Audit & adjust your spending to reach your 2025 savings goals
2025 is almost halfway over, which means it's a perfect time for people to reevaluate their annual savings goals, spending habits, and income.
CardRates.com CFP® and personal finance expert Bobbi Rebell sits down with Wealth's Brad Smith for a conversation to share her strategies on acclimating to a new budget and unnecessary spending.
To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Wealth here.
All week long on wealth, we're conducting your mid-year financial checkup. If you're one of the Americans who wanted to save more or spend less in 2025, you set this at the outset of the year as one of your goals. Well, guess what? This is your opportunity for a progress report. I'm joined in studio by Bobby Ribell, who is the cardrates.com CFP and personal finance expert. Bobby, good to have you here in studio with us. So, let's talk about these mid-year check-ins. How can a mid-year check-in and audit, how can this help with some of your spending habits?
Okay. Well, the first thing you want to do is you want to look back at your history because we learn so much from history, we know. So you want to look at not your New Year's resolutions, Brad. You want to look at your New Year's expectations. And think about how you did relative to that. So look at how you did in terms of your income. What were you expecting? Did you expect to get a raise? Maybe you got it, maybe you didn't. Did you expect to earn money in overtime? How did your actual earning come in based on your expectations? And then you want to think about how your spending went. What were your expenses? Were they higher than expected? Did you have some surprises? And of course, think about where you are in terms of your debt. Did you make the kind of progress that you would hope to make? And finally, savings and investments. So, take a holistic point of view.
So once you take that in, what do you do with that information?
You need to analyze it. You need to actually take the time. I know we talk about being mindful with our money these days, and I talk about financial wellness a lot. But the truth is that really matters, taking the time to assess how you did. And the interesting thing is, there are some things we can control and some things we can't control. So think about what you could control in terms of your income, right? How much, how did you do? Did you take the time to ask for that raise? Did you offer to work the overtime? Did you really get going on that side hustle? How did that income come, and what did you have control of? And the same thing with the spending. Did you get pulled into spending things that you, spending on things that maybe you regret a little bit? But also, I think people should give themselves a little bit of a break. This year has been tough. There's a lot of things that hit us that were not in our control. So we need to give ourselves a little love and remember things like inflation, things costing more, we couldn't control that. Think about though what you could do differently.
That's why I needed to go to that Beyoncé concert. It just had to happen, even though it would have been overspending by normal years. But how do you adjust and pull back from overspending and course correct?
Yeah, so you want to really think about how you're spending. Think about why you're spending. So you had to go to the Beyoncé concert. You had to. And, and you know, we can talk about how you manage your summer spending, how you might think about your priorities, but really think through what you can do to take better control and spend more deliberately. So that might mean little, you know, tricks and tips. So write down your budget, put it somewhere where you can see it, but then take it a step further. I like to think about renewing your budget vows. So you put, maybe on your refrigerator, whatever it is, your spending plan, your budget, what you have, and then you get used to it. So you don't really see it anymore, take it down once a week, once every two weeks, put it in your calendar as a reminder, rewrite it, adjust it, constantly rework it, because life happens and it may not be realistic anymore. So constantly checking in with that.
Had to.
You also might want to do some little tip, little tips and tricks like putting when you're shopping online, put your stuff in your wish list, not your cart. It's one extra step. Remove that credit card from inside your, you know, that remember, when your computer remembers it, you know how that is. You want to remove that. Wait to make those peer, those purchases, and of course, unsubscribe to those retailers who love to remind you that every day is the best sale ever. Every day is your last chance to get that deal that you know you want to get. And I also say, shop your closet and your home. Not just clothing. We tend to buy things that we already have in our home just because we can't find it. It makes sense to get organized. And then, you know, we talked about the work in, that Walmart work in. It's not, it's not a bad thing to buy a dupe. Own it.
Right. Yeah.
Yeah.
That's facts. You've got a lot of good vendors or vendors on Canal Street who could sell you a dupe, for sure here.
Yeah, well those are forgeries. We're talking legit dupes. We're keeping it above board, legal, inspired by, inspired by. How do you leave room in your budget for those summer vacations and other fun activities?
Generalizing the two versus inspired by.
Like Beyoncé concerts, right?
Like Beyoncé concerts. Right. So you want to think about your priorities and really write them down, and think about where do you get the best bang for your buck. And it might be one giant splurge event like, you know, a Taylor Swift or Beyoncé concert, and that may be it. And then, you know, you can just say, you know what's the best value for the money in the summer? Being lazy. Just chill with your friends. It's okay to spend less and really make sure that you find a way to get the things that matter the most to you.
Absolutely. Like Beyoncé.
It's all about Beyoncé today.
Exactly. The, the, the she economy powered by Beyoncé. Thank you so much for joining us.
