logo
Historic early childhood development investments threatened as Budget withdrawal sparks fears of lost progress

Historic early childhood development investments threatened as Budget withdrawal sparks fears of lost progress

Daily Maverick20-05-2025

The evidence is clear. Quality early learning programmes deliver a 13% annual return on investment through improved health, education, and employment outcomes. Scaling up ECD would create 300,000 jobs and 70,000 new enterprises, primarily in township and rural communities. Investing in ECD isn't just a moral imperative; it is an economic strategy.
In a dramatic turn of events, the Government of National Unity (GNU) has withdrawn the 2025/2026 National Budget, following deep divisions over the proposed VAT increase. As South Africa prepares for a new Budget to be tabled on 21 May 2025, uncertainty looms. For the early childhood development (ECD) sector, the stakes couldn't be higher.
For the first time in South Africa's history, the government proposed a historic R10-billion allocation to expand the ECD subsidy, a R210-million increase for ECD infrastructure, and R336-million to extend nutrition support to our youngest citizens. It was a moment that made the sector feel seen, valued, and finally recognised not just in policy, but in practice. But now, with the Budget withdrawn once again, this progress hangs in the balance.
The smartest investment South Africa can make
The evidence is clear. As Nobel Prize winner James Heckman's work has shown, quality early learning programmes deliver a 13% annual return on investment through improved health, education, and employment outcomes.
The Department of Basic Education's (DBE) own 2030 ECD Strategy shows that scaling up ECD would create 300,000 jobs and 70,000 new enterprises, primarily in township and rural communities. Investing in ECD isn't just a moral imperative; it is an economic strategy.
ECD investment directly contributes to the GNU's own priorities: driving inclusive growth, reducing poverty, and building a developmental state. Ilifa Labantwana modelling shows that increased ECD funding could:
Reduce malnutrition and child poverty.
Improve the working conditions of 250,000 largely female ECD workers.
Relieve care burdens for more than two million caregivers, unlocking economic participation.
Stimulate township and rural economies through infrastructure and programme expenditure.
'This investment would enable us to retain qualified practitioners, maintain resources, and support families through holistic programmes,' said Refilwe Mkhoe from Lusemanzi ECD Centre in Orange Farm.
The cost of neglect is far greater
Failing to protect this funding now means continuing a generational cycle of poverty. One in four children under five in South Africa is stunted. More than 1.3 million children aged three to five are not in any early learning programme. Most ECD practitioners, many of whom are black women, earn below the minimum wage.
Agnes Ramosela, the principal at Tsepiso's Kiddies World Preschool in Lenasia South, said: 'We are not even able to pay ourselves minimum wage. I am currently employing 20 people, mostly young people struggling with employment, and I am sometimes unable to pay them.'
Progressive alternatives exist
We acknowledge that the removal of the proposed VAT increase has created new fiscal pressures. However, austerity cannot, and must not, come at the expense of young children. Even with our last rand, there is no wiser or more transformative investment than ECD. Rather than cutting these important services, the government must pursue a more sustainable revenue strategy.
The Budget Justice Coalition (BJC) has proposed progressive and equitable alternatives to raise revenue without placing additional burdens on poor people. These include implementing a net wealth tax, tackling corporate tax base erosion and profit shifting, reversing unnecessary corporate tax cuts and rebalancing the tax mix, expanding the taxation of luxury goods, among others. The South African Revenue Service has also suggested investment in improving compliance and collection efficiency as a revenue generating mechanism. These measures align with our Constitution's call for equity and social justice, and they can support sustainable investment in key services like ECD.
The time is now
We call on the GNU to protect, not reverse, the R10-billion subsidy expansion, the R210-million infrastructure investment, and the R336-million increased nutrition support. These are not optional line items. They are the building blocks of a thriving nation. In March this year, at the ECD Leadership Summit, President Cyril Ramaphosa issued a heartfelt apology, saying: 'it was a mistake not to invest in ECD 30 years ago'. He is right. And now, we have a second chance.
We urge all political parties in the GNU, and Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana, to keep young children at the centre of South Africa's development agenda. ECD must remain a non-negotiable. DM
Tshepo Mantjé is the Right to ECD Coordinator at Equality Collective and the Real Reform for ECD Movement Coordinator. Daniel McLaren is a Public Finance Economist at Ilifa Labantwana. Hopolang Selebalo is Head of Policy and Research at SmartStart South Africa and Chairperson of the Real Reform for ECD Steering Committee.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's influence on Trump: A closer look at the Afrikaner genocide debate
Elon Musk's influence on Trump: A closer look at the Afrikaner genocide debate

