Budget allocations for Karachi: JI to hold protest march on 21st
Addressing at a press conference at JI's Karachi headquarters, Idara Noor-e-Haq on Tuesday, Munim Zafar said that while both parties enjoy ministries and privileges in the federal government, they have done little to address Karachi's chronic issues, including water shortages, power outages, and crumbling infrastructure. He highlighted that Karachi, despite being Pakistan's economic hub, was largely ignored in the recent federal and provincial budgets.
He pointed to the K4 water supply project as a glaring example of neglect. He said the Sindh government sought Rs 40 billion for this project but only Rs 3.2 billion were allocated, calling it a deliberate betrayal of Karachi's needs. He noted the project has been stalled for 22 years and this paltry sum ensures it remains in limbo.
He also criticised the PPP-led provincial government for failing to launch any new mega projects for Karachi, despite the city generating the bulk of Sindh's revenue.
Munim Zafar accused the PPP of hypocrisy, citing Karachi Mayor Murtaza Wahab's recent complaints about the federal government ignoring the city. He questioned why the PPP doesn't use its influence in the center to push for the city's rights if it is serious about Karachi. Similarly, he slammed the MQM for using Karachi's name to win votes but doing nothing in return, noting that while both parties are quick to secure ministries and perks for themselves, they show no urgency in resolving Karachi's crises.
The JI leader said the protest rally on June 21 will demand fair budget allocations for Karachi, immediate completion of the K4 water project, new infrastructure and development initiatives, and an end to political neglect of the city. He vowed that JI would continue its legal and democratic struggle for Karachi's rights and urged citizens to join the upcoming protest, declaring that it's time for real action, not empty promises.
Shifting focus to international affairs, Munim Zafar strongly condemned Israel's attacks on Palestine and other Muslim nations, as well as the United States for repeatedly shielding Israel at the UN. He said the UN has failed its purpose by allowing such atrocities and called the Organization of Islamic Cooperation equally ineffective, urging Muslim countries to unite independently to confront aggressors like Israel.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Bilawal bhutto launches Niaz stadium renovation, reaffirms commitment to corruption-free development
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, former Foreign Minister of Pakistan and current head of the Pakistan People's Party, leads a delegation to Washington, which played a key mediatory role in a ceasefire after Pakistan's conflict with India in May. Photo: AFP Listen to article Pakistan Peoples Party Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari dismissed on Tuesday speculation on any potential legislation on a 27th Constitutional Amendment as "baseless". Even as the 26th Constitutional Amendment remains marred in controversy, power corridors in Islamabad have been abuzz with rumours of a possible 27th Constitutional Amendment. Speculation suggests that the potential amendment would bring further changes to the structure and functioning of superior judiciary. The 26th Amendment had brought in sweeping changes to the judicial framework. Speaking to reporters at the launch of renovation works for Hyderabad's Niaz Stadium, Bilawal rubished the "baseless rumours". 'So far, no federal minister, prime minister or party member has approached me regarding any amendments.' He underscored that the 26th Amendment was passed after reaching a consensus and with compromise from political parties. "PPP wanted constitutional courts, but we compromised,' said Bilawal. Read: Rumours swirl around '27th amendment' amid flurry of high-level meetings Meanwhile on X (formerly Twitter), PPP's media wing quoted Bilawal as saying, 'the 26th Constitutional Amendment is an eternal success. Judicial reforms and constitutional courts were a demand of the Charter of Democracy, but we prioritised a constitutional bench over a constitutional court for the sake of consensus'. '26ویں آئینی ترمیم محض ایک دور کی کامیابی نہیں بلکہ یہ ہمیشہ کی کامیابی ہے، عدالتی ریفامز اور آئینی عدالتیں چارٹر آف ڈیموکریسی کا مطالبہ تھا مگر ہم نے اتفاق رائے کیلئے آئینی عدالت کے بجائے آئینی بینچ کو ترجیح دی۔ چیئرمین پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی بلاول بھٹو زرداری@BBhuttoZardari… — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) August 12, 2025 Commenting on India's stance on the Indus Waters Treaty, Bilawal asserted that Pakistan must receive its share of three rivers under the agreement, warning that if the treaty is not honoured, Pakistan would seek water from all six rivers under international law. He recalled visiting Hyderabad a year ago to inaugurate a water filtration plant and expressed satisfaction over the pace of ongoing projects by the provincial government. 'In the past, some politicians sowed seeds of hatred here, but now Hyderabad will keep moving forward.' Stressing the need to shift from traditional flood irrigation methods towards advanced water technology, he added, 'so far, we have only focused on flood irrigation. The federal government must move towards modernisation in the water sector".