Thanks for having me.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump job approval at 38 percent in new survey
President Trump's approval rating dipped to 38 percent, the lowest of his second term, according to the latest poll from Quinnipiac University. In the June poll, 38 percent of registered voters approved of the way Trump is doing his job, while 54 percent disapproved. The results mark the first time Trump's numbers dipped below 40-percent threshold since returning to office in January — when he enjoyed an all-time high job approval rating of 46 percent. In February, that number slumped to 45 percent; in March, to 42 percent; and in April, to 41 percent. Quinnipiac University did not release polling data in May. Immigration remains the president's best issue, with 43 percent approval and 54 percent disapproval ratings. But the numbers have declined slightly from April, when 45 percent approved and 50 percent disapproved of his handling of immigration. On the issue of deportations, 40 percent approved and 56 percent disapproved — a slightly downward turn from April, when 42 percent approved and 53 percent disapproved. Trump's approval is 40 percent on the economy, 38 percent on trade, 37 percent on universities, 35 percent on the Israel-Hamas conflict and 34 percent on the Russia-Ukraine war. 'As the Russia – Ukraine war grinds through its third year, Americans make it clear they have little appetite for the way the Trump administration is handling the situation,' Quinnipiac University polling analyst Tim Malloy said in a statement. Polling averages maintained by Decision Desk HQ show Trump's job approval rating at 47 percent approval and 49.9 percent disapproval. A poll this week from YouGov/The Economist has Trump's approval among registered voters at 45 percent and his disapproval at 53 percent. The latest poll was conducted June 5-9, with 1,265 self-identified registered voters. The margin of error is 2.8 percentage points.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Retirement Contingency Plans Gen Z Can Start Working on Now
No one wants to spend their 20s or 30s thinking about what could go wrong decades from now. But if there's one thing we can learn from what boomers and Gen X are dealing with, it's that retirement doesn't always go as planned. Some older Americans spent decades saving diligently, only to watch the market tank right as they were ready to retire. And others were even forced to delay retirement altogether due to a variety of factors, like inflation and medical costs. Read Next: Check Out: But don't worry. If you're still young, you have plenty of time to do things differently. Here are a few smart (and not-so-obvious) retirement contingency plans Gen Z can start working on now. Your investments could be on track for years, and then suddenly crash 30% because of one global crisis. And though the stock market has always recovered eventually after major crashes in the past, the recovery time can take months or years. So if you don't want to be so dependent on your portfolio, consider investing in a high-income skill that can help you make money regardless of how the economy is doing, like content creation, coding or freelance photography. That way, you won't feel forced to pull money out of your retirement account at a loss if you know you can earn a few thousand a month on the side. Learn More: Retiring in a high-cost U.S. city can be difficult if you don't have much in your nest egg. If you'd rather have financial breathing room than stress about covering rent in a big city, consider moving abroad or downsizing. Even though you might not be retiring soon, you can start researching alternative retirement destinations now. That could mean scoping out low-cost cities in the U.S., learning about countries with digital nomad or retirement visas, joining Facebook groups or Reddit threads where expats share real numbers and experiences, learning about what it means to downsize, or calculating how much you'll need to retire comfortably, depending on your desired living situation. The idea of never working again sounds nice until you realize how long retirement can last, and how expensive healthcare, housing and just living can be. If you don't mind continuing to work after 65, semi-retirement can be a plan that works better for you than fully retiring. That can mean working seasonally or part-time doing something you enjoy, taking a few years off and returning to work later, or taking mini-retirements throughout your life instead of saving it all for the end. What makes semi-retirement worth considering is that it gives you more control and lets you stay financially afloat even if the markets don't cooperate. Even the most 'safe' investments can take a hit when the economy gets shaky. Stocks go through bear markets. Bonds lose value when interest rates spike. Real estate markets can crash. In other words, there's no such thing as a totally risk-free investment. That's why you should never put all your eggs in one basket when it comes to investing for retirement. So if you haven't already, work with a financial planner to help you create a mix of assets that can support you no matter what the market's doing. You'll also want to diversify your income streams so you can keep growing your retirement fund even if you lose your main source of income. You can have a diversified investment portfolio, a fully loaded retirement account and a six-figure income, but if you're still carrying high-interest debt into your 50s and 60s, it can drag down everything you've worked for. Especially in retirement, when you're no longer earning a full-time income, debt payments can feel heavier than ever. If you focus on paying off high-interest credit cards and minimizing lifestyle inflation in your 20s and 30s, you free up money that can go toward savings, investing or building the kind of flexibility you'll need later. It also makes it easier to retire on your own terms, without being tied to monthly payments that limit your options. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money This article originally appeared on 5 Retirement Contingency Plans Gen Z Can Start Working on Now Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bentz defends Republican tax and spending bill, despite costs and cuts impacting his district
