting expression is instantly recognizable on products. What sets Smudge's merchandise apart from generic meme merch is that it's officially licensed, meaning fans know their purchases support Smudge's family and help maintain his influencer career. In the USA, where e-commerce is booming, this merchandise arm is a key driver of Smudge's income stream. Licensing and Media Opportunities in the Smudge Business Model Another important part of the Smudge the Cat business model is licensing. Memes often exist in a gray area of internet ownership, but Smudge's photo is original content, allowing his family to legally license it. This means Smudge's likeness can appear in official memes, ad campaigns, and even media productions. Licensing agreements are highly valuable because they generate passive income. Once a deal is signed, Smudge earns royalties whenever his image is used commercially. This makes licensing one of the most sustainable long-term strategies for meme-based pet influencers. Social Media Monetization: Turning Followers Into Revenue With millions of followers across Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter, Smudge also benefits from social media monetization programs. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok provide monetization options such as ad revenue sharing, bonuses for engagement, and special creator partnerships. While these earnings may not rival sponsorships or merchandise, they create a steady background income. More importantly, high engagement on these platforms boosts Smudge's credibility as an influencer, making him more appealing to brands. Public Appearances and Fan Engagement Smudge's meme fame has also extended into the offline world. From meet-and-greet events to pop culture conventions, appearances give fans a chance to interact with their favorite internet cat. These events often sell tickets, merchandise, or photo opportunities, generating another income stream. What makes this special is that it reinforces Smudge's brand as more than just an internet meme. Fans see him as a real personality, not just a static image on a screen. This personal connection translates directly into higher loyalty and stronger merchandise sales. Behind-the-Scenes Economics of Smudge Pet Influencer Income USA The economics of Smudge's influencer career show how virality can be monetized in smart, sustainable ways. Engagement plays a massive role here. The original meme's popularity created a loyal community, and that community now drives revenue by liking, sharing, and purchasing. For example, every time a Smudge meme resurfaces online, it reignites interest in his social media accounts and merchandise. This cyclical nature of meme culture ensures that Smudge's relevance doesn't fade easily. Unlike a single viral video, a meme template has infinite remix potential, which keeps Smudge in circulation year after year. Comparing Smudge's Business Model to Other Pet Influencers in the USA Smudge's business model stands out when compared to other top pet influencers in the USA, like Grumpy Cat or Jiffpom. Grumpy Cat, for instance, relied heavily on licensing and merchandise before her passing, while Jiffpom's revenue comes primarily from brand sponsorships and TikTok fame. Smudge, however, occupies a unique niche: meme culture. While other pets may go viral for their looks or tricks, Smudge's fame is rooted in internet humor. This allows for a broader audience appeal — not just cat lovers, but meme lovers in general. It also means his income streams can be more diverse, spanning from merchandise to digital licensing. Why Fans Love Following Smudge the Cat A big part of the Smudge pet influencer income USA story is the audience. Fans don't just follow Smudge because he's cute; they follow him because he represents internet culture. His expressions are endlessly relatable, making him the perfect 'reaction face' for daily emotions. This relatability is what makes Smudge's brand so powerful. Fans feel connected to him in a way that goes beyond traditional influencer-audience relationships. Every share, like, or purchase is a way for fans to participate in the meme, which fuels the income model even further. The Cultural Impact of the Smudge Meme Business Model Beyond money, Smudge's business model has cultural significance. He shows how a single viral moment can be transformed into long-term success. In many ways, Smudge's career is a case study in modern internet economics, where humor and relatability can be monetized just as effectively as beauty or talent. Interestingly, Smudge's fame has also contributed to broader conversations about pet adoption and responsible ownership. Many fans are inspired by his story to adopt cats themselves, proving that meme culture can have real-world impact. What Smudge Teaches Us About How Pet Influencers Make Money Smudge's journey from viral meme to thriving pet influencer highlights the adaptability of internet culture. His business model blends brand sponsorships, merchandise, licensing, social media monetization, and appearances, showing that influencer income in the USA doesn't come from a single source but from a carefully balanced mix. This diversified approach ensures that even if one revenue stream slows down, others can carry the brand forward. It also demonstrates how important authenticity and relatability are in today's influencer economy. Fans aren't just buying into Smudge the cat — they're buying into the cultural moment he represents. Final Thoughts: Smudge as a Blueprint for Meme-Economy Success Smudge's story proves that internet memes are more than fleeting jokes — they can be sustainable businesses when managed well. The Smudge the Cat business model is a fascinating example of how viral fame, when paired with smart branding and audience engagement, can generate lasting income in the USA. What makes Smudge unique is that his career isn't just about selling products or posting sponsored content. It's about being part of a cultural phenomenon that resonates with millions. For anyone curious about how pet influencers make money, Smudge's thriving income stream offers a cheerful, meme-filled answer: with a mix of humor, strategy, and a whole lot of personality. This article is intended solely for informational and editorial purposes. It does not constitute endorsement or promotion of any artificial intelligence technology. Business Upturn makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store