Committee calls on Government to ban NDAs to tackle misogyny in music industry
Speaking about her experience in the report, which was published on Wednesday, singer Celeste told the committee: 'What is most prevalent in the daily experience of being female in the music industry is this idea of an ingrained bias, or even an unconscious, sexist bias.'
The WEC called for improved protections and reporting mechanisms, after finding that sexual harassment remains pervasive in the industry, with reporting rates low due to fear of retaliation, and added that women in music still faced unequal pay and ageism.
It urged the Government to bring forward proposals to prohibit the use of NDAs and other forms of confidentiality agreements in cases involving sexual abuse, sexual harassment or sexual misconduct, bullying or harassment, and discrimination relating to a protected characteristic.
The WEC said doing so would 'demonstrate decisive leadership and ensure that the silencing of victims of abuse will no longer be tolerated'.
It also underlined the 'inadequacy' of legal protections for freelance musicians, saying the Equality Act did not 'clearly extend' to freelancers and those working under temporary conditions such as 'depping', which means substituting for another musician.
The report also highlighted challenges faced by parents and carers in the music industry, saying freelancers in particular struggled with 'inadequate maternity support and the high cost of childcare'.
The WEC called on the Government to amend the Employment Rights Bill to align maternity allowance with statutory maternity pay to allow self-employed women 'greater flexibility during maternity leave and remove unfairness within the system'.
Chairwoman of the WEC and Labour MP Sarah Owen said: 'One year on from the Women and Equalities Committee's report on misogyny in music, significant issues within the industry remain unaddressed and appear to be on repeat.
'WEC's 2024 report warned women pursuing careers in music face endemic misogyny and discrimination in a sector dominated by self-employment.
'It laid bare a boys' club where sexual harassment and abuse is common, and the non-reporting of such incidents is high.
'The misuse of NDAs is a major concern.
'NDAs are frequently used to silence victims of harassment and abuse, often under coercive circumstances.
'The report presents evidence of the psychological toll these agreements take and the power imbalances that make them particularly harmful in the music industry.
'Women working in music feel rightly frustrated at the lack of support from the Government in tackling the challenges they face.
'Female artists should not encounter limitations in opportunity or have to work far harder to get the recognition their ability and talent merits.
'We urge ministers to accept the recommendations in our new report and help set the music industry on a path of lasting change free from discrimination and harassment.'
The report also called on the Government to support the Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority, a new independent body designed to address misconduct across the creative sectors, by 'providing it with the legal assurances it needs to undertake its crucial work'.
The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
4 minutes ago
- Spectator
How long before Rachel Reeves introduces a ‘FTSE tax'?
As figures out today show the salaries at the top of business soaring, there are plenty of good reasons for the chief executives of the FTSE 100 to be paid a lot more – at least if you look at it dispassionately. These companies are catching up with global salaries. They need to attract talent from around the world. And they need to stop businesses from moving to New York. The trouble is, we also have a Labour government that is searching for more tax revenue and backbenchers and party activists determined that the 'rich' should pay more. Against that backdrop, paying yourself a couple of million more does not look so smart. With soaring taxes and a higher cost of living, most people are feeling squeezed for cash. The bosses of Britain's biggest companies, however, are doing better than ever. The latest data from the High Pay Commission found that the average pay for the man or woman running a FTSE 100 company rose to £5.91 million last year, a 15.9 per cent increase. It is the highest on record, overtaking the £5.79 million average recorded in 2017/2018. Meanwhile, median pay also set a fresh record of £4.58 million. There has never been a better time to take the helm of the UK's largest companies. It is not hard to understand why. Most of the major FTSE 100 companies operate in a global market, and while the salaries may sound huge to most of us, they are often far less than the same executives would be earning if their business was listed in the United States, or even in much of mainland Europe. If they want to compete globally, as they should, they have to pay the going rate. For shareholders and for staff, the difference between a brilliant CEO and a slightly rubbish one is so vast that it is worth paying an extra million or two to get the right person. Here's the catch, however. Surely the FTSE's leaders have picked the wrong year for a bumper pay rise? The Chancellor Rachel Reeves is desperate for more tax revenue to fill the 'black hole' that has opened up in the public finances. Her backbenchers, alongside senior ministers such as the Deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rayner, are determined to 'tax the rich' to pay for higher spending, to pay the public sector more, and to avoid any cuts in the welfare bills. Wealth taxes, higher inheritance tax and steeper capital gains taxes are already under discussion. If the pay of these executives keeps going up, it won't be long before there are proposals for a 'FTSE tax'. Perhaps a one-off 'solidarity levy' of 10 per cent on salaries over £1 million or a windfall tax on companies paying their CEO over £5 million could work? Both would be wildly popular with Labour activists. These FTSE bosses are making themselves an easy target – and they will only have themselves to blame if they get clobbered in the Budget.
Daily Mirror
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP confirms date as bank accounts to be checked
DWP has confirmed the start date for powers it is calling 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation' Banks will be ordered to trawl through millions of accounts from April 2026 in a sweeping crackdown designed to root out benefits cheats. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has confirmed the start date for powers it is calling 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation'. The new system, created under the Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill, will let banks flag up accounts that appear to breach benefit rules, such as holding more than the £16,000 savings limit for Universal Credit. Officials will not see detailed transactions, but will be alerted if accounts raise suspicions. The DWP claims the scheme will save taxpayers £1.5 billion over five years after losses from benefits fraud and error hit a record £7.4 billion last year. A fact sheet released by ministers stressed: 'Any information shared through the Eligibility Verification Measure will not be shared on the presumption or suspicion that anyone is guilty of any offence.' It insisted the department will not have direct access to people's bank details but banks will be obliged to pass on alerts. At the same time, the law gives the Government tough new powers to recover money from fraudsters, including taking funds directly from bank accounts and, in cases of persistent refusal to repay, banning offenders from driving for up to two years. The measures were unveiled as Labour's Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall attacked the current system. She said: 'The social security system that we inherited from the Conservatives is failing the very people that it is supposed to help and is holding our country back. 'The facts speak for themselves. One in 10 people of working age are now claiming a sickness or disability benefit. Almost one million young people are not in education, employment or training – one in eight of all our young people.' Critics, however, warn the plans risk ushering in 'mass financial surveillance' of claimants and could wrongly penalise vulnerable households. The DWP insists the focus is on clamping down on fraudsters who cost honest taxpayers billions - but campaigners argue the changes mark a dangerous step towards banks acting as watchdogs over private finances. Silkie Carlo, Director, Big Brother Watch, said: 'These powers are a disaster for financial privacy and the presumption of innocence... This is a completely unprecedented regime of intrusive generalised financial surveillance across the population.'