Oregon Rep. Cliff Bentz, center, voted for a proposal to cut Medicaid funding. The state's lone Republican congresman said the tax bill he and House Republicans put forward will make people "very happy." () Oregon's lone Republican Congressman, Cliff Bentz, represents more than 705,000 Oregonians — about 16% of the state's population — who will feel disproportionately the cuts in the Republican tax and spending bill currently being considered by the U.S. Senate and that passed the U.S. House in May. Bentz's 2nd Congressional District spans two-thirds of the state east of the Willamette Valley and is home to mostly rural communities with higher average rates of poverty, food insecurity, unemployment and Medicaid enrollment than the rest of the state and nation. The bill, which Bentz voted for, would cut spending on Medicaid and on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, funding meant to ensure low-income Americans have food. In a 45-minute phone interview with the Capital Chronicle last Friday, Bentz defended the Republican tax and spending bill, adding that middle and low-income families, small businesses and the timber industry would be particularly pleased. 'I'll just say that there's a lot of really, really, really good things in this bill that I think people are going to be very, very happy for,' he said, pointing to the bill's lowering or ending taxes on certain wages, such as overtime and tips, and costs, such as car loans. He dismissed questions about the possible impacts Medicaid cuts could have on rural medical clinics that cannot turn patients away regardless of insurance, saying 'If I may, this is supposed to be an interview, not an interrogation or an argument.' Instead, Bentz said, the bill reflects fiscal responsibility. 'The most important thing that I was focused on is our economy, and making sure that we don't damage the economy, while at the same time trying to reduce the deficit,' he said. In fact, according to analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the bill if implemented would add trillions to the national deficit and the national debt. That growing debt would be driven not just by spending but by extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed during President Donald Trump's first term that brought the federal corporate income tax rate and income tax rates on the wealthiest Americans to historic lows. A year after the act passed — for the first time in history — America's billionaires paid a lower effective tax rate than the bottom half of American households, according to analysis by economists at the University of California at Berkeley. Bentz said without extending the 2017 tax cuts, the average American family would see their income taxes rise by about $1,700 and up to 7 million jobs could be lost. Those figures come from the Council of Economic Advisers, a three-member, president-appointed agency within the Executive Branch that recommends economic policies. The Capital Chronicle received nearly three dozen questions for Bentz submitted by readers. The bulk of those questions, and the interview, covered provisions of the bill that would impact access to health insurance under Medicaid, cuts to federal jobs and clean energy tax credits, tax cuts for the wealthy and the power President Donald Trump has over the Republican Party. An annotated and full transcript of the interview can be read here. To reduce federal spending, Republicans have focused on adding new work and citizenship requirements to Medicaid eligibility that could result in about 7.6 million people losing coverage over the next decade, or a bit less than 10% of everyone in the country who relies on Medicaid, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It would result in $76 billion to $88 billion a year not being spent on the program, according to Bentz's analysis of Congressional Budget Office data. The group of 7.6 million includes immigrants at risk of deportations and people who might be receiving Medicaid despite higher than reported income. But the bulk of the 7.6 million — more than 60% — are what Bentz calls the 'able-bodied adults choosing not to work.' Analysis of 2024 U.S. Census Bureau surveys finds they are mostly in school, are parents, caretakers or disabled Americans. Bentz, who serves on the House Energy and Commerce Committee responsible for the Medicaid cuts proposed in the bill, said that he consulted closely with former Democratic Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber, a doctor, for weeks on the bill, and called him 'a genius' in a recent interview on Oregon Public Broadcasting. But Kitzhaber told the Capital Chronicle that there was 'nothing morally defensible in the bill' following a May 22 virtual town hall Bentz hosted the day the Republican tax and spending bill passed the House. 'We advised him on how the program works, and I warned him over and over again that the impact of this was not going to be good, especially for people in his part of the state,' Kitzhaber said. About one in three Oregonians relies on Medicaid for their health insurance. But in the 20 counties in Bentz's district, the numbers are even higher. In Malheur, Klamath and Josephine counties, more than 40% of residents rely on Medicaid, according to the Oregon Health Authority. In Jefferson County, where Bentz is from, half of all residents are covered by Medicaid. Bentz said he couldn't work all of Kitzhaber's recommendations into the bill, including his warnings that it would be overburdensome to rural clinics to take health insurance away from people who will seek medical care they cannot pay for, anyway. Bentz said he understands why Kitzhaber would bemoan it: 'Well, he's a doctor.' 'He is going to be on the side of the patient at all times,' Bentz said. 