logo
India's sibling CXOs: Two sides of the same coin

India's sibling CXOs: Two sides of the same coin

Hindustan Times3 days ago
Earlier this week, when the world was cheering Shailesh Jejurikar's appointment as CEO of Procter & Gamble, I found myself thinking not just about another Indian at the helm of a global powerhouse—but about his brother, Rajesh Jejurikar. Shailesh and Rajesh Jejurikar (HT)
In a country rightly proud of its rising tide of global CEOs, from Sundar Pichai to Satya Nadella, Shailesh's elevation is yet another proud moment. But if you really want to understand the Indian brand of leadership, you'd do well to look a little closer home, at Rajesh Jejurikar, the calm, self-effacing Executive Director and CEO of the Auto and Farm Sector at Mahindra & Mahindra.
Rajesh doesn't chase headlines. He builds legacies.
He's the kind of leader who prefers the quiet of a shopfloor in Nashik to the glare of a boardroom in Mumbai. He spends as much time with engineers tinkering on next-gen EVs as he does with dealer partners in small-town India. And when credit is handed out, he's the first to redirect it to the team.
I recall a conversation with one of the Indian auto industry's doyens and Mahindra's top former leaders, Dr Pawan Goenka, now Chairman of IN-SPACe, who offered a telling anecdote. 'When I was made President of the Auto business way back in 2003,' Goenka told me, 'Rajesh was in serious contention. I was leading R&D, he was heading marketing. The Scorpio's success was built equally on both. Maybe I got the role simply because I was 50 and he was 40.'
It's classic Rajesh: talented without being territorial, dedicated without being demanding.
His journey at Mahindra spans more than two decades, marked by product milestones, global forays, and a resurgence of the brand's SUV dominance. And yet, when I messaged him on Wednesday to congratulate him on his brother's big moment, Rajesh replied with characteristic grace accepting all the good wishes on behalf of his family and wishing the best to his brother. Shy. Humble. Gracious.
At a time when leadership is often equated with visibility, charisma, and personal branding, there exists a quieter, steadier form of influence – one rooted in purpose, resilience, and trust. These are leaders who build institutions without needing applause, who shape industries through thoughtful decisions rather than public declarations. Often overshadowed by more high-profile siblings or peers, their power lies in consistency, empathy, and a deep belief in the collective over the individual.
Later that evening, we spoke. I asked what the two brothers have in common.
'We both call our parents daily. It's a habit we never skip. We weren't academic toppers, but we loved sports. I did athletics, he played serious cricket. We both enjoy reading, partying, and living a balanced life.'
He added, 'We're practical, not theoretical. We cut to the core of problems. But Shailesh is more structured. I go with intuition. Having lived in India longer, I'm more at ease with ambiguity. He likes structure.'
There's something about Indian siblings. Maybe it's the shared values, the grounding in middle-class aspiration, or just the magic of complementary strengths. Over the years, we've seen this quiet symphony of sibling success play out in boardrooms.
Take Ajay and Vindi Banga. Ajay, the World Bank President and former Mastercard chairman, is a master of strategic inclusion and global diplomacy. Vindi led Hindustan Unilever's India and global businesses with a razor-sharp focus and environmental vision. One brings charisma, the other discipline. Together, they reflect two faces of excellence.
Or Indra Nooyi and Chandrika Tandon. Indra, the formidable former CEO of PepsiCo, is admired for her strategic mind and social conscience. Chandrika, her sister, is a McKinsey veteran turned Grammy-nominated artist and philanthropist. Steel and soul, in equal measure.
Then you have the Kurian twins, Thomas, CEO of Google Cloud, and George, CEO of NetApp. Thomas is the change agent, George the anchor. One disrupts, the other delivers. Both are rooted in intellectual rigor and quiet determination.
But perhaps no sibling trio embodies understated excellence quite like the Natarajan brothers.
N. Chandrasekaran (Chandra), the Chairman of Tata Sons, rose from intern to CEO of TCS before becoming the first non-family professional to lead the Tata Group. His career is defined by focus, operational brilliance, and the ability to lead both turnaround stories and transformational acquisitions.
N. Ganapathy Subramaniam (NGS), Chandra's elder brother, served as COO of TCS, steering one of the world's largest IT companies with vision, stability, and deep trust among clients.
Their eldest brother, N. Srinivasan, is Group Finance Director at the Murugappa Group, widely respected for his integrity, financial stewardship, and people-first approach.
