
Asean agrees tariff deals with US should not harm members
KUALA LUMPUR: Southeast Asian leaders reached an understanding on Tuesday that any bilateral agreements they might strike with the United States on trade tariffs would not harm each others' economies, Malaysia's premier Anwar Ibrahim said.
Anwar, the current chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, said there was consensus during a leaders' summit in Kuala Lumpur that any deals negotiated with Washington would ensure the interests of the region as a whole were protected.
The Asean meeting came at a time of global market volatility and slowing economic growth, and amid uncertainty over a trade war that has ensued since US President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs.
Southeast Asia is among the regions hardest hit by the tariffs, with six of its countries facing levies of between 32 per cent and 49 per cent in July if negotiations on reductions fail.
"While proceeding with bilateral negotiations... the consensus rose to have some sort of understanding with Asean that decisions should not be at the expense of any other country," Anwar told a press conference.
"So we will have to protect the turf of 650 or 660 million people," he said of Asean.
With a combined gross domestic product of more than $3.8 trillion, Asean members are in a precarious position in relation to the United States, which is the biggest market for the region's exports, key drivers of its growth.
Anwar said on Monday that he had written to Trump requesting a meeting on the tariffs between the United States and Asean.
Anwar was speaking at the conclusion of the summit on Tuesday, which included an economic gathering of leaders of the Asean bloc, Gulf countries and China, which was represented by Premier Li Qiang.
Asean leaders also called for a temporary ceasefire in army-ruled Myanmar to be expanded nationwide, to enable warring sides to build trust and work towards convening dialogue after four years of turmoil.
Myanmar has been in crisis since its military overthrew an elected civilian government in 2021, triggering pro-democracy protests that morphed into a widening rebellion, with more than 3.5 million people displaced, according to the United Nations.
A devastating earthquake in March that killed more than 3,800 people led to a series of temporary ceasefires in affected areas, a truce that the military government has violated with continued air strikes and artillery attacks, according to data compiled by a conflict monitor and the United Nations.
"We further called for the sustained extension and nationwide expansion of the ceasefire in Myanmar, as an initial step towards the cessation of violence," the Asean leaders said in a statement.
"We encouraged all relevant stakeholders in Myanmar to build trust towards convening an inclusive national dialogue."
Anwar hailed "significant" engagement steps on Myanmar on Monday after last month holding a closed-door meeting in Bangkok with junta chief Min Aung Hlaing and virtual talks with the shadow National Unity Government, which is aligned with rebel forces.
On Tuesday, Anwar said Asean leaders had agreed that the path forward was to engage all sides in the Myanmar conflict. "Now we have gone to a stage where both parties are now in consultation, although at the lower key level," he said, stressing the need to extend and expand the ceasefire.
His remarks come after Maris Sangiampongsa, the foreign minister of Thailand, Myanmar's neighbour, said he would propose broader international engagement with the junta, which has been ostracised by Western powers, with sanctions imposed on the generals. - Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
13 hours ago
- Observer
The US veto on Gaza ceasefire: A sign of democracy in decline
In 1814, many years after his presidency, John Adams, the second president of the United States, gave a strong warning about democracy. He believed that no democracy in history had survived forever. According to him, the real threats came not from outside enemies, but from inside — from pride, greed and the desire for power. In his view, democracy could only survive if both leaders and citizens held strong values and behaved with responsibility. Today, this warning feels very close to reality. The US, often seen as a symbol of democracy, now faces serious challenges. Many politicians seem more focused on power than on public service. They speak mainly to their supporters and ignore the rest. Political division is rising and trust in institutions like the courts, media and elections is getting weaker. These are not just political problems. They show that the foundation of democracy is becoming less stable. One powerful example is the ongoing war in Gaza. Since October 2023, the people of Gaza have experienced terrible suffering. More than 35,000 Palestinians have been killed, including large numbers of women and children. Homes, hospitals, schools and basic infrastructure have been destroyed. Many people have no access to clean water, food, or medicine. The humanitarian crisis is growing worse each day. According to aid groups, large parts of the population are now on the edge of famine and medical services are collapsing. Around the world, there have been strong calls for a ceasefire. The United Nations has brought forward several resolutions. Human rights organisations have called for action. People across many countries have protested in the streets. They demand justice and peace. Many feel deep frustration at the international community's slow and divided response. However, the United States continues to give full support to Israel, including weapons, funding and political protection. Just a few days ago, the United States used its fifth veto at the UN Security Council since the war began. The resolution called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. This veto came while more civilians were dying and international aid groups were warning of famine and total collapse in the health system. Previous ceasefire resolutions were also blocked, despite widespread global support. Such actions raise serious questions about the direction of American democracy. A true democracy should care not only about votes and elections, but also about human rights, fairness and compassion. When a country that claims to support freedom and justice helps to block peace efforts and ignores mass suffering, it loses moral credibility. Democracy must mean more than strategy and power. John Adams believed that democracy depends on the moral choices of its leaders. When those in power stop acting with honesty and responsibility, the democratic system becomes weaker. Today, the US response to Gaza shows how quickly these values can disappear when political interests become the main goal. Despite this, many people in the United States are speaking out. Students have protested on university campuses. Religious leaders are calling for peace. Several members of Congress have asked for a new approach. Public demonstrations in major cities continue, with protesters calling for an end to military support and a shift towards diplomacy. These voices are demanding a return to moral leadership and real democratic values. They remind us that democracy can survive — but only if people are willing to defend it. Democracy is not just about systems and laws. It also requires courage, truth and care for others. Political leaders must act not only for their own supporters, but also for those affected by their policies abroad. A democracy that ignores this responsibility may keep its form, but it loses its spirit. John Adams warned that democracy could destroy itself from the inside. His words were not just for the past — they speak clearly to the present. The decisions made now, both in domestic and foreign policy, will decide what kind of democracy the US remains. If it wants to be respected, it must show that it still believes in justice, human dignity and peace.


Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Oman showcases inclusive vision at Global Disability Forum
NEW YORK: The Sultanate of Oman took part in the 18th session of the Conference of States Parties to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), held during June 10-12 at the United Nations headquarters in New York. Oman's delegation to the conference was headed by Ambassador Omar bin Said al Kathiri, Oman's Permanent Representative to the UN in New York, and comprised representatives from the Ministry of Social Development and the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs. In a speech delivered by Badr bin Fareesh al Yahyaee, Assistant Director-General of the for Persons with Disabilities at the Ministry of Social Development, Oman highlighted its extensive efforts to support and empower persons with disabilities across all sectors. These efforts align with the provisions of the State's Basic Law, relevant national legislation, 'Oman Vision 2040' and the country's commitments under international conventions and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030. Oman's address also outlined key achievements in the care and empowerment of persons with disabilities, including the draft law on the rights of persons with disabilities, which was formulated in accordance with the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Other milestones include the development of a comprehensive national guide for engineering standards and specifications for inclusive urban environments and accessible transportation, as well as the organisation of the first National Forum for Persons with Disabilities in 2023, whose outcomes laid the groundwork for a dedicated lab to enhance services and programmes for persons with disabilities. The Sultanate of Oman emphasised the importance of raising public awareness about the rights of persons with disabilities as a shared responsibility, with active participation from persons with disabilities themselves. It also called for unified visions among all member states to achieve an accessible, barrier-free environment that fulfils their aspirations. - ONA


Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
The spotlight on hate speech and radicalisation online
The prevalence of hate speech and incitement to violence on social platforms is becoming increasingly alarming. A wave of misogyny, slander and threats is becoming normalised, while social platforms are being exploited as podiums for bigotry and radicalisation. The boundaries between terrorism and other forms of offending are often blurred. Recent incidents involving vehicular homicide, hate crimes, school shootings and extremist acts have raised serious concerns. According to studies, the rise in unfiltered hate significantly facilitated radicalisation on social media. Studies indicate that online extremism and online offending are likely to encourage and endorse violence. Beyond violent behaviour, radicalisation can also be recognised as the process of embracing extremist beliefs. Younger individuals are more susceptible to being influenced by radical ideologies. Easy access to extremist content and instructions online directly fuels a rise in youth radicalisation. According to the United Nations, hate speech coupled with disinformation can lead to discrimination and large-scale violence. The Internet radicalisation of youngsters and children is one of the most pressing current problems. Digital natives spend a lot of time online, and important aspects of their lives and social interactions are rooted online. Adolescents can lack critical judgement in their decisions and be impulsive, which can facilitate violent actions. The radicalisation of youth can occur over an extended period. Social variables such as health, economics and politics can all create situations of oppression. In some cases, a specific incident, a deep dissatisfaction with authority, global politics, or grievance triggered it. Children as young as 12 years old are being radicalised. The way the Internet presents, selects, links,and assembles information has been of concern in the context of extremist beliefs, according to scholars Jeans Binder and Jonathan Kenyon in "Terrorism and the Internet: How Dangerous is Online Radicalisation". The alarming normalisation and acceptance of extremist beliefs online points to the formation of echo chambers, in which individuals can surround themselves with like-minded people and help reinforce each other's views, thus contributing to the amplification of opinions and acts of violence. In the article 'Public Mental Health Approaches to Online Radicalisation: An Empty Systematic Review', the authors suggest that peer-to-peer, video hosting and collaborative platforms can serve as conduits to extremist content. The authors claim that there is a growing number of radicalised persons among younger users of short video platforms, such as TikTok, Discord, Telegram, gaming platforms and online videogames. They build upon one another to create a more multifaceted and variegated threat. In 'The Third Generation of Online Radicalization', Jacob Ware recounts how Estonian police caught a 13-year-old boy in early 2020 for leading an international terrorist organisation. Ware writes that the teen's radicalisation stemmed from encrypted chatrooms; he radicalised others, drawing inspiration from a mix of revolutionary ideologies. Investigators on counter-terrorism claim that violent posts on social media, forums and end-to-end encrypted messaging services are mostly visual and depict violence. According to investigators, this is a common tactic criminal actors use to heighten an emotional response. Unintentional individuals may fall into radical Internet rabbit holes. The lack of knowledge and understanding of extremism among young people can lead to misinterpretations of the factors that put youth at risk. It is crucial to recognise that radicalisation is a social process; the problem involves not only social media but also online relationships and beliefs derived from the Internet. Sonia Ambrosio The writer is journalist, academic and researcher in media studies