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ex-defence secretary Shapps criticised as he is cleared to join missiles start-up
The parliamentary standards body has been criticised for clearing Grant Shapps, a former Conservative defence secretary, to join a defence startup as long as he promises not to work on defence matters. In a ruling that drew scorn from political ethics experts, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba), which monitors and advises on the revolving door between Westminster and the business sector, gave Shapps the green light to become the chair of Cambridge Aerospace. Shapps told Acoba that the company, founded three months after the Conservatives' general election defeat last year, planned to 'develop technologies to reduce risks to aviation'. Disclosures show he cited examples such as airport delays caused by drones. Acoba, which is due to be scrapped amid allegations that it is 'toothless', agreed he could take up the position, providing 'strategic direction and high level advice', on condition that he did not work on matters related to defence. Acoba appeared to accept Shapps's description of Cambridge Aerospace's activities, saying the company's work 'focuses on civilian aerospace', meaning there was no direct overlap with the former defence minister's access to sensitive information. The Labour MP Phil Brickell said this explanation was 'stretching credulity' given Cambridge Aerospace's own public statements and backers. The company, which has attracted around $100m (£73.9m) in funding, outlined its plans in a presentation to investors, first reported by The Upstart and subsequently obtained by The Guardian. Slides in the presentation describe Cambridge Aerospace as a 'defence tech' company and refer to the need to prepare for a 'new era of warfare'. Speaking to Bloomberg last month, Prof Steven Barrett, Cambridge Aerospace's co-founder and a longtime acquaintance of Shapps, said the company had 'one mission'. This was 'to protect the UK and our allies from the well-known threats we face from the skies'. The company's first product, dubbed Skyhammer, aims to intercept drones and cruise missiles, leading to comparisons with Israel's Iron Dome missile defence system. The technology is understood to have been initially intended to counter drones and could expand to include defence against threats including ballistic and hypersonic missiles. The firm is planning to operate from an engineering site in Munich and a manufacturing hub in the Polish city of Gdansk. Barrett's co-founder, Chris Sylvan, previously worked for Anduril, a California-based defence company that is developing what Sylvan appears to have described as 'robot fighter jets' in a post on the professional social networking platform LinkedIn. The post is no longer available. Shapps served as defence secretary between August 2023 and July 2024, a tenure that falls within the two-year grace period during which former ministers must apply to Acoba if they want to take up private sector roles. The system is designed to ensure that ministers and their new employers do not benefit unfairly from information or contacts garnered from their time in government. Acoba can only advise on appointments but, in practice, has no power to block them, unlike its equivalent body in France, which can veto appointments. In its advice to Shapps, Acoba said the risk of a conflict of interest was 'limited'. 'Whilst you will have had oversight of a wide range of information on policy, operations and matters generally affecting defence, there is no direct overlap with your access to sensitive information as this work focuses on civilian aerospace,' it said. Earlier this year, Keir Starmer pledged to replace Acoba, which was described as 'toothless' in a 2017 report, with a tougher system of checks and balances to monitor ministers' private earnings after leaving office. Brickell said Acoba's advice to Shapps was 'yet another example' of why Labour was getting rid of Acoba. 'It's weak, has no teeth and doesn't have the powers to prevent conflicts of interest from arising,' he said. 'Grant Shapps seems to be saying one thing about what he'll be doing, while his company is saying another. It is stretching credulity to breaking point. The authorities clearly need to look at this again, and Shapps should resign from this post if he can't provide satisfactory answers.' A spokesperson for the campaign group Transparency International said: 'Oversight of this revolving door rests on little more than gentlemen's agreements, with no means in practice of enforcing the business appointment rules. 'It will just invite abuse until the rules governing former ministers entering the private sector are tightened, and properly enforced.' Shapps said: 'I joined Cambridge Aerospace because I have always believed in the importance of protecting our civilian airspace — a belief only strengthened by witnessing the devastation caused by Russia's aggression in Ukraine. 'As the company has grown, so too have the threats facing our nation. Our mission is to develop technology that can save lives, strengthen UK and allied security, and create highly skilled British jobs. I'm proud to be a founding partner in a business dedicated to those goals.' A spokesperson for Acoba pointed to the advice it had given Shapps not to engage in defence matters for two years. 'The committee also took into account that as a qualified pilot since 1995, Mr Shapps had a long-term interest in aviation, unrelated to his time in ministerial office,' they added. Barrett said: 'In the less than a year since Cambridge Aerospace was formed, we have developed a range of products, hired nearly 60 people into highly skilled engineering roles, and continue to invest significantly in full domestic manufacturing. 'As we have seen in Ukraine, the need to protect against a range of threats from the air, targeted at anything from infrastructure to civilian populations is only increasing. I am incredibly proud of the work our team has done to provide a low-cost solution that can provide vital defensive capabilities to these threats facing Europe and our allies.'
