Anti-drone lasers will be fitted to military vehicles to protect the UK from swarm attacks by terror groups or hostile nations
Laser weapons capable of shooting down drones will be fitted to military vehicles to help protect the UK from swarm attacks by terror groups or hostile nations, The Mail On Sunday can reveal.
Defence experts have said the laser-armed vehicles could guard airfields, sensitive locations such as GCHQ and other areas of critical national infrastructure.
Tanks, armoured personnel carriers and reconnaissance vehicles will be equipped with the lasers, which are designed to blast drones out of the sky from more than half a mile.
Details of the laser plans emerged as Britain begins ramping up its defence spending to counter threats from Russia and China.
After criticism from US President Donald Trump, the UK aims to spend 4.1 per cent of its GDP on defence by 2027, and 5 per cent by 2035.
At a Nato summit last week, Sir Keir Starmer said increased defence spending was vital to counter threats at home and abroad.
The lasers, known as direct energy weapons, fire an intense beam of infrared light, causing a target to heat up and explode.
They will be equipped with sensors capable of tracking drones to ensure the weapon remains locked-on to its target.
Tanks, armoured personnel carriers and reconnaissance vehicles will be equipped with the lasers, which are designed to blast drones out of the sky from more than half a mile
Unlike conventional weapons, they strike at the speed of light and are virtually limitless in terms of ammunition.
Earlier this month, the Ministry of Defence announced that it would invest £1 billion in lasers.
Details of the laser plan have been revealed by the MoD in a 'preliminary market engagement notice' to defence companies.
The document, seen by The Mail on Sunday, said the MoD was seeking a 'laser direct energy weapon to destroy small unmanned air systems (drones) at ranges of 1km-plus'.
It adds that 'availability to deliver within 12 months ideally' will be required.
Defence firms will have to demonstrate the capability of their systems as they bid for the £20 million contract. Earlier this month, the MoD also revealed plans to develop a fleet of drones capable of being launched from Transit vans.
Col Philip Ingram, a former Army intelligence officer, said the lasers were vital for national security and 'can't come quickly enough'.
The MoD said the laser weapons will be 'created this decade', adding: 'Following the successful trial of a high-energy laser mounted to a Wolfhound armoured vehicle, we are engaging the market to help inform decisions on procurement.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Another fake Net Zero market that nobody wanted is set to collapse
This week came news that UK bioethanol producer Vivergo Fuels is once again on the brink of closure – this time as a result of the UK's trade deal with the US, which removes tariffs on cheaper American bioethanol imports. Its rival, Ensus UK, faces a similarly uncertain future. Vivergo produces enough bioethanol to supply about 30 per cent of the UK's bioethanol needs for low carbon road fuels. Government rules require a percentage of bioethanol to be blended into petrol before it can be sold in order to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions associated with transport – considered to be one of the hardest to abate sectors. This is not the first time that Vivergo has faced closure. Back in 2018 it shut down for four months due to uncertainty over government support. It only reopened when the Government created a subsidy scheme known as the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO), which forces fuel suppliers to sell renewable fuels. Bioethanol producers earn RTFO certificates, which they sell to fuel suppliers to help them meet their quotas. And that's the heart of the issue: the UK bioethanol industry wasn't created to meet any actual consumer demand – it exists to satisfy a policy target: the use of green fuel in transport. Now it faces extinction thanks to a different policy priority: that of securing an advantageous trade deal with the US. American bioethanol is cheaper to produce. If it now enters the UK tariff-free, it will almost certainly displace UK-made bioethanol. But once the emissions from transatlantic shipping are factored in, much of the carbon benefit from the RTFO is wiped out. In 2023, the UK as a whole emitted 375 million tonnes of greenhouse gases, about 0.7 per cent of global emissions. Road transport accounted for roughly 100 million tonnes. Using UK bioethanol cuts transport emissions by around 82 per cent, but switching to US imports halves those savings. The impact on global emissions? Negligible – effectively defeating the purpose of the policy. This is a textbook example of how net zero policies can create artificial markets that collapse as soon as political winds shift. Bioethanol was never commercially viable on its own, it was simply created to tick a box. And now, it's likely to be sacrificed for the greater prize of trade access – a goal with arguably broader economic value to the nation. There's no easy compromise here. If the UK wants its trade deal with the US, it's unlikely to be allowed to impose carbon border taxes or other constraints on US ethanol without breaching the deal. But any industry that only survives because overseas competitors are excluded isn't genuinely viable. Unless there's a clear national interest – such as energy security – consumers shouldn't be forced to pay higher prices to prop up policy experiments. The public didn't ask for biofuels, they were pushed into using them by renewable fuels mandates. And now the protections that insulated the UK bioethanol industry from international competition are being lifted, the future looks bleak for the sector. But then, the emissions savings were so paltry on a global scale that it's difficult to see the point of the complex system of mandates, certificates and subsidies that prop it all up. Worse still, both Vivergo and Ensus run on wheat, and together consume up to 15 per cent of UK wheat production when operating at full capacity. Their closure would deliver another blow to a farming sector already reeling from successive policy missteps. This is a cautionary tale. When governments create fake markets, they distort industries, misallocate capital, and raise consumer costs – all for gains that may prove illusory. There are very good reasons why we don't have a centrally planned economy, and it's time ministers stopped pretending we do.
The Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Sun
Aldi announces massive change to its alcohol aisle in UK supermarket ‘first'
BUDGET retailer Aldi has announced a massive change to its alcohol aisle in a UK supermarket "first." Aldi will change 20 million of its wine bottles becoming the first retailer to make the move. The collaboration project will see Aldi work with its wine suppliers and bottling partner Greencroft. New lighter wine bottles will be introduced as part of the retailers ongoing commitment to reducing unnecessary packaging. The new bottles will weigh in at a staggeringly low 300g. This takes the average weight across the range from 409g to just 371g. Additional bottles with reduced weights are expected to follow later in the year. Aldi will be the first UK supermarket to make the massive change. The new 300g bottles are now being used for popular lines such as Grapevine Sauvignon Blanc and Grapevine Merlot. The move is part of a broader initiative that has seen the supermarket reduce bottle weights since 2022. Aldi has said this has resulted in the removal of approximately 12.7 million empty bottles from circulation each year. Luke Emery, National Sustainability Director at Aldi UK, said: 'We're always looking for practical ways to reduce our environmental footprint while continuing to deliver the unbeatable quality and value our customers expect. Expert reveals the top everyday food pairings for bargain supermarket wine 'By working closely with our wine suppliers, we're introducing a simple yet impactful change that's already cutting down on materials and associated carbon. "It's one of the many steps we're taking as we continue to explore how we can continue to reduce bottle weights across our range and make our products more sustainable over time.' Aldi's new wine bottles will weigh a whopping 65 grams less than the standard 365 gram bottles. The retailer has said the roll out of the new bottles has already begun and will be completed by 2025. A statement on the Aldi website reads: "Who said that wine bottles must be made of glass, measuring 750 milliliters, and weighing 365 grams? "Following our mission to optimise packaging, we discovered new and creative ways to package the so-called drink of the gods. "All versions indicated a significant reduction in raw material use, as well as a decrease in carbon emissions - as they say, many roads lead to Rome." Wine expert shares her view on Aldi's Whispering Angel dupe WINE culturist Amelia Singer hails 'The Chassaux et Fils Rosé' as a "really savvy move from Aldi". Here, she gives Fabulous her verdict... Sainte Victoire is my favourite part of Provence to find personality filled yet great value Rosé. Thanks to the altitude of the Sainte Victoire hillsides, the grapes get exposed to plenty of sunshine during the day but their ripeness is moderated by cooler evening temperatures. This enables the wine to brim with intense, complex fruit which is balanced by elegant acidity and herbal finesse. I am delighted that Aldi are highlighting an actual area of Provence as quality and flavour profiles can vary greatly – however I always know with Rosé from Sainte Victoire that I will not be disappointed. Amelia Singer's podcast, 'Ameliarate Through Wine', which pairs celebrities' personalities, core values, and careers with wine. Available on Apple & Spotify.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Cutting personal independent payments: potentially devastating or justified?
As predicted (Starmer offers 'massive concessions' on welfare bill to Labour rebels, 26 June), an attempt has been made to salvage the welfare bill. Discontented MPs and disabled people alike will welcome the assurance that people currently receiving personal independence payments (Pip) or the health element of universal credit will be protected from changes. But the episode is damaging, has caused thousands of disabled people needless worry, and may come to be seen as pivotal in Keir Starmer's tenure. There is something deeply invidious about having two classes of benefit recipients – the protected current recipients, and those making future claims. At the same time, it is clear that the benefits system does need reform and, in particular, needs to support people into work rather than taking a punitive and brutal approach to cost saving. How Starmer has ended up in this position is fascinating, if it were not extraordinary for a government with such a majority and the potential to make radical and equitable change to be repeatedly wrongfooted. U-turns look weak and messy, and presenting them as a response to active listening is unlikely to convince anyone. Starmer claims not to be ideological, and there is the issue; policy is being shaped not by a coherent strategic vision and principle-driven aspirations for better lives, opportunities and genuine equality, but by economic necessity and caution. It's a flawed model, certain to intensify divisions between ministries, Labour members, taxpayers, benefit recipients and the wider electorate. There is major learning and reflection needed by the government; the optics have gone badly wrong, but the welfare reform chaos is a symptom of a much deeper political Melanie HenwoodHartwell, Northamptonshire I am a social worker and I support cutting Pips. I have encountered a number of young adults trapped in a cycle of welfare dependency, unemployment and chaotic lifestyles. They share a belief that the state must fund every aspect of life, and a lack of understanding that benefits come not 'from the government' but are redistributed from taxation of the population. Pip is often claimed on the basis of anxiety or depression, but the idea of working to support oneself, or seeking training or education to make work more attainable, is absent from their thinking. The answer? Probably a combination of education, early interventions and nudges towards culture change, including reducing the availability of Pip. In the long term the status quo won't help the young people I work and address supplied What is not being made clear in government statements and coverage of the cuts to disability benefits is the personal independence payment's relationship to work. Pip is paid to help with the additional costs arising from disability. It is paid to people in work and out of work. It is crucial in enabling people to stay in work, paying for technical and personal support, health needs, travel and other costs. It also enables people who cannot work full-time to work. What will happen to these working people when they can no longer afford the additional costs? It's clear the government does not understand the role of Pip in enabling BetteridgeManchester As we approach the parliamentary vote on the new welfare bill, spare a thought for the many Pip recipients who received the benefit when it was known as disability living allowance. I suspect, for many, the scars still linger from that government change to the system. What that revealed was that disability allowance was not directed to those most in need of it due to their disability. Rather, receiving the new benefit depended upon one's ability to fill out a 40-page form. Next, it depended on having the physical and mental resilience to challenge the result and take it to a tribunal. This was a protracted and stressful period of time. For many, who made it that far, the tribunal reversed the DWP scoring and people found that they had their old level of benefit reinstated. Just a shame that stress makes many medical conditions far worse for the individual. Many years ago, I believed that the DWP wanted to help those with serious disabilities. These days, I have as much faith in them as they appear to have in disabled people (DWP letters now seem to be written with a subtext of 'you're a fraud and we'll catch you').Name and address supplied Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
