
Illegal fishing boats double in five-month surge off Australian waters with 60 destroyed
The recent surge — where one boat was caught with more than half a tonne of sea cucumbers — comes after almost 270 vessels were netted between July 1 and May 30.
Nearly 60 boats have since been destroyed as part of the crackdown.
Many of the intercepted boats are small, narrow-hulled vessels typically designed only for travel near shore.
Authorities have seized large quantities of illegally harvested sea cucumber, shark fin, salt used to preserve the catch, and smaller amounts of other marine species.
The rise in boat arrivals — 169 of the 270 were in the past six months — comes after Australia had seen a dip in recent years.
In total, 229 vessels have had fishing gear and/or catch forfeited under Australian legislation.
The bulk of the activity has been off the Northern Territory coast, with 212 foreign fishers prosecuted in Darwin Local Court since July 1 last year.
During one raid near the Cobourg Peninsula in the Northern Territory on May 21, authorities seized 600 kilograms of sea cucumber and 330kg of salt from a boat of eight fishermen.
The 600kg seized sea cucumber, also known as trepang, was estimated to be worth $60,000.
Their vessel was destroyed and all on board were charged.
The skipper was sentenced to a two-month jail term, to be released after 21 days on a $2000 undertaking to be of good behaviour for a period of two years.
The remainder received a six-week sentence, but can be released after three weeks.
Soaring prices for sea cucumber and shark fins, among other produce, had been blamed for the swell of fishers travelling to Australian waters.
Australian Fisheries Management Authority's fisheries manager Justin Bathurst said the foreign nationals undertook enormous risk in travelling to Australia as they could be detained, face heavy fines and their ships can be burnt or sunk.
'Illegal foreign fishers choosing to fish illegally in Australia are taking considerable risks. They will lose their catch, fishing gear, vessel and could even go to jail,' Mr Bathurst said.
But monitoring in excess of 30,000km of coastline, much of which is situated in very remote areas, poses a challenge and stretches authorities resources.
In a multi-agency operation, AFMA works with the Australian Border Force to deter illegal fishing, along with patrols watching for people smugglers and other unlawful activity.
Beyond aerial, land and sea surveillance, Australian authorities also undertake targeted campaigns within Indonesian fishing communities, including through social media and releasing educational material.
The foreign boats — usually from Indonesia — breaching Australian water has been an ongoing issue off northern waters and doesn't stop short at just fishing vessels with people smugglers also using smaller boats.
At least 10 boats containing up to 183 people in total were intercepted by Australia's Operation Sovereign Borders between the start of the financial year to the end of April, Department of Home Affairs told AFR.
But rather than the larger boats which were intercepted at the height of Australia's illegal boat arrival crisis, data shows a new trend emerging of small vessels ferrying just a handful of people.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Record fine leaves Qantas with unwanted brand baggage
Qantas stands accused of betraying Australian values and undermining its reputation by illegally sacking baggage handlers. Experts warn the airline, which markets itself as the "Spirit of Australia", risks losing its place in the national psyche as a result of its recent indiscretions. Qantas was on Monday fined a record $90 million for outsourcing 1820 ground staff roles, a move the Federal Court ruled was designed to curb union bargaining power in wage negotiations. It added to a $100 million fine it received for selling tickets to flights that were already cancelled between 2021 and 2023, against the backdrop of executives pocketing seven-figure bonuses. Trading on being the "Spirit of Australia" could mean the flag carrier might be held to "exceptional, indeed unique" standards, Justice Michael Lee noted as he delivered the fine. RMIT associate professor of finance Angel Zhong agreed, saying the positioning invited scrutiny of the airline's ethics, not only its performance. "Illegally sacking workers is seen as a betrayal of the very values Qantas claims to represent: fairness, mateship and respect," she told AAP. "If Qantas is the 'Spirit of Australia', then the public expects it to act with a conscience, not just a balance sheet." Illegally sacked Qantas employee Don Dixon said the company meant everything to Australians, but needed to behave with that in mind. "It's an Australian company. You go overseas and see that red kangaroo, you know 'that's my country and I'm going home, I feel safe' ... that's been lost," he told AAP. The embattled airline unsuccessfully appealed against the decision to the High Court, paving the way for the penalty to be awarded. Justice Lee ordered Qantas to pay $90 million in penalties, with $50 million to be paid to the union that brought the proceedings and highlighted the illegal conduct. He cited the "sheer scale of the contraventions, being the largest of their type" as a reason to impose a penalty that would deter