Trump Seeks Putin-Zelenskiy Trilateral Summit, US Mulls 10% Intel Stake
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Versalink Holdings Full Year 2025 Earnings: RM0.019 loss per share (vs RM0.052 loss in FY 2024)
Explore Versalink Holdings's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Versalink Holdings (Catalist:40N) Full Year 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: RM39.9m (up 5.7% from FY 2024). Net loss: RM2.63m (loss narrowed by 63% from FY 2024). RM0.019 loss per share (improved from RM0.052 loss in FY 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period The primary driver behind last 12 months revenue was the Export segment contributing a total revenue of RM26.4m (66% of total revenue). Notably, cost of sales worth RM31.5m amounted to 79% of total revenue thereby underscoring the impact on earnings. The largest operating expense was General & Administrative costs, amounting to RM8.65m (74% of total expenses). Over the last 12 months, the company's earnings were enhanced by non-operating gains of RM620.0k. Explore how 40N's revenue and expenses shape its earnings. Versalink Holdings shares are down 42% from a week ago. Risk Analysis Don't forget that there may still be risks. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Versalink Holdings that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What we know about video allegedly showing captured US tank flying Russian and American flags
In August 2025, as U.S. President Donald Trump prepared to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Russian broadcaster RT circulated a video that claimed to authentically show a captured U.S. tank in Ukraine flying both U.S. and Russian flags. Days before the video started circulating, Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska in an unsuccessful bid to secure a peace deal in the war in Ukraine. RT said the footage showed a captured U.S. M113 armored personnel carrier near Mala Tochmacka, an embattled village in Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia Oblast. The broadcaster claimed it had received the footage from a soldier in the field. Though RT's report reflected verified details about which Russian forces were fighting near Mala Tochmacka, the video also displayed signs of the use of artificial intelligence. Due to a lack of corroborating evidence, Snopes could not confirm the video's authenticity. In August 2025, days after U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin's unsuccessful bid to end the war in Ukraine through a summit in Alaska, a video (archived) circulated online that claimed to authentically show a captured U.S. tank in Ukraine flying U.S. and Russian flags. One version of the video, posted on a pro-Ukraine X account, had more than 690,000 views at the time of this writing. The video also circulated on Facebook (archived), Threads (archived), Instagram (archived), Bluesky (archived) and TikTok (archived). Additionally, Snopes readers wrote in asking whether the video was authentic. The video quickly drew ire from Ukrainian officials. Andriy Yermak, the head of the office of the president of Ukraine, posted (archived) the video on Telegram, describing it as the work of "propagandists" and "the height of insolence." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with Trump on Aug. 18, the date the video started circulating, to continue discussions about how to end the war. Snopes could not independently verify where or when the video was recorded. The footage came from RT (archived), previously known as Russia Today, a broadcaster that the European Union suspended shortly after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 for practices of "disinformation and information manipulation." RT said it got the footage from soldiers operating near Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, where fighting had been ongoing since 2022. Snopes, which does not rely on anonymous sources, could not independently verify RT's source. The footage also showed signs of possibly having been created or manipulated by artificial intelligence. The flags on the tank appeared unnaturally bright compared with the rest of the footage. In one clip, the Russian flag appeared to suddenly morph in and out of existence. Given the lack of verifiable information about this video, we could not give it a rating at the time of this writing. We reached out to Vlad Andritsa, the journalist who RT said initially received the footage from Russian soldiers in the field, for information about how he verified it and await a reply. Morphing flags raised AI suspicions Three clips in RT's 46-second video showed a tank, reportedly a captured U.S. M113 armored vehicle, flying Russian and U.S. flags. In the first clip, the vehicle drove along a paved road lined by electricity wires. The flags waved as they would be expected to if they were attached to a moving vehicle but appeared very bright compared with the surrounding green, gray and brown landscape. In the second clip, the Russian flag suddenly appeared to morph in and out of existence. Frame-by-frame analysis of this clip (around time code 0:21) showed the Russian flag change shape from a white blob to a blue-and-white blob and back to a white blob. The American flag remained fully suspended throughout this time. (Telegram @rt_russ) That movement — the sudden shape-shifting of an element of a video — was a characteristic tell of other viral AI-generated videos. The RT video included a third clip that appeared to be a zoomed-out version of the second, where the Russian flag again appeared to morph in and out of existence. RT post reflected real movements in war in Ukraine Though Snopes could not independently verify the authenticity of the video, RT's accompanying