What binds the three together? Perseverance, humility, and a shared sense of purpose. Their rural upbringing in Tamil Nadu, grounded in hard work and simplicity, has shaped their leadership styles, which are empathetic, collaborative, and quietly effective. Their personal style could be very different though. One might walk into a meeting casually savoring a mango, turning its taste into conversation; the other could spend an entire interview revealing nothing yet saying everything.
And sometimes the brothers' bonhomie also plays out at the intersection of business and policy. Take the Rajan brothers: Raghuram Rajan, former RBI Governor and global economic thinker, and Mukund Rajan, who once helmed brand and ethics at Tata Sons. Both brought intellect and integrity to their respective domains, policy and enterprise, while embodying different public personas: one global, vocal, and reformist; the other methodical, thoughtful, and mission-driven.
'Raghuram has written extensively—articles, books—and he's known for sticking to his convictions. I think what I admire most is his willingness to stand up for what he believes, even if it goes against conventional wisdom,' said Mukund Rajan.
'Like his early warnings about the financial crisis—he stood alone in a room and raised concerns. That takes courage. He believes in objectivity and truth. You can explain or rationalize it, but you can't change it. For me, that commitment to authenticity has shaped my career. I stayed with the Tata Group because of their ethical values. When I became the Chief Ethics Officer, it felt like a validation that I had chosen the right path—just like Raghuram had.'
Then there's the Kant brothers. Amitabh Kant, India's former Niti Aayog CEO and G20 Sherpa, is best known for his role in architecting Make in India and Startup India. His brother, Ravi Kant, played a pivotal role as Managing Director of Tata Motors, where he championed the Nano and helped globalise the company's footprint through acquisition of Jaguar and Land Rover. Both are visionary institution-builders. One in public policy, the other in corporate strategy. Their shared DNA: passion for impact, articulation of big ideas, and fearless execution.
What sets such people apart, according to those who've worked closely with them, is a deep-rooted hunger to grow and an exceptional ability to learn and adapt. In Shailesh's case, he never shied away from new challenges. Whether it meant moving across continents or shifting roles and sectors. From India to Kenya, Singapore to the U.S., and back again, he embraced change with openness and resolve. That kind of professional mobility, his brother says, builds perspective and character.
Paired with a strong learning muscle and an instinct for execution, it's what enables leaders to thrive in uncertain times. Many also point to a defining trait often seen in Indian professionals in global companies: a mix of ambition, work ethic, and the ability to figure things out, qualities that consistently set them apart.
'Shailesh is a keen learner… He has a remarkable ability to relate with people and take them along with his ideas,' said KR Subramanian, Operating Partner, The Convergence Foundation. Subramanian and Shailesh joined P&G as management trainees on the same day and worked alongside each other for many years. They shared an apartment as bachelors and have remained friends. Their sons graduated together from Harvard—one studied law, the other business administration.
Shailesh is proof that what feels out of reach may be possible for young Indian professionals, Subramanian added.
For Ajay Banga of the World Bank, it has all been about serendipity.
'Vindi is more thoughtful and I am a little bit more impulsive but at the end of the day, both of us value serendipity – both at our careers and at our personal lives. One of the things that both of us feel very happy about is that Serendipity has taken us places,' Ajay Banga said in a podcast hosted by SOIL Institute of Management.
'You overthink jobs and think you want to be in a position in a certain number of years. By the time you reach there, you realise the entire structure has changed. Overplanning your career based on today's structure is the worst thing you can do,' he added.
And the best life hack? Be born second.
'One really good piece of work is to be born second. Life is 50% luck and my luck was having him (Vindi) there before me.'
So, as we cheer for Shailesh Jejurikar, and rightfully so, let's also raise a quiet toast to the other brothers and sisters who stand just off stage, shaping the future of Indian and global businesses with empathy, integrity, and excellence.
Because in the end, leadership isn't always loud. Sometimes, it just shows up, gets the job done, and lets others shine.
Amrit Raj is a former Mint journalist and the author of Indian Icon: A Cult Called Royal Enfield. He is the Chief Marketing Officer at Zetwerk, a manufacturing company.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine
Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine

The Hindu

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine

A top aide to U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday (August 3, 2025) accused India of effectively financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, after the U.S. leader escalated pressure on New Delhi to stop buying Russian oil. "What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia," said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of Mr. Trump's most influential aides. Mr. Miller's criticism was one of the strongest yet by the Trump administration about one of the United States' major partners in the Indo-Pacific. "People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact," MR. Miller said on Fox News. The Indian Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday that New Delhi will keep purchasing oil from Moscow despite U.S. threats. A 25% tariff on Indian products went into effect on Friday as a result of its purchase of military equipment and energy from Russia. Trump has also threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Mr. Miller tempered his criticism by noting Mr. Trump's relationship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which he described as "tremendous.

Not acceptable: Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine
Not acceptable: Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Not acceptable: Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine

A top aide to US President Donald Trump criticised India for buying Russian oil, accusing the country of indirectly funding Russia's war in Ukraine. This comes as the Trump administration intensifies pressure on nations that continue purchasing oil from Miller, one of Trump's most influential advisors, said that Trump clearly believes India should stop buying Russian oil. "What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing oil from Russia," Miller said on Sunday Morning seemed surprised at the scale of India's oil trade with Russia. On Fox News, he said, "People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact." Despite the US pressure, India has shown no sign of stopping its purchases. According to the news agency Reuters, Indian government sources said they will continue to import oil from Miller tempered his criticism by noting Trump's relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which he described as "tremendous."TRUMP SLAPS TARIFFS ON INDIAOn July 30, Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods and warned of potential penalties over India's purchase of Russian arms and oil. Immediately after the tariff announcement, Trump launched a blistering attack on New Delhi's ties with Moscow, dismissing both countries as "dead economies" and bluntly stating that he "does not care" what India does with has said he would consider imposing steep tariffs -- as high as 100% -- on imports from any country that continues to purchase oil from Russia unless Russia agrees to peace deal with TRADE WITH MOSCOW POINT OF IRRITATION: RUBIOWhile US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also criticised India's growing ties with Moscow. He called India a "strategic partner" but said its ongoing oil trade with Russia is a "point of irritation" in US-India imports of Russian oil have grown rapidly over the past few years. According to Reuters, before the Ukraine war in 2021, only 3% of India's oil came from Russia. That number has now jumped to between 35% and 40% of its total oil imports.- EndsWith inputs from Agencies Must Watch

The ‘right to repair' must include the ‘right to remember'
The ‘right to repair' must include the ‘right to remember'

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

The ‘right to repair' must include the ‘right to remember'