'Anything that does not provide coverage for everybody, he's going to be concerned about it.' Bentz says he's been worried about the U.S. budget deficit, or the gap between how much revenue the federal government brings in against how much it spends, since before joining Congress in 2021. Bentz has been quoted in the past saying he won't vote for a bill that raises the deficit. The Republican tax bill would raise the national deficit by $3.6 trillion over the next decade and would add $2.4 trillion of debt to the nation's $35 trillion debt, according to analysis by the Congressional Budget Office. It would also raise the debt ceiling — a legal limit to the amount of money the federal government can borrow — by $4 trillion. Asked why Bentz voted for it given his past statements, he said he had to. 'The fact of the matter is, we have to raise the debt ceiling to avoid defaulting on debt incurred way before I got here, and we are not going to default,' he said. Indeed, during Trump's first term from January 2017 to December 2020, the growth in the U.S.'s annual deficit was the third-largest increase, relative to the size of the economy, of any U.S. presidential administration, according to reporting by ProPublica and The Washington Post. Even before the COVID pandemic hit in late 2019, Trump was on track to add close to $10 trillion to the nation's debt by 2025 — $3 trillion more than his predecessor, former President Barack Obama. The version of the Republican tax bill that Bentz voted for before it got to the Senate included a provision that would have transferred and privatized 500,000 acres of public land in Nevada and Utah. Republican U.S. Rep. Ryan Zinke, of Montana's 1st Congressional District, ended up getting the provision killed following pressure from hunting and fishing groups in his state. Bentz said he does not support selling off public land to the private sector, but that he does support trading it for the right purposes. He said most of the 500,000 acres slated for transfer in the bill were going to be made in a trade, not a handover. He said he was surprised Zinke caved and that he believes some of the 'movie stars and whatnot who have moved up there,' to Montana, played a role in getting Zinke to axe the transfer. 'There are really good reasons many times in the West, where there are literally tens and hundreds of millions of acres of public land, to transfer a small portion of it so that we can actually grow and perhaps address, oh I don't know, housing issues? Since everybody knows that we are desperately short of housing,' he said. 'Why in the world would we try to preserve land for hunting when people are living under a tree someplace?' Reporting in the Oregonian found Bentz's district has about $10 billion in committed investment in solar, wind and energy projects spurred by tax incentives and investments in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Among them is Sunstone Solar, which would be Oregon's largest approved solar and storage project on 10,000 acres of farmland in Morrow County. Many of the projects committed so far are incomplete or haven't broken ground. Bentz, who did not vote for the bill in 2022, said he was not worried about losing those projects, and that he thought the clean energy tax credits were bad policy. 'These incentives are all tax-driven incentives, which allow folks to avoid paying taxes in return for investing in a certain type of activity in this case,' he said. Bentz, a career lawyer before becoming a politician, said he is not concerned about Trump or his advisers' defiance and disinterest in judicial review. He said Trump's continued appeals to higher and higher courts when he loses in lawsuits brought against him and his policies are his legal right, and if he 'bumps into a judge that he doesn't appreciate the opinion of, he has every opportunity and right to appeal it.' Bentz said he believes Trump is simply using the full scope of the legal system to his advantage, and that he would not support Trump defying the Supreme Court. 'I would not support anyone ignoring the Supreme Court. That's not how our system works,' Bentz said. As for whether Republicans will fall into line on all of Trump's orders, Bentz said it's not because of pressure, but because they agree with what the president stands for. He said having power in the majority is a new experience for him after 12 years in the Oregon Legislature, led by Democrats. 'I was never one day in the majority, not even one day. And as a result, when I got here and found that I had all Republican control across the scope of the three branches of government, it's been a huge and welcome change,' he said. Bentz said he was unaware of constituent concerns about several topics but will 'look into' issues. On the well-publicized departure of the superintendent of Oregon's only national park because of staffing concerns: 'The person's (former Crater Lake National Park Superintendent Kevin Heatley) concern may be well founded. It may not. Until I know the facts better, I'm not going to take a position on it, but now that you've raised an issue, we'll look into it.' On federal cuts to the National Weather Service office in Pendleton that ended overnight weather forecasts for Central Oregon, as reported by The Bulletin in Bend: 'No one has come to me with that concern, staff or otherwise, but now that you've raised it, we'll look into it.' And in response to a question from a reader who wanted to know whether Bentz would do anything to ensure the display of a plaque made with taxpayer money to commemorate the 140 law enforcement officers who defended the U.S. Capitol and the lawmakers in it from insurrectionists on Jan. 6, 2021: 'I think it's safe to say that you're the first one to raise that issue. We'll check it out.' A May 23 article in The Washington Post found the plaque sitting in a utility room in the Capitol basement three years after Congress approved it because the current House Republicans haven't instructed the Architect of the Capitol to install it. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