IOL News

time15 hours ago

  • IOL News

Elon Musk's influence on Trump: A closer look at the Afrikaner genocide debate

US president Donald Trump shakes hands with billionaire businessman Elon Musk on May 30 before their public feud. Image: Allison Robbert / AFP The public fallout between US President Donald Trump and South African-born billionaire Elon Musk is not bothering one of the political parties in the Government of National Unity (GNU). Trump and Musk took to their social media platforms this week over differences in his administration's spending. Musk stated that Trump would not have won the 2024 presidential elections without his campaign spending hundreds of US dollars. Freedom Front Plus leader Dr Corné Mulder said he did not believe the approach by Trump or his administration would be changed due to the bitter feud and affect its response to allegations of 'genocide' against white Afrikaner farmers in South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Mulder was responding to questions about whether the fallout could see Trump dramatically changing his views on the white Afrikaner genocide in South Africa. Musk is widely regarded as a person who wielded immense influence on Trump. 'It is incorrect to assume that US foreign policy is based on the influence of specific individuals. Unhappiness with SA is not something new. Even during the (Joe) Biden administration, a bipartisan bill was introduced in the US Congress to relook the US-SA relationship,' he said. Political analyst Professor Dirk Kotzé said Musk has in the past been influential in these issues, but there are many other South Africans who are also influential and close to Trump. 'So it will not necessarily change this matter, I don't think Musk was the one who dealt with or promoted the issue of genocide necessarily, he was more there in terms of black economic empowerment and employment equity and those government policies that he criticised, so he will continue with that until there is an agreement about Starlink,' Kotzé explained. He added: 'When it comes to the Afrikaner issues and what is called genocide, I don't think he was ever a key person in that, I think that is more where the conservatives – AfriForum, Solidarity, (South African-born American conservative political commentator and radio host) Joe Pollak and others – came in to promote that idea.' Kotzé said his understanding is that there has been a smaller, second group that went to the US after the earlier AfriForum-Solidarity delegation, but without any public attention because it created much more disturbances within US politics in general. 'So I think it has become a controversial issue in the US, and Trump wants to avoid that. I can see that this is not going to be a public project in the future, it is not something they will announce in the media, welcome them, and have public events,' he predicted. Kotzé also anticipates that this initiative or project will, over time, actually slow down. 'I don't see it developing strong momentum that it will be something very prominent in the future. I think it is going to disappear over time,' he said.

New rules mandate energy-efficient motors — a win for SA's strained power grid
New rules mandate energy-efficient motors — a win for SA's strained power grid