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trade ambitions and sanctions realities
EDITORIAL: It is a promising signal that Iran and Pakistan have chosen to deepen economic cooperation at a time when the region — and indeed the world — is realigning itself under shifting power equations. A USD 10 billion annual trade target is no small ambition, and President Pezeshkian's first official visit to Pakistan since taking office underlines Tehran's readiness to work with Islamabad to meet it. The warmth on display, from Lahore to Islamabad, and the repeated gestures of solidarity exchanged between the two delegations reflect encouraging maturity in bilateral ties. But ambition alone doesn't move trade. As with most things in this part of the world, the bigger story lies in what isn't being said. The last time Pakistan tried to pursue a transformative energy partnership with Iran, through the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline, the entire project was brought to its knees by American pressure and the threat of sanctions. Today, the geopolitical temperature is even higher — and the sanctions' regime is far more aggressive. So the question is simple: how exactly do both sides plan to reach that USD 10 billion mark? The Americans have made it clear that even friends and strategic partners are not exempt from the rules. India was sharply reprimanded for engaging too openly with Russia. European states have faced secondary threats for exploring trade that could circumvent restrictions. In this environment, it is inconceivable that Washington will sit idle while two Muslim neighbours forge an expansive trade relationship with one of the world's most heavily sanctioned economies. And yet that's precisely why this initiative matters. If Pakistan and Iran can demonstrate an effective, legal framework to grow trade while navigating the sanctions' minefield, they may offer a blueprint for others in the region facing similar dilemmas. But that framework has to be clearly articulated. Otherwise, this remains yet another round of high-sounding intent with little prospect of implementation. Border markets, local currency settlements, barter mechanisms, and third-party intermediaries have all been discussed in the past. But without serious institutional design, and real political will, they haven't gone far. If this renewed push is to succeed, both capitals must show how the mechanics of trade will be shielded from punitive action, how banks and customs authorities will be protected, and how businesses will be incentivised to take part despite the obvious risk. There is also a diplomatic layer that cannot be ignored. For Pakistan, this balancing act will only become harder as it tries to maintain strategic relations with both Iran and the west. The same applies to Iran, which must decide how to engage regional players without endangering its existing partnerships. Quietly, both sides likely understand that a successful trade expansion must also include a quiet understanding with Washington; or, at the very least, the ability to convincingly demonstrate that the arrangement does not violate international obligations. It is also worth asking why there hasn't been more transparency from both governments about how these goals will be achieved. The statements from the Iranian president were full of brotherly warmth and regional vision. The Pakistani side echoed those sentiments. But beyond calls for unity and generic pledges of cooperation, there is still little detail on how a sanctions-proof architecture will be built. This silence is understandable, perhaps. But it is also dangerous. In an economic environment as fragile as Pakistan's, and as constrained as Iran's, lofty goals without credible roadmaps invite not just scepticism, but policy fatigue. Stakeholders — whether state-owned firms, private traders, or regional partners — need clarity before they can commit. Still, this moment holds promise. For once, both countries are aligned in political vision and economic intent. If they can now align on execution, the results could be transformative. But they must also be realistic. In today's world, trade isn't just about tariffs and logistics; it's about sovereignty, resilience, and the skill to navigate hostile global currents. That's the test before them now. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Israel's ‘Vietnam'?
Israel's Gaza takeover plan has aroused a great deal of froth and indignant verbiage at the UN and in many countries of the world. To take a representative sample, UN Assistant Secretary General Miroslav Jenca told the UN Security Council on August 10, 2025 that the plan risks another calamity with far-reaching consequences reverberating across the region, causing further forced displacement, killings and destruction. The UN's humanitarian office OCHA said 98 children had died from acute malnutrition since the start of the conflict in October 2023, with 37 deaths since July 2025, figures that are probably a gross underestimate. OCHA's Coordination Director Ramesh Rajasingham says, 'This is no longer a looming hunger crisis – this is starvation, pure and simple.' People do not need this belated description of events in Gaza when they are confronted daily by pictures of emaciated children in hospitals being cared for by distraught but incredibly calm mothers. Palestinian Ambassador to the UN Riyad Mansour said 'over two million victims are enduring unbearable agony', while Israel's plans for the takeover of Gaza City are 'illegal and immoral'. All this diplomatic huffing and puffing is taking place in the hallowed halls of the UN in New York, where the Security Council is meeting to address the issue of Israel's plans for Gaza. Notable absentees at the meeting are the veto-bearing US and its ally Israel, both berating even this articulate waterfall of words, which nevertheless remain as hollow as the shameful inaction by Arab and Muslim countries in solidarity with their oppressed Palestinian brothers and sisters. Some of these worthy neighbours of Israel continue to enjoy diplomatic relations with Tel Aviv and others even feel little or no compunction in entering into lucrative trade and economic deals with the Zionist entity. So much for Muslim solidarity. The death toll (probably an underestimate) since October 2023 has climbed to 61,430, most of whom have been killed while seeking food at aid centres. All the hot air emanating from Palestine's original Muslim supporters and, lately, Western capitals finally appalled at Israeli cruelty and falling back on the moribund 'two-state solution' for fear of worse, cannot and will not change an iota of the misery and suffering of the people of Gaza. Only action will. There has been unceasing talk, and protests by people in Western countries, to boycott Israel in arms and the economy, on the lines of the boycott that so successfully hollowed out South Africa's apartheid regime. But this holy campaign has yet to see the light of day in any meaningful sense, misgivings and vows of cutting off arms supplies by Germany and others of late notwithstanding. Benjamin Netanyahu's plan is to take over Gaza City and another area not yet fully in the control of the Israeli army to destroy Hamas and rescue the remainder of the Israeli hostages still with Hamas. But even his own military chief has expressed strong reservations regarding the plan, fearing the hostages will be lost and the Israeli army bogged down in a protracted guerrilla war with Hamas. He was firmly overruled by Netanyahu and has now agreed to implement the plan. The far-right in Netanyahu's Cabinet wants the plan to be strengthened and made more rigorous. It feels the plan does not go far enough. By this they mean their desire to capture Gaza and eject the Palestinians. Netanyahu's 'short timetable', destruction of Hamas and rescue of the hostages are all likely to fail. The Israeli military's professional assessment is probably nearer the mark. Netanyahu intends, if his plans succeed, to impose a government in Gaza composed of neither Hamas nor the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO). He is hoping to impose a government of the elements opposing Hamas, composed mostly of bands of Bedouin criminals. Hamas has clearly messaged that any such collaborationist regime imposed on Gaza will be treated as an arm of the Israeli enemy. Interestingly, Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani in an interview has put a new twist on Israel's plans for Gaza. He thinks the invasion of Gaza risks turning into a 'Vietnam' for Israeli soldiers. That is surely not a fate Israel's main unremitting supporter the US would wish to see replicated and visited on its beloved Zionist 'pet'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