report did contain authentic or plausible details about the ongoing war in Ukraine. According to RT, the footage showed a captured M113 armored vehicle near Mala Tochmacka, Ukraine. The U.S. has supplied M113 armored personnel carriers to Ukraine since 2022. RT said the footage showed a vehicle operated by the 70th Guards Motorized Rifle Regiment, a regiment of the Russian ground forces originally from Chechnya, a semi-independent autonomous region of Russia. Ukrainian officials and Russian war-focused Telegram channels (archived) said fighting occurred near Mala Tochmacka in early August, around a week before RT posted the video of the tank allegedly carrying the U.S. and Russian flags. According to both the above information and geolocated footage published by Ukrainian (time code 0:34, archived) and Russian (time code 2:48) military channels, Ukrainian forces struck Russian armored vehicles near Mala Tochmacka on Aug. 10. However, none of this footage appeared to show the alleged M113 carrying the U.S. and Russian flags. According to the Institute for the Study of War, a nonpartisan public-policy research organization documenting armed conflicts around the world, fighting near Mala Tochmacka continued until Aug. 18, the most recent report at the time of this writing. The ISW reported that the 70th Guards Motorized Rifle Regiment was involved in these clashes. Given the above, it was not impossible that the footage authentically showed a recording by a Russian soldier from the 70th Guards Motorized Rifle Regiment of a captured U.S. tank operated by Russian soldiers near Mala Tochmacka, though Snopes could not independently verify this fact. Ultimately, the video did not contain enough information for Snopes to determine its date or recording location. While Russian troops were no doubt present near Mala Tochmacka around the time the video circulated and could have captured a U.S.-donated M113 armored vehicle, several aspects of the video gave rise to suspicion. RT, a Russian broadcaster that the European Council suspended for its practice of "disinformation and information manipulation," spread the footage from an anonymous source. Additionally, the footage itself showed a Russian flag that appeared to disappear and reappear, a common sign of AI use. provided translations from Russian and Ukrainian to English. COLVIN, JILL, and MICHELLE L. PRICE. "For Trump and Putin, Handshakes on a Red Carpet and a Joint Limo Ride, Then an Abrupt Ending." AP News, 15 Aug. 2025, CORBET, SYLVIE, et al. "Trump Begins Planning for Putin-Zelenskyy Meeting While Affirming US Help with Security Guarantees." AP News, 18 Aug. 2025, Council of the EU. "EU Imposes Sanctions on State-Owned Outlets RT/Russia Today and Sputnik's Broadcasting in the EU." Council of the European Union, March 2, 20222, Harward, Christina, et al. "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, August 13, 2025." Institute for the Study of War, 13 Aug. 2025, "M113 Family of Vehicles." BAE Systems, Accessed 19 Aug. 2025. Malyasov, Dylan. "Vietnam-Era M113s Save Lives in Ukraine War." Defence Blog, 10 Jan. 2025, Sobieski, Jessica, et al. "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, August 18, 2025." Institute for the Study of War, 18 Aug. 2025, "Влад Андрица." Telegram, Командование Мотострелкового Полка Из Чечни Пытается Скрыть Саботаж Среди Военных в Украине. 14 Jun. 2022, "Рапортували, що закріпилися в тюрмі" — поблизу Оріхового три години відбивали штурм російської "броні". Accessed 19 Aug. 2025.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kim Heng's (Catalist:5G2) Promising Earnings May Rest On Soft Foundations
Explore Kim Heng's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Kim Heng Limited's (Catalist:5G2) robust earnings report didn't manage to move the market for its stock. We did some digging, and we found some concerning factors in the details. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Examining Cashflow Against Kim Heng's Earnings One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'. That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking. Over the twelve months to June 2025, Kim Heng recorded an accrual ratio of -0.11. That implies it has good cash conversion, and implies that its free cash flow solidly exceeded its profit last year. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of S$14m, well over the S$1.77m it reported in profit. Given that Kim Heng had negative free cash flow in the prior corresponding period, the trailing twelve month resul of S$14m would seem to be a step in the right direction. Having said that, there is more to the story. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio. Check out our latest analysis for Kim Heng Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Kim Heng. How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit? While the accrual ratio might bode well, we also note that Kim Heng's profit was boosted by unusual items worth S$3.4m in the last twelve months. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. We can see that Kim Heng's positive unusual items were quite significant relative to its profit in the year to June 2025. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power. Our Take On Kim Heng's Profit Performance Kim Heng's profits got a boost from unusual items, which indicates they might not be sustained and yet its accrual ratio still indicated solid cash conversion, which is promising. Based on these factors, we think it's very unlikely that Kim Heng's statutory profits make it seem much weaker than it is. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Kim Heng you should be mindful of and 1 of them can't be ignored. Our examination of Kim Heng has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