Daily Maverick

time16 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

New rules mandate energy-efficient motors — a win for SA's strained power grid

As of June 2025, South Africa has activated mandatory regulations that affect a R3-billion industry and will result in annual energy savings of 840 gigawatt hours — enough to power a city the size of Polokwane or approximately 140,000 households for a year. Electric motors might not sound exciting — but they're everywhere. They power conveyor belts in factories, water pumps on farms, fans in cooling systems, and crushers in mines. And as of June 2025, every new motor sold in South Africa will have to meet higher energy efficiency standards. That's because South Africa has officially implemented its Minimum Energy Performance Standards (Meps) for electric motors, bringing the country in line with global standards. The change affects a R3-billion industry, with the goal of saving up to 10% of energy per low voltage motor — which is significant in a country where demand exceeds supply. The new rule requires that most three-phase, low-voltage electric motors sold in South Africa meet IE3 (International Efficiency) standards. Less efficient IE1 and IE2 motors will be phased out over time, as old ones reach their end of life. Regulated by the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications, this shift applies to motors rated between 0.75 kW and 375 kW with two, four, six, or eight poles — the kind you'd find in factories, farms, and commercial buildings. According to the International Energy Agency, electric motors and motor systems are responsible for about 53% of the world's total electricity consumption. And standards like MEPs offer the potential to reduce the energy demand of motor systems by 20 to 30% with short payback periods. Fanie Steyn, Executive of the Electric Motor Division at WEG Africa, a leading motor manufacturer, said that about 250,000 IE1 motors were imported into South Africa each year, representing a R3-billion value chain. Currently, there's a 3:1 ratio of IE1 to IE3 motors entering the country. 'From now, that's all about to change,' said Steyn. Those motors now need to be replaced with IE3 models, which are typically 4 to 10% more efficient. This might not sound like much — but considering that all electric motors account for around 65% of industrial energy use, and industry accounts for about 60% of the country's total energy demand, these efficiency gains are not negligent. 'Electric motors are the prime mover for all industry — almost everything that moves is driven by an electric motor. 'If you go to where a cold drink is bottled, the pump that pumps it, the conveyor that moves the bottles, where bread is made, or where mielies are crushed to make flour — it's all powered by motors,' he said. 'Almost everything that moves is by a motor.' Efficiency standard So starting this year, the new rules will require that all new motors meet the IE3 efficiency standard, which means they use electricity more efficiently and last longer. While the rules don't force businesses to replace existing motors immediately, over time, as older motors wear out, they will be replaced with these more efficient models. Dr Theo Covary, the lead researcher of the cost benefit analysis undertaken to inform these new regulations, estimates that this change will save South Africa 474 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity in the first year alone — enough to power about 44,000 homes for a year. Over the next decade, the savings will add up to 5,763 GWh, roughly the annual electricity use of a major South African city. 'The new IE3 regulation is expected to reduce electricity demand by approximately 0.25% in year one, which is reducing electricity by 0.25% in one year, 'which may seem small and insignificant but is material given the high net economic benefit to the economy', said Covary. The total cumulative energy savings of 5,763 GWh after 10 years is equivalent to the electricity used by Nelson Mandela Bay in one year. This is because as more and more older, less efficient motors reach their end of life and get replaced by more efficient models, the savings increase. In addition to energy savings, this reduction would prevent about 5 million tons of CO₂ emissions. To put this in perspective, offsetting that amount of carbon would require planting spekboom — an indigenous South African plant known for its carbon sequestration ability — over an area of approximately 3,333 square kilometres, which is about twice the size of the Western Cape's Garden Route District. Energy efficiency adds up If you consider that Eskom generated about 200 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in the financial year ending March 2024, the estimated 840 GWh saved (or 0.84 TWh) from this new standard represents 0.25% of the power the country uses in a year. ' It might not sound like much, but believe me — 0.25% is a lot, and it all adds up,' said Chris Yellend, an electrical engineer and energy analyst from Business EE Intelligence. 'It's good that South Africa is following suit and becoming more energy efficient.' He added that energy efficiency measures like this offer the best returns in terms of cost. 'Instead of spending billions on new generation infrastructure, the economy can invest in efficiency — it's a no-brainer. Improving energy efficiency is the most cost-effective way of 'building' new electricity supply. It's not as insignificant as it might seem.' Steyn echoed these sentiments, saying: 'What do you do if you don't have energy? You have to build more power stations, maybe solar or wind farms — but all those options are massive projects with huge capital outlay. And it takes time and long periods of investment and installations before you can do that. 'We have an energy crisis, so in the short term one of the quickest or easiest ways to overcome that is to increase efficiency of products.' Steyn added: 'South Africa has done a phenomenal job over the years with labelling programmes — for fridges, TVs, lights. But now, finally, we're targeting the big energy consumers: electric motors.' According to a 2022 cost-benefit analysis by Covary and economist Linton Reddy of DNA Economics — which informed the regulation — these seemingly small savings are actually substantial, especially given the poor performance of Eskom's generation fleet. Despite the modest efficiency improvements, the long operating hours of motors translate into significant overall savings. To put it into context, Yelland said: 'If you value electricity at around R2.00 per kilowatt-hour, that's a saving — or a reduction in revenue to Eskom — of about R1.68-billion.' Tax breaks and rebates for motor upgrades Companies that upgrade to the new IE3 motors can tap into financial incentives. Zadok Olinga, a former president of the Southern Africa Energy Efficiency Confederation and director of resource management consultancy Oelinga, said the new minimum standards aligned with South Africa's broader push for energy efficiency — and opened the door to claiming Section 12L tax deductions and Eskom rebates. Under Section 12L, businesses can claim 95 cents per kilowatt-hour of verified energy saved as a tax deduction. Eskom also offers a 41c/kWh rebate for projects that cut electricity use — including motor upgrades — as long as minimum savings and demand reduction targets are met. Phase in Manufacturers and Original Equipment Manufacturers can still sell off their existing IE1 and IE2 stock until May 2026. End-users — such as factories or farms — aren't required to immediately replace older motors, but must buy energy-efficient ones when they do. 'Motors are built to last around 20 years,' said Van Niekerk from WEG.'But in reality, many reach end-of-life within seven to 10 years, especially in demanding environments.' For businesses that run motors 24/7, the higher upfront cost of an IE3 motor is often recovered in a matter of months through lower electricity bills. For others — say, a bakery or a workshop that runs motors eight hours a day — the payback period might be two to three years. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store