In May 2025, the Indian government took a significant step toward promoting sustainable electronics. It accepted a report proposing a Repairability Index for mobile phones and appliances, ranking products based on ease of repair, spare part access, and software support. New e-waste policies now include minimum payments to incentivise formal recycling. These are timely moves. But as India takes steps toward making repair a consumer right, we must also treat it as a cultural and intellectual resource — a form of knowledge that deserves preservation and support. India's digital and Artificial Intelligence (AI) policy landscape is evolving rapidly. Initiatives such as Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence (NSAI) emphasise innovation, data-driven governance and economic efficiency. Yet, the systems that quietly sustain everyday life — especially the informal repair and maintenance economy — remain largely invisible in digital and policy frameworks. In an age of cloud backups and algorithmic processing, it is easy to forget the value of knowledge that cannot be codified. Much of India's repair expertise lives in muscle memory, quiet observation, and years of hands-on improvisation. This tacit knowledge is vital to India's material resilience. From mobile fixers in Delhi's Karol Bagh to appliance technicians in Chennai's Ritchie Street, repairers keep devices working well past their planned obsolescence. 'If we don't fix it, who will?' says a mobile repairer in Ritchie Street. 'People throw things out. But we see what can be made new.' Their tools may be modest and their workshops discreet, but their work reflects deep ingenuity. They restore devices not by consulting manuals, but by diagnosing faults through sensory cues, reusing components, and adapting creatively to constraints. Yet, this ecosystem is gradually eroding. As product designs become less repairable and consumer habits shift toward disposability, informal repairers find themselves increasingly locked out of markets, of skilling programmes, and of policy attention. What risks being lost is not only economic opportunity but also a vast, undocumented reservoir of knowledge that has long supported India's technological resilience. Also Read | India's rising e-waste, the need to recast its management Why tacit knowledge matters 'I learnt by watching my uncle,' says an appliance repairer in Bhopal. 'He never explained with words. He just showed me once, and expected me to try. That's how we pass it on.' Tacit knowledge refers to forms of skill and intuition that are difficult to formalise. In India's repair economy, this expertise is typically passed down through mentorship, observation, and repetition — not through formal training or certification. It is inherently adaptive and context-sensitive, qualities that structured digital systems, including AI, often struggle to replicate. As AI advances, it increasingly draws on insights shaped by this kind of labour. However, mechanisms to acknowledge or equitably involve the contributors of this knowledge are still evolving. The result is a growing imbalance: AI systems continue to improve, while the communities enabling that learning often remain unrecognised. Globally, the Right to Repair movement has gained momentum. The European Union recently introduced rules requiring manufacturers to provide access to spare parts and repair documentation. In India, the Department of Consumer Affairs launched a Right to Repair framework in 2022, followed by a national portal in 2023 covering electronics, automobiles, and farm equipment. Meanwhile, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 12 promotes repair as part of responsible consumption. India now has the opportunity to lead by recognising repair not just as a service but also as a form of knowledge work. The blind spot in India's digital policy In 2021-22, India generated over 1.6 million tonnes of e-waste, becoming the world's third-largest producer. The E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022 introduced Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) — a principle that makes manufacturers responsible for post-use product management. However, while these rules encourage recycling, they make only a passing mention of repair as a preventive strategy. National skilling programmes such as the Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) focus on short-term certifications for formal industrial roles. Repair work, which requires improvisation, diagnostic skill and creative reuse does not easily fit this framework. Similarly, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 celebrates Indian knowledge traditions and experiential learning but offers little guidance on how to support or transmit hands-on repair expertise. Campaigns such as Mission LiFE (LiFEStyle For Environment) promote repair and reuse, but complementary efforts are needed to support the workers who make such sustainability practices possible. While policies now champion circularity, they risk leaving behind the very workforce whose skills make it real. As sustainability becomes a national priority, policymakers and technologists are reconsidering how we design, discard, and extend the life of everyday products. One emerging idea in research is 'unmaking' — the process of taking apart, repairing or repurposing devices after their first use, revealing design flaws and opportunities for reuse. Breakdowns and repairs are not failures; they are feedback loops and sources of practical insight. A discarded circuit board can become a teaching tool. A salvaged phone part can restore someone's access to work or school. A broken appliance can be repaired and reused. Informal repairers perform this work daily. Their labour sits at the centre of the circular economy, where reuse is not an afterthought but a design principle. Recognising them as stewards of sustainability — not marginal figures — can reshape how we think about environmental and digital innovation alike. AI-enabled solutions for repair justice India's culture of jugaad and frugality long pre-dates today's tech-forward policies. Repairers have always adapted across devices and decades, with minimal support. As the country invests in AI infrastructure and digital public goods, it must align these ambitions with the ground realities of repair. Most modern gadgets are built for compactness and control, not repair. According to a 2023 iFixit global report, only 23% of smartphones sold in Asia are easily repairable due to design constraints. To change this, design norms and procurement policies must include repairability from the start. To make technology genuinely sustainable, public policy must consider not only how products are manufactured and used but also how they break down, are repaired, and find new life. A shift toward designing for 'unmaking', where disassembly and repair are anticipated from the outset, should inform both hardware standards and AI-integrated systems. This transition will require coordinated institutional action. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology can embed repairability criteria into AI and procurement policies. The Department of Consumer Affairs could expand the Right to Repair framework to include product classification and community involvement. Platforms such as e-Shram, under the Ministry of Labour and Employment, can formally recognise informal repairers and connect them to social protection and skill-building schemes. The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship can consider training programmes to account for the tacit, diagnostic nature of repair work, which does not conform to standardised industrial templates. To support this, decision trees can help codify typical repair pathways, while Large Language Models can capture, summarise, and translate tacit repair narratives into structured, shareable knowledge, enabling broader learning without stripping local context or expertise. Supporting this ecosystem is not merely a question of intellectual property or technical efficiency. It is about valuing the quiet, embodied labour that sustains our digital and material lives — an essential step toward a just, repair-ready technological future. As philosopher Michael Polanyi observed, 'We know more than we can tell.' By choosing to remember what cannot be digitised, we preserve the human wisdom essential to a meaningful technological future. Kinnari Gatare is a researcher in Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and a former UX Design Consultant, National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL), Indian Institute of Technology Madras

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store