other businesses from similar conduct. Qantas will have to pay the hefty bill on top of a $120 million compensation payment it has made to the affected ground staff for their economic loss, pain and suffering following the outsourcing. Public frustration and disappointment with Qantas might have increased, Assoc Prof Zhong said, but it wouldn't necessarily change consumer behaviour with price, route availability and loyalty programs outweighing ethical concerns. "That said, sustained reputational damage can have long-term effects," she said. "If trust continues to decline, Qantas risks losing not just customers, but its privileged position in the national psyche." Qantas stands accused of betraying Australian values and undermining its reputation by illegally sacking baggage handlers. Experts warn the airline, which markets itself as the "Spirit of Australia", risks losing its place in the national psyche as a result of its recent indiscretions. Qantas was on Monday fined a record $90 million for outsourcing 1820 ground staff roles, a move the Federal Court ruled was designed to curb union bargaining power in wage negotiations. It added to a $100 million fine it received for selling tickets to flights that were already cancelled between 2021 and 2023, against the backdrop of executives pocketing seven-figure bonuses. Trading on being the "Spirit of Australia" could mean the flag carrier might be held to "exceptional, indeed unique" standards, Justice Michael Lee noted as he delivered the fine. RMIT associate professor of finance Angel Zhong agreed, saying the positioning invited scrutiny of the airline's ethics, not only its performance. "Illegally sacking workers is seen as a betrayal of the very values Qantas claims to represent: fairness, mateship and respect," she told AAP. "If Qantas is the 'Spirit of Australia', then the public expects it to act with a conscience, not just a balance sheet." Illegally sacked Qantas employee Don Dixon said the company meant everything to Australians, but needed to behave with that in mind. "It's an Australian company. You go overseas and see that red kangaroo, you know 'that's my country and I'm going home, I feel safe' ... that's been lost," he told AAP. The embattled airline unsuccessfully appealed against the decision to the High Court, paving the way for the penalty to be awarded. Justice Lee ordered Qantas to pay $90 million in penalties, with $50 million to be paid to the union that brought the proceedings and highlighted the illegal conduct. He cited the "sheer scale of the contraventions, being the largest of their type" as a reason to impose a penalty that would deter other businesses from similar conduct. Qantas will have to pay the hefty bill on top of a $120 million compensation payment it has made to the affected ground staff for their economic loss, pain and suffering following the outsourcing. Public frustration and disappointment with Qantas might have increased, Assoc Prof Zhong said, but it wouldn't necessarily change consumer behaviour with price, route availability and loyalty programs outweighing ethical concerns. "That said, sustained reputational damage can have long-term effects," she said. "If trust continues to decline, Qantas risks losing not just customers, but its privileged position in the national psyche." Qantas stands accused of betraying Australian values and undermining its reputation by illegally sacking baggage handlers. Experts warn the airline, which markets itself as the "Spirit of Australia", risks losing its place in the national psyche as a result of its recent indiscretions. Qantas was on Monday fined a record $90 million for outsourcing 1820 ground staff roles, a move the Federal Court ruled was designed to curb union bargaining power in wage negotiations. It added to a $100 million fine it received for selling tickets to flights that were already cancelled between 2021 and 2023, against the backdrop of executives pocketing seven-figure bonuses. Trading on being the "Spirit of Australia" could mean the flag carrier might be held to "exceptional, indeed unique" standards, Justice Michael Lee noted as he delivered the fine. RMIT associate professor of finance Angel Zhong agreed, saying the positioning invited scrutiny of the airline's ethics, not only its performance. "Illegally sacking workers is seen as a betrayal of the very values Qantas claims to represent: fairness, mateship and respect," she told AAP. "If Qantas is the 'Spirit of Australia', then the public expects it to act with a conscience, not just a balance sheet." Illegally sacked Qantas employee Don Dixon said the company meant everything to Australians, but needed to behave with that in mind. "It's an Australian company. You go overseas and see that red kangaroo, you know 'that's my country and I'm going home, I feel safe' ... that's been lost," he told AAP. The embattled airline unsuccessfully appealed against the decision to the High Court, paving the way for the penalty to be awarded. Justice Lee ordered Qantas to pay $90 million in penalties, with $50 million to be paid to the union that brought the proceedings and highlighted the illegal conduct. He cited the "sheer scale of the contraventions, being the largest of their type" as a reason to impose a penalty that would deter other businesses from similar conduct. Qantas will have to pay the hefty bill on top of a $120 million compensation payment it has made to the affected ground staff for their economic loss, pain and suffering following the outsourcing. Public frustration and disappointment with Qantas might have increased, Assoc Prof Zhong said, but it wouldn't necessarily change consumer behaviour with price, route availability and loyalty programs outweighing ethical concerns. "That said, sustained reputational damage can have long-term effects," she said. "If trust continues to decline, Qantas risks losing not just customers, but its privileged position in the national psyche." Qantas stands accused of betraying Australian values and undermining its reputation by illegally sacking baggage handlers. Experts warn the airline, which markets itself as the "Spirit of Australia", risks losing its place in the national psyche as a result of its recent indiscretions. Qantas was on Monday fined a record $90 million for outsourcing 1820 ground staff roles, a move the Federal Court ruled was designed to curb union bargaining power in wage negotiations. It added to a $100 million fine it received for selling tickets to flights that were already cancelled between 2021 and 2023, against the backdrop of executives pocketing seven-figure bonuses. Trading on being the "Spirit of Australia" could mean the flag carrier might be held to "exceptional, indeed unique" standards, Justice Michael Lee noted as he delivered the fine. RMIT associate professor of finance Angel Zhong agreed, saying the positioning invited scrutiny of the airline's ethics, not only its performance. "Illegally sacking workers is seen as a betrayal of the very values Qantas claims to represent: fairness, mateship and respect," she told AAP. "If Qantas is the 'Spirit of Australia', then the public expects it to act with a conscience, not just a balance sheet." Illegally sacked Qantas employee Don Dixon said the company meant everything to Australians, but needed to behave with that in mind. "It's an Australian company. You go overseas and see that red kangaroo, you know 'that's my country and I'm going home, I feel safe' ... that's been lost," he told AAP. The embattled airline unsuccessfully appealed against the decision to the High Court, paving the way for the penalty to be awarded. Justice Lee ordered Qantas to pay $90 million in penalties, with $50 million to be paid to the union that brought the proceedings and highlighted the illegal conduct. He cited the "sheer scale of the contraventions, being the largest of their type" as a reason to impose a penalty that would deter other businesses from similar conduct. Qantas will have to pay the hefty bill on top of a $120 million compensation payment it has made to the affected ground staff for their economic loss, pain and suffering following the outsourcing. Public frustration and disappointment with Qantas might have increased, Assoc Prof Zhong said, but it wouldn't necessarily change consumer behaviour with price, route availability and loyalty programs outweighing ethical concerns. "That said, sustained reputational damage can have long-term effects," she said. "If trust continues to decline, Qantas risks losing not just customers, but its privileged position in the national psyche."

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Cut off his access': AFP veteran David Craig outlines how to target exiled illicit tobacco kingpin Kazem Hamad
A law enforcement veteran has outlined what Australian authorities can do to go after exiled crime boss Kamez Hamad. Hamad is widely reported to control the majority of Victoria's illicit tobacco trade, with experts estimating his profits to be in the billions – well above the wealth accumulated by the likes of Carl Williams and Tony Mokbel. In a series of articles published on Monday, the Herald Sun revealed the luxury Middle Eastern lifestyle of the crime boss, with trips to idyllic beach destinations like Bodrum in Turkey. According to Deakin University criminologist James Martin, Hamad likely makes an 'extraordinary' amount of money from the illicit tobacco trade. 'Whichever way you look at the numbers, if he controls the majority of the illicit trade – and that market is worth billions of dollars – he is making an extraordinary amount of money,' he said. Speaking to Sky News Australia on Monday, former Australian Federal Police detective superintendent David Craig said Hamad had managed to remain in control of his organisation despite being deported to Iraq in 2023 following a prison sentence for heroin trafficking. Asked how Hamad managed to get his profits out of the country, Mr Craig said while international organised crime still used cash couriers who were 'willing to carry large amounts of cash on assignment on a percentage basis', this method would not work for the amount of money Hamad was accruing. 'I would expect that he's diversified his money laundering efforts and that would be one method he would rely upon,' he said. 'The other is the traditional Middle Eastern Hawala banking system, where money isn't actually transferred across international lines, so it stays below the radar of the monitoring of the local governments. 'What I highly suspect is occurring in this case is cryptocurrency – mass crypto being transferred into his wallet or wallets of his associates in the Middle East, directly from Australia. It's very, very hard to police that.' While stating Australia does have extradition treaties with the UAE and Turkey – where Hamad has reportedly spent time - Mr Craig said attempting to extradite him might not be the best use of law enforcement resources. 'The question in my mind would be, do we want to actually bring this person back to our justice system again so then we can deport him again, or do we spend those resources to cut off his access to the illegal gains coming out of Australia,' he said. 'And the people that are working for him in Australia, if they can be deported, let's move them on as well.' The law enforcement veteran also said the Australian government was ignoring a major tool to go after the illicit tobacco trade. 'Australia is actually a signatory to the… prevention of illicit Tobacco Goods Act,' he said. 'We signed that in 2013 and came into power two years ago in September 2023… the main thrust of that agreement is to have a track and trace system so that tobacco products could be tracked from manufacture to point of sale. 'That allows law enforcement multiple access points that allows us to monitor the illegal bleed between illegal markets and legal markets. It allows us to not just guess what's happening in the marketplace, but to proactively plan interventions to stop this. 'Now this government has done nothing to actually start this. It's in law. They have it in the UK, they have it in Europe and a number of other countries. Australia simply hasn't done that.' According to Mr Martin, the size of Australia's illicit tobacco market was directly linked to government policies designed to reduce smoking rates. 'If you overtax a product, like we've seen with tobacco, then it doesn't make sense to purchase it legally, so it will drive demand to black market substitutes and that provides opportunities for organised crime and that's what has happened here in Australia.' He said in order to combat the issue, the tax on legal cigarettes and vapes needed to come down and enforcement ramped up. 'It's an issue of resourcing and if these people are making billions of dollars and we are only funding our law enforcement agencies $300m then who's got the resources to win a fight like that,' Mr Martin said. Mr Craig said the penalties associated with trafficking in illicit tobacco were significantly less than with illicit drugs while the profits were higher. 'Why wouldn't you go to a softer market, which is exactly what these people are doing, going to illicit market of tobacco,' he said.


Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Record fine leaves Qantas with unwanted brand baggage
Qantas stands accused of betraying Australian values and undermining its reputation by illegally sacking baggage handlers. Experts warn the airline, which markets itself as the "Spirit of Australia", risks losing its place in the national psyche as a result of its recent indiscretions. Qantas was on Monday fined a record $90 million for outsourcing 1820 ground staff roles, a move the Federal Court ruled was designed to curb union bargaining power in wage negotiations. It added to a $100 million fine it received for selling tickets to flights that were already cancelled between 2021 and 2023, against the backdrop of executives pocketing seven-figure bonuses. Trading on being the "Spirit of Australia" could mean the flag carrier might be held to "exceptional, indeed unique" standards, Justice Michael Lee noted as he delivered the fine. RMIT associate professor of finance Angel Zhong agreed, saying the positioning invited scrutiny of the airline's ethics, not only its performance. "Illegally sacking workers is seen as a betrayal of the very values Qantas claims to represent: fairness, mateship and respect," she told AAP. "If Qantas is the 'Spirit of Australia', then the public expects it to act with a conscience, not just a balance sheet." Illegally sacked Qantas employee Don Dixon said the company meant everything to Australians, but needed to behave with that in mind. "It's an Australian company. You go overseas and see that red kangaroo, you know 'that's my country and I'm going home, I feel safe' ... that's been lost," he told AAP. The embattled airline unsuccessfully appealed against the decision to the High Court, paving the way for the penalty to be awarded. Justice Lee ordered Qantas to pay $90 million in penalties, with $50 million to be paid to the union that brought the proceedings and highlighted the illegal conduct. He cited the "sheer scale of the contraventions, being the largest of their type" as a reason to impose a penalty that would deter other businesses from similar conduct. Qantas will have to pay the hefty bill on top of a $120 million compensation payment it has made to the affected ground staff for their economic loss, pain and suffering following the outsourcing. Public frustration and disappointment with Qantas might have increased, Assoc Prof Zhong said, but it wouldn't necessarily change consumer behaviour with price, route availability and loyalty programs outweighing ethical concerns. "That said, sustained reputational damage can have long-term effects," she said. "If trust continues to decline, Qantas risks losing not just customers, but its privileged position in the national psyche."